Implementing an interdisciplinary intergenerational program using the Cyber Seniors® reverse mentoring model within higher education

References

• American Society of Consultant Pharmacists. (2015). Geriatric pharmacy curriculum guide (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Andreoletti, C., & Howard, J. L. (2016). Bridging the generation gap: Intergenerational service- learning benefits young and old. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education. doi:10.1080/02701960.2016.1152266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustin, F., & Freshman, B. (2016). The effects of service learning on college students’ attitudes towards older adults. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 37(2), 123–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Bernard Osher Foundation. (2005). Osher Lifelong Learning Institutes. Retrieved on May 18, 2017 from http://www.osherfoundation.org/index.php?olli
   Google Scholar
• Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bringle, R. G., & Kremer, J. F. (2006). Evaluation of an intergenerational service-learning project for undergraduates. Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly, 19(5), 407–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charness, N., Schumann, C., & Boritz, G. (2002). Training older adults in word processing: Effects of age, training technique, and computer anxiety. International Journal of Technology and Aging, 5, 79–105.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research, 4(1), 62–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J (2006). Factors predicting the use of technology: Findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging, 21, 333–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman, L. T., Murty, S., Ingram, J. G., & Evans, R. J. (2003). Incorporating intergenerational service-learning into an introductory gerontology course. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 39(1–2), 219–240.
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furco, A. (1996). Service-learning: A balanced approach to experiential education. In B. Taylor (Ed.), Expanding boundaries: Service and learning (pp. 2–6). Washington, DC: Corporation for National Service.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. J. (2010). Older adults and OATS computer training programs: A social impact analysis, Findings report. New York: The New York Academy of Medicine Division of Health Policy. Retrieved on September 27, 2017 from. https://oats.org/white-papers/older-adults-and-oats-computer-training-programs-a-social-impact-analysis-findings-report/
   Google Scholar
• Gerontological Society of America. (2012). Communicating with older adults, An evidence- based review of what really works. Washington, DC: NY.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, T. A., Mendes de Leon, C. F., Bassuk, S. S., & Berkman, L. F. (2006). Social engagement and depressive symptoms in late life: Longitudinal findings. Journal of Aging and Health, 18(4), 604–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Web Index. (2014). Age distribution of active social media users worldwide as of 3rd quarter 2014, by platform. In Statista - The statistics portal Retrieved on May 18, 2017 from http://insight.globalwebindex.net/social. Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, D. (1998). Student perceptions of aging and disability as influenced by service learning. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 15(3), 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton, K., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Pew internet and american life project. Pew Research Center: Washington, DC. Retrieved on June 10, 2017 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/06/16/social-networking-sites-and-our-lives/
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez, C. R., & Gonzalez, M. Z. (2008). Effects of intergenerational interaction on aging. Journal of Educational Gerontology, 34(4), 292–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, K. A. (2009). Interdisciplinary strategies as transformative change in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 34(5), 331.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, M. (1997). The benefits of intergenerational community service projects: Implications for promoting intergenerational unity, community activism, and cultural continuity. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 28(3), 211–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karavidas, M., Lim, N. K., & Katsikas, S. L. (2005). The effects of computers on older adult users. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 697–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Wayne State University Press Detroit, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Kolomer, S. R., Lewinson, T., Kropf, N. P., & Wilks, S. E. (2008). Increasing aging content in social work curriculum: Perceptions of key constituents. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 48(1/2), 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Laguna, K., & Babcock, R. L. (1997). Computer anxiety in young and older adults: Implications for human-computer interactions in older populations. Computers in Human Behavior, 13(3), 317–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laidlaw, K., Power, M. J., & Schmidt, S.; the WHOQOL-OLD Group. (2007). The attitudes to ageing questionnaire (AAQ): Development and psychometric properties. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 3670379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasher, K. P., & Faulkender, P. J. (1993). Measurement of aging anxiety: Development of the aging about aging scale. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 37(4), 247–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyd, B. H., & Gressard, C. (1985). The reliability and validity of an instrument for the assessment of computer attitudes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(4), 903–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubben, J., Blozik, E., Gillmann, G., IIiffe, S., von Renteln Kruse, W., Beck, J. C., & Stuck, A. E. (2006). Performance of an abbreviated version of the lubben social network scale among three european community–Dwelling older adult populations. The Gerontologist, 46(4), 503–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrea, J., & Smith, T. (1997). Program profiles. In S. Newman (Ed), Intergenerational programs: Past, present, and future (pp. 95–114). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Meister, J. C., & Willyerd, K. (2010). Mentoring millennials. Harvard Business Review, 88(5), 67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami, J., Lund, D. A., Wright, S. D., & Stephenson, M. (2003). Service learning in gerontology. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 23(3), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, W. (2012). Reverse mentoring at work: Fostering cross-generational learning and developing millennial leaders. Human Resource Management, 51, 549–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association for Geriatric Education. (2013). Retrieved on May 18, 2017 from http://n-age.org/
   Google Scholar
• Natvig, D. (2007). Meeting intergenerational needs through service learning. Educational Gerontology, 33(7), 573–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S. (1997). Intergenerational programs: Past, present, and future. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, S., Faux, R., & Larimer, B. (1997). Children’s views on aging: Their attitudes and values. The Gerontologist, 37(3), 412–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, S., & Hatton-Yeo, A. (2008). Intergenerational learning and the contributions of older people. Ageing Horizons, 8(10), 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Penick, J. M., Fallshore, M., & Spencer, A. M. (2014). Using intergenerational service learning to promote positive perceptions about older adults and community service in college students. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 12, 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Pillemer, K., & Suitor, J. J. (2002). Peer support for Alzheimer’s caregivers: Is it enough to make a difference? Research on Aging, 24(2), 171–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodin, P., Brown, L. H., & Shedlock, D. (2013). Intergenerational service-learning: A review of recent literature and directions for the future. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 34(1), 3–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rusnack, B., & Cassaday, S. (2014). Cyber-Seniors [DVD]. Canada: The Best Part, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sessa, V. I., Kabacoff, R. I., Deal, J., & Brown, H. (2007). Generational differences in leader values and leadership behaviors. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 10(1), 47–74.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, J. L. (2006). Intergenerational service-learning. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10(3), 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (2006). Leading to grow and growing to lead: Leadership development lessons from positive organizational studies. Organizational Dynamics, 35, 305–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teater, B. (2016). Intergenerational programs to promote active aging: The experiences and perspectives of older adults. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 40(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S. R., & Bouman, J. P. (2008). Seven ways of teaching and learning: University community partnerships at baccalaureate institutions. Journal of Community Practice, 12(3/4), 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, H. L., & Dorfman, L. T. (2008). A view from the other side: Elders’ reactions to intergenerational service-learning. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 4(2), 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D., & Chonody, J. (2013). Social workers’ attitudes toward older adults: A review of the literature. Journal of Social Work Education, 49(1), 150–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. (2005). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wild, K. V., Mattek, N. C., Maxwell, S. A., Dodge, H. H., Jimison, H. B., & Kaye, J. A. (2012). Computer-related self-efficacy and anxiety in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 8(6), 544–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, T. L., & Janke, M. C. (2013). Perceived benefits and concerns of older adults in a community intergenerational program: Does race matter? Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 37(2), 121–140.
   Google Scholar