Macrophytes as biological indicators of organic pollution in the Lepenci River Basin in Kosovo

References

• Anbarasu K, Anbuselvan G. 2017. Physico-chemical parameter analysis of water in Musiri Taluk, Tamil Nadu, India. World News Nat Sci (WNOFNS). 6(1):36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Baattrup-Pedersen A, Riis T. 1999. Macrophyte diversity and composition in relation to substratum characteristics in regulated and unregulated Danish streams. Freshw Biol. 42(2):375–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birk S, Bonne W, Borja A, Brucet S, Courrat A, Poikane S, Solimini A, Van De Bund W, Zampoukas N, Hering D. 2012. Three hundred ways to assess Europe’s surface waters: an almost complete overview of biological methods to implement the Water Framework Directive. Ecol Indic. 18:31–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birk S, Willby N. 2010. Towards harmonization of ecological quality classification: establishing common grounds in European macrophyte assessment for rivers. Hydrobiologia. 652(1):149–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewin PA, Buckton ST, Ormerod SJ. 1998. River habitat surveys and biodiversity in acid-sensitive rivers. Aquatic Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst. 8(4):501–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brix H. 1997. Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment Wetlands. Water Sci Technol. 35(5):11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Burchardt L, Messyasz B, Stępniak A. 2006. Diversity of phytoplankton community in Borusa and Grundela Ponds. Teka Komisji Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska Przyrodniczego. 3(1):35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bytyçi P, Fetoshi O, Durmishi BH, Etemi FZ, Çadraku H, Ismaili M, Abazi AS. 2018. Status assessment of heavy metals in water of the Lepenci River Basin, Kosova. J Ecol Eng. 19(5):19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bytyçi P, Ymeri P, Czikkely M, Fetoshi O, Shala-Abazi A, Ismaili M, Ramshaj Q, Millaku F. 2019. The application of benthic diatoms in water quality assessment in Lepenci River Basin, Kosovo. J Ecol Eng. 20(11):43–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbiener R, Trémolières M, Mercier JL, Ortscheit A. 1990. Aquatic macrophyte communities as bioindicators of eutrophication in calcareous oligosaprobe stream waters (Upper Rhine plain. Alsace). Vegetatio. 86(1):71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Ciecierska H, Kolada A. 2014. ESMI: a macrophyte index for assessing the ecological status of lakes. Environ Monit Assess. 186(9):5501–5517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.F. W. 1975. Primary production of freshwater macrophytes. Photosynth Product Differ Environ. Hidrobiologia. 12(1):177–180.
   Google Scholar
• Dave G. 1992. Sediment toxicity and heavy metals in eleven lime reference lakes of Sweden. Water Air Soil Pollut. 63(1-2):187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson FH. 1988. Water flow and the vegetation of running waters. In: Veg Inl waters. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson FH, Kern-Hansen U. 1979. The effect of natural and artificial shade on the macrophytes of Lowland streams and the use of shade as a management technique. Int Rev Der Gesamten Hydrobiol Und Hydrogr. 64(4):437–455.
   Google Scholar
• Dodkins I, Aguiar F, Rivaes R, Albuquerque A, Rodríguez-González P, Ferreira MT. 2012. Measuring ecological change of aquatic macrophytes in Mediterranean rivers. Limnologica. 42(2):95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake JC, Heaney SI. 1987. Occurrence of phosphorus and its potential remohilization in the littoral sediments of a productive English lake. Freshwater Biol. 17(3):513–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 14184.2003.
   Google Scholar
• Euro + Med. 2006. Euro + Med PlantBase - the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. [accessed 2017 Oct 02]. http://ww2.bgbm.org/EuroPlusMed/
   Google Scholar
• Gebler D, Kayzer D, Szoszkiewicz K, Budka A. 2014. Artificial neural network modelling of macrophyte indices based on physico-chemical characteristics of water. Hydrobiologia. 737(1):215–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmück N, Haury J, Léglize L, Muller S. 1995. Assessment of the bio-indicator capacity of aquatic macrophytes using multivariate analysis. Hydrobiologia. 301(1):115–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith MB, Hill BH, McCormick FH, Kaufmann PR, Herlihy AT, Selle AR. 2005. Comparative application of indices of biotic integrity based on periphyton, macroinvertebrates, and fish to southern Rocky Mountain streams. Ecol Indic. 5(2):117–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam SM. 1982. A proposed method for monitoring river pollution using macrophytes. Environ Technol Lett. 3(1-11):19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering D, Borja A, Carstensen J, Carvalho L, Elliott M, Feld CK, Heiskanen A-S, Johnson RK, Moe J, Pont D, et al. 2010. The European Water Framework Directive at the age of 10: a critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Sci Total Environ. 408(19):4007–4019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering D, Buffagni A, Moog O, Sandin L, Sommerhäuser M, Stubauer I, Feld C, Johnson R, Pinto P, Skoulikidis N, et al. 2003. The development of a system to assess the ecological quality of streams based on macroinvertebrates – design of the sampling programme within the AQEM project. Internat Rev Hydrobiol. 88(34):345–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering D, Johnson RK, Kramm S, Schmutz S, Szoszkiewicz K, Verdonschot P. 2006. Assessment of European streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish: a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress. Freshw Biol. 51(9):1757–1785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering D, Meier C, Rawer-Jost C, Feld CK, Biss R, Zenker A, Sundermann A, Lohse S, Böhmer J. 2004. Assessing streams in Germany with benthic invertebrates: selection of candidate metrics. Limnologica. 34(4):398– 365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering D, Moog O, Sandin L, Verdonschot P. 2004. Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia. 516(1-3):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes NTH, Whitton BA. 1981. Phytobenthos of the River Tees and its tributaries. Freshw Biol. 11(2):139–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilies S. 1962. Die bedeutungder Stremung fur die Biocenoze i Rhitron und Potamon. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Hydrologie. 1(1):433–435.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2014. ISO 5567-6 Water quality sampling-part 6. Guidance on sampling of rivers and streams.
   Google Scholar
• Jordanov D, Kitanov B, Valjev S. 1963–1964. Flora of RP Bulgaria. Vols. 1and 2. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Jordanov D, Kožuharov B. 1966. Flora of RP Bulgaria. Vol. 3. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Jordanov D, Kožuharov B. 1970. Flora of RP Bulgaria. Vol. 4. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Jordanov D, Kožuharov B. 1979. Flora of RP Bulgaria. Vol. 7. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Josifović M., ed. 1970–1977. Flora SR Srbije, Vols 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Josifovic ML, Stjepanovic L, Jankovic M, Gajic B, Kojic M, Diklic N. 1972. Flora SR Srbije III, SANU, Beograd, Yugoslavia.
   Google Scholar
• Josifovic ML, Stjepanovic L, Jankovic M, Gajic B, Kojic M, Diklic N. 1973. Flora SR Srbije IV, SANU, Beograd, Yugoslavia.
   Google Scholar
• Jusik S, Staniszewski R. 2019. Shading of river channels as an important factor reducing macrophyte biodiversity. Pol J Environ Stud. 28(3):1215–1222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhar U, Germ M, Gaberščik A, Urbanič G. 2011. Development of a river macrophyte Index (RMI) for assessing river ecological status. Limnologica. 41(3):235–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampert W, Sommer U. 1996. Ekologia wód śródlądowych. Poloni: Wydawca Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Linda U, Jolanta J. 2016. Report fitting the assessment system for rivers in Latvia using Macrophytes to the results of the Central Baltic Geographical Intercalibration group, Riga.
   Google Scholar
• Lyche-Solheim A, Feld CK, Birk S, Phillips G, Carvalho L, Morabito G, Mischke U, Willby N, Søndergaard M, Hellsten S, et al. 2013. Ecological status assessment of European lakes: a comparison of metrics for phytoplankton, macrophytes, benthic invertebrates and fish. Hydrobiologia. 704(1):57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maberly SC, Haslam SM. 1988. River plants of Western Europe: the macrophytic vegetation of the watercourses of the European Economic Community. J Ecol. 76(4):1248–1249.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning (MESP). 2010a. General description of hydrography. Pristina.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning (MESP). 2010b. The state of water report in Kosovo, Pristina. 31–35.
   Google Scholar
• Muller S. 1990. Une sequence de groupements vegetaux bio-indicateurs d’eutrophisation croissante des cours d’eau faiblement mineralises des basses vosges greseuses du nord. Comptes Rendus L’Academie Des Sci - Ser III. 3(1):509–514.
   Google Scholar
• Muratov R, Szoszkiewicz K, Zhamangara A, Jusik S, Gebler D, Beisenova R, Akbayeva L. 2015. An attempt to prepare macrophyte index for rivers for assessment watercourses in Kazakhstan. Meteorol Hydrol Water Manage. 3(2):27–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natho G, 1988, HASLAM, S. M., River plants of Western Europe. The macrophytic vegetation of watercourses of the European Economic Community. XII, 512 S., 313 Abb., 171 Tab. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, London, New York, New Rochelle, Melbourne, Sydney, 1987. I. Feddes Repert.
   Google Scholar
• Newbold C, Holmes N. 1987. Nature conservation: water quality criteria and plants as water quality monitors. Water Pollut Control. 186:345–364.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hare MT, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Nijboer R, Szoszkiewicz K, Ferreira T. 2006. Macrophyte communities of European streams with altered physical habitat. Hydrobiologia. 566(1):197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbay H, Yaprak AE, Turan N. 2019. Assessing water quality in the Ceyhan River basin (Turkey) with the use of aquatic macrophytes. Chem Ecol. 35(10):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paparisto K, Demiri M, Mitrushi I, Qosja X. 1988. Flora of Albania. Vol. 1. Tirana: Albanian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Robach F, Thiébaut G, Trémolières M, Muller S. 1996. A reference system for continental running waters: Plant communities as bioindicators of increasing eutrophication in alkaline and acidic waters in north-east France. Hydrobiologia. 340(1-3):67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saric M, Diklic N. 1986. Flora SR Srbije X, SANU, Beograd, Yugoslavia
   Google Scholar
• Schneider S, Krumpholz T, Melzer A. 2000. Indicating the trophic state of running waters by using TIM (trophic index of macrophytes) - exemplary implementation of a new index in the River Inninger Bach. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol. 30(2000):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sierka E, Tomczak A. 2013. Macrophytes in the assessment of river ecological condition on the example of Pszczynka River (Silesian Upland). Environ Socio-Economic Stud. 1(3):14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Singh P, Malik A, Mohan D, Sinha S. 2004. Multivariate statistical techniques for the evaluation of spatial and temporal variations in water quality of Gomti River (India)-a case study. Water Res. 38 (18):3980–3992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siobhan Fennessy M, Cronk JK, Mitsch WJ. 1994. Macrophyte productivity and community development in created freshwater wetlands under experimental hydrological conditions. Ecol Eng. 3(4):469–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniszewski R, Szoszkiewicz K, Zbierska J, Lesny J, Jusik S, Clarke RT. 2006. Assessment of sources of uncertainty in macrophyte surveys and the consequences for river classification. Hydrobiologia. 566(1):235–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szoszkiewicz K, Jusik S, Lawniczak AE, Zgola T. 2010. Macrophyte development in unimpacted lowland rivers in Poland. Hydrobiologia. 656(1):117–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szoszkiewicz K, Jusik S, Zgola T, Czechowska M, Hryc B. 2007. Uncertainty of macrophyte-based monitoring for different types of lowland rivers. Belgian J Bot. 140(1):7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Szoszkiewicz K, Karolewicz K, Ławniczak A, Dawson FH. 2002. An assessment of the MTR aquatic plant bioindication system for determining the trophic status of Polish Rivers. Polish J Environ Stud. 11(4):421–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The plant list 2013. Version 1. www.theplantlist.org.
   Google Scholar
• Thiébaut G, Guérold F, Muller S. 2002. Are trophic and diversity indices based on macrophyte communities pertinent tools to monitor water quality. Water Res. 36(14):3602–3610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiébaut G, Muller S. 1999. A macrophyte communities sequence as an indicator of eutrophication and acidification levels in weakly mineralised streams in north-eastern France. Hydrobiologia. 410(1):17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremp H, Kohler A. 1995. The usefulness of macrophyte monitoring-systems, exemplified on eutrophication and acidification of running waters. Acta Bot Gall. 142(6):541–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutin HG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Moore DM, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA. 1968–1980. Flora Europaea. Vols. 2–5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vangjeli J, Ruci B, Mullaj A, Paparisto K, Xh Q. 2000. Flora of Albania. Vol. 4. Tirana: Albanian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Velćev VD, Kožuharov S. 1982. Flora of RP Bulgaria. Vol. 8. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
   Google Scholar
• WFD. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Parliam.
   Google Scholar
• WFD-UKTAG. 2008. UKTAG river assessment methods macrophytes and phytobenthos macrophytes (River leafpacs). Scotland: Water Framework Directive - United Kingdom Advisody Group (WFD-UKTAG).
   Google Scholar
• WFD-UKTAG. 2014. UKTAG guide to phytobenthos in rivers - diatoms for assessing river and lake ecological quality (DARLEQ2). Scotland: Water Framework Directive – United Kingdom Advisory Group (WFD-UKTAG).
   Google Scholar
• Wiegleb G, Herr W, Zander B, Bröring U, Brux H, van de Weyer K. 2015. Natural variation of macrophyte vegetation of lowland streams at the regional level. Limnologica. 51(1):53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willby N, Pitt JA, Phillips G. 2009. The ecological classification of UK Rivers using aquatic macrophytes. Report – SC010080/R2.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson C. 1988. River plants of Western Europe. The macrophytic vegetation of watercourses of the European Economic Community. S. M. Haslam. Q Rev Biol. ISBN-13: 978–1107634671
   Google Scholar
• Żelazo J. 2006. River and Valley restoration (in Polish). Infrastructure and ecology of rural areas. Polska Akademia Nauk, Oddział w Krakowie, Komisja Technicznej Infrastruktury Wsi. 4(1):11–31.
   Google Scholar