Tertiary Level Saudi EFL Learners’ Reading Strategies in Relation to Gender and Proficiency

References

• Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. doi:10.1598/RT.61.5.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhaisoni, E. (2012). Language learning strategy use of Saudi EFL students in an intensive English learning context. Asian Social Science, 8(13), 115–127. doi:10.5539/ass.v8n13p115
   Google Scholar
• Alkhaleefah, T. (2017). Saudi EFL learners’ reported reading problems and strategic processing of text types: A think-aloud case study. Reading Psychology, 38(7), 687–730. doi:10.1080/02702711.2017.1336660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Nujaidi, A. H. (2003). The relationship between vocabulary size, reading strategies, and reading comprehension of EFL learners in Saudi Arabia (Unpublished PhD thesis). Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.
   Google Scholar
• Al Roomy, M., & Alhawsawi, S. (2019). Understanding reading strategies of EFL Saudi students. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 33–44. doi:10.5539/elt.v12n6p33
   Google Scholar
• Altalhab, S. (2019). The use of reading strategies amongst Saudi university EFL students. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(3), 234–241. doi:10.5539/jel.v8n3p234
   Google Scholar
• Alyami, S. (2006). Word-solving strategies used By Saudi EFL majors in reading English texts. Exeter City, UK: Exeter University. Unpublished MED.
   Google Scholar
• Asgarabadi, Y;Rouhi, A;Jafarigohar, M. (2015). Learner's gender, reading strategies, and reading performance in expository and argumentative macro-genres. Journal of Foreign Languages, Cultures and Civilizations, 3(2), 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E., & Kamil, M. (1995). Interpreting relationships between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 16(1), 15–34. doi:10.1093/applin/16.1.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463–494. doi:10.2307/3586295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonkongsaen, N. (2014). The effects of gender, reading anxiety and language learning experience on Thai science-oriented students’ use of reading strategies. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 10(1), 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels: Variations, disparities, and generalizability. The Reading Matrix, 2(3), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. D. & Th. S. Rogers. (2004). Introspection research: verbal protocols. In: Doing second language research (pp. 53–78). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. doi:10.1093/applin/1.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, P.L. (1988). Interactive approaches to second language reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121–134. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb02534.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K., & Chen, S. (2015). The use of EFL reading strategies among high school students in Taiwan. The Reading Matrix, 15(2), 156–166.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, G. (1997). Key concepts in ELT: Schemas. ELT Journal, 51(1), 86–86. doi:10.1093/elt/51.1.86
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, J. (2014). English as a medium of instruction – A growing global phenomeon. Oxford, UK: The British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Wolters, C. A., York, M. J., Swanson, E., Kulesz, P. A., & Francis, D. J. (2015). Adolescents’ use of reading comprehension strategies: Differences related to reading proficiency, grade level, and gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 81–95. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitrisia, D., Kok, E. T., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2015). Investigating metacognitive awareness of reading strategies to strengthen students' performance in reading comprehension. The Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 30(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. (1982). Language and literacy. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375–397. doi:10.2307/3586977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 33(1), 35–54. doi:10.1177/003368820203300102
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., & Roehrig, A. (2011). Roles of general versus second language (L2) knowledge in L2 reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23(1), 42–64.
   Google Scholar
• Güss, C. D. (2018). What is going through your mind? Thinking aloud as a method in cross-cultural psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 2018(9), 1292. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, A., & Dodd, B. (1996). The effect of first written language on the acquisition of English literacy. Cognition, 59(2), 119–147. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00691-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-L. (2012). A study of the selection of reading strategies among genders by EFL college students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 310–319. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.037
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K.R. & Oxford, Rebecca. (2008). Understanding EFL learners’ strategy use and strategy awareness. The Asian EFL Journal, 10, 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lyn, S & Scanlon, J. (2016). Q Skills for Success: Level 3: Reading & Writing Student Book, 2nd edition. Oxford, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Masrai, A., & Milton, J. (2012). The vocabulary knowledge of university students in Saudi Arabia. TESOL Arabia Perspectives, 19(3), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mushait, S. A. (2003). The relationship of L1 reading and L2 language proficiency with the L2 reading comprehension and strategies of Saudi L2 university students (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Essex, Colchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R., Cho, Y., Leung, S., & Kim, H. (2004). Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An exploratory study. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 42(1), 1–47. doi:10.1515/iral.2004.001
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Peart, S. M. (2017). L2 reading: Strategies and gender preferences in the foreign language classroom. Lenguaje y Textos, 45(45), 17–27. doi:10.4995/lyt.2017.7437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26–56. doi:10.1191/0265532203lt243oa
   Google Scholar
• Poole, A. (2005). Gender differences in reading strategy use among ESL college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 36(1), 7–20. doi:10.1080/10790195.2005.10850177
   Google Scholar
• Poole, A. (2009). The reading strategies used by male and female Colombian university students. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 11(1), 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard, C. (2014). Reading strategy use of low- and high-proficiency learners and the effect of reading instruction. Bulletin of Higher Education Okayama University, 10, 115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, J., Gu, P. Y., Zhang, L. J., & Hu, G. (2007). Reading strategies and approaches to learning of bilingual primary school pupils. Language Awareness, 16(4), 243–262. doi:10.2167/la423.0
   Google Scholar
• Rauss, K., & Pourtois, G. (2013). What is bottom-up and what is top-down in predictive coding? Front Psychol, 4, 276 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Reichle, E. D. (2010). Models of the reading process. Cognitive Science, 1(6), 787–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheorey, R., and Mokhtari, K. 2001, Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, vol. 29,431–449.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In J. Torgesen & B. Wong (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 87–131). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taki, S., & Soleimani, H. (2012). Online reading strategy use and gender differences: The case of Iranian EFL learners. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 173–184.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D., & Oxford, R. (1997). A Gender-related analysis of strategies used to process written input in the native language and a foreign language. Applied Language Learning, 8(1), 43–73.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. (2005). An investigation of the effects of listening programmes on lower secondary students’ listening comprehension in PRC (Unpublished MA dissertation). SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, Singapore.
   Google Scholar