277
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Great Debate Reconsidered, with an Eye toward Struggling Beginning Readers

ORCID Icon

References

  • Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Allington, R., & Woodside-Jiron, H. (1999). The politics of literacy teaching: How “research” shaped educational policy. Educational Researcher, 28, 4–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X028008004
  • Austin, M., & Morrison, C. (1961). The torch lighters: Tomorrow’s teachers of reading. Cambridge, MA: Distributed by Harvard University Press.
  • Bear, D., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnson, F. (2003). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
  • Blachman, B. (1997). Early intervention and phonological awareness: A cautionary tale. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia (pp. 409–425). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Bond, G., & Dykstra, R. (1967). The cooperative research program in first-grade reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 4, 5–142. doi:10.2307/746948
  • Chall, J. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Chomsky, C. (1979). Approaching reading through invented spelling. In L. Resnick & P. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (Vol. 2, pp. 43–64). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Clay, M. (1991a). Becoming literate: The construction of inner control. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Clay, M. (1991b). Introducing a new storybook to young readers. The Reading Teacher, 45, 264–273.
  • Cunningham, J., Koppenhaver, D., Erickson, K., & Spadorcia, S. (2004). Word identification and text characteristics. In J. Hoffman & D. Schallert (Eds.), The texts in elementary classrooms (pp. 21–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ehri, L. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Ehri, L., & Wilce, L. (1985). Movement into reading: Is the first stage of printed word learning visual or phonetic? Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 163–179. doi:10.2307/747753
  • Engelmann, S., & Bruner, E. (1968). DISTAR. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
  • Excellent Public Schools Act. (2021). North Carolina Senate Bill 387. Retrieved from https://www.ncleg.gov/Sessions/2021/Bills/Senate/PDF/S387v4.pdf
  • Felton, R. (2005). Teaching reading to students with reading disabilities: What we know about what works. Winston-Salem, NC: Report prepared for the North Carolina Partnership Training System.
  • Flanigan, K., Solic, K., & Gordon, L. (2022). The “P” word: 8 principles for tackling today’s questions and misconceptions about phonics. The Reading Teacher, 1, 73–83. doi:10.1002/trtr.2101
  • Fries, C. (1963). Linguistics and reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Good, R., & Kaminski, R. (2002). DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency passages for first through third grades (Technical Report No. 10). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
  • Good, R., & Kaminski, R. (2011). DIBELS Next. Longman, CO: Sopris.
  • Goodman, K. (1985). What’s whole in whole language. Toronto: Scholastica Canada.
  • Gray, W. S., Monroe, M., & Artley, S., & Arbuthnot, M. (1956). The new, basic reading program. Chicago: Scott, Foresman, and Company.
  • Guszak, F. J. (1985). Diagnostic reading instruction in the elementary school (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
  • Guszak, F. J. (1997). Reading for students with special needs (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
  • Harste, J. (1989). The basalization of American reading instruction. One researcher responds. Theory into Practice, 28, 265–273. doi:10.1080/00405848909543416
  • Henderson, E. H. (1981). Learning to read and spell: The child’s knowledge of words. DeKalb, IL: Northern Illinois Press.
  • Henderson, E. H. (1986). Understanding children’s knowledge of written language. In D. Yaden & S. Templeton (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness and beginning literacy (pp. 65–77). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Henderson, E. H. (1990). Teaching spelling (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Hoffman, J., McCarthey, S., Abbot, J., Christian, C., Corman, L., Curry, C., Dressman, M., Elliot, B., Matherne, D., & Stahle, D. (1994). So what’s new in the new basals: A focus on first grade. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 1, 47–73. doi:10.1080/10862969409547836
  • Holdaway, D. (1979). Foundations of literacy. Auckland, NZ: Heinemann.
  • Hoover, W., & Gough, P. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799
  • Invernizzi, M., Rosemary, C. Juel, C., & Richards, H. (1997). At-risk readers and community volunteers: A three-year perspective. Journal of Scientific Studies in Reading, 3, 277–300. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0103_6
  • Jerrolds, B., & Thompson, R. (1995). History of the whole language concept. Georgia Journal of Reading, 20, 10–15.
  • Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437
  • Lee. D., & Allen, R.V. (1963). Learning to read through experience. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
  • Liberman, I., & Liberman, A. (1992). Whole language versus code-emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 343–366). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Lyon, G. R. (2001). Testimony of Dr. G. Reid Lyon, Chief of Child Development and Behavior Branch (NICHD), to the House Subcommittee on Education Reform. Retrieved from www.hhs.gov/asl/testify/t010308.html)
  • Morris, D. (2005a). The Howard Street tutoring manual: Teaching at-risk readers in the primary grades (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Morris, D. (2005b). A Title I reading success story. Reading Research and Instruction, 45, 1, 1–18. doi:10.1080/19388070509558439
  • Morris, D. (2011). Interventions to develop phonological and orthographic systems. In A. McGill-Franzen & R. Allington (Eds.), Handbook of reading disability research (pp. 279–288). New York: Routledge.
  • Morris, D. (2014). Diagnosis and correction of reading problems (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  • Morris, D. (2015a). Morris informal reading inventory: Kindergarten to grade 8. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Morris, D. (2015b). Preventing early reading failure: An argument. The Reading Teacher, 68, 7, 502–509. doi:10.1002/trtr.1346
  • Morris, D. (2023). The case for tutoring struggling readers in the primary grades. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 39, 2, 104–119.
  • Morris, D., Bloodgood, J., Lomax, R., & Perney, J. (2003). Developmental steps in learning to read: A longitudinal study in kindergarten and first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 3, 302–328. doi:10.1598/RRQ.38.3.1
  • Morris, D., & Perney, J. (2018). Using a sight word measure to predict future reading fluency problems in grades 1–3. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34, 4, 338–348. doi:10.1080/10573569.2018.1446857
  • Morris, D., Trathen, W., Gill, T, Schlagal, R., Ward, D., & Frye, E. (2017a). Assessing reading rate in the primary grades (1–3). Reading Psychology, 38, 7, 653–672. doi:10.1080/02702711.2017.1323057
  • Morris, D., Trathen, W., Perney, J., Gill, T; Schlagal, R., Ward, D., & Frye, E. (2017b). Three DIBELS tasks vs. three informal reading/spelling tasks: A comparison of predictive validity. Reading Psychology, 38, 3, 289–320. doi:10.1080/02702711.2016.1263700
  • Morris, D., Trathen, W., Perney, J., Gill, T., Schlagal, R., Ward, D., & Frye, E. (2018). Tracking children’s print-processing skill across grades 1–3: Implications for reading assessment and instruction. Reading Psychology, 39, 8, 820–854. doi:10.1080/02702711.2018.1547805
  • Morris, D., Tyner, B., & Perney, J. (2000). Early Steps: Replicating the effects of a first-grade reading intervention program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 4, 681–693. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.681
  • Nation’s Report Card. (2019). Fourth-grade reading scores, nationwide, on the National Assessment of Educational Progress: 2005–2019. Retrieved from www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading/nation/achievement/?grade=4
  • National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (reports of the subgroups). Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
  • No Child Left Behind Act. (2002). Public Law No. 107-110. retrieved from www.ed.gov./policy/elsec/leg/esea02/index
  • Pearson, P. D. (1989). Commentary: Reading the Whole Language movement. Elementary School Journal, 90, 231–241. doi:10.1086/461615
  • Pearson, P. D. (1997). The First Grade Studies: A personal reflection, Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 428–432. doi:10.1598/RRQ.32.4.5
  • Pennell, A. (2021). The development of first graders’ word knowledge in classrooms where teachers are implementing a mandated phonics curriculum (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Appalachian State University, Boone, NC.
  • Perfetti, C. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. Gough, L. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Routman, R. (1988). Transitions from literature to literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  • Santa, C., & Høien, T. (1999). An assessment of Early Steps: A program for early intervention of reading problems. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 54–79. doi:10.1598/RRQ.34.1.4
  • Shanahan, T. (2021). “What is the science of reading?” Retrieved from https://www.shanahanonliteracy.com/blog/what-is-the-science-of-reading- 1#sthash.A6zhKChw.dpbs
  • Share, D. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
  • Slavin, R. (2003). Why reading reform is essential (Chapter 1). In D. Morris & R. Slavin (Eds.), Every child reading (pp. 1–7). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Smith, F. (1981). Demonstrations, engagements, and sensitivity. The choice between people and programs. Language Arts, 58, 634–642.
  • Spear-Swerling, L. (2006). Children’s reading comprehension and oral reading fluency in easy text. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 199–220. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-4114-x
  • Spear-Swerling, L. (2019). Structured literacy and typical literacy practices: Understanding differences to create instructional opportunities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 3, 201–211. doi:10.1177/0040059917750160
  • Stauffer, R. (1970). The language-experience approach to the teaching of reading. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Torgesen, J. (2000). Individual differences in response to early intervention in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55–64. doi:10.1207/SLDRP1501_6

Commercial reading programs and reading assessments mentioned in the article

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.