Goldmann Applanation Tonometry versus Dynamic Contour Tonometry after Vitrectomy with Silicone Oil Endotamponade

References

• Tamm ER. The trabecular meshwork outflow pathways: structural and functional aspects. Exp Eye Res 2009;88(4):648–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm A, Nilsson SFE. Uveoscleral outflow–a review. Exp Eye Res 2009;88(4):760–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy Chowdhury U, Hann CR, Stamer WD, Fautsch MP. Aqueous humor outflow: dynamics and disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015;56(5):2993–3003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitacre MM, Stein R. Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 1993;38(1):1–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonnu PA, Ho T, Newson T, El Sheikh A, Sharma K, White E, et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89(7):851–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(1):146–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recep ÖF, Hasıripi H, Çağıl N, Sarıkatipoğlu H. Relation between corneal thickness and intraocular pressure measurement by noncontact and applanation tonometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27(11):1787–1791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2006;15(1):2–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanngiesser HE, Kniestedt C, Robert YC. Dynamic contour tonometry: presentation of a new tonometer. J Glaucoma 2005;14(5):344–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punjabi OS, Kniestedt C, Stamper RL, Lin SC. Dynamic contour tonometry: principle and use. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006;34(9):837–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barleon L, Hoffmann EM, Berres M, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142(4):583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieshaber MC, Schoetzau A, Zawinka C, Flammer J, Orgul S. Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125(6):740–744.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kamppeter BA, Jonas JB. Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140(2):318–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E, Fernandez-Vidal A, Benitez del Castillo JM, Wasfi M, et al. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 2006;113(12):2156–2162.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45(9):3118–3121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle A, Lachkar Y. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldman applanation tonometry over a wide range of central corneal thickness. J Glaucoma 2005;14(4):288–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr A, Remky A, Hirsch T, Rennings C, Plange N. Tonometry in corneal edema after cataract surgery: dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:815–819.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Kao L, Pham N, Tran AQ. The effect of corneal edema on dynamic contour and Goldmann tonometry. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85(6):451–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL. Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005;243(4):359–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemmensen K, Hjortdal J. Intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanics in Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy and after posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmol 2014;92(4):350–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuest M, Kotliar K, Walter P, Plange N. Monitoring intraocular pressure changes after intravitreal ranibizumab injection using rebound tonometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014;34(4):438–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NG, Fineman MS, Brown GC. Incidence of intraocular pressure spike and other adverse events after vitreoretinal surgery. Ophthalmology 2006;113(1):42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han DP, Lewis H, Lambrou FH, Jr., Mieler WF, Hartz A. Mechanisms of intraocular pressure elevation after pars plana vitrectomy. Ophthalmology 1989;96(9):1357–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangouritsas G, Mourtzoukos S, Portaliou DM, Georgopoulos VI, Dimopoulou A, Feretis E. Glaucoma associated with the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:727–734.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Jazzaf AM, Netland PA, Charles S. Incidence and management of elevated intraocular pressure after silicone oil injection. J Glaucoma 2005;14(1):40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedel KG, Gabel VP, Neubauer L, Kampik A, Lund OE. Intravitreal silicone oil injection: complications and treatment of 415 consecutive patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1990;228(1):19–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honavar SG, Goyal M, Majji AB, Sen PK, Naduvilath T, Dandona L. Glaucoma after pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil injection for complicated retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 1999;106(1):169–176; discussion 77.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg RS, Peyman GA, Huamonte FU. Elevation of intraocular pressure after pars plana vitrectomy. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1976;200(2):157–161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romano V, Cruciani M, Semeraro F, Costagliola C, Romano MR. Development of ocular hypertension secondary to tamponade with light versus heavy silicone oil: a systematic review. Indian J Ophthalmol 2015;63(3):227–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Valenzuela E, Shareef S, Walsh J, Sharma SC. Programmed cell death of retinal ganglion cells during experimental glaucoma. Exp Eye Res 1995;61(1):33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teke MY, Elgin U, Sen E, Ozdal P, Ozturk F. Intravitreal silicone oil induced changes in corneal biomechanics. Int Ophthalmol 2014;34(3):457–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses RA. The Goldmann applanation tonometer. Am J Ophthalmol 1958;46(6):865–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelzer R. [Relationship of the corneal applanations to intraocular pressure in enucleated human eyes (author’s transl)]. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1973;189(1):33–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lau W, Pye D. Changes in corneal biomechanics and applanation tonometry with induced corneal swelling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52(6):3207–3214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton KE, Pye DC, Hali A, Lin C, Kam P, Ngyuen T. The effect of contact lens induced corneal edema on Goldmann applanation tonometry measurements. J Glaucoma 2007;16(1):153–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Cayer MM, Descovich D, Kamdeu-Fansi A, Harasymowycz PJ, Li G, et al. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2011;20(8):482–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamas N, Fuest M, Koutsonas A, Roessler G, Mazinani BE, Walter P, et al. Goldmann applanation tonometry versus dynamic contour tonometry after vitrectomy. J Glaucoma 2016;25(8):663–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldbaum MH, McCuen BW, Hanneken AM, Burgess SK, Chen HH. Silicone oil tamponade to seal macular holes without position restrictions. Ophthalmology 1998;105(11): 2140–2147; discussion 7–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox MS, Trese MT, Murphy PL. Silicone oil for advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 1986;93(5):646–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucke KH, Foerster MH, Laqua H. Long-term results of vitrectomy and silicone oil in 500 cases of complicated retinal detachments. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;104(6):624–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocak I, Koc H. Comparison of Densiron 68 and 1 000 cSt silicone oil in the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with inferior breaks. Int J Ophthalmol 2013;6(1):81–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avitabile T, Bonfiglio V, Buccoliero D, Castiglione F, Reibaldi M, Castaing M, et al. Heavy versus standard silicone oil in the management of retinal detachment with macular hole in myopic eyes. Retina 2011;31(3):540–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo S, Genovesi-Ebert F, Vento A, Cresti F, Di Bartolo E, Belting C. A new heavy silicone oil (HWS 46-3000) used as a prolonged internal tamponade agent in complicated vitreoretinal surgery: a pilot study. Retina 2007;27(5):613–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf S, Schon V, Meier P, Wiedemann P. Silicone oil-RMN3 mixture (“heavy silicone oil”) as internal tamponade for complicated retinal detachment. Retina 2003;23(3):335–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann H, Stappler T, Wong D. Heavy tamponade 1: a review of indications, use, and complications. Eye (Lond) 2008;22(10):1342–1359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfaro DV, Tran VT. A clinical comparison of the Oculab Tono-Pen with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in eyes filled with silicone oil. Retina 1991;11(2):219–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JH, Shin JP, Kim IT, Park DH. Variation of 24-hour intraocular pressure in silicone oil-filled eyes. Retina 2016;36(1):59–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas JB, Knorr HLJ, Rank RM, Budde WM. Intraocular Pressure and Silicone Oil Endotamponade. J Glaucoma 2001;10(2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson MJ, Bhatnagar P, Dhrami-Gavazi E, Santos RA, Barile GR, Del Priore LV, et al. Pascal dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry in gas and air-filled eyes after vitrectomy surgery. Retina 2009;29(4):481–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes. Eye (Lond) 2009;23(2):262–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann EM, Pfeiffer N, Barleon L, Grus FH. [Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements in the course of product certification according to EN ISO 8612:2001]. Ophthalmologe 2006;103(4):317–320.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonaro F, Andrew T, Mackey DA, Spector TD, Hammond CJ. Comparison of three methods of intraocular pressure measurement and their relation to central corneal thickness. Eye (Lond) 2010;24(7):1165–1170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pursten A, Grein HJ, Pillunat LE. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124(4):471–416.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dastiridou AI, Ginis HS, De Brouwere D, Tsilimbaris MK, Pallikaris IG. Ocular rigidity, ocular pulse amplitude, and pulsatile ocular blood flow: the effect of intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009;50(12):5718–5722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willekens K, Rocha R, Van Keer K, Vandewalle E, Abegão Pinto L, Stalmans I, et al. Review on dynamic contour tonometry and ocular pulse amplitude. Ophthalmic Res 2016;55(2):91–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plange N, Rennings C, Herr A, Weber A, Roessler GF, Mazinani BE, et al. Ocular pulse amplitude before and after cataract surgery. Curr Eye Res 2012;37(2):115–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenn O, Troost R, Vogel A, Grus F, Beck S, Pfeiffer N. Ocular pulse amplitude in patients with open angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, and ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86(9):981–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto M, Matsuura T, Ogata N. Ocular blood flow before, during, and after vitrectomy determined by laser speckle flowgraphy. Ophthal Surgery Lasers Imaging Retina 2014;45(2):118–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krepler K, Polska E, Wedrich A, Schmetterer L. Ocular blood flow parameters after pars plana vitrectomy in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Retina 2003;23(2):192–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Effert R, Wolf S, Arend O, Schulte K, Reim M. Retinal hemodynamics after pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade. Ger J Ophthalmol 1994;3(2):65–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heinrich MA, Eppig T, Langenbucher A, Walter S, Behrens-Baumann W, Viestenz A. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry before and after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38(4):683–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barca F, Caporossi T, Rizzo S. Silicone oil: different physical proprieties and clinical applications. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:502143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar