Putting the affect into affective polarisation

References

• Abelson, R. P. (1963). Computer simulation of hot cognition. In S. Tomkins & S. Messick (Eds.), Computer simulation of personality (pp. 277–298).
   Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, A. I., & Saunders, K. (2005). Why can’t we all just get along? The reality of a polarized America. The Forum, 3(2), 0000102202154088841076. https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1076
   Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, A. I., & Webster, S. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowitz, A. I., & Webster, S. W. (2018). Negative partisanship: Why Americans dislike parties but behave like rabid partisans. Political Psychology, 39(S1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertson, B., & Gadarian, S. K. (2015). Anxious politics: Democratic citizenship in a threatening world. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., Bakker, B. N., & Schumacher, G. (2024). Being of one mind: Does alignment in physiological responses and subjective experiences shape political ideology? Political Psychology, 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., & Vander Wielen, R. J. (2017). Taming intuition: How reflection minimizes partisan reasoning and promotes democratic accountability. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, H., Carroll, R., Renström, E., & Ryan, A. (2023). Elite communication and affective polarization among voters. Electoral Studies, 84, 102639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2023.102639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, B. N., Hopmann, D. N., & Persson, M. (2015). Personality traits and party identification over time. European Journal of Political Research, 54(2), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, B. N., Lelkes, Y., & Malka, A. (2021). Reconsidering the link between self-reported personality traits and political preferences. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1482–1498. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., Gothreau, C., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(6), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0823-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., & Homan, M. D. (2020). Yikes! are we disgusted by politicians? Politics and the Life Sciences, 39(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2020.16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bakker, B. N., Schumacher, G., & Rooduijn, M. (2021). Hot politics? Affective responses to political rhetoric. American Political Science Review, 115(1), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banda, K. K., & Cluverius, J. (2018). Elite polarization, party extremity, and affective polarization. Electoral Studies, 56, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankert, A. (2022). The personality origins of positive and negative partisanship. Politics and Governance, 10(4), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i4.5719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bankert, A., Huddy, L., & Rosema, M. (2017). Measuring partisanship as a social identity in multi-party systems. Political Behavior, 39(1), 103–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9349-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, M., & Pope, J. C. (2019). Does party trump ideology? Disentangling party and ideology in America. American Political Science Review, 113(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassan-Nygate, L., & Weiss, C. M. (2022). Party competition and cooperation shape affective polarization: Evidence from natural and survey experiments in Israel. Comparative Political Studies, 55(2), 287–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berntzen, L. E., Kelsall, H., & Harteveld, E. (2024). Consequences of affective polarization: Avoidance, intolerance and support for violence in the United Kingdom and Norway. European Journal of Political Research, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blascovich, J., Vanman, E., Mendes, W., & Dickerson, S. (2014). Social psychophysiology for social and personality psychology. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446287842
   Google Scholar
• Bor, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2022). The psychology of online political hostility: A comprehensive, cross-national test of the mismatch hypothesis. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowes, S. M., Blanchard, M. C., Costello, T. H., Abramowitz, A. I., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2020). Intellectual humility and between-party animus: Implications for affective polarization in two community samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 88, 103992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxell, L., Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2024). Cross-country trends in affective polarization. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, M. M. (2023). Aroused argumentation: How the news exacerbates motivated reasoning. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(1), 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211010577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braley, A., & Lenz, G. (2023). Behind the paper: Why voters who value democracy participate in democratic backsliding. https://communities.springernature.com/posts/whyvoters-who-value-democracy-participate-in-democratic-backsliding
   Google Scholar
• Braley, A., Lenz, G. S., Adjodah, D., Rahnama, H., & Pentland, A. (2023). Why voters who value democracy participate in democratic backsliding. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(8), 1282–1293. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01594-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J., & Bakker, B. N. (2022). The complicated but solvable threat–politics relationship. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(5), 368–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, M. J., & Vallabha, S. (2022). Intraindividual changes in political identity strength are associated with political animosity in the United States and the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, D. E., Kalla, J. L., & Westwood, S. J. (2023). Does affective polarization undermine democratic norms or accountability? Maybe not. American Journal of Political Science, 67(3), 808–828. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, E. A. (2022). Coordination in interpersonal systems. Cognition and Emotion, 36(8), 1467–1478. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2023.2168624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. (1980). The American voter. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, T. N., McClean, C. T., & Settle, J. E. (2020). Follow your heart: Could psychophysiology be associated with political discussion network homogeneity? Political Psychology, 41(1), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, T. N., & Settle, J. E. (2022). What goes without saying. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, S., & Jerit, J. (2018). Disgust, anxiety, and political learning in the face of threat. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 266–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, E. C. (2020). The social dimension of political values. Political Behavior, 42(3), 961–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09530-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass politics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). The Free Press of Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., & Filion, D. L. (2017). The electrodermal system.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, N., & Lelkes, Y. (2022). The nature of affective polarization: Disentangling policy disagreement from partisan identity. American Journal of Political Science, 66(3), 775–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Levendusky, M. S., & McLain, A. (2018). No need to watch: How the effects of partisan media can spread via interpersonal discussions. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., & McGrath, M. C. (2019). The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubèl, R., Schumacher, G., Homan, M. D., Peterson, D., & Bakker, B. N. (2024). Negative news is arousing and evokes negative affect: A replication and extension. Media & Communication, 12, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7807.
   Google Scholar
• Dukes, D., Abrams, K., Adolphs, R., Ahmed, M. E., Beatty, A., Berridge, K. C., Broomhall, S., Brosch, T., Campos, J. J., Clay, Z., Clément, F., Cunningham, W. A., Damasio, A., Damasio, H., D’Arms, J., Davidson, J. W., de Gelder, B., Deonna, J., de Sousa, R., … Sander, D. (2021). The rise of affectivism. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 816–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01130-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, P. J. (2020). Identity as dependent variable: How Americans shift their identities to align with their politics. American Journal of Political Science, 64(3), 699–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erisen, C. (2020). Anger in political decision making. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics (pp. 1–23).
   Google Scholar
• Evers, C., Hopp, H., Gross, J. J., Fischer, A. H., Manstead, A. S., & Mauss, I. B. (2014). Emotion response coherence: A dual-process perspective. Biological Psychology, 98, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorina, M. P., & Levendusky, M. S. (2006). Disconnected: The political class versus the people. Red and Blue Nation, 1, 49–71.
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine, J. R., Gillioz, C., Soriano, C., & Scherer, K. R. (2022). Linear and non-linear relationships among the dimensions representing the cognitive structure of emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 36(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.2013163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, B. Q., Feinberg, M., Lassetter, B., Thai, S., & Gatchpazian, A. (2023). The political is personal: The costs of daily politics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(1), 1–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, T., Aldrich, D. P., Panagopoulos, C., Hummel, D., & Kim, D. (2022). The harmful effects of partisan polarization on health. PNAS Nexus, 1(1), pgac011. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gadarian, S. K., & Albertson, B. (2014). Anxiety, immigration, and the search for information. Political Psychology, 35(2), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. N., & Bankert, A. (2020). The moral roots of partisan division: How moral conviction heightens affective polarization. British Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341700059X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garzia, D., Ferreira da Silva, F., & Maye, S. (2023). Affective polarization in comparative and longitudinal perspective. Public Opinion Quarterly, 87(1), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., & Washington, E. (2010). Party affiliation, partisanship, and political beliefs: A field experiment. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 720–744. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2020). American affective polarization in comparative perspective. In Elements in American politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2023). Who dislikes whom? Affective polarization between pairs of parties in Western democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 997–1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123422000394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, A. (2023). Regulating collective emotion. In B. Q. Ford & J. J. Gross (Eds.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 183–189). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, A. (2024). What makes groups emotional? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 19(2), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916231179154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goudarzi, S., Pliskin, R., Jost, J. T., & Knowles, E. D. (2020). Economic system justification predicts muted emotional responses to inequality. Nature Communications, 11(1), 383. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14193-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2004). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, S. (1999). Understanding party identification: A social identity approach. Political Psychology, 20(2), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenendyk, E. W., & Banks, A. J. (2014). Emotional rescue: How affect helps partisans overcome collective action problems. Political Psychology, 35(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, C. (2022). Constrained citizens? Ideological structure and conflict extension in the us electorate, 1980–2016. British Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 1602–1621. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712342100051X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harteveld, E. (2021). Fragmented foes: Affective polarization in the multiparty context of The Netherlands. Electoral Studies, 71, 102332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hietanen, J. K., Surakka, V., & Linnankoski, I. (1998). Facial electromyographic responses to vocal affect expressions. Psychophysiology, 35(5), 530–536. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577298970445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, S. J., & Tausanovitch, C. (2015). A disconnect in representation? Comparison of trends in congressional and public polarization. The Journal of Politics, 77(4), 1058–1075. https://doi.org/10.1086/682398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., Lawall, K., & Tilley, J. (2023). The polarizing effect of partisan echo chambers. American Political Science Review, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., Leeper, T. J., & Tilley, J. (2021). Divided by the vote: Affective polarization in the wake of the brexit referendum. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1476–1493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homan, M. D., Hamdan, M., Hendriks, K., & Petropoulos Petalas, D. (2023). Neural responses to emotional displays by politicians: Differential mu and alpha suppression patterns in response to in-party and out-party leaders. Psyarxiv, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Homan, M. D., Schumacher, G., & Bakker, B. N. (2023). Facing emotional politicians: Do emotional displays of politicians evoke mimicry and emotional contagion? Emotion, 23(6), 1702–1713. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., & Khatib, N. (2007). American patriotism, national identity, and political involvement. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00237.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aarøe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, L. (2024). Sweet victory, bitter defeat: The amplifying effects of affective and perceived ideological polarization on the winner–loser gap in political support. European Journal of Political Research, (2), 455–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, J., Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2022). Partisan blocking: Biased responses to shared misinformation contribute to network polarization on social media. Journal of Communication, 72(2), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmoe, N. P., & Mason, L. (2022). Radical American partisanship: Mapping violent hostility, its causes, and the consequences for democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Kawakatsu, M., Lelkes, Y., Levin, S. A., & Tarnita, C. E. (2021). Interindividual cooperation mediated by partisanship complicates Madison’s cure for “mischiefs of faction”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(50), e2102148118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102148118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kekkonen, A., & Ylä-Anttila, T. (2021). Affective blocs: Understanding affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies, 72, 102367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., & Gross, J. J. (1999). Functional accounts of emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 13(5), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. W., Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2021). The distorting prism of social media: How self-selection and exposure to incivility fuel online comment toxicity. Journal of Communication, 71(6), 922–946. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2018). Affective polarization or partisan disdain? Untangling a dislike for the opposing party from a dislike of partisanship. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohout, S., Kruikemeier, S., & Bakker, B. N. (2023). May I have your attention, please? An eye tracking study on emotional social media comments. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M. K., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. O. (1993). Looking at pictures: Affective, facial, visceral, and behavioral reactions. Psychophysiology, 30(3), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03352.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Poehlmann, K. M., Ito, T. A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2008). The psychophysiology of emotions. In R. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), The handbook of emotions (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lay, J. C., Holman, M. R., Greenlee, J. S., Oxley, Z. M., & Bos, A. L. (2023). Partisanship on the playground: Expressive party politics among children. Political Research Quarterly, 76(3), 1249–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221132223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. H.-Y., Lelkes, Y., Hawkins, C. B., & Theodoridis, A. G. (2022). Negative partisanship is not more prevalent than positive partisanship. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(7), 951–963. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01348-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y. (2016). Mass polarization: Manifestations and measurements. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y. (2021a). Policy over party: Comparing the effects of candidate ideology and party on affective polarization. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(1), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y. (2021b). What do we mean by negative partisanship? The Forum, 19(3), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2021-2027
   Google Scholar
• Lelkes, Y., & Westwood, S. J. (2017). The limits of partisan prejudice. The Journal of Politics, 79(2), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1086/688223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, S. A., Milner, H. V., & Perrings, C. (2021). The dynamics of political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(50), e2116950118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, D. M., Smith, E. R., & Ray, D. G. (2008). Intergroup emotions and intergroup relations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(5), 1866–1880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00130.x
   Google Scholar
• MacKuen, M., Wolak, J., Keele, L., & Marcus, G. E. (2010). Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malka, A., Lelkes, Y., & Soto, C. J. (2019). Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. British Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 1045–1069. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manokara, K., Ðurić, M., Fischer, A., & Sauter, D. (2021). Do people agree on how positive emotions are expressed? A survey of four emotions and five modalities across 11 cultures. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 45(4), 601–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-021-00376-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis, M. F. (2018). How politics affects religion: Partisanship, socialization, and religiosity in America. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1086/694688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2015). “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2018). Ideologues without issues: The polarizing consequences of ideological identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 866–887. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfy005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2024). Political identities. In L. Huddy, D. Sears, J. Levy, & J. Jerit (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 886–917). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehlhaff, I. D., Ryan, T. J., Hetherington, M., & MacKuen, M. (2023). Where motivated reasoning withers and looms large: Fear and partisan reactions to the covid-19 pandemic (tech. rep.).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. (2019). CCES 2016, Team Module of University of Minnesota (UMN). https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/XI1VKC.
   Google Scholar
• Moons, W. G., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Thinking straight while seeing red: The influence of anger on information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 706–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206298566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. P., Squires, N. K., Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2003). Activation of political attitudes: A psychophysiological examination of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology, 24(4), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9221.2003.00349.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosleh, M., Martel, C., & Rand, D. G. (2023). Psychological underpinnings of partisan bias in tie formation on social media.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2007). Effects of ‘in-your-face’ television discourse on perceptions of a legitimate opposition. American Political Science Review, 101(November), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540707044X
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (1998). The effect of disgust-eliciting visuals on attitudes toward animal experimentation. Communication Quarterly, 46(4), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379809370116
   Google Scholar
• Nai, A., & Otto, L. P. (2021). When they go low, we gloat: How trait and state schadenfreude moderate the perception and effect of negative political messages. Journal of Media Psychology, 33(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak, S. S., Fraser, T., Panagopoulos, C., Aldrich, D. P., & Kim, D. (2021). Is divisive politics making Americans sick? Associations of perceived partisan polarization with physical and mental health outcomes among adults in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 284, 113976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onraet, E., Dhont, K., & Van Hiel, A. (2014). The relationships between internal and external threats and right-wing attitudes: A three-wave longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(6), 712–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214524256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orhan, Y. E. (2022). The relationship between affective polarization and democratic backsliding: Comparative evidence. Democratization, 29(4), 714–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.2008912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, L. V., & Huber, G. A. (2020). The policy basis of measured partisan animosity in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 64(3), 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmundsen, M., Hendry, D. J., Laustsen, L., Smith, K. B., & Petersen, M. B. (2022). The psychophysiology of political ideology: Replications, reanalyses, and recommendations. The Journal of Politics, 84(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1086/714780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., Giessing, A., & Nielsen, J. (2015). Physiological responses and partisan bias: Beyond self-reported measures of party identification. PLoS One, 10(5), e0126922. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinus, M., Halperin, E., Cao, Y., Coman, A., Gross, J., & Goldenberg, A. (2023). Emotion regulation contagion. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/km6r4
   Google Scholar
• Potter, R. F., & Keene, J. R. (2012). The effect of sports fan identification on the cognitive processing of sports news. International Journal of Sport Communication, 5(3), 348–367. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.5.3.348
   Google Scholar
• Rathje, S., Van Bavel, J. J., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(26), e2024292118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J., & Lau, R. R. (2007). Affective intelligence and voting: Information processing and learning in a campaign. In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, M. MacKuen, & A. N. Crigler (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 152–179). The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reiljan, A. (2020). ‘Fear and loathing across party lines’ (also) in Europe: Affective polarisation in European party systems. European Journal of Political Research, 59(2), 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renström, E. A., Bäck, H., & Carroll, R. (2021). Intergroup threat and affective polarization in a multi-party system. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(2), 553–576. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.7539
   Google Scholar
• Rollicke, L. (2023). Polarisation, identity and affect-conceptualising affective polarisation in multi-party systems. Electoral Studies, 102655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro, E., & Broockman, D. E. (2022). The promise and pitfalls of cross-partisan conversations for reducing affective polarization: Evidence from randomized experiments. Science Advances, 8(25), eabn5515. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abn5515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1991). Comparing and miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692891003003001
   Google Scholar
• Satherley, N., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2020). Identity, ideology, and personality: Examining moderators of affective polarization in New Zealand. Journal of Research in Personality, 87, 103961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauter, D., & Russell, J. A. (2023). What do nonverbal expressions tell us about emotion?. In A. Scarantino (Ed.), Handbook of emotion theory Handbook of Emotion Theory Taylor & Francis (pp. 1–41). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R., & Moors, A. (2019). The emotion process: Event appraisal and component differentiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 719–745. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, D., Alessandra, N., Alia-Klein, N., Becker, S., Cromwell, H. C., Dolcos, F., Eslinger, P. J., Frewen, P., Kemp, A. H., Pace-Schott, E. F., Raber, J., Silton, R. L., Stefanova, E., Williams, J. H. G., Abe, N., Aghajani, M., Albrecht, F., Alexander, R., Anders, S., … Lowe, L. (2024). The human affectome. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 158, 105450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, G., Rooduijn, M., & Bakker, B. N. (2022). Hot populism? Affective responses to antiestablishment rhetoric. Political Psychology, 43(5), 851–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, G., Rooduijn, M., & Gillissen, M. (2023). Empathic concern and perspective-taking have opposite effects on affective polarization.
   Google Scholar
• Segovia, C. (2022). Affective polarization in low-partisanship societies. The case of Chile 1990–2021. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 928586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.928586
   Google Scholar
• Settle, J. E. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simas, E. N., Clifford, S., & Kirkland, J. H. (2020). How empathic concern fuels political polarization. American Political Science Review, 114(1), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsson, O., Goldberg, S. B., Marks, J., Yan, L., & Narayanan, J. (2022). Bridging the (brexit) divide: Effects of a brief befriending meditation on affective polarization. PLoS One, 17(5), e0267493. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. B. (2022). Politics is making us sick: The negative impact of political engagement on public health during the trump administration. PLoS One, 17(1), e0262022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., Fournier, P., & Nir, L. (2019). Cross-national evidence of a negativity bias in psychophysiological reactions to news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(38), 18888–18892. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, R., Balabanova, A., Bajada, C. J., & Pavarini, G. (2023). Emotional experiences and psychological wellbeing in 51 countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Emotion, 24(2), 311–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakiris, M., Vehar, N., & Tucciarelli, R. (2021). Visceral politics: A theoretical and empirical proof of concept. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1822), 20200142. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., van Noord, J., Kesberg, R., Garcıa-Sánchez, E., Brandt, M. J., Kuppens, T., Easterbrook, M. J., Smets, L., Gorska, P., Marchlewska, M., & Turner-Zwinkels, T. (2023). Affective polarization and political belief systems: The role of political identity and the content and structure of political beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 01461672231183935, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, M., & Iyengar, S. (2023). Learning to dislike your opponents: Political socialization in the era of polarization. American Political Science Review, 117(1), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542200048X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Banks, A. J., Hutchings, V. L., & Davis, A. K. (2009). Selective exposure in the internet age: The interaction between anxiety and information utility. Political Psychology, 30(4), 591–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00716.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelkel, J. G., Stagnaro, M., Chu, J., Pink, S., Mernyk, J., Redekopp, C., Cashman, M., Submitters, Q., Druckman, J., Rand, D., & Willer, R. (2022). Megastudy identifying successful interventions to strengthen Americans’ democratic attitudes. Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, M. (2021). Affective polarization in multiparty systems. Electoral Studies, 69, 102199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Morey, A. C., & Srivastava, J. (2014). Motivated selective attention during political ad processing: The dynamic interplay between emotional Ad content and candidate evaluation. Communication Research, 41(1), 119–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212441793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, S. W., & Albertson, B. (2022). Emotion and politics: Noncognitive psychological biases in public opinion. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(1), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-105353
   Google Scholar
• Webster, S. W., Glynn, A. N., & Motta, M. P. (2022, May 11). Partisan schadenfreude and candidate cruelty.
   Google Scholar
• Weisel, O., & Böhm, R. (2015). “Ingroup love” and “outgroup hate” in intergroup conflict between natural groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., Menchen-Trevino, E., von Hohenberg, B. C., de Leeuw, S., Gonçalves, J., Davidson, S., & Gonçalves, A. (2024). Non-news websites expose people to more political content than news websites: Evidence from browsing data in three countries. Political Communication, 41(1), 129–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolak, J. (2020). Compromise in an age of party polarization. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. J., Tiedens, L. Z., Jung, H., & Tsai, M.-H. (2011). Mad enough to see the other side: Anger and the search for disconfirming information. Cognition and Emotion, 25(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903534105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar