Effects of artificial submersed vegetation on consumption and growth of mandarin fish Siniperca chuatsi (Basilewsky) foraging on live prey

References

• Alexander ME, Kaiser H, Weyl OLF, Dick JTA. 2015. Habitat simplification increases the impact of a freshwater invasive fish. Environ Biol Fish. 98(2):477–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton BA, Schreck CB. 1987. Metabolic cost of acute physical stress in juvenile Steelhead. Trans Am Fish Soc. 116(2):257–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean CW, Winfield IJ. 1995. Habitat use and activity patterns of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)), rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.)), perch (Perca fluviatilis (L.)) and pike (Esox lucius (L.)) in the laboratory: the role of predation threat and structural complexity. Ecol Freshwat Fish. 4(1):37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Camp EV, Gwinn DC, Iii WEP, Frazer TK. 2012. Changes in submersed aquatic vegetation affect predation risk of a common prey fish Lucania parva (Cyprinodontiformes: Fundulidae) in a spring-fed coastal river. Fisheries Manage Ecol. 19(3):245–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chick JH, McIvor CC. 1997. Habitat selection by three littoral zone fishes: effects of predation pressure, plant density and macrophyte type. Ecol Freshwat Fish. 6:122–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen LD, Heck KL, Abele LG. 1981. Experiments on competition and predation among shrimps of seagrass meadows. Ecology. 62(6):1484–1493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke SJ, Steinmetz J, Degner JF, Grant EC, Philipp DP. 2003. Metabolic fright responses of different-sized Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) to two avian predators show variations in nonlethal energetic costs. Can J Zool. 81(4):699–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui F. 2013. Studies on the predatory behavior of mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi) as one species of piscivore (pp. 1–102) [Master thesis]. Beijing (China): University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• DeBoom CS, Wahl DH. 2013. Effects of coarse woody habitat complexity on predator–prey interactions of four freshwater fish species. Trans Am Fish Soc. 142(6):1602–1614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl S. 1993. Effects of habitat structure on resource availability, diet and growth of benthivorous perch, Perca Fluviatilis. Oikos. 67(3):403–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einfalt LM, Wojcieszak DB, Wahl DH. 2013. Behavior, growth and habitat selection of hatchery esocids reared with artificial vegetation. Trans Am Fish Soc. 142(2):345–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn AJ, Ritz DA. 1999. Effect of habitat complexity and predatory style on the capture success of fish feeding on aggregated prey. J Mar Biol Ass. 79(3):487–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadomski DM, Parsley MJ. 2005. Effects of turbidity, light level, and coverage on predation of white sturgeon larvae by prickly sculpins. Trans Am Fish Soc. 134(2):369–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaly AE, Kamal M, Mahmoud NS. 2005. Phytoremediation of aquaculture wastewater for water recycling and production of fish feed. Environ Int. 31(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotceitas V. 1990. Variation in plant stem density and its effects on foraging success of juvenile bluegill sunfish. Environ Biol Fish. 27(1):63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotceitas V, Colgan P. 1989. Predator foraging success and habitat complexity: quantitative test of the threshold hypothesis. Oecologia. 80(2):158–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayse JW, Wissing TE. 1996. Effects of stem density of artificial vegetation on abundance and growth of age-0 bluegills and predation by largemouth bass. Trans Am Fish Soc. 125(3):422–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson ES. 1979. Interactions between piscivorous fishes and their prey. In: Stoud RH, Clepper H, editors. Predator-prey systems in fisheries management. Washington (DC): Sport Fishing Institute; pp. 231–241
   Google Scholar
• Howard RK, Koehn JD. 1985. Population dynamics and feeding ecology of pipefish (Syngnathidae) associated with eelgrass beds of Western Port, Victoria. Mar Freshwat Res. 36(3):361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James PL, Heck KL. 1994. The effects of habitat complexity and light-intensity on ambush predation within a simulated seagrass habitat. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 176:187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck KL, Jr, Thoman TA. 1981. Experiments on predator-prey interactions in vegetated aquatic habitats. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 53(2-3):125–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Hicks BJ, Guo CB, Li ZJ, Liu JS, Zhang TL. 2014. Does hatchery-reared Siniperca chuatsi (Actinopterygii, Perciformes) compete significantly with two wild Siniperca populations for diets in a shallow lake? Hydrobiologia. 741(1):125–138. doi:10.1007/s10750-014-1866-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Li Z. 2009. In situ nutrient removal from aquaculture wastewater by aquatic vegetable Ipomoea aquatica on floating beds. Water Sci Technol. 59(10):1937–1943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Zhang TL, Ye SW, Liu JS, Li ZJ. 2013a. Feeding habits and predator-prey size relationships of mandarin fish Siniperca chuatsi (Basilewsky) in a shallow lake, central China. J Appl Ichthyol. 29(1):56–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Zhang TL, Zhang CW, Li ZJ, Liu JS, Hicks BJ. 2013b. Effects of turbidity and light intensity on foraging success of juvenile mandarin fish Siniperca chuatsi (Basilewsky). Environ Biol Fish. 96(8):995–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang XF. 1996. The structure and behavioural response of lateral line of Siniperca chuatsi in relation to its feeding habit. Ocean Limnol Sin Chin. 27:457–462.
   Google Scholar
• Liang XF, Kiu JK, Huang BY. 1998. The role of sense organs in the feeding behaviour of Chinese perch. J Fish Biol. 52(5):1058–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang XF, Lin XT, Li SQ, Liu JK. 2008. Impact of environmental and innate factors on the food habit of Chinese perch Siniperca chuatsi (Basilewsky) (Percichthyidae). Aquac Res. 39(2):150–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu LW, Liang XF, Fang JG. 2015. The optimal stocking density for hybrid of Siniperca chuatsi (female) x Siniperca scherzeri (male) mandarin fish fed minced prey fish. Aquac Res. 48(3):1342–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons C, Eckert G, Stoner AW. 2016. Influence of temperature and congener presence on habitat preference and fish predation in blue (Paralithodes platypus Brandt, 1850) and red (P. camtschaticus Tilesius, 1815) king crabs (Anomura: Lithodidae). J Crustacean Biol. 36(1):12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacRae PSD, Jackson DA. 2001. The influence of smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) predation and habitat complexity on the structure of littoral fish assemblages. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 58:342–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel MJ, Adams MM. 2009. Differential effects of structural complexity on predator foraging behavior. Behavior Ecol. 20(2):313–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray GPD, Stillman RA, Britton JR. 2016. Habitat complexity and food item size modify the foraging behaviour of a freshwater fish. Hydrobiologia. 766(1):321–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orrock JL, Preisser EL, Grabowski JH, Trussell GC. 2013. The cost of safety: refuges increase the impact of predation risk in aquatic systems. Ecology. 94(3):573–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrand KG, Braeutigam BJ, Wahl DH. 2004. Consequences of vegetation density and prey species on spotted gar foraging. Trans Am Fish Soc. 133(3):794–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson L, Eklov P. 1995. Prey refuges affecting interactions between piscivorous perch and juvenile perch and roach. Ecology. 76(1):70–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryer CH. 1988. Pipefish foraging: effects of fish size, prey size and altered habitat complexity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 48:37–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savino JF, Stein RA. 1982. Predator-prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Trans Am Fish Soc. 111(3):255–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savino JF, Stein RA. 1989a. Behavioral interactions between fish predators and their prey: effects of plant-density. Anim Behav. 37:311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savino JF, Stein RA. 1989b. Behavior of fish predators and their prey: habitat choice between open water and dense vegetation. Environ Biol Fish. 24(4):287–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharf I, Nulman E, Ovadia O, Bouskila A. 2006. Efficiency evaluation of two competing foraging modes under different conditions. Am Nat. 168(3):350–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz ST, Kruschel C. 2010. Frequency and success of ambush and chase predation in fish assemblages associated with seagrass and bare sediment in an Adriatic lagoon. Hydrobiologia. 649(1):25–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikawa DC, Yakupitiyage A. 2010. The hydroponic production of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L) by using hybrid catfish (Clarias macrocephalus×C. gariepinus) pond water: potentials and constraints. Agric Water Manage. 97(9):1317–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer PM, Mattila J, Heck KL. 2000. The effects of vegetation density on the relative growth rates of juvenile pinfish, Lagodon rhomboides (Linneaus), in Big Lagoon, Florida. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 244(1):67–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahr KJ, Shoup DE. 2016. The effects of macrophyte stem density and structural complexity on foraging return of invertivorous juvenile largemouth bass. N Am J Fish Manage. 36(4):788–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein RA. 1977. Selective predation, optimal foraging, and the predator-prey interaction between fish and crayfish. Ecology. 58(6):1237–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart-Smith RD, Stuart-Smith JF, White RWG, Barmuta LA. 2007. The impact of an introduced predator on a threatened galaxiid fish is reduced by the availability of complex habitats. Freshwat Biol. 52(8):1555–1563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundbaum K, Näslund I. 1998. Effects of woody debris on the growth and behaviour of Brown Trout in experimental stream channels. Can J Zool. 76(1):56–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trang NTD, Brix H. 2014. Use of planted biofilters in integrated recirculating aquaculture-hydroponics systems in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Aquac Res. 45(3):460–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valinoti CE, Ho CK, Armitage AR. 2011. Native and exotic submerged aquatic vegetation provide different nutritional and refuge values for macroinvertebrates. J. Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 409(1-2):42–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valley RD, Bremigan MT. 2002. Effects of macrophyte bed architecture on largemouth bass foraging: implications of exotic macrophyte invasions. Trans Am Fish Soc. 131(2):234–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warfe DM, Barmuta LA. 2004. Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species. Oecologia. 141(1):171–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winfield IJ. 1986. The influence of simulated aquatic macrophytes on the zooplankton consumption rate of juvenile roach, Rutilus rutilus, rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus, and perch, Perca fluviatilis. J Fish Biol. 29:37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar