Effects of disturbance at two spatial scales on macroinvertebrate and fish metrics of stream health

References

• Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB. 1997. Revision to rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish, EPA 841-D-97-002. Washington (DC): US Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Benke AC, Meyer JL. 1988. Structure and function of a blackwater river in the southeastern U.S.A. Proc Int Assoc Theor Appl Limnol. 23:1209–1218.
   Google Scholar
• Frissell CA, Liss WJ, Warren CE, Hurley MD. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environ Manage. 10:199–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Growns I, Reinfelds I, Williams S, Coade G. 2009. Longitudinal effects of a water supply reservoir (Tallowa Dam) on downstream water quality, substrate and riffle macroinvertebrate assemblages in the Shoalhaven River, Australia. Mar Freshwater Res. 60:594–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grubaugh JW, Wallace JB, Houston ES. 1996. Longitudinal changes of macroinvertebrate communities along an Appalachian stream continuum. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 53:896–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst DB, Silldorff EL. 2006. Comparison of the performance of different bioassessment methods: similar evaluations of biotic integrity from separate programs and procedures. J North Am Benthol Soc. 25:513–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RK, Goedkoop W. 2002. Littoral macroinvertebrate communities: spatial scale and ecological relationships. Freshwater Biol. 47:1840–1854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RK, Goedkoop W, Sandin L. 2004. Spatial scale and ecological relationships between the macroinvertebrate communities of stony habitats of streams and lakes. Freshwater Biol. 49:1179–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RK, Hering D, Furse MT, Clarke RT. 2006. Detection of ecological change using multiple organism groups: metrics and uncertainty. Hydrobiologia. 566:115–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jongman RHG, Ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR. 1995. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenat DR. 1993. A biotic index for the southeastern United States: derivation and list of tolerance values, with criteria for assigning water-quality ratings. J North Am Benthol Soc. 12:279–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepš J, Šmilauer P. 2007. Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li J, Herlihy A, Gerth W, Kaufmann P, Gregory S, Urquhart S, Larsen DP. 2001. Variability in stream macroinvertebrates at multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biol. 46:87–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lücke JD, Johnson RK. 2009. Detection of ecological change in stream macroinvertebrate assemblages using single metric, multimetric or multivariate approaches. Ecol Indic. 9:659–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martel N, Rodríguez MA, Bérubé P. 2007. Multi-scale analysis of responses of stream macrobenthos to forestry activities and environmental context. Freshwater Biol. 52:85–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxted JR, Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Poretti V, Primrose N, Silvia A, Penrose D, Renfrow R. 2000. Assessment framework for mid-Atlantic coastal plain streams using benthic macroinvertebrates. J North Am Benthol Soc. 19:128–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune B, Grace JB. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. Gleneden Beach (OR): MjM Software Design.
   Google Scholar
• McCune B, Mefford MJ. 2011. PC-ORD: multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 6.0. Gleneden Beach (OR): MjM Software Design.
   Google Scholar
• Milner AM, Oswood MW. 2000. Urbanization gradients in streams of Anchorage, Alaska: a comparison of multivariate and multimetric approaches to classification. Hydrobiologia. 422/423:209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris RH. 1995. Biological monitoring: the dilemma of data analysis. J North Am Benthol Soc. 14:440–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paller MH. 1995. Relationship among number of fish species, reach length, and sampling effort in South Carolina coastal plain streams. North Am J Fish Manage. 15:110–120.
   Google Scholar
• Paller MH. 2001. Comparison of fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessments from South Carolina coastal plain streams. Aquat Ecosys Health Manage. 4:175–186.
   Google Scholar
• Paller MH, Fletcher DE, Standora MM, Grabowski TB, Jones TA, Dyer SA, Isely JJ. 2006. Emigration of fish from two South Carolina cooling reservoirs. North Am J Fish Manag. 26:976–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paller MH, Martin FD, Wike LD, Specht WL. 2007. Factors influencing the accuracy of a macroinvertebrate bioassessment protocol in South Carolina coastal plain streams. J Fresh Ecol. 22:23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paller MH, Reichert MJM, Dean JM. 1996. The use of fish communities to assess environmental impacts in South Carolina coastal plain streams. Trans Am Fish Soc. 125:633–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paller MH, Specht WL. 2006. Effects of stream size on taxa richness and other commonly used benthic bioassessment metrics. Hydrobiologia. 568:309–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plafkin JL, Barbour MT, Porter KD, Gross SK, Hughes RM. 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, EPA/440/4-89/001. Washington (DC): US Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Poff NL. 1997. Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. J North Am Benthol Soc. 16:391–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff NL, Hart DD. 2002. How dams vary and why it matters for the emerging science of dam removal. BioScience. 52:659–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards C, Haro RJ, Johnson LB, Host GE. 1997. Catchment and reach-scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits. Freshwater Biol. 37:219–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCDHEC (South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control). 1998. Standard operating and quality control procedures for macroinvertebrate sampling. Technical Report No. 004-98. Columbia (SC): Bureau of Water; Division of Water Monitoring, Assessment, and Protection; Aquatic Biology Section.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa WP. 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 15:335–391.
   Google Scholar
• Sponseller RA, Benfield EF, Valett HM. 2001. Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communities. Freshwater Biol. 46:1409–1424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson JM, Morin A. 2009. Covariation of stream community structure and biomass of algae, invertebrates and fish with forest cover at multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biol. 54:2139–2154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P. 2006. Canoco for Windows, version 4.54. Wageningen: Plant Research International.
   Google Scholar
• Tiemann JS, Gillette DP, Wildhaber ML, Edds DR. 2004. Effects of lowhead dams on riffle-dwelling fishes and macroinvertebrates in a midwestern river. Trans Am Fisheries Soc. 133:705–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonn WM. 1990. Climate change and fish communities: a conceptual model approach. Trans Am Fish Soc. 119:337–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 37:130–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Lyons J, Rasmussen P, Seelbach P, Simon T, Wiley M, Kanehl P, Baker E, Niemela S, Stewart PM. 2003. Watershed, reach, and riparian influences on stream fish assemblages in the northern lakes and forest ecoregion, U.S.A. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 60:491–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigel BM, Wang L, Rasmussen PW, Butcher JT, Stewart PM, Simon TP, Wiley MJ. 2003. Relative influence of variables at multiple spatial scales on stream macroinvertebrates in the northern lakes and forest ecoregion, U.S.A. Freshwater Biol. 48:1440–1461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar