Glucose-Permeable Interpenetrating Polymer Network Hydrogels for Corneal Implant Applications: A Pilot Study

REFERENCES

• Carlsson D J, Li F, Shimmura S, Griffith M. Bioengineered corneas: How close are we?. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2003; 14(4)192–197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chirila T V. An overview of the development of artificial corneas with porous skirts and the use of PHEMA for such an application. Biomaterials 2001; 22(24)3311–3317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan D, Klenkler B J, Sheardown H. Progress in the development of a corneal replacement: Keratoprostheses and tissue-engineered corneas. Expert Review of Medical Devices 2006; 3(1)59–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith M, Hakim M, Shimmura S, Watsky M A, Li F, Carlsson D, Doillon C J, Nakamura M, Suuronen E, Shinozaki N, Nakata K, Sheardown H. Artificial human corneas: Scaffolds for transplantation and host regeneration. Cornea 2002; 21: S54–61, (Suppl 7)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li F, Carlsson D, Lohmann C, Suuronen E, Vascotto S, Kobuch K, Sheardown H, Munger R, Nakamura M, Griffith M. Cellular and nerve regeneration within a biosynthetic extracellular matrix for corneal transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100(26)15346–15351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan B, Dudenhoefer E J, Dohlman C H. Keratoprosthesis: An update. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2001; 12(4)282–287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peralta R J, Kanellopolous A J. Boston Keratoprosthesis: A long-term prospective clinical study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48, E-Abstract 1895
   Google Scholar
• Alio J L, Mulet M R, Haroun H, et al. Five year follow-up of biocolonisable microporous fluorocarbon haptic (BIOKOP) keratoprosthesis implantation in patients with high risk corneal graft failure. Br J Ophthalmol 2004; 88: 1585–1589
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M K, Lee J L, Wee W R, Lee J H. Seoul-type keratoprosthesis: Preliminary results of the first 7 human cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120: 761–766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber J C. Keratoprosthesis: Past and present. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1988; 28(2)103–109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White J H, Gona O. “Proplast” for keratoprosthesis. Ophthalmic Surg 1988; 19(5)331–333
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cardona H. The Cardona keratoprosthesis: 40 years experience. Refract Corneal Surg 1991; 7(6)468–471
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pintucci S, Pintucci F, Caiazza S, Cecconi M. The Dacron felt colonizable keratoprosthesis: After 15 years. Eur J Ophthalmol 1996; 6(2)125–130
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Legeais J M, Renard G, Parel J M, Serdarevic O, Mei-Mui M, Pouliquen Y. Expanded fluorocarbon for keratoprosthesis cellular ingrowth and transparency. Exp Eye Res 1994; 58(1)41–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell D R. The soft keratoprosthesis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1997; 95: 751–802
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doane M G, Dohlman C H, Bearse G. Fabrication of a kera-toprosthesis. Cornea 1996; 15(2)179–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinkaus-Randall V. Cornea. Principles of Tissue Engineering, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA 2000; 471–491
   Google Scholar
• Ricci R, Pecorella I, Ciardi A, Della Rocca C, Di Tondo U, Marchi V. Strampelli's osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis. Clinical and histological long-term features of three prostheses. Br J Ophthalmol 1992; 76(4)232–234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polack F M, Heimke G. Ceramic keratoprostheses. Ophthalmology 1980; 87(7)693–698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aquavella J V, Rao G N, Brown A C, Harris J K. Keratoprosthesis. Results, complications, and management. Ophthalmology 1982; 89(6)655–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford G J, Chirila T V, Vijayasekaran S, Dalton P D, Constable I J. Preliminary evaluation of a hydrogel core-and-skirt keratoprosthesis in the rabbit cornea. J Refract Surg 1996; 12(4)525–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks C R, Chirila T V, Clayton A B, Fitton J H, Vijayasekaran S, Dalton P D, Lou X, Platten S, Ziegelaar B, Hong Y, Crawford G J, Constable I J. Clinical results of implantation of the Chirila keratoprosthesis in rabbits. Br J Ophthalmol 1998; 82(1)18–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou X. Coppenhagen. v. mechanical characteristics of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) hydrogels crosslinked with various difunctional compounds. Polym Int 2001; 50: 319–325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilhan-Sarac O, Akpek E K. Current concepts and techniques in keratoprosthesis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005; 16: 246–250
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chirila T V, Hicks C R, Dalton P D, Vijayasekaran S, Lou X, Anthony Y H. Artificial Cornea. Prog Polym Sci 1998; 23(3)447–473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace C, Jacob J T, Stoltz A, Bi J J, Bundy K. Corneal epithelial adhesion strength to tethered-protein/peptide modified hydrogel surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005; 72A(1)19–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi J J, Downs J C, Jacob J T. Tethered protein/peptide-surface-modified hydrogels. J Biomater Sci-Polym Ed 2004; 15(7)905–916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi J J, Rochefort J, Jacob J T. Corneal epithelial cell growth over surface-modified hydrogels. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42(4)S267–S267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klenkler B J, Griffith M, Becerril C, West-Mays J A, Sheardown H. EGF-grafted PDMS surfaces in artificial cornea applications. Biomaterials 2005; 26(35)7286–7296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrett K, Griffith C M, Deslandes Y, Pleizier G, Sheardown H. Adhesion of corneal epithelial cells to cell adhesion peptide modified pHEMA surfaces. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2001; 12(6)647–671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans M D, Xie R Z, Fabbri M, Madigan M C, Chaouk H, Beumer G J, Meijs G F, Griesser H J, Steele J G, Sweeney D F. Epithelialization of a synthetic polymer in the feline cornea: A preliminary study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41(7)1674–1680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton B A, Walboomers X F, Dziegielewski M, Evans M D, Taylor S, Jansen J A, Steele J G. Modulation of epithelial tissue and cell migration by microgrooves. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 56(2)195–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney D F, Xie R Z, Evans M D, Vannas A, Tout S D, Griesser H J, Johnson G, Steele J G. A comparison of biological coatings for the promotion of corneal epithelialization of synthetic surface in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44(8)3301–3309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans M D, Xie R Z, Fabbri M, Bojarski B, Chaouk H, Wilkie J S, McLean K M, Cheng H Y, Vannas A, Sweeney D F. Progress in the development of a synthetic corneal onlay. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002; 43(10)3196–3201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney D F, Xie R Z, O'Leary D J, Vannas A, Odell R, Schindhelm K, Cheng H Y, Steele J G, Holden B A. Nutritional requirements of the corneal epithelium and anterior stroma: Clinical findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39(2)284–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney D F, Xie R Z, O'Leary D J, Vannas A, Odell R, Schindhelm K, Cheng H Y, Steele J G, Holden B A. Nutritional requirements of the corneal epithelium and anterior stroma: Clinical findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39(2)284–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie R Z, Stretton S, Sweeney D F. Artificial cornea: Towards a synthetic onlay for correction of refractive error. Biosci Rep 2001; 21(4)513–536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Sheardown H. Glucose permeable poly(dimethyl siloxane) poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) interpenetrating networks as ophthalmic biomaterials. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 233–244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong J P, Katsuyama Y, Kurokawa T, Osada Y. Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength. Adv Mater 2003; 15(14)1155–1158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y, Gong J P, Osada Y. Novel hydrogels with excellent mechanical performance. Prog Polym Sci 2005; 30(1)1–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y, Kurwabara R, Na Y H, Kurokawa T, Gong J P, Osada Y. Determination of fracture energy of high strength double network hydrogels. J Phys Chem B. 2005; 109: 11559–11562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaneko D, Tada T, Kurokawa T, Gong J P, Osada Y. Mechanically strong hydrogels with ultra-low frictional coefficients. Adv Mater 2005; 17(5)535–538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na Y H, Kurokawa T, Katsuyama Y, Tsukeshiba H, Gong J P, Osada Y, Okabe S, Karino T, Shibayama M. Structural characteristics of double network gels with extremely high mechanical strength. Macromol 2004; 37(14)5370–5374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung D, Koh W, Ko J, Hu Y, Carrasco M, Noolandi J, Ta C N, Frank C W. Biomimetic strain hardening in interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels. Polym. 2007; 48: 5376–5387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen K T, West J L. Photopolymerizable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 2002; 23(22)4307–4314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czeslik C, Jackler G, Hazlett T, Gratton E, Steitz R, Wittemann A, Ballauff M. Salt-induced protein resistance of polyelectrolyte brushes studied using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and neutron reflectometry. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2004; 6: 5557–5563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruise G M, Scharp D S, Hubbell J A. Characterization of permeability and network structure of interfacially photopolymerized poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials 1998; 19(14)1287–1294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks C R, Crawford G J, Chirila T V, et al. Development and clinical assessment of an artificial cornea. Prog Retin Eye Res 2000; 19: 149–170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung D, Zheng L, Bakri A, Marshall A, Duhamel P, Carrasco M, Noolandi J, Cochran J R, Frank C W, Ta C N. Development of a novel keratoprosthesis based on photolithographically patterned, biomimetic hydrogels. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48, E-Abstract 1864
   Google Scholar
• Myung D, Koh W, Bakri A, Zhang F, Marshall A, Ko J, Noolandi J, Carrasco M, Cochran J R, Frank C W, Ta C N. Design and fabrication of an artificial cornea based on a photolithographically patterned hydrogel construct. Biomed Microdevices 2007; 9(6)911–922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardona H. Keratoprosthesis: Acrylic optical cylinder with supporting intralamellar plate. Am J Ophthalmol 1962; 54: 284–294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda T, Sugawara T. Photochemical protein fixation on polymer surfaces via derivatized phenyl azido group. Langmuir 1995; 11(6)2272–2276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda T, Inoue K, Sugawara T. Development of micropatterning technology for cultured cells. ASAIO Trans 1990; 36(3)M559–562
   Google Scholar
• Cruise G M, Scharp D S, Hubbell J A. Characterization of permeability and network structure of interfacially photopolymerized poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate hydrogels. Biomater 1998; 19: 1287–1294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers J KM, Bakst G, Busch R S, Hamilton R A. Accuracy of home blood glucose monitors using forearm blood samples: FreeStyle versus One Touch Ultra. Am J Health-System Pharm 2003; 60(11)1130–1135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman B, McGarraugh G, Heller A, Bohannon N, Skyler J, De Leeuw E, Clarke D. FreeStyle: A small-volume electrochemical glucose sensor for home blood glucose testing. Diabetes Technol Ther 2000; 2(2)221–229
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vergnaud J M. General survey on the mass transfers taking place between a polymer and a liquid. J Polym Eng 1996; 15(1–2)57–77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooqui N, Myung D, Masek M, Dalal R, Koh W, Gupta S, Noolandi J, Frank C, Ta C N. Histological evaluation of poly(ethylene glycol)–poly(acrylic acid) (PEG–PAA) double network hydrogel corneal implant. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46, E-Abstract 873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arica M Y, Hasirci V N. Permeability of PHEMA membranes prepared by photoinitiation. Polym Int 1993; 32(2)177–182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoft R A, Friend J, Dohlman C H. Corneal glucose flux. II. Its response to anterior chamber blockade and endothelial damage. Arch Ophthalmol 1971; 86(6)685–691
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinoshita J H, Masurat T, Helfant M. Pathways of glucose metabolism in corneal epithelium. Science 1955; 122: 72–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurice D M (1969) Nutritional aspects of corneal grafts and prostheses. Corneo-Plastic Surgery Proceedings of the Second International Corneo-Plastic Conference, Elmsford, NY, 1969, P V Rycroft. Pergamon Press, London, 197–207
   Google Scholar
• Cardona H. Plastic keratoprosthesis—A description of plastic material and comparative, histologic study of recipient corneas. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964; 58: 247–252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirila T V, Constable I J, Crawford G J, Vijayasekaran S, Thompson D E, Chen Y C, Fletcher W A, Griffin B J. Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) sponges as implant materials: In vivo and in vitro evaluation of cellular invasion. Biomaterials 1993; 14(1)26–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung D, Derr K, Huie P, Noolandi J, Ta K P, Ta C N. Glucose permeability of human, bovine, and porcine corneas in vitro. Ophthal Res 2006; 38(3)158–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarey B E, Schmidt F R. Modeling glucose distribution in the cornea. Curr Eye Res. 1990; 9: 1025–1039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linebarger E, Song D, Ruckhofer J. Intacs: The intrastromal corneal ring. Int Ophthalmol Clin Refract Surg. 2000; 40: 199–208
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruckhofer J, Bohnke M, Alzner E, et al. Confocal microscopy after implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 2144–2151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller L, Marfurt C, Kruse F, Tervo T M. Corneal nerves: Structure, contents and function. Exp Eye Res. 2003; 76: 521–542
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spadea L, Fasciani R, Necozione S, Balestrazzi E. Role of the corneal epithelium in refractive changes following laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Refract Surg. 2000; 16: 133–139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyman G A, Beyer C F, Bezerra Y, Vincent J M, Arosemena A, Friedlander M H, Hoffmann L, Kangeler J, Roussau D. Photoablative inlay laser in situ keratomileusis (PAI-IASIK) in the rabbit model. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31(2)389–397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans M D, McLean K M, Hughes T C, Sweeney D F. A review of the development of a synthetic corneal onlay for refractive correction. Biomaterials 2001; 22(24)3319–3328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar