Distinctive macroinvertebrate communities in a subtropical river network

References

• Allen JD. 1995. Stream ecology. Structure and function of running waters. Dordrecht/ Boston/ London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Allan JD. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 35(1):257–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altermatt F, Seymour M, Martinez N. 2013. River network properties shape α‐diversity and community similarity patterns of aquatic insect communities across major drainage basins. J Biogeogr. 40(12):2249–2260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in wadeable streams and rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, 2nd ed. EPA 841-B-99-002. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water.
   Google Scholar
• Becker JC, Rodibaugh KJ, Labay BJ, Bonner TH, Zhang Y, Nowlin WH. 2014. Physiographic gradients determine nutrient concentrations more than land use in a Gulf Slope (USA) river system. Freshw Sci. 33(3):731–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Borcard D. 2008a. Modelling directional spatial processes in ecological data. Ecol Model. 21:325–336.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Borcard D. 2008. Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology. 89(9):2623–2632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles DE, Arsuffi TL. 1993. Karst aquatic ecosystems of the Edwards Plateau region of central Texas, USA: a consideration of their importance, threats to their existence, and efforts for their conservation. Aquatic Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 3(4):317–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AV, Brussock PP. 1991. Comparisons of benthic invertebrates between riffles and pools. Hydrobiologia. 220(2):99–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown BL, Swan CM. 2010. Dendritic network structure constrains metacommunity properties in riverine ecosystems. J Anim Ecol. 79(3):571–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter JL, Resh VH. 2001. After site selection and before data analysis: sampling, sorting, and laboratory procedures used in stream benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring programs by USA state agencies. J North Amer Benthol Soc. 20(4):658–682.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo-Escrivà A, Valls L, Rochera C, Camacho A, Rochera L, Mesquita-Joanes F. 2017. Disentangling environmental, spatial, and historical effects on ostracod communities in shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia. 787(1):61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caston, CB, Nowlin, WH, Gaulke, A, Vanni, MJ. 2009. The relative importance of heterotrophic bacteria to pelagic ecosystem dynamics varies with reservoir trophic state. Limnology and Oceanography. 54:2143–2156.
   Google Scholar
• Cauvy-Fraunié S, Espinosa R, Andino P, Jacobsen D, Dangles O. 2015. Invertebrate metacommunity structure and dynamics in an Andean glacial stream network facing climate change. PloS One. 10(8):e0136793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottenie K. 2005. Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol Lett. 8(11):1175–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dascher ED, Burlakova LE, Karatayev AY, Ford DF, Schwalb AN. 2018. Distribution of unionid freshwater mussels and host fishes in Texas. A study of broad-scale spatial patterns across basins and a strong climate gradient. Hydrobiologia. 810(1):315–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datry T, Bonada N, Heino J. 2016. Towards understanding the organisation of metacommunities in highly dynamic ecological systems. Oikos. 125(2):149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis J, Pavlova A, Thompson R, Sunnucks P. 2013. Evolutionary refugia and ecological refuges: key concepts for conserving Australian arid zone freshwater biodiversity under climate change. Glob Change Biol. 19(7):1970–1984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz PH. 2014. Photographic guide to the aquatic invertebrates of the upper San Marcos River Hays County, San Marcos, Texas. 1st ed. ISBN-13 978-1500260170.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz PH. 2016a. Key to Ephemeroptera of Texas. San Marcos: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz PH. 2016b. Key to Trichoptera families of Texas. San Marcos: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds WK, Oakes RM. 2008. Headwater influences on downstream water quality. Environ Manage. 41(3):367–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolédec S, Tachet H. 1989. Ecological observations and life histories of five net‐spinning caddisflies (Trichoptera) of the lower ardèche river. Aquatic Insects. 11(2):89–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dray SP, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR. 2006. Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol Model. 196(3/4):483–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feminella JW. 2000. Correspondence between stream macroinvertebrate assemblages and 4 ecoregions of the southeastern USA. J North Amer Benthol Soc. 19(3):442–461.
   Google Scholar
• Göthe E, Angeler DG, Sandin L. 2013. Metacommunity structure in a small boreal stream network. J Anim Ecol. 82(2):449–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves-Souza T, Romero GQ, Cottenie K. 2014. Metacommunity versus biogeography: a case study of two groups of Neotropical vegetation-dwelling arthropods. Plos One.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith GE, Bryce SA, Omernik JM, Comstock JA, Rogers AC, Harrison B, Hatch SL, Bezanson D. 2004. Ecoregions of Texas (color poster with map, descriptive text, and photographs): Reston, VA, U. S. Geological Survey (map scale 1:2,500,000).
   Google Scholar
• Heino J, Melo AS, Bini LM, Altermatt F, Al-Shami SA, Angeler DG, Bonada N, Brand C, Callisto M, Cottenie K, et al. 2015. A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels. Ecol Evol. 5(6):1235–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino J, Melo AS, Siqueira T, Soininen J, Valanko S, Bini LM. 2015. Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects. Freshw Biol. 60(5):845–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino J, Soininen J, Alahuhta J, Lappalainen J, Virtanen R. 2017. Metacommunity ecology meets biogeography: effects of geographical region, spatial dynamics and environmental filtering on community structure in aquatic organisms. Oecologia. 183:12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Gallagher ED. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia. 129(2):271–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Legendre L. 2012. Numerical Ecology, 3rd edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Leibold MA, Economo EP, Peres-Neto P. 2010. Metacommunity phylogenetics: separating the roles of environmental filters and historical biogeography. Ecol Lett. 13(10):1290–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold MA, Holyoak M, Mouquet N, Amarasekare P, Chase JM, Hoopes MF, Holt RD, Shurin JB, Law R, Tilman D, Loreau M. 2004. The metacommunity concept: A framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol Lett. 7:601–613.
   Google Scholar
• Logue JB, Mouquet N, Peter H, Hillebrand H. Metacommunity Working Group 2011. Empirical approaches to metacommunities: a review and comparison with theory. Trends Ecol. Evolut. 26(9):482–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB. 2008. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 4th ed. Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mykrä H, Heino J, Muotka T. 2004. Variability of lotic macroinvertebrate assemblages and stream habitat characteristics across hierarchical landscape classifications. Environ Manage. 34(3):341–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MH, Wagner H. 2017. Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
   Google Scholar
• Omernik JM. 1987. Map Supplement Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States. Ann Assoc Amer Geograp. 77(1):118–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D. 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology. 87(10):2614–2625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pont D, Hugueny B, Beier U, Goffaux D, Melcher A, Noble R, Rogers C, Roset N, Schmutz S. 2006. Assessing river biotic condition at a continental scale: a European approach using functional metrics and fish assemblages. J Appl Ecol. 43(1):70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Core Team R. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rice SP, Greenwood MT, Joyce CB. 2001. Tributaries, sediment sources, and the longitudinal organization of macroinvertebrate fauna along river systems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 58(4):824–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmera D, Árva D, Boda P, Bódis E, Bolgovics Á, Borics G, Csercsa A, Deák C, Krasznai EÁ, Lukács BA, Mauchart P. 2018. Does isolation influence the relative role of environmental and dispersal‐related processes in stream networks? An empirical test of the network position hypothesis using multiple taxa. Freshw Biol. 2018:74–85.
   Google Scholar
• Schwalb AN, Morris TJ, Mandrak NE, Cottenie K. 2013. Distribution of unionid freshwater mussels depends on the distribution of host fishes on a regional scale. Diversity Distrib. 19(4):446–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart KW, Baumann RW, Stark BP. 1973. The distribution and past dispersal of southwestern United States Plecoptera. Trans Amer Entomol Soc. 99:507–546.
   Google Scholar
• Szytko SW, Stewart KW. 1977. The stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Texas. Trans Amer Entomol Soc. 103:327–378.
   Google Scholar
• Vilmi A, Karjalainen SM, Hellsten S, Heino J. 2016. Bioassessment in a metacommunity context: Are diatom communities structured solely by species sorting? Ecol Indic. 62:86–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentworth CK. 1922. A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol. 30(5):377–392.
   Google Scholar
• Williams DD. 2006. The biology of temporary waters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winegardner AK, Jones BK, Ng IS, Siqueira T, Cottenie K. 2012. The terminology of metacommunity ecology. Trends Ecol Evol (Amst). 27(5):253–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawalski R. 2017. Benthic macroinvertebrate community structure of the Guadalupe River Basin, San Marcos, TX. Texas State University.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang J, Wang L, Lu D, Cai D, Wang B. 2014. Influences of dispersal and local environmental factors on stream macroinvertebrate communities in Qinjiang River, Guangxi, China. Aquat Biol. 20(3):185–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao K, Song K, Pan Y, Wang L, Da L, Wang Q. 2017. Metacommunity structure of zooplankton in river networks: roles of environmental and spatial factors. Ecol Indic. 73:96–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar