ESAP Students’ Comprehension of Multiple Technical Reading Texts: Insights from Personal Epistemological Beliefs

References

• Alizadeh, P.S. (2009). English for the students of midwifery. Tehran, Iran: Boshra Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. (1999). Exploring second language reading. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, P.D. (2006). Can factors related to self-regulated learning and epistemological beliefs predict learning achievement in undergraduate asynchronous web-based courses? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). North Carolina State University, Greensboro, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Bendixen, L., & Hartley, K. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28(1), 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Benson, M.J. (1991). University ESL reading: A content analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 10, 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E.B., & Kamil, M.L. (1995). Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistics threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 15–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden, C.J. (2005). An exploratory study of the relationship between epistemological beliefs and self-directed learning readiness . (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2004). Epistemological beliefs and implicit theories of intelligence as predictors of achievement goals. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 371–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2006). Effects of personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts. Reading Psychology, 27, 457–484.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2010a). Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Processes, 47, 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2010b). When law students read multiple documents about global warming: Examining the role of topic-specific beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing. Instructional Science, 38(6), 635–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., & Samuelstuen, M.S. (2008). Are sophisticated students always better? The role of topic-specific personal epistemology in the understanding of multiple expository texts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 814–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisbois, J.E. (1995). Connections between first and second-language reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(4), 565–584.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., & Aglinskas, C.(2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition & Instruction, 20(4), 485–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., & Sommer, J.(2004). Facilitating textual integration with macro-structure focusing task. Reading Psychology, 25, 313–339.
   Google Scholar
• Buehl, M.M., & Alexander, P.A. (2005). Motivation and performance differences in students’ domain-specific epistemological belief profiles. American Educational Research Journal, 42(4), 697–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell, P.L. (1998). Can reading strategies be successfully taught? The Language Teacher, . 22(3). . Retrieved from http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp./jalt/pub/tlt/98/mar/carrell.html
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, J.W., & Fitzgerald, J. (1996). Epistemology and reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 36–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhieb-Henia, N. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of metacognitive strategy training for reading research articles in an ESP context. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 387–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust, M., & Kandelshine-Waldman, O. (2011). The effects of different approaches to reading instruction on letter detection tasks in normally achieving and low achieving readers. Reading and Writing, 24(5), 545–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofer, B.K., & Pintrich, P.R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67, 88–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jehng, J., Johnson, S., & Anderson, R. (1993). Schooling and students’ epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 23–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardash, C.M., & Howell, K.L. (2000). Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates’ cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 524–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, M.N., & Shabani, M.B. (2013). Comparing the strategic behavior of more successful vs. less successful readers of multiple technical reading texts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchener, K.S., & King, P.M. (1981). Reflective judgment: Concepts of justification and their relationship to age and education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 2, 89–116.
   Google Scholar
• Kizilgunes, B., Tekkaya, C., & Sungur, S. (2009). Modeling the relations among students’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 243–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, K. (2010). Strategic use of multiple texts for the evaluation of arguments. Reading Psychology, 31, 121–149.
   Google Scholar
• Kurby, C.A., Britt, M.A., & Magliano, J.P. (2005). The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in between-text integration. Reading Psychology, 26(4–5), 335–362.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B. (1992). How much lexis is necessary for reading comprehension? In H. Bejoint & P. Arnaud (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 126–132). London, UK: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Schallert, D.L. (1997). The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance. TESOL Quarterly 31(4), 713–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodewyk, K.R. (2007). Relations among epistemological beliefs, academic achievement, and task performance in secondary school students. Educational Psychology, 27(3), 307–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonka, K., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (1996). Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Education, 31, 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, M. (2010). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Influence on academic performance in higher education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Capella University, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Scirica, F., & Salvi, L. (2006). Effects of beliefs about meaning construction and task instructions on interpretation of narrative text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(4), 411–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. (2011). Investigating the contributions of background knowledge and reading comprehension strategies to L2 reading comprehension: An exploratory study. Reading and Writing, 24, 883–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizokawa, D.T., & Hansen-Krening, N. (2000). The ABCs of attitudes toward reading: Inquiring about the reader's response. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(1), 72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen, M.B., & Feldman, K.A. (1999). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning. Journal of Staff, Program and Organizational Development, 16(2), 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, M., & Nasr, A. (2004). Improving reading performance among Egyptian engineering students: Principles and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 425–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, D.D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 282–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, G. (2000). Relationship between epistemological beliefs and conceptual change learning. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 16, 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Ricco, R., Pierce, S., & Medinilla, C. (2010). Epistemic beliefs and achievement motivation in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(2), 305–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Schmid, S. (2010). Epistemological beliefs and epistemic strategies in self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer, J.M., Carlo, M.S., Dufresne, R., & Mestre, J. (1996). The assessment of levels of domain expertise while reading. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 373–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rukavina, I., & Daneman, M. (1996). Integration and its effect on acquiring knowledge about competing scientific theories from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 272–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito, Y., Horwitz, E.K., & Garza, T.J. (1999). Foreign language reading anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 202–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. (1989). The effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer, M., Crouse, A., & Rhodes, N. (1992). Epistemological beliefs and mathematical text comprehension: Believing it is simple does not make it so. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 435–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer, M., & Walker, K. (1997). Epistemological beliefs and valuing school: Considerations for college admissions and retention. Research in Higher Education, 38(2), 173–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Bendixen, L., & Dunkle, M.E. (2002). Development and validation of the epistemic belief inventory. In B.K. Hofer & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261–276). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Bruning, R. (1996). Readers’ implicit models of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 290–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., & Bruning, R. (1999). How implicit models of reading affect motivation to read and reading engagement. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 281–302.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D.H., & Zimmerman, B.J. (1997). Developing self-efficacious readers and writers: The role of social and self-regulatory processes. In J.T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 34–50). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, S. (2002). Effects of subskills and text types on Korean EFL reading scores. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 107–130.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S.A., Hynd, C.R., Britton, B.K., McNish, M.M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner, L.A. (2007). Effects of personal and epistemological beliefs on performance in a college developmental mathematics class . (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Taillefer, G., & Pugh, T. (1998). Strategies for professional reading in L1 and L2. Journal of Research in Reading, 21(2), 96–108.
   Google Scholar
• Tolhurst, D. (2007). The influence of learning environments on students’ epistemological beliefs and learning outcomes. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Epistemological beliefs, school achievement, and college major: A large-scale longitudinal study on the impact of certainty beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 348–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., & Voss, J.F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M.B. W., & Goldman, S.R. (2005). Relations between adolescents’ text processing and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 467–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, P., & Kardash, C. (2002). Critical elements in the design and analysis of studies of epistemology. In B.K. Hofer & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 231–260). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Yamashita, J. (2002). Reading strategies in L1 and L2: Comparison of four groups of readers with different reading ability in L1 and L2. ITL: Review of Applied Linguistics, 135–136, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L.J. (2005). Developing students’ extensive reading skills through the use of “The Article Explorer.” In P.F. Kwah & M. Vallance (Eds.), Teaching English to Chinese Students (pp. 30–36). Singapore: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar