Can You Hear That Peak? Utilization of Auditory and Visual Feedback at Peak Limb Velocity

References

• Alais, D., & Burr, D. (2004). The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology, 14, 257–262. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, P. R., & Landa, J. (1976). A biomechanical analysis of the karate chop. Research Quarterly, 47, 610–618. doi:10.1080/10671315.1976.10616718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doody, S. G., Bird, A. M., & Ross, D. (1985). The effect of auditory and visual models on the acquisition of timing task. Human Movement Science, 4, 271–281. doi:10.1016/0167-9457(85)90014-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulberg, M. S., Amant, R. S., & Zettlemoyer, L. S. (1999). An imprecise mouse gesture for the fast activation of controls. In A. M. Sasse & C. Johnson (Eds.), Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 1999 (pp. 375–385). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429–434. doi:10.1038/415429a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 162–169. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorov, N. T., & Mkrticheva, L. (1938). Mechanism of light flicker fusion during the course of dark and light adaptation. Nature, 142, 750–751. doi:10.1038/142750a0.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischauer, M. A., & Sherwood, D. E. (2008). Development of motor error detection capability in an underhand throwing task. In N. P. Beaulieu (Ed.), Physical activity and children: New research (pp. 195–210). New York, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ghazanfar, A. A., & Schroeder, C. E. (2006). Is neocortex essentially multisensory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 278–285. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, S. (1920). The dark adaptation of the human eye. Journal of General Physiology, 2, 499–517. doi:10.1085/jgp.2.5.499.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hore, J., Ritchie, R., & Watts, S. (1999). Finger opening in an overarm throw is not triggered by proprioceptive feedback from elbow extension or wrist flexion. Experimental Brain Research, 125, 302–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaekl, P. M., & Harris, L. R. (2007). Auditory-visual temporal integration measured by shifts in perceived temporal location. Neuroscience Letters, 417, 219–224. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.02.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 235–254. doi:10.1080/00222895.1984.10735319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jegede, E., Watts, S., Stitt, L., & Hore, J. (2005). Timing of ball release in overarm throws affects ball speed in unskilled but not skilled individuals. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23, 805–816. doi:10.1080/02640410400021393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juravle, G., Deubel, H., Tan, H. Z., & Spence, C. (2010). Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement. Behavioural Brain Research, 208, 391–401. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keele, S. W., & Posner, M. I. (1968). Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 155–158. doi:10.1037/h0025754.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Körding, K. P., & Wolpert, D. M. (2006). Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 319–326. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy-Tzedek, S., Hanassy, S., Abboud, S., Maidenbaum, S., & Amedi, A. (2012). Fast, accurate reaching movements with a visual-to-auditory sensory substitution device. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 30, 313–323. doi:10.3233/RNN-2012-110219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proteau, L., Roujoula, A., & Messier, J. (2009). Evidence for continuous processing of visual information in a manual video-aiming task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 41, 219–231. doi:10.3200/JMBR.41.3.219-231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, J. A., & Knill, D. C. (2003). Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 341–352. doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1525-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T. Jr. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shams, L., Kamitani, Y., & Shimojo, S. (2000). What you see is what you hear. Nature, 408, 788. doi:10.1038/35048669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, L., & de Grosbois, J. (2015). Why encode limb and body displacements in the velocity domain? Neurophysiological and behavioral evidence. In T. Heinen (Ed.), Advances in visual perception research (pp. 279–292). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, L., & Nguyen, T. (2010). Real-time decreased sensitivity to an audio-visual illusion during goal-directed reaching. PLoS One, 5, e8952. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008952.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Witten, I. B., & Knudsen, E. I. (2005). Why seeing is believing: Merging auditory and visual worlds. Neuron, 48, 489–496. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar