1,921
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Spatial distribution patterns of benthic macroinvertebrate functional feeding groups by stream size and gradient in Republic of Korea

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 715-738 | Received 28 Jun 2019, Accepted 01 Oct 2019, Published online: 22 Oct 2019

References

  • Allan JD, Castillo MM. 2007. Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • AQEM Consortium. 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM system. A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the water framework directive, version, 1. Germany: University Duisburg-Essen. Contract No: EVK1-CT1999-00027, EU Projects. European Union.
  • Arle J, Blondzik K, Claussen U, Duffek A, Grimm S, Hilliges F, Hoffmann A, Leujak W, Mohaupt V, Naumann S, et al. 2014. Environmental policy, water resources management in Germany. Part 2. Water quality, federal ministry of environment, nature conservation, building and nuclear safety, 53048 Bonn. Bonn: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Construction and Nuclear Safety.
  • Bae YJ, Won DH, Lee WJ, Seung HW. 2003. Development of environment assessment technique and biodiversity management system and their application to stream ecosystems in Korea. Korean J Environ Biol. 21(3):223–233.
  • Baptista DF, Buss DF, Dias LG, Nessimian JL, Da Silva ER, De Moraes Neto AHA, de Carvalho SN, De Oliveira MA, Andrade LR. 2006. Functional feeding groups of Brazilian Ephemeroptera nymphs: ultrastructure of mouthparts. Ann Limnol - Int J Lim. 42:87–96.
  • Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Griffith GE, Frydenborg R, McCarron E, White JS, Bastian ML. 1996. A framework for biological criteria for Florida streams using benthic macroinvertebrates. J North Am Benthol Soc. 15(2):185–211.
  • Barman B, Gupta S. 2015. Spatial distribution and functional feeding groups of aquatic insects in a stream of Chakrashila Wildlife Sanctuary. Assam, India. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst. 416:37.
  • Beauchard O, Gagneur J, Brosse S. 2003. Macroinvertebrate richness patterns in North African streams. J Biogeogr. 30(12):1821–1833.
  • Bhawsar A, Bhat MA, Vyas V. 2015. Distribution and composition of macroinvertebrates functional feeding groups with reference to catchment area in Barna Sub-Basin of Narmada River Basin. IJSRES. 3(11):385–393.
  • Brasil LS, Juen L, Batista JD, Pavan MG, Cabette H. 2014. Longitudinal distribution of the functional feeding groups of aquatic insects in streams of the Brazilian Cerrado Savanna. Neotrop Entomol. 43(5):421–428.
  • Buss DF, Baptista DF, Silveira MP, Nessimian JL, Dorvillé L. 2002. Influence of water chemistry and environmental degradation on macroinvertebrate assemblages in a river basin in South-East Brazil. Hydrobiologia. 481(1/3):125–136.
  • Carrie R, Dobson M, Barlow J. 2015. The influence of geology and season on macroinvertebrates in Belizean streams: implications for tropical bioassessment. Freshw Sci. 34(2):648–662.
  • Carter JL, Fend SV. 2001. Inter-annual changes in the benthic community structure of riffles and pools in reaches of contrasting gradient. Hydrobiologia. 459(1/3):187–200.
  • Cummins KW. 1973. Trophic relations of aquatic insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 18(1):183–206.
  • Cummins KW. 1974. Structure and function of stream ecosystems. BioScience. 24(11):631–641.
  • Cummins KW, Klug MJ. 1979. Feeding ecology of stream invertebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 10(1):147–172.
  • Cummins KW, Merritt RW, Andrade PC. 2005. The use of invertebrate functional groups to characterize ecosystem attributes in selected streams and rivers in south Brazil. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ. 40(1):69–89.
  • Davis WM. 1899. The geographical cycle. Geogr J. 14(5):481–504.
  • Fenoglio S, Badino G, Bona F. 2002. Benthic macroinvertebrate communities as indicators of river environment quality: an experience in Nicaragua. Rev Biol Trop. 50(3–4):1125–1131.
  • Ferréol M, Dohet A, Cauchie H-M, Hoffmann L. 2005. A top-down approach for the development of a stream typology based on abiotic variables. Hydrobiologia. 551(1):193–208.
  • Fierro P, Bertrán C, Mercado M, Peña-Cortés F, Tapia J, Hauenstein E, Caputo L, Vargas-Chacoff L. 2015. Landscape composition as a determinant of diversity and functional feeding groups of aquatic macroinvertebrates in southern rivers of the Araucanía, Chile. Lat Am J Aquat Res. 43(1):186–200.
  • Fu L, Jiang Y, Ding J, Liu Q, Peng QZ, Kang MY. 2016. Impacts of land use and environmental factors on macroinvertebrate functional feeding groups in the Dongjiang River basin, southeast China. J Freshw Ecol. 31(1):21–35.
  • George ADI, Abowei JFN, Alfred-Ockiya JF. 2010. The distribution, abundance and seasonality of benthic macro invertebrate in Okpoka creek sediments, Niger Delta, Nigeria. Res J Appl Sci Eng Technol. 2(1):11–18.
  • Glaz P, Sirois P, Nozais C. 2012. Determination of food sources for benthic invertebrates and brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis in Canadian Boreal Shield lakes using stable isotope analysis. Aquat Biol. 17(2):107–117.
  • Heino J, Parviainen J, Paavola R, Jehle M, Louhi P, Muotka T. 2005. Characterizing macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in relation to stream size and tributary position. Hydrobiologia. 539(1):121–130.
  • Hwang S-J, Kim N-Y, Yoon SA, Kim B-H, Park MH, You K-A, Lee HY, Kim HS, Kim YJ, Lee J, Lee OM, et al. 2011. Distribution of benthic diatoms in Korean rivers and streams in relation to environmental variables. Ann Limnol Int J Lim. 47(S1):S15–S33.
  • Hynes HBN. 1970. The ecology of running waters. Vol. 555. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
  • Jacobsen D, Schultz R, Encalada A. 1997. Structure and diversity of stream invertebrate assemblages: the influence of temperature with altitude and latitude. Freshw Biol. 38(2):247–261.
  • Jiang X-M, Xiong J, Qiu J-W, Wu J-M, Wang J-W, Xie Z-C. 2010. Structure of macroinvertebrate communities in relation to environmental variables in a subtropical Asian river system. Int Rev Hydrobiol. 95(1):42–57.
  • Jun Y-C, Kim N-Y, Kim S-H, Park Y-S, Kong D-S, Hwang S-J. 2016. Spatial distribution of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in relation to environmental variables in Korean Nationwide streams. Water. 8(1):27.
  • Jun Y-C, Won D-H, Lee S-H, Kong D-S, Hwang S-J. 2012. A multimetric benthic macroinvertebrate index for the assessment of stream biotic integrity in Korea. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 9(10):3599–3628.
  • Kerans BL, Karr JR. 1994. A benthic Index of Biotic Integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley. Ecol Appl. 4(4):768–785.
  • Kim D-H, Chon T-S, Kwak G-S, Lee S-B, Park Y-S. 2016. Effects of land use types on community structure patterns of benthic macroinvertebrates in streams of urban areas in the South of the Korea Peninsula. Water. 8(5):187.
  • Kim J-Y, Kim P-J, Hwang S-J, Lee J-K, Lee S-W, Park C-H, Moon J-S, Kong D-S. 2017. Korean stream types based on benthic macroinvertebrate communities according to stream size and altitude. J Freshw Ecol. 32(1):741–759.
  • Kim KH, Shim ES. 2001. Geochemical characteristics and origin of dissolved ions in the Han River water. Econ Environ Geol. 34(6):539–553.
  • Kong DS, Son SH, Hwang SJ, Won DH, Kim MC, Park JH, Jeon TS, Le JE, Kim JH, Kim JS, et al. 2018. Development of Benthic Macroinvertebrates Index (BMI) for biological assessment on stream environment. J Korean Soc Water Environ. 34(2):183–201.
  • Lee K-S, Keun RJ, Jin AS. 2014. Change of regime coefficient due to dredging and dam construction. J KEDS. 40(1):30–38.
  • Lee SH, Heo IH, Lee KM, Kwon WT. 2005. Classification of local climatic regions in Korea. Korean Meteorol Soc. 41(6):983–995.
  • Lee S-W, Hwang S-J, Lee J-K, Jung D-I, Park Y-J, Kim J-T. 2011. Overview and application of the National aquatic ecological monitoring program (NAEMP) in Korea. Ann Limnol Int J Lim. 47(S1):S3–S14.
  • Leopold LB, Wolman MG. 1957. River channel patterns: braided, meandering, and straight. Geological Survey Professional Paper. Washington (DC): US Government Printing Office.
  • Li F, Chung N, Bae M-J, Kwon Y-S, Park Y-S. 2012. Relationships between stream macroinvertebrates and environmental variables at multiple spatial scales. Freshw Biol. 57(10):2107–2124.
  • Merritt RW, Cummins KW. 1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 3rd ed. Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
  • Merz JE, Ochikubo C. 2005. Effects of gravel augmentation on macroinvertebrate assemblages in a regulated California river. River Res Appl. 21(1):61–74.
  • Ministry of Environment [ME]. 2011. Ecological river restoration techniques guideline. Technical specification. Sejong Metropolitan Autonomous City, Republic of Korea: The Ministry of Environment.
  • ME. 2017. Study on the selection and application of the reference streams in the stream/river ecosystem (II). Sejong Metropolitan Autonomous City, Republic of Korea: Ministry of Environment.
  • ME and NIER. 2013. Survey and evaluation of aquatic ecosystem health in Korea (V). Incheon Metropolitan City, Republic of Korea: The National Institute of Environmental Research.
  • Minshall GW, Petersen RC, Cummins KW, Bott TL, Sedell JR, Cushing CE, Vannote RL. 1983. Interbiome comparison of stream ecosystem dynamics. Ecol Monogr. 53(1):1–25.
  • NIER. 2015. Korean Reach File (KRF) of water environment information system. [accessed 2018 November] http://water.nier.go.kr/publicFront/gisInfo/gisKrf.jsp?menuIdx=5_3#rivernetwork_contents02.
  • Nelson SM, Lieberman DM. 2002. The influence of flow and other environmental factors on benthic invertebrates in the Sacramento river, USA. Hydrobiologia. 489(1/3):117–129.
  • Ohio EPA. 2015. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life. State of Ohio, USA: Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Water Ecological Assessment Section. Biocriteria Manual Volume III. Revised June 2015.
  • Oliveira A, Nessimian JL. 2010. Spatial distribution and functional feeding groups of aquatic insect communities in Serra da Bocaina streams, Southeastern Brazil. Acta Limnol Bras. 22(4):424–441.
  • Olivero AP, Anderson MG. 2008. Northeast aquatic habitat classification system. Arlington County (VA): The Nature Conservancy, Eastern Regional Office.
  • Parsons M, Thoms M, Norris R. 2001. Australian river assessment system: AusRivAS physical assessment protocol. Monitoring River Health Initiative Technical Report. Report Number 22. Canberra, Australia: Environmental Australia.
  • Príncipe RE, Gualdoni CM, Raffani GB, Corigliano MC. 2010. Spatial-temporal patterns of functional feeding groups in mountain streams of Córdoba, Argentina. Ecol Austral. 20:257–268.
  • Ro TH, Chun DJ. 2004. Functional feeding group gatergorization of Korean immature aquatic insects and community stability analysis. Korean J Limnol. 37(2):137–148.
  • Rosenberg DM, Danks H, Lehmkuhl DM. 1986. Importance of insects in environmental impact assessment. Environ Manage. 10(6):773–783.
  • Rosgen DL. 1994. A classification of natural rivers. Catena. 22(3):169–199.
  • Ryu JS, Chang HW, Lee KS. 2008. Hydrogeochemistry and isotope geochemistry of the Han River system: a summary. J Geol Soc Korea. 44(4):467–477.
  • Sandin L. 2003. Benthic macroinvertebrates in Swedish streams: community structure, taxon richness, and environmental relations. Ecography. 26(3):269–282.
  • Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana (IL): The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Press.
  • Sirisinthuwanich K, Sangpradub N, Hanjavanit C. 2016. Development of biotic index to assess the Phong and Cheon rivers’ healths based on benthic macroinvertebrates in Northeastern Thailand. AACL Bioflux. 9(3):680–694.
  • Smith MJ, Kay WR, Edward DHD, Papas PJ, Richardson STJ, Simpson JC, Pinder AM, Cale DJ, Horwitz PHJ, Davis JA, et al. 1999. AusRivAS: using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological condition of rivers in Western Australia. Freshw Biol. 41(2):269–282.
  • Strahler AN. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans AGU. 38(6):913–920.
  • Ter Braak C. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology. 67(5):1167–1179.
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development [USEPA]. 2013. National rivers and streams assessment 2008–2009. Washington (DC): USEPA.
  • USEPA. 2018. National rivers and streams assessment 2018/19: site evaluation guidelines. Washington (DC): USEPA.
  • Uwadiae RE. 2010. Macroinvertebrates functional feeding groups as indices of biological assessment in a tropical aquatic ecosystem: implications for ecosystem functions. N Y Sci J. 3(8):6–15.
  • Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 37(1):130–137.
  • Wallace JB, Webster JR. 1996. The role of macroinvertebrates in stream ecosystem function. Annu Rev Entomol. 41(1):115–139.
  • Walsh MC, Deeds J, Nightingale B. 2007. Classifying lotic systems for conservation: methods and results of the Pennsylvania aquatic community classification. Pittsburgh (PA): Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program, Western Pennsylvania Conservancy.
  • WFD. 2000. E.U. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council establishing a framework for the community action in the field of water policy. Brussels: The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
  • Yun CW, Moon HS. 2009. Classification of forest vegetation type and environmental properties in limestone area of Korea. J Agric Life Sci. 43(2):1–8.
  • Zelinka M, Marvan P. 1961. Zur präazisierung der biologischen klassifikation der reinheid fliessender gewäasser. Arch. Hydrobiol. 57(3):389–407.