Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Freshwater Ecology Volume 34, 2019 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
998
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Fish community response to in-channel woody debris in a channelized river system

Michael W. ArcherSchool of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA; ;Surface Water Division, Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality, Lincoln, NE, USA; View further author information
,
Brenda M. PracheilEnvironmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USAView further author information
,
Alexandrea E. OttoSchool of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA; View further author information
&
Mark A. PeggSchool of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA; Correspondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 351-362 | Received 29 Nov 2018, Accepted 25 Apr 2019, Published online: 20 May 2019

References

  • Acuña V, Díez JR, Flores L, Meleason M, Elosegi A. 2013. Does it make economic sense to restore rivers for their ecosystem services?. J Appl Ecol . 50(4):988–997.
  • Angermeier PL, Karr JR. 1984. Relationships between woody debris and fish habitat in a small warmwater stream. Trans Amer Fisher Soc. 113(6):716–726.
  • Archer MW. 2010. Retention, movement, and the biotic response to large woody debris in the channelized Missouri River [master’s thesis]. Lincoln (NE): University of Nebraska.
  • Beechie TJ, Sear DA, Olden JD, Pess GR, Buffington JM, Moir H, Roni P, Pollock MM. 2010. Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. BioScience. 60(3):209–222.
  • Dolloff CA, Warren ML. Jr, 2003. Fish relationships with large wood in small streams. In: Gregory, S, Boyer, KL, Gurnell, AM, editors. The Ecology and Management of Wood in World Rivers American Fisheries Society, Symposium, Vol. 37, Bethesda, Maryland, p. 179–193.
  • Drobish M. editor. 2006. Missouri River standard operating procedures for sampling and data collection, Vol. 1.1. SD: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; p. 162.
  • Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata ZI, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard A, Soto D, Stiassny ML, Sullivan CA. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev. 81(02):163–182.
  • Fruget JF. 1992. Ecology of the lower Rhône after 200 years of human influence: a review. Regul Riv: Res Mgmt. 7(3):233–246.
  • Guyette RP, Cole WG, Dey DC, Muzika RM. 2002. Perspectives on the age and distribution of large wood in riparian carbon pools. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 59(3):578–585.
  • Harmon ME, Franklin JF, Swanson FJ, Sollins P, Gregory SV, Lattin JD, Anderson NH, Cline SP, Aumen NG, Sedell JR, et al. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv Ecol Res. 15:133–302.
  • Hesse LW, Sheets W. 1993. The Missouri River hydrosystem. Fisheries. 18(5):5–14.
  • Johnson SL, Rodgers JD, Solazzi MF, Nickelson TE. 2005. Effects of an increase in large wood on abundance and survival of juvenile salmonids (Oncorhynchus spp.) in an Oregon coastal stream. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 62(2):412–424.
  • Jongman R. 2002. Homogenisation and fragmentation of the European landscape: ecological consequences and solutions. Lands Urb Plan. 58(2-4):211–221.
  • Kennedy TL, Turner TF. 2011. River channelization reduces nutrient flow and macroinvertebrate diversity at the aquatic terrestrial transition zone. Ecosphere. 2:1–13.
  • Lehtinen RM, Mundahl ND, Madejczyk JC. 1997. Autumn use of woody snags by fishes in backwater and channel border habitats of a large river. Environ Biol Fish. 49:7–19.
  • Lepori F, Palm D, Brännäs E, Malmqvist B. 2005. Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecol Appl. 15(6):2060–2071.
  • Oberdorff T, Tedesco PA, Hugueny B, Leprieur F, Beauchard O, Brosse S, Dürr HH. 2011. Global and regional patterns in riverine fish species richness: a review. Int J Ecol. 2011:12.
  • Oksanen O, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, et al. 2016. Vegan: community ecology package. R Package Version 2.3-5. accessed [3 October 2018]. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
  • Pegg MA, Pierce CL. 2002. Fish community structure in the Missouri and lower Yellowstone rivers in relation to flow characteristics. Hydrobiologia. 479(1/3):155–167.
  • Pracheil BM, McIntyre PB, Lyons JD. 2013. Enhancing conservation of large-river biodiversity by accounting for tributaries. Front Ecol Environ. 11(3):124–128.
  • R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
  • Ridenour CJ, Starostka AB, Doyle WJ, Hill TD. 2009. Habitat used by Macrhybopsis chubs associated with channel modifying structures in a large regulated river: implications for river modification. River Res Appl. 25(4):472–485.
  • Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Reidy Liermann C, et al. 2010. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature. 467(7315):555–561.
  • Wolter C, Arlinghaus R. 2003. Navigation impacts on freshwater fish assemblages: the ecological relevance of swimming performance. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 13(1):63–89.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.