Middle School Teachers' Perceptions of Computer-Assisted Reading Intervention Programs

References

• Achieve 3000. (2015a). Achieve3000 Texas. Retrieved from http://www.achieve3000.com/texas.
   Google Scholar
• Achieve 3000. (2015b). The next dimension in response to intervention. Retrieved from https://www.achieve3000.com/learning-solutions/intervention/.
   Google Scholar
• Achieve 3000. ( n.d.). Research to practice: How Achieve 3000 differentiated literacy solutions use research to prepare students to thrive in the 21st century. Retrieved from http://doc.achieve3000.com/intranet/A3K12_00102_ResearchToPractice.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ACT, Inc. (2014). The condition of college & career readiness 2014. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/cccr14/pdf/CCCR14-NationalReadinessRpt.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (2011). Reading intervention in the middle grades. Voices from the Middle, 19(2), 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (2015). What really matters for middle school readers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Blachowicz, J., Bates, A., Berne, J., Bridgman, T., Chaney, J., & Perney, J. (2009). Technology and at-risk young readers and their classrooms. Reading Psychology, 30, 387–411.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, M. C. (2015). An investigation of the effects of a computer-assisted reading program on the oral reading fluency and comprehension of elementary students. (Unpublished dissertation). Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS.
   Google Scholar
• Capo, B. H., & Orellana, A. (2011). Web 2.0 technologies for classroom instruction: High school teachers' perceptions and adoption factors. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 12(4), 235–253.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Data-Driven Reform in Education. (n.d.). Best evidence encyclopedia: Reading middle and high school. Retrieved from http://www.bestevidence.org/reading/mhs/mhs_read.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7, 198–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, H. N. (2012). Perception and use of instructional technology: Teacher candidates as adopters of innovation. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (Assession Order Number UMI 3513740.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2014). Common Core State Standards Initiative English Language Arts Standards 2014. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, D. V. (2009). “I'm not stupid”: How assessment drives (in)appropriate reading instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(4), 283–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deville, C., & Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2011). Accountability-assessment under No Child Left Behind: Agenda, practice, and future. Language Testing, 28(3), 307–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorris, S. (2015). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the reading achievement of elementary school students. (Unpublished dissertation). Walden University, Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbriet-Leftwitch, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Teacher Education, 42(3), 255–284.
   Google Scholar
• Falke, T. R. (2012). The effects of implementing a computer-assisted reading support program on the reading achievement of sixth graders. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (Order Number UMI 3509372).
   Google Scholar
• Franzak, J. K. (2006). Zoom: A review of the literature on marginalized adolescent readers, literacy theory, and policy implications. Review of Educational Research, 76(2), 209–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, L. (2011). Examining the Scholastic READ 180 teachers' perceptions regarding local setting factors and role of the teacher impacting the program's implementation in seventh grade at three middle schools. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (Assession Order Number UMI 3468186).
   Google Scholar
• Gunning, T. G. (2012). Building literacy in secondary content area classrooms. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume III (pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton-Prillhart, A. N., Hopkins, M. B., Skinner, C. H., & McCane-Bowling, S. (2011). Enhancing sight word reading in second-grade students using a computer-assisted sight word reading system. Journal of Evidence-Based Practices for Schools, 12(2), 205–218.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, E. S. (2014). An investigation into the effectiveness of Scholastic's Read 180 as an intervention program at the secondary level in a middle Tennessee school district (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (Assession Order Number UMI 3582788).
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277–302.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, A. (2012). Literacy teachers' perceptions of professional development that increases integration of technology into literacy instruction. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(1), 37–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, A., & Reinking, D. (2011). Teachers' perceptions of integrating information and communication technologies into literacy instruction: A national survey in the United States. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(4), 312–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Istation. (2015). Istation reading curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.istation.com/Product/EnglishInstruction.
   Google Scholar
• Ivey, G., & Baker, M. I. (2004). Phonics instruction for older students? Just say no. Educational Leadership, 61(6), 35–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keengwe, J., & Hussein, F. (2014). Using computer-assisted instruction to enhance achievement of English language learners. Education and Information Technologies, 19(2), 295–306.
   Google Scholar
• Khowaja, K., & Salim, S. S. (2013). A systematic review of strategies and computer-assisted intervention (CBI) for reading comprehension of children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(9), 1111–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S., Samson, J. F., Fitzgerald, R., & Hartry, A. (2010). A randomized experiment of a mixed-methods literacy intervention for struggling readers in Grades 4–6: Effects on word reading efficiency, reading comprehension and vocabulary, and oral reading fluency. Reading and Writing, 23(9), 1109–1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, J. H., Chai, C. S., & Tsai, C. (2014). Demographic factors, TPACK constructs, and teachers' perceptions of constructivist-oriented TPACK. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 185–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, S. (2011). The Read 180 Program: Analysis of program effect on the reading achievement, motivation, engagement and self-efficacy of sixth grade middle school students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Accession Order Number UMI 3481667).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M., Navarrete, C. C., Scordino, R., Kang, J., Ko, Y., & Lim, M. (2016). Examining Teachers' use of iPads: Comfort level, perception, and use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 159–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loadman, W., Sprauge, K., Hamilton, J., Coffey, D., Faddis, B., & Beam, B. (2010). Using randomized clinical trials to determine the impact of reading intervention on struggling adolescent readers: Reports of research from five nationally funded striving readers grants. Paper presented at 2010 Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness Conference, Washington, DC. Evanston, IL: SREE.
   Google Scholar
• Marcum, C. E. (2010). Teacher and administrator perceptions of technology use in two West Virginia middle schools (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Accession Order Number UMI 3448195).
   Google Scholar
• May, M. M. (2014). The impact of computer-assisted instruction on ninth- and tenth-grade students (Doctoral dissertation). University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL. Retrieved from http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0005381/Mcneely_May_pdf_7-3-141.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in educational psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). The nation's report card: Reading 2013. Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_2013/.
   Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E., Sargent, S., & Moreland, M. (2014). Evaluating the efficacy of using a digital reading environment to improve reading comprehension within a reading clinic. Reading Psychology, 35(5), 397–421.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman, A. P., & Bailey, J. M. (2014). Technology integration in a science classroom: Preservice teachers' perceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 744–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, S. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sancar Tokmak, H. (2015). Pre-service teachers' perceptions of TPACK development after designing educational games. Asia=Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 392–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholastic, Inc. (2011). Read 180 next generation software manual. Retrieved on from http://edproductsupport.scholastic.com/content/techsupport/read180ng/manuals/R180_NG_SM_2_0_2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scholastic, Inc. (2012). Read 180 software manual. Retrieved from http://edproductsupport.scholastic.com/content/techsupport/read180/manuals/R180_EE_SM_2_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scholastic, Inc. (2015). The Read 180 experience. Retrieved from http://www.scholastic.com/read180/read-180-experience/literacy-program-instructional-technology.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Shippen, M. E., Morton, R. C., Flynt, S.W., Houchins, D.E., & Smitherman, T. (2012). Efficacy of a computer-assisted program on acquisition of reading skills of incarcerated youth. Remedial and Special Education, 33(1), 14–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., & Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(3), 290–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetter, M. E., & Hughes, M. T. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to enhance the reading comprehension of struggling readers: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 25(4), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Stover, K., Kissel, B., Wood, K., & Putman, M. (2015). Examining the literacy teachers' perceptions of the use of VoiceThread in an elementary, middle school, and a high school classroom for enhancing instructional goals. Literacy Research and Instruction, 54, 341–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, R. (2010). Impact of a web-based reading program on sixth-grade English language learners. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Accession Order Number UMI 3528615).
   Google Scholar
• Yurchak, S. (2013). The effect of Read 180 on the reading achievement of struggling readers in a large, public, urban high school in northern New Jersey (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (Accession Order Number UMI 3613825).
   Google Scholar