Channel catfish and freshwater drum population demographics across four large Midwestern rivers

References

• Abner JK, Phelps QE. 2018. Latitudinal trends in freshwater drum population dynamics: facing a changing climate. River Res Applic. 34(3):262–269.  
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angradi TR, Bolgrien DW, Jicha TM, Pearson MS, Taylor DL, Moffett MF, Blocksom KA, Walters DM, Elonen CM, Anderson LE, et al. 2011. An assessment of stressor extent and biological condition in the North American mid-continent great rivers (USA). RS. 19(2):48–63.
   Google Scholar
• Arterburn JE, Kirby DJ, Berry CR, Jr. 2002. A survey of angler attitudes and biologist opinions regarding trophy catfish and their management. Fisheries. 27(5):10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barada TJ, Pegg AM. 2011. Population characteristics of channel catfish in the Platte River, Nebraska. In: Michaletz PH, Travnichek VH, editors. Conservation, ecology, and management of catfish: The Second International Symposium. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society, Symposium 77. p. 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Becker GC. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwell BG, Brown ML, Murphy BR. 1995. Development and evaluation of a standard weight (Ws) equation for freshwater drum. Prairie Naturalist. 27:51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Brown AV, Brown KB, Jackson DC, Pier WK. 2005. Lower Mississippi River and its tributaries. In: Benke AC, Cushing CE, editors. Rivers of North America. Burlington (MA): Elsevier Academic Press. p. 231–282.
   Google Scholar
• Buckmeier DL, Warren Schlechte J. 2009. Capture efficiency and size selectivity of channel catfish and blue catfish sampling gears. North Am J Fish Manage. 29(2):404–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueltmann AT, Phelps QE. 2015. Assessment of the middle Mississippi River channel catfish population. Copeia. 103(3):580–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler RL. 1965. Freshwater drum, Aplodinotus grunniens, in the navigational impoundments of the Mississippi River. Trans Am Fish Soc. 94(4):339–349.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler RL, Smith LL, Jr. 1950. The age and rate of growth of the sheepshead, Aplodinotus grunniens Rafinesque, in the Upper Mississippi River navigation pools. Trans Am Fish Soc. 79(1):43–54.2.0.CO;2]
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter SR. 1998. The need for large-scale experiments to assess and predict the response of ecosystems to perturbation. In: Pace ML, Groffman PM, editors. Successes, limitations, and frontiers in ecosystem science. New York: Springer. p. 287–312.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo RE. 2007. Demographics and the ecological role of the Channel Catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) in commercially exploited and unexploited reaches of the Wabash River, with implications for the Flathead Catfish (Pylodictis olivaris). Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo RE, Phelps QE, Garvey JE, Heidinger RC, Stefanavage T. 2008. Gear-specific population demographics of channel catfish in a large midwestern river. N Am J Fish Manage. 2:241–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo RE, Phelps QE, Miller CM, Garvey JE, Heidinger RC, Richards NS. 2010. Comparison of channel catfish age estimates and resulting population demographics using two common structures. N Am J Fish Manage. 30(1):305–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counihan TD, Waite IR, Casper AF, Ward DL, Sauer JS, Irwin ER, Chapman CG, Ickes BS, Paukert CP, Kosovich JJ, et al. 2018. Can data from disparate long-term fish monitoring programs be used to increase our understanding of regional and continental trends in large river assemblages? PLoS One. 13(1):e0191472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBoer JA, Whitten AL, Culver EF, Lubinski BJ, Parker J, Costenbader D, Gibson-Reinemer DK, Casper AF, Cao Y, Chick JH, Epifanio JE. 2017. Long-term survey and assessment of large-river fishes in Illinois, 2016 (Project) F-101-R. Illinois Natural History Survey Technical Report 2016 (28). Annual report prepared for the Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Division of Fisheries and the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• DeBoer JA, Thoms MC, Casper AF, Delong MD. 2019. The response of fish diversity in a highly modified large river system to multiple anthropogenic stressors. J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 124(2):384–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBoer JA, Thoms MC, Lamer JT, Casper AF, Delong MD. 2021. Complex to simple: fish growth along the Illinois River network. Ecol Complexity. 45:100891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBoer JA, Thoms MC, Delong MD. 2022. Ecosystem response through a resilience lens: do differences in the Illinois River over 150 y indicate regime shifts? J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 127, e2021JG006553. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JG006553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delong MD. 2005. Upper Mississippi River basin. In: Benke AC, Cushing CE, editors. Rivers of North America. Burlington (MA): Elsevier Academic Press. p. 327–374.
