The effect of document source trustworthiness on the evaluation and strategic use of embedded sources when reading health information online

References

• Alexander, P. (2020). What research has revealed about readers’ struggles with comprehension in the digital age: Moving beyond the phonics versus whole language debate. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S89–S97. doi:10.1002/rrq.331
   Google Scholar
• Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., Florit, E., & Mason, L. (2022). The role of individual differences in sourcing: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 749–792. doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09640-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balena, F., & Fawcette, J. (1999). Programming Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0 (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Microsoft Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barzilai, S., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2015). The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints. Learning and Instruction, 36, 86–103. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, A., & Kiefer, M. (2021). Comparison of different response time outlier exclusion methods: A simulation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 675558. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L., Bråten, I., & McCrudden, M. T. (2018). Introduction to research on multiple source use. In J. L. G. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 1–13). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315627496
   Google Scholar
• Brante, E. W., & Strømsø, H. I. (2018). Sourcing in text comprehension: A review of interventions targeting sourcing skills. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 773–799. doi:10.1007/s10648-017-9421-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Andreassen, R. (2016). Sourcing in professional education: Do text factors make any difference? Reading and Writing, 29(8), 1599–1628. doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9611-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485–522. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J.-F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In J. R. Kirby & M. J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 276–314). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139048224.017
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F. & Durik, A. (2018). Representations and processes in multiple source use. In J. L. G. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. T. McCrudden (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 17–33). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. F. (2020). Multiple document comprehension. In L. Zhang (Ed.), The oxford encyclopedia of educational psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Durik, A., & Rouet, J. F. (2022). Reading contexts, goals, and decisions: Text comprehension as a situated activity. Discourse Processes, 59(5-6), 361–378. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2022.2068345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J. F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser & P. Van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 209–233). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.4324/9781410603135
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M. A., Rouet, J. F., & Braasch, J. L. (2012). Documents as entities: Extending the situation model theory of comprehension. In M. A. Britt, J-F. Rouet & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.) Reading-from words to multiple texts (pp. 174–193). New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203131268
   Google Scholar
• Burin, D. I., González, F. M., Martínez, M., & Marrujo, J. G. (2021). Expository multimedia comprehension in E‐learning: Presentation format, verbal ability and working memory capacity. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 797–809. doi:10.1111/jcal.12524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández Huerta, J. (1959). Medidas sencillas de lecturabilidad. Consigna, 214, 29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Foy, J. E., LoCasto, P. C., Briner, S. W., & Dyar, S. (2017). Would a madman have been so wise as this?” The effects of source credibility and message credibility on validation. Memory & Cognition, 45(2), 281–295. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0656-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2019). Readers’ processing and use of source information as a function of its usefulness to explain conflicting scientific claims. Discourse Processes, 56(5-6), 429–446. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2019.1610305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschling, S., Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2021). Investigating Differences in Experts’ and Laypersons’ Evaluation of a Scientific Conflict with Eye-Tracking and Cued-Retrospective Thinking Aloud (No. 6184). EasyChair. Retrieved from https://easychair.org/publications/preprint_open/3rzX.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2010). Trust online: Young adults’ evaluation of web content. International Journal of Communication, 4, 27. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/download/636/423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, A., & Barber, S. J. (2021). The effects of repetition frequency on the illusory truth effect. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 1–12. doi:10.1186/s41235-021-00301-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2013). Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 696–713. doi:10.1177/0267323113499113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 111(2), 228–238. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammerer, Y., Kalbfell, E., & Gerjets, P. (2016). Is this information source commercially biased? How contradictions between web pages stimulate the consideration of source information. Discourse Processes, 53(5-6), 430–456. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2016.1169968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A. M., Khan, H. M., Huang, P., Warrian, K., & Gooi, P. (2022). Assessing the quality of online information on glaucoma procedures. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. Journal Canadien D’ophtalmologie, 57(1), 23–28. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2021.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, M. S., Molenaar, A., Brennan, L., Reid, M., & McCaffrey, T. (2022). Young adults’ use of different social media platforms for health information: Insights from web-based conversations. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(1), e23656. doi:10.2196/23656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Cognitive affective engagement model of multiple source use. Educational Psychologist, 52(3), 182–199. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1329014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., Alexander, P. A., & Stephens, L. A. (2017). Trust but verify: Examining the association between students’ sourcing behaviors and ratings of text trustworthiness. Discourse Processes, 54(2), 83–104. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2016.1174654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., Lee, H. Y., Du, H., Oaxaca, G. S. C., Lyu, B., Falcon, A. L., & Lin, C. J. (2022). Preservice teachers’ recognition of source and content bias in educational application (app) reviews. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, 107297. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, S., & Andrews, S. (2015). To transform or not to transform: Using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1171. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo‐Rouet, M., Potocki, A., Scharrer, L., Ros, C., Stadtler, M., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J. F. (2019). How good is this page? Benefits and limits of prompting on adolescents’ evaluation of web information quality. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(3), 299–321. doi:10.1002/rrq.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood, K. (2016). Do people overestimate their information literacy skills? A systematic review of empirical evidence on the Dunning-Kruger effect. Communications in Information Literacy, 10(2), 199–213. doi:10.15760/comminfolit.2016.10.2.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlon, J., Maibach, E., Ballew, M., Bergquist, P., Goldberg, M., Gustafson, A., … Leiserowitz, A. (2020, June 4) Who do americans trust most for information about COVID-19? Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. Retrieved October 12, 2022, from https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/who-do-americans-trust-most-for-information-about-covid-19/.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A., & Liedke, J. (2021, August 24). About four-in-ten Americans say social media is an important way of following covid-19 vaccine news. Pew Research Center. Retrieved February 15, 2022, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/08/24/about-four-in-ten-americans-say-social-media-is-an-important-way-of-following-covid-19-vaccine-news/.
   Google Scholar
• Naeem, S. B., Bhatti, R., & Khan, A. (2021). An exploration of how fake news is taking over social media and putting public health at risk. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 38(2), 143–149. doi:10.1111/hir.12320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, J. Y., Ahmed, S., & Zhang, C. J. (2021). Dietary and herbal supplements for weight loss: Assessing the quality of patient information online. Nutrition Journal, 20(1), 72–13. doi:10.1186/s12937-021-00729-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/a83d84cb-en
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, A., Potocki, A., Stadtler, M., Macedo-Rouet, M., Paul, J., Salmerón, L., & Rouet, J. F. (2018). Fostering teenagers’ assessment of information reliability: Effects of a classroom intervention focused on critical source dimensions. Learning and Instruction, 58, 53–64. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J. F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. Van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., & Salovich, N. A. (2018). Can’t we just disregard fake news? The consequences of exposure to inaccurate information. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 232–239. doi:10.1177/2372732218785193
   Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2018). The role of validation in multiple-document comprehension. In T. Richter & J. Maier (Eds.) Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 151–167). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 478–493. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F., Le Bigot, L., de Pereyra, G., & Britt, M. A. (2016). Whose story is this? Discrepancy triggers readers’ attention to source information in short narratives. Reading and Writing, 29(8), 1549–1570. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9625-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F., Ros, C., Bordas, B., Sanchiz, M., Saux, G., Richter, T., & Britt, M. A. (2020). When Does Source Information Help? Content Vs. Source-Based Validation as a Function of Readers’ Prior Knowledge (No. 4493) EasyChair. Retrieved from https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/2w2N.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J. F., Skov, O., De Pereyra, G., Ros, C., Le Bigot, L., & Vibert, N. (2018). Relevance versus big numbers: Students’ criteria for selecting scholarly references online. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24(4), 476–489. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xap0000194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Delgado, P., & Mason, L. (2020). Using eye‐movement modelling examples to improve critical reading of multiple webpages on a conflicting topic. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 1038–1051. doi:10.1111/jcal.12458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Strømsø, H. I., Kammerer, Y., Stadtler, M., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Comprehension processes in digital reading. In M. Barzillai, J. Thomson, S. Schroeder, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Learning to read in a digital world (pp. 91–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Saux, G., Britt, M. A., Vibert, N., & Rouet, J. F. (2021a). Building mental models from multiple texts: How readers construct coherence from inconsistent sources. Language and Linguistics Compass, 15(3), e12409. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saux, G., Vibert, N., Dampuré, J., Burin, D. I., Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. F. (2021b). From simple agents to information sources: Readers’ differential processing of story characters as a function of story consistency. Acta Psychologica, 212, 103191. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359–393. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). The content–source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G Braasch (Eds.) Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379–402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., Paul, J., Globoschütz, S., & Bromme, R. (2015). Watch out!—An instruction raising students’ epistemic vigilance augments their sourcing activities. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. P. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2278–2283). Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2014). Students’ sourcing while reading and writing from multiple web documents. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(02), 92–111. doi:10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2014-02-02
   Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 192–204. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 176–203. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.769994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boekel, M., Lassonde, K. A., O’Brien, E. J., & Kendeou, P. (2017). Source credibility and the processing of refutation texts. Memory & Cognition, 45(1), 168–181. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0649-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., Reyes, H., Gilabert, R., Calpe, J., Soria, E., & Graesser, A. C. (2002). ETAT: Expository text analysis tool. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers : A Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc, 34(1), 93–107. doi:10.3758/BF03195428
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2019). Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 121(11), 1–40. doi:10.1177/016146811912101102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar