A Solid-Phase Assay for the Quantitation of Total Protein Eluted from Balafilcon, Lotrafilcon, and Etafilcon Contact Lenses

REFERENCES

• Jones L, Senchyna M, Glasier M A, Schickler J, Forbes I, Louie D, May C. Lysozyme and lipid deposition on silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Cont Lens. 2003; 29: S75–79, discussion S83–74, S192–194
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Senchyna M, Jones L, Louie D, May C, Forbes I, Glasier M. Quantitative and conformational characterization of lysozyme deposited on balafilcon and etafilcon contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 2004; 28: 25–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen R, Schnider C. A next-generation silicone hydrogel lens for daily wear. Optician. 2004; 227: 23–25
   Google Scholar
• Santos L, Rodrigues D, Lira M, Oliveira M E, Oliveira R, Vilar E Y, Azeredo J. The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption, and microbial colonization of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2007; 30: 183–188
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang S, Borazjani R N, Salamone J C, Ahearn D G, Crow S A, Jr., Pierce G E. In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafilcon A hydrogel contact lenses: Effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Cont Lens Ant Eye. 2005; 28: 113–119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Subbaraman L N, Glasier M A, Lorentz H, Senchyna M, Jones L. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2006; 83: 143–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman L N, Glasier M A, Senchyna M, Jones L. Stabilization of lysozyme mass extracted from lotrafilcon silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2005; 82: 209–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman L N, Glasier M A, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Kinetics of in vitro lysozyme deposition on silicone hydrogel, PMMA, and FDA groups I, II, and IV contact lens materials. Curr Eye Res. 2006; 31: 787–796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwala M, Glasier M A, Subbaraman L N, Jones L. Quantity and conformation of lysozyme deposited on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials using an in vitro model. Eye Cont Lens. 2007; 33: 138–143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohnert J L, Horbett T A, Ratner B D, Royce F H. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988; 29: 362–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith D J, Christensen M T, Barry J R, Stein J M. Determination of the lysozyme deposit curve in soft contact lenses. Eye Cont Lens. 2003; 29: 79–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leahy C D, Mandell R B, Lin S T. Initial in vivo tear protein deposition on individual hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1990; 67: 504–511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minarik L, Rapp J. Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact lenses: Effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J. 1989; 15: 185–188
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fowler S A, Korb D R, Allansmith M R. Deposits on soft contact lenses of various water contents. CLAO J. 1985; 11: 124–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bontempo A R, Rapp J. Protein and lipid deposition onto hydrophilic contact lenses in vivo. CLAO J. 2001; 27: 75–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrett Q, Chatelier R C, Griesser H J, Milthorpe B K. Effect of charged groups on the adsorption and penetration of proteins onto and into carboxymethylated poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials. 1998; 19: 2175–2186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltys-Robitaille C E, Ammon D M, Jr, Valint P L, Jr, Grobe G L, III. The relationship between contact lens surface charge and in vitro protein deposition levels. Biomaterials. 2001; 22: 3257–3260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith D, Hong B, Christensen M. A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. Curr Eye Res. 1997; 16: 503–510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, Franklin V, Tighe B. An in vivo comparison of the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 2000; 77: 503–510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minno G E, Eckel L, Groemminger S, Minno B, Wrzosek T. Quantitative analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses: I. Comparison to visual methods of analysis. II. Deposit variation among FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci. 1991; 68: 865–872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith P K, Krohn R I, Hermanson G T, Mallia A K, Gartner F H, Provenzano M D, Fujimoto E K, Goeke N M, Olson B J, Klenk D C. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem. 1985; 150: 76–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry O H, Rosenbrough N J, Farr A, Randall R J. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951; 193: 265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976; 72: 248–254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan G, Nyquist G, Caldwell K D, Payor R, McCraw E C. Quantitation of total protein deposits on contact lenses by means of amino acid analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993; 34: 1804–1813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S T, Mandell R B, Leahy C D, Newell J O. Protein accumulation on disposable extended wear lenses. CLAO J. 1991; 17: 44–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cerulli L, Pocobelli A, Ricci F, Missiroli A, Sabbatini L, Zambonin P. Two methods of examining protein deposits on hydrophilic contact lenses. CLAO J. 1992; 18: 101–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tripathi P C, Tripathi R C. Analysis of glycoprotein deposits on disposable soft contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992; 33: 121–125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbaraman L N, Glasier M A, Senchyna M, Sheardown H, Jones L. Extraction efficiency of an extraction buffer used to quantify lysozyme deposition on conventional and silicone hydrogel contact lens materials. Eye Cont Lens. 2007; 33: 169–173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doi E, Shibata D, Matoba T. Modified colorimetric ninhydrin methods for peptidase assay. Anal Biochem. 1981; 118: 173–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You W W, Haugland R P, Ryan D K, Haugland R P. 3-(4-carboxybenzoyl) quinoline-2-carboxaldehyde, a reagent with broad dynamic range for the assay of proteins and lipoproteins in solution. Anal Biochem. 1997; 244: 277–282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starcher B. A ninhydrin-based assay to quantitate the total protein content of tissue samples. Anal Biochem. 2001; 292: 125–129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace C N, Vajdos F, Fee L, Grimsley G, Gray T. How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein. Protein Sci. 1995; 4: 2411–2423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morcol T, Subramanian A. A red-dot-blot protein assay technique in the low nanogram range. Anal Biochem. 1999; 270: 75–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBQCA Protein Quantitation Kit. 2001, Molecular Probes: 4
   Google Scholar
• Bright A M, Tighe B J. The composition and interfacial properties of tears, tear substitutes, and tear models. J Brit Cont Lens Assoc. 1993; 16: 57–66
   Google Scholar
• Fullard R J, Snyder C. Protein levels in nonstimulated and stimulated tears of normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990; 31: 1119–1126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman E R. Biochemistry of the eye. Plenum Press, New York, NY 1991
   Google Scholar
• Saatci A O, Irkec M, Unlu N. Tear cholesterol levels in blepharitis. Ophthalmic Res. 1990; 22: 269–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedler F C. Analysis of biomaterials deposited on soft contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res. 1977; 11: 525–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijlstra A, Kuizenga A. Analysis and function of the human tear proteins. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1994; 350: 299–308
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng V, Cho P, To C. Tear proteins of normal young Hong Kong Chinese. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000; 238: 738–745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sack R A, Beaton A, Sathe S, Morris C, Willcox M, Bogart B. Towards a closed eye model of the pre-ocular tear layer. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000; 19: 649–668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng V, Cho P. The relationship between total tear protein concentrations determined by different methods and standards. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2000; 238: 571–576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitoma M, Oho T, Shimazaki Y, Koga T. Inhibitory effect of bovine milk lactoferrin on the interaction between a streptococcal surface protein antigen and human salivary agglutinin. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 18060–18065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moguilevsky N, Retegui L A, Masson P L. Comparison of human lactoferrins from milk and neutrophilic leucocytes. Relative molecular mass, isoelectric point, iron-binding properties and uptake by the liver. Biochem J. 1985; 229: 353–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullard R J, Kissner D M. Purification of the isoforms of tear specific prealbumin. Curr Eye Res. 1991; 10: 613–628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones K D. Troubleshooting protein binding in nitrocellulose membranes (Part 1)—Principles. IVD Technology. 1999; 32–41
   Google Scholar
• Prager M D, Quintana R P. Radiochemical studies on contact lens soilation. I. Lens uptake of 14C-lysozyme from simple and complex artificial tear solutions. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997; 36: 119–124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirejovsky D, Patel A S, Rodriguez D D, Hunt T J. Lipid adsorption onto hydrogel contact lens materials. Advantages of Nile red over oil red O in visualization of lipids. Optom Vis Sci. 1991; 68: 858–864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffield J B, Graff D, Li H P. A solid-phase method for the quantitation of protein in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate and other interfering substances. Anal Biochem. 1987; 166: 49–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar