THE READABILITY OF CONTENT TEXTBOOKS USED IN MIDDLE AND JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS

REFERENCES

• Arnsdorf , V. E. 1963 . Readability of basal social studies materials . The Reading Teacher , 16 : 243 – 246 .
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin , R. S. and Kaufman , R. 1979 . A concurrent validity study of the Raygor readability estimate . Journal of Reading , 23 November : 148 – 153 .
   Google Scholar
• Beard , J. G. 1967 . Comprehensibility of high school textbooks: Association with content area . Journal of Reading , 11 : 229 – 234 .
   Google Scholar
• Bormuth , J. R. 1975 . “ Reading literacy: Its definition and assessment ” . In Toward a Literate Society , Edited by: Carrol , J. B. and Chall , J. S. 61 – 100 . New York : McGraw‐Hill .
   Google Scholar
• Bradley , J. , Ames , W. and Mitchell , J. 1980 . Intrabook readability: Variations within history textbooks . Social Education , 44 October : 524 – 523 .
   Google Scholar
• Burkhead , M. and Ulferts , G. 1977 . Sample frequency in application of Dale‐ Chall readability formulas . Journal of Reading Behavior , 9 : 287 – 291 . Fall
   Google Scholar
• Campbell , A. 1979 . How readability formulae fall short in matching student to text in the content areas . Journal of Reading , 22 May : 683 – 689 .
   Google Scholar
• Chall , J. S. 1958 . Readability: An appraisal of research and application , Columbus : Ohio State University .
   Google Scholar
• Dale , E. and Chall , J. 1948 . A formula for predicting readability . Educational Research Bulletin , 27 ( 11‐20 ) January 21 and February 17 : 37 – 54 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , F. B. 1972 . Psychometric research on comprehension in reading . Reading Research Quarterly , 7 : 628 – 678 . Summer
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison , A. and Kantor , R. 1982 . On the failure of readability formulas to define readable texts . Reading Research Quarterly , 17 : 187 – 209 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald , G. G. 1980 . Readability of the Fry sampling procedure . Reading Research Quarterly , 15 : 489 – 503 .
   Google Scholar
• Freeman , P. and Anderson , R. C. 1983 . Effects of vocabulary difficulty, text cohesion, and schema availability on reading comprehension . Reading Research Quarterly , 18 : 277 – 294 . Spring
   Google Scholar
• Fry , E. 1968 . A readability formula that saves time . Journal of Reading , 11 April : 513 – 516 . 575 – 578 .
   Google Scholar
• Fry , E. 1977 . Fry's readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to Level 17 . Journal of Reading , 21 December : 242 – 252 .
   Google Scholar
• Goodlad , J. 1977 . What goes on in our schools . Educational Researcher , 6 : 3 – 6 .
   Google Scholar
• Harker , J. W. 1977 . Selecting instructional materials for content area reading . Journal of Reading , 21 November : 126 – 130 .
   Google Scholar
• Harris , A. J. and Jacobson , M. D. 1979 . A framework for readability research: Moving beyond Herbert Spencer . Journal of Reading , 22 February : 390 – 398 .
   Google Scholar
• Hill , W. 1983 . Content area reading revisited . The Reading Professor , IX : 3 – 8 . Winter
   Google Scholar
• Hittleman , D. R. 1978 . Readability, readability formulas, and cloze: Selecting instructional materials . Journal of Reading , 22 November : 117 – 121 .
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch , W. and Vipond , D. 1979 . “ Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory ” . In Perspectives on memory research , Edited by: Nelson , L. G. 329 – 365 . Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Klare , G. 1974‐75 . Assessing readability . Reading Research Quarterly , 10 : 62 – 103 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klare , G. 1976 . A second look at the validity of readability formulas . Journal of Reading Behavior , 8 : 129 – 152 . Summer
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretschmer , J. 1976 . Updating the Fry readability formula . The Reading Teacher , 29 March : 555 – 559 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laffey , J. L. , ed. 1972 . Reading in the content areas , Newark, Del. : International Reading Association .
   Google Scholar
• Longo , J. A. 1982 . The Fry Graph: Validation of the college levels . Journal of Reading , 26 December : 229 – 234 .
   Google Scholar
• Mallinson , G. G. 1952 . The reading difficulty of textbooks for general science . School Review , 60 : 94 – 98 .
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell , M. 1978 . Readability: Have we gone too far? . Journal of Reading , 21 March : 525 – 530 .
   Google Scholar
• McCall , W. A. and Crabbs , L. M. 1926 . Standard test lessons in reading , New York : Columbia University Teachers College . revised 1950, 1961
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin , G. H. 1969 . SMOG grading‐‐a new readability formula . Journal of Reading , 12 May : 639 – 646 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Commission on Excellence in Education . April 1983 . A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform , April , 65 Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Education .
   Google Scholar
• Nelson , J. 1978 . Readability: Some cautions for the content area teacher . Journal of Reading , 21 April : 620 – 625 .
   Google Scholar
• Olshavsky , J. 1978 . “ Comprehension profiles of good and poor readers across materials of increasing difficulty ” . In Reading: Disciplined inquiry in process and practice , Edited by: Pearson , D. and Hansen , J. 73 – 76 . Clemson, S.C. : National Reading Conference .
   Google Scholar
• 0'Rourke , W. J. 1980 . Research on attitude of secondary teachers toward teaching reading in content classrooms . Journal of Reading , 23 January : 126 – 135 .
   Google Scholar
• Powers , R. 1958 . A recalculation of four readability formulas . Journal of Educational Psychology , 49 April : 99 – 105 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers , R. and Ross , J. 1959 . New diagrams for calculating readability scores rapidly . Journalism Quarterly , 36 : 179 – 182 . Spring
   Google Scholar
• Raygor , A. L. 1977 . “ The Raygor readability estimate: A quick and easy way to determine difficulty ” . In Reading: Theory, research, and practice , Twentysixth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference Edited by: Pearson , D. and Hansen , J. 259 – 263 . Clemson, S.C.
   Google Scholar
• Standal , T. C. 1978 . Readability formulas: What's out, what's in . The Reading Teacher , 31 March : 642 – 646 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens , K. C. 1980 . Readability formulae and McCall‐Crabbs Standard Test Lessons in Reading . Reading Teacher , 33 January : 413 – 415 .
   Google Scholar
• Trapini , F. and Walmsley , S. 1981 . Five readability estimates: Differential effects of simplifying a document . Journal of Reading , 24 February : 398 – 403 .
   Google Scholar
• Wall , S. 1969 . Readability‐‐a neglected criterion in secondary textbook selection . Reading World , 9 October : 12 – 16 .
   Google Scholar
• Yoakam , G. A. 1928 . Reading and study , 199 New York : Macmillan Co. .
   Google Scholar