1,419
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Note

A comparison between fixed and random sampling of a low density spotted bass population in a large river

, , , &
Pages 533-540 | Received 01 Apr 2019, Accepted 07 Jun 2019, Published online: 25 Jun 2019

References

  • Baker JA, Killgore KJ, Kasul RL. 1991. Aquatic habitats and fish communities in the lower Mississippi River. Aquat Sci. 3:313–356.
  • Bonvechio KI, Allen MS, Bonvechio TF, Coughlin TP. 2008. Comparison of largemouth bass assessment metrics between standardized and historical sampling designs at six Florida lakes. N Am J Fish Manag. 28(4):1132–1137.
  • Brown ML, Allen MS, Beard TD Jr. 2012. Data management and statistical techniques. In Zale AV, Parrish DL, Sutton TM, editors. Fisheries techniques. 3rd ed. Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society; p. 15–75.
  • Carlson BD, Propst DB, Synes DJ, Jackson RS. 1995. Economic impact of recreation on the Upper Mississippi River System. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Technical Report EL-95-16.
  • Chick JH, Pegg MA, Koel TM. 2006. Spatial patterns of fish communities in the upper Mississippi River: assessing fragmentation by low – head dams. River Res Appl. 22(4):413–427.
  • Gabelhouse DW Jr. 1984. A length categorization system to assess fish stocks. N Am J Fish Manag. 4(3):273–285.
  • Gammon JR. 1998. The Wabash river ecosystem. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • King TA, Williams JC, Davies WD, Shelton WL. 1981. Fixed versus random sampling of fishes in a large reservoir. Trans Am Fish Soc. 110(4):563–568.
  • McClelland MA, Sass GG. 2012. Assessing fish collections from random and fixed site sampling methods on the Illinois River. J Freshw Ecol. 27(3):325–333.
  • Neumann RB, Guy CS, Willis DW. 2012. Length, weight, and associated indices. In Zale AV, Parrish DL, Sutton TM, editors. Fisheries techniques. 3rd ed. Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society; p. 637–676.
  • Patterson CP. 2014. A comparison of a fixed vs. stratified random sampling design for electrofishing Largemouth Bass in Oklahoma. J Southeastern Assoc Fish Wildlife Agencies. 1:70–74.
  • Pegg MA, McClelland MA. 2004. Spatial and temporal patterns in fish communities along the Illinois River. Ecol Freshwater Fish. 13(2):125–135.
  • Pyron M, Lauer TE. 2004. Hydrological variation and fish assemblage structure in the middle Wabash River. Hydrobiologia. 525(1-3):203–213.
  • Quist MC, Gerow KG, Bower MR, Hubert WA. 2006. Random versus fixed-site sampling when monitoring relative abundance of fishes in headwater streams of the Upper Colorado River Basin. N Am J Fish Manag. 26(4):1011–1019.
  • R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
  • Ratcliff EN, Gittinger EJ, O’Hara TM, Ickes BS. 2014. Long term resource monitoring program procedures: fish monitoring. 2nd ed. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Upper Mississippi River Restoration LTRMP 2014-P001.
  • Slipke JW, Martin AD, Pitlo J Jr, Maceina MJ. 2002. Use of the spawning potential ratio for the upper Mississippi River channel catfish fishery. N Am J Fish Manag. 22(4):1295–1300.
  • Sparks RE, Bayley PB, Kohler S, Osborne LL. 1990. Disturbance and recovery of large floodplain rivers. Environ Manage. 14(5):699–709.
  • Sparks RE, Nelson JC, Yin Y. 1998. Naturalization of the flood regime in regulated rivers: the case of the upper Mississippi River. Bioscience. 48(9):706–720.
  • Smith PW. 2002. The fishes of Illinois. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
  • USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2015. USGS Current Conditions for the Nation. Department of the Interior. [July 2016]. //nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/uv.