Fractal Features and Surface Micromorphology of Unworn Surfaces of Rigid Gas Permeable Contact Lenses

References

• Efron N. Contact Lens Practice. 2nd ed. China: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ţălu SD. Ophtalmologie – Cours. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Medical publishing house “Iuliu Haţieganu”; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ţălu Ş, Ţălu M, Giovanzana S, Shah R. A brief history of contact lenses. HVM Bioflux 2011;3(1):33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Douthwaite WA. Contact Lens Optics and Lens Design. 3rd ed. Bradford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bettuelli M, Trabattoni S, Fagnola M, Tavazzi S, Introzzi L, Farris S. Surface properties and wear performances of siloxane-hydrogel contact lenses. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013;101(8):1585–1593. DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.32901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojić D, Bojović B, Stamenković D, Jagodić N, Koruga Ð. Contact lenses characterization by AFM MFM, and OMF. In: Ghista, DN (Ed). Biomedical Science, Engineering and Technology. Croatia: InTech; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ţălu Ş. Characterization of surface roughness of unworn hydrogel contact lenses at a nanometric scale using methods of modern metrology. Polym Eng Sci 2013;53(10):2141–2150. DOI: 10.1002/pen.23481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Codina C, Efron N. Impact of manufacturing technology and material composition on the surface characteristics of hydrogel contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom 2005;88:396–404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ţălu Ş, Ţălu M. Surface roughness of contact lenses investigated with atomic force microscopy. SBMM. 2012;7:107–110.
   Google Scholar
• Turhan SA, Toker E. Optical coherence tomography to evaluate the interaction of different edge designs of four different silicone hydrogel lenses with the ocular surface. Clin Ophthalmol 2015;9:935–942. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S83798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipecki J, Sitarz M, Kocela A, Kotynia K, Jelen P, Filipecka K. et al. Studying functional properties of hydrogel and silicone-hydrogel contact lenses with PALS, MIR and Raman spectroscopy. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2014;131:686–690. DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.04.144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Méijome JM. Objective analysis of properties and material degradation in contact lens polymers using different techniques. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minho, Portugal; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Marmo C, Somorjai GA. Friction studies of hydrogel contact lenses using AFM: non-crosslinked polymers of low friction at the surface. Biomaterials 2001;22:3285–3294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu W, Busscher HJ, Hooymans JM, van der Mei HC. Surface thermodynamics and adhesion forces governing bacterial transmission in contact lens related microbial keratitis. J Colloid Interface Sci 2011;358(2):430–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva D, Fernandes AC, Nunes TG, Colaço R, Serro AP. The effect of albumin and cholesterol on the biotribological behavior of hydrogels for contact lenses. Acta Biomater 2015;26:184–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pult H, Tosatti SG, Spencer ND, Asfour JM, Ebenhoch M, Murphy PJ. Spontaneous blinking from a tribological viewpoint. Ocul Surf 2015;13(3):236–249. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2014.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaishankar D, Buhrman JS, Valyi-Nagy T, Gemeinhart RA, Shukla D. Extended release of an anti-heparan sulfate peptide from a contact lens suppresses corneal herpes simplex virus-1 infection. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016;57(1):169–180. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-18365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak WC, Cheung KY, Orban J, Lee CJ, Turner AP, Griffith M. Surface-engineered contact lens as an advanced theranostic platform for modulation and detection of viral infection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2015;7(45):25487–25494. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b08644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng W, Yang C, Ding X, Engler AC, Hedrick JL, Yang YY. Broad-spectrum antimicrobial/antifouling soft material coatings using poly(ethylenimine) as a tailorable scaffold. Biomacromolecules 2015;16(7):1967–1977. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Fernández MJ, Tabary N, Martel B, Cazaux F, Oliva A, Taboada P. et al. Poly-(cyclo)dextrins as ethoxzolamide carriers in ophthalmic solutions and in contact lenses. Carbohydr Polym 2013;98(2):1343–1352. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohit A, Willcox M, Stapleton F. Tear lipid layer and contact lens comfort: a review. Eye Contact Lens 2013;39(3):247–253. DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31828af164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ţălu Ş. Mathematical methods used in monofractal and multifractal analysis for the processing of biological and medical data and images. Anim Biol Anim Husb 2012;4(1):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Ţălu Ş. Texture analysis methods for the characterisation of biological and medical images. Extreme Life Biospeology Astrobiol 2012;4(1):8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ţălu Ş, Stach S. Multifractal characterization of unworn hydrogel contact lens surfaces. Polym Eng Sci 2014;54:1066–1080. DOI: 10.1002/pen.23650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premium GP Materials. [cited 2016 Jul 23]. Available from: http://www.lagadocorp.co/products/premium-gp-materials
   Google Scholar
• GP Lens Materials. [cited 2017 Jan 23]. Available from: http://www.bausch.com/ecp/our-products/contact-lenses/gp-lens-materials
   Google Scholar
• Contamac’s Gas Permeable ( GP) materials. [cited 2017 Jan 23]. Available from: http://www.contamac.com/Products/Gas-Permeable/
   Google Scholar
• Phillips AJ, Lynne S. (eds.). Contact lenses. 4th ed., Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann Medical; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Kulesza S, Bramowicz M. A comparative study of correlation methods for determination of fractal parameters in surface characterization. Appl Surf Sci 2014;293:196–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramowicz M, Kulesza S, Lipiński T, Szabracki P, Piątkowski P. Fractal analysis of AFM data characterizing strongly isotropic and anisotropic surface topography, Solid State Phenom 2013; 203–204:86–89. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.203-204.86.
   Google Scholar
• Ţălu Ş, Bramowicz M, Kulesza S, Shafiekhani A, Ghaderi A, Mashayekhi F. et al. Microstructure and tribological properties of FeNPs@a-C:H films by micromorphology analysis and fractal geometry. Ind Eng Chem Res 2015;54(33):8212–8218. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ţălu Ş, Bramowicz M, Kulesza S, Solaymani S, Shafikhani A, Ghaderi A. et al. Gold nanoparticles embedded in carbon film: micromorphology analysis. J Ind Eng Chem 2016;35:158–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.12.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ţălu Ş, Solaymani S, Bramowicz M, Naseri N, Kulesza S, Ghaderi A. Surface micromorphology and fractal geometry of Co/CP/X (X = Cu, Ti, SM and Ni) nanoflake electrocatalysts. RSC Advances 2016;6:27228–27234. DOI: 10.1039/C6RA01791F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ţălu Ş, Bramowicz M, Kulesza S, Solaymani S, Ghaderi A, Dejam Laya et al. Microstructure and micromorphology of ZnO thin films: case study on Al doping and annealing effects. Superlattice Microst 2016;93:109–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2016.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vranceanu DM, Cotrut CM, Bramowicz M, Titorencu I, Kulesza S, Kiss A. et al. Osseointegration of sputtered SiC-added hydroxyapatite for orthopaedic applications. Ceram Int 2016;42(8):10085–10093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramowicz M, Kulesza S, Czaja P, Maziarz W. Application of the autocorrelation function and fractal geometry methods for analysis of MFM images. Arch Metall Mater 2014;59:451–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaja P, Maziarz W, Przewoźnik J, Żywczak A, Ozga P, Bramowicz M. et al. Surface topography, microstructure and magnetic domains in Al for Sn substituted metamagnetic Ni–Mn–Sn Heusler alloy ribbons. Intermetallics 2014;55:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong WP, Sullivan PJ, Stout KJ. Comprehensive study of parameters for characterizing 3-dimensional surface topography. 4. Parameters for characterizing spatial and hybrid properties. Wear 1994;178:45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Sayles RS, Thomas TR. Spatial representation of surface roughness by means of structure function - Practical alternative to correlation. Wear 1977;42:263–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Thomas TR. Digital analysis of very small scale surface roughness. J Wave Mater Interact 1988;3:341–350.
   Google Scholar
• Ţălu Ş. Micro and Nanoscale Characterization of Three Dimensional Surfaces. BASICS and Applications. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Napoca Star Publishing; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Borri C, Paggi M. Topological characterization of antireflective and hydrophobic rough surfaces: are random process theory and fractal modeling applicable? J Phys D Appl Phys 2015;48: 045301. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/48/4/045301.
   Google Scholar