   Google Scholar
• Donabauer SB. 2009. Population dynamics of flathead, channel, and blue catfish in the Wabash River. Indianapolis (IN): Indiana Department of Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Eder BL, Pegg MA, Mestl GE. 2016. Modeling effects of length limit regulations on riverine populations of channel catfish. North Am J Fish Manage. 36(1):140–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson KA, Sakaris PC, Conner H, Irwin ER. 2021. Hydrologic effects on growth and hatching success of age-0 Channel Catfish in the Tallapoosa River basin: implications for management in regulated systems. North Am J Fish Manage. 41(Special Issue 1):S118-S132.
   Google Scholar
• Fritts MW, DeBoer JA, Gibson-Reinemer DK, Lubinski BJ, McClelland MA, Casper AF. 2017. Over 50 years of fish community monitoring in Illinois’ large rivers: the evolution of methods used by the INHS’s Long-term Survey and Assessment of Large-River Fishes in Illinois. Ill Nat Hist Surv Bull. 41(1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gainer CG, Kim HH, Phelps QE. 2021. Gear specific catch rates and size structure of channel catfish in the Upper Mississippi River. River Res Appl. 37:799–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham K, Deisanti K. 1999. The population and fishery of blue catfish and channel catfish in the Harry S. Truman Dam tailwater, Missouri. In: Irwin ER, Hubert WA, Rabeni CF, Schramm Jr, HL, Coon T, editors. Catfish 2000: Proceedings of the International Ictalurid Symposium. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 24, Bethesda, Maryland. p. 361–376.
   Google Scholar
• Guy CS, Brown ML, editors. 2007. Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel MJ, Spurgeon JJ, Pegg MA. 2021. Catfish population characteristics among river segments with altered fluvial geomorphic conditions in the Missouri River, Nebraska, USA. North Am J Fish Manage. DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HDR Engineering. 2021. Quad Cities aquatic program 2020 annual report. Prepared for Exelon Nuclear. Cordova, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Helms DR. 1975. Variations in the abundance of channel catfish year classes in the upper Mississippi River and causative factors. Iowa Conservation Commission, Iowa Fisheries Technical Series 75-1, Des Moines.
   Google Scholar
• Hubert WA. 1999. Standards for assessment of age and growth data for channel catfish. J Freshwater Ecol. 14(3):313–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isely JJ, Grabowski TB. 2007. Age and growth. In: Guy CS, Brown ML, editors. Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society. p. 187–228.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson ZJ, Quist MC, Larscheid JG. 2008. Growth standards for nine North American fish species. Fisheries Manage. 15(2):107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquemin SJ, Pyron M. 2013. Effects of allometry, sex, and river location on morphological variation of freshwater drum Aplodinotus grunniens in the Wabash River, USA. Copeia. 2013(4):740–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources (KDFW). 2021. Ohio River catfish information. https://fw.ky.gov/Fish/Pages/Ohio_River_Catfish.aspx. Accessed March 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak TJ, Porath MT, Michaletz PH, Travnichek VH. 2011. Catfish science: status and trends in the 21st century. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 77:755–780.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE, Andersen ALAN, Bowman D, Bull CM, Burns E, Dickman CR, Hoffmann AA, Keith DA, Liddell MJ, et al. 2012. Value of long-term studies. Austral Ecology. 37(7):745–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher R. 2019. 2018 commercial catch report exclusive of Lake Michigan. Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Alton, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Michaletz PH, Dillard JG. 1999. A survey of catfish management in the United States and Canada. Fisheries. 24(8):6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda LE, Bettoli PW. 2007. Mortality. In Guy CS, Brown ML, editors. Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society. p. 229–277.
   Google Scholar
• Moody-Carpenter CJ, Radford D, Frey R, Murray T, Yff D, Effert-Fanta E, Bollinger E, Meiners S, Colombo RE. 2020. The long-term fish population monitoring program for the Wabash River, Project Number: F-186-R-05. Eastern Illinois University. Annual report.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann RM, Allen MS. 2007. Size structure. In: Guy, C.S. & Brown, M.L. (Eds.). Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society. p. 375–421.
   Google Scholar
• Ogle DH. 2016. Introductory fisheries analyses with R. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Ogle DH, Wheeler P, Dinno A. 2021. FSA: fisheries stock analysis. R package version 0.8.32. https://github.com/droglenc/FSA. Accessed November 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver DC, Rude NP, Whitledge GW, Stich DS. 2021. Evaluation of recently implemented harvest regulations in a data-limited catfish fishery with Bayesian estimation. North Am J Fish Manage. 41(S1):S364–S378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitlo J, Jr. 1997. Response of upper Mississippi River channel catfish population to changes in commercial harvest regulations. North Am J Fish Manage. 17(4):848–859.
   Google Scholar
• Porath MT, Kwak TJ, Neely BC, Shoup DE. 2021. Catfish 2020, A clear vision of the future. North Am J Fish Manage. 41(S1):S1–S10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope KL, Kruse CG. 2007. Condition. In: Guy CS, Brown ML, editors. Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society. p. 423–471.
   Google Scholar
• Pyron M, Logsdon Muenich R, Casper AF. 2020. Conservation potential of North American large rivers: the Wabash River compared with the Ohio and Illinois rivers. Fish Aquatic Sci. 23(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn S. 2011. Human interactions with catfish. In Michaletz PH, Travnichek VH, editors. Conservation, ecology, and management of catfish: The Second International Symposium. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society. p. 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds JB, Kolz AL. 2012. Electrofishing. In Zale AV, Parrish SL, Sutton TM, editors. Fisheries techniques, 3rd ed. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society. p. 305–362.
   Google Scholar
• Rypel AL. 2007. Sexual dimorphism in growth of freshwater drum. Southeast Nat. 6(2):333–342.2.0.CO;2]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rypel AL. 2011. Meta-analysis of growth for five North American catfishes: effects of climate, hydrologic habitat, and latitudinal countergradients. In Michaletz PH, Travnichek VH, editors. Conservation, ecology, and management of catfish: The Second International Symposium. Bethesda: American Fisheries Society, Symposium 77. pp. 661–677.
   Google Scholar
• Rypel AL, Bayne DR, Mitchell JB. 2006. Growth of freshwater drum from lotic and lentic habitats in Alabama. Trans Am Fish Soc. 135(4):987–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindt AR. 2021. Comparing channel catfish populations in the fragmented Minnesota River. North Am J Fish Manage. DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarnecchia DL, Schooley JD. 2020. Bowfishing in the United States: History, status, ecological impact, and a need for management. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 123(3–4):285–338.
   Google Scholar
• Shephard S, Jackson DC. 2005. Channel Catfish maturation in Mississippi streams. N Am J Fish Manage. 25(4):1467–1475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slipke JW, Martin AD, Pitlo J, Maceina MJ. 2002. Use of the spawning potential ratio for the upper Mississippi River Channel Catfish fishery. North Am J Fish Manage. 22(4):1295–1300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart DR, Long JM, Shoup DE. 2016. Simulation modeling to explore the effects of length-based harvest regulations for ictalurus fisheries. North Am J Fish Manage. 36(5):1190–1204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2012. Commercial Fisheries Baseline Economic Assessment – U.S. waters of the Great Lakes, Upper Mississippi River, and Ohio River Basins. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers GLMRIS Team, p. 92.
   Google Scholar
• USFWS. 2011. National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation.
   Google Scholar
• USFWS. 2016. National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation.
   Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy L. 1938. A quantitative theory of organic growth. Human Biology. 10:181–213.
   Google Scholar
• White D, Johnston K, Miller M. 2005. Ohio River basin. In: Benke AC, Cushing CE, editors. Rivers of North America. Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press. p. 375–426.
   Google Scholar