Advanced search
Publication Cover
Reading Psychology Volume 42, 2021 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
435
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Using Disciplinary Literacy to Teach Children to Write Science Informational Text

Sarah K. ClarkDepartment of Teacher Education, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2797-3350View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Leigh K. SmithDepartment of Teacher Education, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USAView further author information
,
Emma JuddDepartment of Teacher Education, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USAView further author information
&
Victoria RosdahlDepartment of Teacher Education, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USAView further author information
Pages 455-483 | Received 28 Jul 2020, Accepted 12 Oct 2020, Published online: 15 Mar 2021

References

  • Akerson, V., Buck, G., Donnelly, L., Nargund-Joshi, V., & Weiland, I. (2011). The importance of teaching and learning the nature of science in the early childhood years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 537–549. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9312-5
  • Avalos, M. A., Secada, W. G., Zisselsberger, M. G., & Gort, M. (2017). “Hey! Today I will tell you about the water cycle!”: Variations of language and organizational features in third-grade science explanation writing. The Elementary School Journal, 118(1), 149–176. doi:10.1086/692987
  • Berninger, V., & Winn, W. (2006). Implications of advancements in brain research and technology for writing development, writing instruction, and educational evolution. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 96–114). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Bradley, L. G., & Donovan, C. A. (2010). Information book read‐alouds as models for second‐grade authors. The Reading Teacher, 64(4), 246–260. doi:10.1598/RT.64.4.3
  • Brozo, W. G., Moorman, G., Meyer, C., & Stewart, T. (2013). Content area reading and disciplinary literacy: A case for the radical center. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(5), 353–357. doi:10.1002/JAAL.153
  • Calkins, L. M., & Ehrenworth, M. (2016). Growing extraordinary writers: Leadership decisions to raise the level of writing across a school and a district. The Reading Teacher, 70(1), 7–18. doi:10.1002/trtr.1499
  • Cervetti, G., Pearson, P. D., Bravo, M. A., & Barber, J. (2006). Reading and writing in the service of inquiry-based science. In R. Douglas, M. Klentschy, & K. Worth (Eds.), Linking science and literacy in the K-8 classroom (pp. 221–244). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
  • Chambliss, M. J., Christenson, L. A., & Parker, C. (2003). Fourth graders composing scientific explanations about the effects of pollutants: Writing to understand. Written Communication, 20(4), 426–454. doi:10.1177/0741088303260504
  • Clark, S. K., & Neal, J. (2018). Teaching second graders to write sequential text.Journal of Educational Research, 111(6), 764–772.
  • Clark, S. K., Jones, C. D., & Reutzel, D. R. (2013). Using text structures of information books to teach writing in the primary grades. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(4), 265–271.
  • Cohen, B. H. (2008). Explaining psychological statistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907–919. doi:10.1037/a0012656
  • Dickinson, P., & Adams, J. (2017). Values in evaluation - The use of rubrics. Evaluation and Program Planning, 65, 113–116. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.07.005
  • Dickson, S. V., Collins, V. L., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1998). What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics. NewYork, NY: Routledge.
  • Dreher, M. J. (2003). Motivating struggling readers by tapping the potential of information books. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 25–38. doi:10.1080/10573560308206
  • Dreher, M. J., & Kletzien, S. B. (2016). Have recommended book lists changed to reflect current expectations for informational text in K-3 classrooms? Reading Psychology, 37(3), 371–391. doi:10.1080/02702711.2015.1055871
  • Duke, N. K., & Bennett-Armistead, V. S. (2003). Reading & writing informational text in the primary grades. New York, NY: Scholastic Teaching Resources.
  • Duncan, D., Diefes-Dux, H., & Gentry, M. (2011). Professional development through engineering academies: An examination of elementary teachers' recognition and understanding of engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 520–539. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00025.x
  • Duschl, R. A., Shouse, A. W., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2008). What research says about K-8 science learning and teaching. The Education Digest, 73(8), 46.
  • Eshach, H., & Fried, M. (2005). Should science be taught to early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315–336. doi:10.1007/s10956-005-7198-9
  • Gerde, H. K., Bingham, G. E., & Wasik, B. A. (2012). Writing in early childhood classrooms: Guidance for best practices. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(6), 351–359. doi:10.1007/s10643-012-0531-z
  • Gotwals, A. W., & Wright, T. (2017). From “Plants Don't Eat” to Plants Are Producers. Science and Children, 55(3), 44–50. doi:10.2505/4/sc17_055_03_44
  • Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
  • Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396–407. doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.488703
  • Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2012). Are attitudes toward writing and reading separable constructs? A study with primary grade children. Reading & Writing Quarterly : Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 28(1), 51–69. doi:10.1080/10573569.2012.632732
  • Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Olson, C. B., D'Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N. (2012). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide. NCEE 2012-4058. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, What Works Clearinghouse.
  • Graham, S., Gillespie, A., & McKeown, D. (2013). Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and Writing, 26(1), 1–15. doi:10.1007/s11145-012-9395-2
  • Greenberg, K. P. (2012). A reliable and valid weighted scoring instrument for use in grading APA-Style empirical research report. Teaching of Psychology, 39(1), 17–23. doi:10.1177/0098628311430643
  • Guo, Y., Wang, S., Hall, A. H., Breit-Smith, A., & Busch, J. (2016). The effects of science instruction on young children’s vocabulary learning: A research synthesis. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(4), 359–367. doi:10.1007/s10643-015-0721-6
  • Hand, B., Pain, V., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L. D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1021–1035. doi:10.1080/095006999290165
  • Hart, J. E., & Lee, O. (2003). Teacher professional development to improve the science and literacy achievement of English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 475–501. doi:10.1080/15235882.2003.10162604
  • Hoffman, J. L., Collins, M. F., & Schickedanz, J. A. (2015). Instructional challenges in developing young children's science concepts: using informational text read‐ alouds. The Reading Teacher, 68(5), 363–372. doi:10.1002/trtr.1325
  • Jones, C. D., Clark, S. K., & Reutzel, D. R. (2016b). Teaching text structure inthe early grades: Examinin the affordances of information texts. Elementary School Journal, 117(1), 143–169.
  • Kersten, S. (2017). Becoming nonfiction authors: Engaging in science inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 71(1), 33–41. doi:10.1002/trtr.1577
  • Kuzon Jr, W. M., Urbanchek, M. G., & McCabe, S. (1996). The seven deadly sins of statistical analysis. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 37(3), 265–272.
  • Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular (Vol. 3). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Latimer, M. E., Bergee, M. J., & Cohen, M. L. (2010). Reliability and perceived pedagogical utility of a weighted music performance assessment rubric. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(2), 168–183. doi:10.1177/0022429410369836
  • Lead States, N. G. S. S. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2011). Reading picture books and learning science: Engaging young children with informational text. Theory into Practice, 50(4), 269–276. doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.607372
  • Meyer, B. J., & Freedle, R. O. (1984). Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21(1), 121–143. doi:10.3102/00028312021001121
  • Meyer, B. J., & Ray, M. N. (2017). Structure strategy interventions: Increasing reading comprehension of expository text. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 127–152.
  • Moje, E. B. (2007). Chapter 1 - Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 1–44. doi:10.3102/0091732X07300046001
  • Moje, E. B. (2015). Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 254–278. doi:10.17763/0017-8055.85.2.254
  • Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K. E., Ellis, L. M., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–71. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4
  • Mongillo, M. B. (2017). Creating mathematicians and scientists: Disciplinary literacy in the early childhood classroom. Early Child Development and Care, 187(3–4), 331–341. doi:10.1080/03004430.2016.1236090
  • Morphy, P., & Graham, S. (2012). Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: A meta-analysis of research findings. Reading and Writing, 25(3), 641–678. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5
  • Moss, B. (2004). Teaching expository text structures through information trade book retellings. The Reading Teacher, 57(8), 710–718.
  • National Commission on Writing. (2006). Writing and school reform. New York, NY: College Entrance Examination Board. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/writingcom/writing-school-reform-natl-comm-writing.pdf.
  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.
  • Neuman, S., & Dickinson, D. K. (2011). Handbook of early literacy research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K–12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33–84. doi:10.3102/0034654307313793
  • Page, E. B., & Petersen, N. S. (1995). The computer moves into essay grading: Updating the ancient test. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(7), 561.
  • Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (3rd ed.). Berkshire, UK: McGraw Hill.
  • Pappas, C. C., Varelas, M., Gill, S., Ortiz, I., & Keblawe-Shamah, N. (2009). Multimodal books in science-literacy units: Language and visual images for meaning making. Language Arts, 86(3), 201–211.
  • Pate, P. E., Homestead, E., & McGinnis, K. (1993). Designing rubrics for authentic assessment. Middle School Journal, 25(2), 25–27. doi:10.1080/00940771.1993.11495201
  • Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science (New York, N.Y.), 328(5977), 459–463. doi:10.1126/science.1182595
  • Purcell-Gates, V., Duke, N. K., & Martineau, J. A. (2007). Learning to read and write genre‐ specific text: Roles of authentic experience and explicit teaching. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(1), 8–45. doi:10.1598/RRQ.42.1.1
  • Reutzel, D. R., Jones, C. D., Clark, S. K., & Kumar, T. (2016a). The Informational Text Structure Survey (ITS2): An exploration of primary grade teachers’ sensitivity to text structure in young children's informational texts. Journal of Educational Research, 109(1), 81–98.
  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 142–175.
  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi- experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Shanahan, C., & Shanahan, T. (2014). Does disciplinary literacy have a place in elementary school? The Reading Teacher, 67(8), 636–639. doi:10.1002/trtr.1257
  • Shanahan, T. (2015). Common Core State Standards: A new role for writing. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 464–479. doi:10.1086/681130
  • Smagorinsky, P. (1998). Thinking and speech and protocol analysis. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 5(3), 157–177. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0503_2
  • Smolkin, L., & Donovan, C. (2001). The contexts of comprehension: The information book read aloud, comprehension acquisition, and comprehension instruction in a first-grade classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 102(2), 97–122. doi:10.1086/499695
  • Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Styus.
  • Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science (New York, N.Y.), 103(2684), 677–680. 680. doi:10.1126/science.103.2684.677
  • Troia, G. A. (2007). Research in writing instruction: What we know and what we need to know. In M. Pressley, A. K. Billman, K. H. Perry, K. E. Reffitt & J. M. Reynolds (Eds.), Shaping literacy achievement: Research we have, research we need(pp. 129–156). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Troia, G. A., & Olinghouse, N. G. (2013). The common core state standards and evidence-based educational practices: The case of writing. Grantee Submission, 42(3), 343–357.
  • Trygstad, P.J., Smith, P.S., Banilower, E.R., & Nelson, M.M. (2013). The status of elementary science education: Are we ready for the Next Generation Science Standards? Retrieved from http://www.horizon-research.com/2012nssme/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/The-Status-of-Elementary-Science-Education_paper.pdf.
  • Williams, J. P., Nubla-Kung, A. M., Pollini, S., Stafford, K. B., Garcia, A., & Snyder, A. E. (2007). Teaching cause-effect text structure through social studies content to at-risk second graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(2), 111–120. doi:10.1177/00222194070400020201
  • Wolf, K., & Stevens, E. (2007). The Role of rubrics in advancing and assessing student learning. Journal of Effective Teaching, 7(1), 3–14.
  • Wright, T. S. (2014). From potential to reality: Content‐rich vocabulary and informational text. The Reading Teacher, 67(5), 359–367. doi:10.1002/trtr.1222
  • Wright, T. S., & Gotwals, A. W. (2017). Supporting kindergartners’ science talk in the context of an integrated science and disciplinary literacy curriculum. The Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 513–537. doi:10.1086/690273
  • Yamishiro, J., & Yamishiro, A. (2017). Joyful learning network. Retrieved from http://www.joyfullearningnetwork.com/about-us.html. .
  • Yopp, R. H., & Yopp, H. K. (2012). Young children’s limited exposure to informational text. Reading Teacher, 7(65), 480–490.
  • Yore, L., Hand, B., Goldman, S., Hildebrand, G., Osborne, J., & Treagust, D. (2004). New directions in language and science education research. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 347–352.

Childrens Literature and Websites

  • Alloian, M. (2012). Plants are alive! New York, NY: Crabtree Publishing Company.
  • Hicks, K. (2000). Living or nonliving? Vero Beach, FL: Rourke Educational Media.
  • Kalman, B. (1998). Is it a Living Thing? New York, NY: Crabtree Publishing Company.
  • Kalman, B. (2007). Homes of Living Things. New York, NY: Crabtree Publishing Company.
  • Kalman, B. (2010a). How do living things find food? New York, NY: Crabtree Publishing Company.
  • Kalman, B. (2010b). Living things need water. New York, NY: Crabtree Publishing Company.
  • Kalman, B. (2010c). What kind of living thing is it? New York, NY: Crabtree Publishing Company.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.