346
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Glaucoma/Lens

Clinical Correlates of Computationally Derived Visual Field Defect Archetypes in Patients from a Glaucoma Clinic

, , , , &
Pages 568-574 | Received 24 Dec 2015, Accepted 15 Jun 2016, Published online: 05 Aug 2016

References

  • Brusini P, Johnson CA. Staging functional damage in glaucoma: review of different classification methods. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52:156–179.
  • Drance SM. The glaucomatous visual field. Br J Ophthalmol 1972;56:186–200.
  • Asman P, Heijl A. Glaucoma hemifield test. Automated visual field evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:812–819.
  • Elze T, Pasquale LR, Shen LQ, Chen TC, Wiggs JL, Bex PJ. Patterns of functional vision loss in glaucoma determined with archetypal analysis. J R Soc Interface 2015;12.
  • Cutler A, Breiman L. Archetypal analysis. Technometrics 1994;36:338–347.
  • Keltner JL, Johnson CA, Cello KE, Edwards MA, Bandermann SE, Kass MA, et al. Classification of visual field abnormalities in the ocular hypertension treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:643–650.
  • Blumenthal EZ, Sapir-Pichhadze R. Misleading statistical calculations in far-advanced glaucomatous visual field loss. Ophthalmology 2003;110:196–200.
  • Chandra A, Bandyopadhyay AK, Bhaduri G. A comparative study of two methods of optic disc evaluation in patients of glaucoma. Oman J Ophthalmol 2013;6:103–107.
  • Danesh-Meyer HV, Gaskin BJ, Jayusundera T, Donaldson M, Gamble GD. Comparison of disc damage likelihood scale, cup to disc ratio, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in the diagnosis of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:437–441.
  • Spaeth GL, Henderer J, Liu C, Kesen M, Altangerel U, Bayer A, et al. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2002;100:181–185; discussion 185–186.
  • Hollands H, Johnson D, Hollands S, Simel DL, Jinapriya D, Sharma S. Do findings on routine examination identify patients at risk for primary open-angle glaucoma? The rational clinical examination systematic review. JAMA. 2013;309:2035–2042.
  • Park SC, De Moraes CG, Teng CC, Tello C, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Initial parafoveal versus peripheral scotomas in glaucoma: risk factors and visual field characteristics. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1782–1789.
  • Patipa M. Visual field loss in primary gaze and reading gaze due to acquired blepharoptosis and visual field improvement following ptosis surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:63–67.
  • Han S, Jung JJ, Kim US. Differences between non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and open angle glaucoma with altitudinal visual field defect. Korean J Ophthalmol 2015;29:418–423.
  • Jung KI, Park HY, Park CK. Characteristics of optic disc morphology in glaucoma patients with parafoveal scotoma compared to peripheral scotoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012;53:4813–4820.
  • Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol 1990;300:5–25.
  • Zalta AH. Lens rim artifact in automated threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology 1989;96:1302–1311.
  • McAuley DL, Russell RW. Correlation of CAT scan and visual field defects in vascular lesions of the posterior visual pathways. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1979;42:298–311.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.