Responses of an aquatic isopod and amphipod to chemical alarm cues from damaged conspecifics

References

• Atema J, Fay RR, Popper AN, Tavolga WN. 1988. Sensory biology of aquatic animals. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bleakley BH, Martell CM, Brodie ED, III. 2006. Variation in anti-predator behavior among five strains of inbred guppies, Poecilia reticulata. Behav Genet. 36:783–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie ED, Jr., Formanowicz DR, Jr., Brodie ED, III. 1991. Predator avoidance and antipredator mechanisms: distinct pathways to survival. Ethol Ecol Evol. 3:73–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brönmark C, Hansson L. 2000. Chemical communication in aquatic systems: an introduction. Oikos. 88:103–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chivers DP, Brown GE, Smith RJF. 1996. The evolution of chemical alarm signals: attracting predators benefits alarm signal senders. Am Nat. 148:649–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chivers DP, Wisenden BD, Hindman CJ, Michalak T, Kusch RC, Kaminskyj SW, Jack KL, Ferrari MCO, Pollock RJ, Halbgewachs CF, et al. 2007. Epidermal ‘alarm substance’ cells of fishes maintained by non-alarm functions: possible defence against pathogens, parasites and UVB radiation. Proc R Soc B. 274:2611–2619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covich AP, Palmer MA, Crowl TA. 1999. The role of benthic invertebrate species in freshwater ecosystems: zoobenthic species influence energy flows and nutrient cycling. Bioscience. 49:119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicke M, Sabelis MW. 1988. Infochemical terminology: based on a cost–benefit analysis rather than origin of compounds? Funct Ecol. 2:131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson S. 1988. The ecological role of chemical stimuli for the zooplankton: predator‐avoidance behavior in Daphnia. Limnol Oceanogr. 33:1431–1439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endler JA. 1986. Defense against predators. In: Feder ME, Lauder GV, editors. Predator–prey relationships. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; p. 109–134.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari MCO, Wisenden BD, Chivers DP. 2010. Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool. 88:698–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gall BG, Brodie ED, Jr. 2009. Behavioral avoidance of injured conspecific and predatory chemical stimuli by larvae of the aquatic caddisfly Hesperophylax occidentalis. Can J Zool. 87:1009–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodenough J, McGuire B, Jakob E. 2010. Perspectives on animal behavior. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hews DK. 1988. Alarm response in larval western toads, Bufo boreas: release of larval chemicals by a natural predator and its effect on predator capture efficiency. Anim Behav. 36:125–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holomuzki JR, Short TM. 1988. Habitat use and fish avoidance behaviors by the stream-dwelling isopod Lirceus fontinalis. Oikos. 52:79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holomuzki JR, Short TM. 1990. Ontogenetic shifts in habitat use and activity in a stream-dwelling isopod. Ecography. 13:300–307.
   Google Scholar
• Hynes HBN. 1956. British freshwater shrimps. New Biol. 21:25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen HP, Stabell OB. 2004. Antipredator behaviour mediated by chemical cues: the role of conspecific alarm signalling and predator labelling in the avoidance response of a marine gastropod. Oikos. 104:43–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe ML. 1992. Chemically mediated avoidance behavior in wild brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis: the response to familiar and unfamiliar predaceous fishes and the influence of fish diet. Can J Zool. 70:288–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macneil C, Dick JTA, Elwood RW. 1999. The dynamics of predation on Gammarus spp. (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Biol Rev. 74:375–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathis A, Chivers DP, Smith RJF. 1995. Chemical alarm signals: predator deterrents or predator attractants? Am Nat. 145:994–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathis A, Smith RJF. 1993a. Chemical alarm signals increase the survival time of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) during encounters with northern pike (Esox lucius). Behav Ecol. 4:260–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathis A, Smith RJF. 1993b. Intraspecific and cross-superorder responses to chemical alarm signals by brook stickleback. Ecology. 74:2395–2404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirza RS, Chivers DP. 2001. Chemical alarm signals enhance survival of Brook Charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) during encounters with predator chain pickerel (Esox niger). Ethology. 107:989–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spivey KL, Chapman TL, Schmitz AL, Bast DE, Smith ALB, Gall BG. 2015. The alarm cue obstruction hypothesis: isopods respond to alarm cues, but do not respond to dietary chemical cues from predatory bluegill. Behaviour. 152:167–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stabell OB, Ogbebo F, Primicerio R. 2003. Inducible defenses in Daphnia depend on latent alarm signals from conspecific prey activated in predators. Chem Senses. 28:141–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel M. 2011. Chemical communication in peracarid crustaceans. Chemical communication in crustaceans. New York (NY): Springer; p. 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Wisenden BD, Cline A, Sparkes TC. 1999. Survival benefit to antipredator behavior in the amphipod Gammarus minus (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in response to injury released chemical cues from conspecifics and heterospecifics. Ethology. 105:407–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisenden BD, Pohlman SG, Watkin EE. 2001. Avoidance of conspecific injury-released chemical cues by free-ranging Gammarus lacustris (Crustacea: Amphipoda). J Chem Ecol. 27:1249–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisenden BD, Rugg ML, Korpi NL, Fuselier LC. 2009. Lab and field estimates of active time of chemical alarm cues of a cyprinid fish and an amphipod crustacean. Behaviour. 146:1423–1442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisenden BD, Thiel TA. 2002. Field verification of predator attraction to minnow alarm substance. J Chem Ecol. 28:433–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooster D, Sih A. 1995. A review of the drift and activity responses of stream prey to predator presence. Oikos. 73:3–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar