Beliefs about the Malleability of Working Memory Guide College Students’ Evaluations of Belief-Inconsistent and Belief-Consistent Journal Articles

References

• Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science (New York, N.Y.), 255(5044), 556–559. doi:10.1126/science.1736359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. G., Patel, N., Von Gunten, C., Valentine, K. D., & Scherer, L. D. (2020). Interpreting politically-charged numerical information: The influence of ­numeracy and problem difficulty on response accuracy. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(2), 11. doi:10.1017/S193029750000735X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, J. (1995). Myside bias in thinking about abortion. Thinking & Reasoning, 1(3), 221–235. doi:10.1080/13546789508256909
   Google Scholar
• Björnson, C. H. (1968). Läsbarhet [Readability]. Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Bowes, S. M., Costello, T. H., Lee, C., McElroy-Heltzel, S., Davis, D. E., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2021). Stepping outside the echo chamber: Is intellectual humility associated with less political myside bias? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 0146167221997619. doi:10.1177/0146167221997619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Brandmo, C., Ferguson, L. E., & Stromso, H. I. (2022). Epistemic justification in multiple document literacy: A refutation text intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 71, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2022.102122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čavojová, V., Šrol, J., & Adamus, M. (2018). My point is valid, yours is not: Myside bias in reasoning about abortion. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(7), 656–669. doi:10.1080/20445911.2018.1518961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogmed. (2011a). ADHD and working memory. Retrieved from http://www.cogmed.com/adhd-working-memory (archived by webcite at http://www.webcitation.org/63U4tNQsO)
   Google Scholar
• Cogmed. (2015). http://www.cogmed.com/
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 62–101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, C., & Fischhoff, B. (2019). Does “putting on your thinking cap” reduce myside bias in evaluation of scientific evidence? Thinking & Reasoning, 25(4), 477–505. doi:10.1080/13546783.2018.1548379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211–245. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gathercole, S. E., Dunning, D. L., & Holmes, J. (2012). Cogmed training: Let’s be realistic about intervention research. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(3), 201–203. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, B. S., Gondoli, D. M., Johnson, A. C., Steeger, C. M., & Morrissey, R. A. (2012). The future promise of Cogmed working memory training. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(3), 214–216. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2012). Current evidence does not support the claims made for CogMed working memory training. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(3), 197–200. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Effects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260–271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, E. D., Braasch, J. L., & Kardash, C. M. (2021). The contributions of childhood vaccination misconceptions to the evaluation and sharing of information from multiple internet texts. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 281–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, E. D., Braasch, J. L. G., & Kardash, C. M. (2019). Individual Differences in revising (and maintaining) accurate and inaccurate beliefs about childhood vaccinations. Discourse Processes, 56(5–6), 415–428. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2019.1596709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingberg, T. (2012). Is working memory capacity fixed? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(3), 194–196. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, J., & Richter, T. (2013). Text-belief consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting information. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 151–175. doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.769997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M. T., & Barnes, A. (2016). Differences in student reasoning about belief-relevant arguments: A mixed methods study. Metacognition and Learning, 11(3), 275–303. doi:10.1007/s11409-015-9148-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Nurse, M. S., & Grant, W. J. (2020). I’ll see it when i believe it: Motivated numeracy in perceptions of climate change risk. Environmental Communication, 14(2), 184–201. doi:10.1080/17524032.2019.1618364
   Google Scholar
• Richter, T. (2011). Cognitive flexibility and epistemic validation in learning from multiple texts. In J. Elen, E. Stahl, R. Bromme, & G. Clarebout (Eds.), Links between beliefs and cognitive flexibility (pp. 125–140). Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, T., Münchow, H., & Abendroth, J. (2020). The role of validation in integrating multiple perspectives. In P. Van Meter, A. List, D. Lombardi, & P. Kendeou (Eds.), Handbook of learning from multiple representations and perspectives (pp. 259–275). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2017). Comprehension of multiple documents with conflicting information: The role of epistemic validation. Educational Psychologist, 52, 148–166. doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, T., & Maier, J. (2018). The role of validation in multiple source use. In J. Braasch, I. Bråten, & M. McCrudden (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 151–167). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shipstead, Z., Hicks, K. L., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Cogmed working memory training: Does the evidence support the claims? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(3), 185–193. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases. Thinking & Reasoning, 14(2), 129–167. doi:10.1080/13546780701679764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Strien, J. L. H., Kammerer, Y., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). How attitude strength biases information processing and evaluation on the web. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 245–252. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 301–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, M.-H., & Wu, Y.-T. (2017). The role of university students’ informal reasoning ability and disposition in their engagement and outcomes of online reading regarding a controversial issue: An eye tracking study | Elsevier Enhanced Reader. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 14–24. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar