Anterior Segment Biometry and Their Correlation with Corneal Biomechanics in Caucasian Children

References

• Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, Grover D, Quigley HA. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(5):868–75. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes BM, Ambrosio R, Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nose W. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(4):673–79. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangouritsas G, Morphis G, Mourtzoukos S, Feretis E. Association between corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in glaucomatous and non-glaucomatous eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;87(8):901–05. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01370.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansouri K, Leite MT, Weinreb RN, Tafreshi A, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA. Association between corneal biomechanical properties and glaucoma severity. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:419–27.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.. 2007;48(7):3026–31. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheibenberger D, Frings A, Steinberg J, Schuler H, Druchkiv V, Katz T, von Kodolitsch Y, Linke S. Ocular manifestation in Marfan syndrome: corneal biomechanical properties relate to increased systemic score points. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(6):1159–63. doi:10.1007/s00417-018-3946-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg J, Amirabadi NE, Frings A, Mehlan J, Katz T, Linke SJ. Keratoconus screening with dynamic biomechanical in vivo scheimpflug analyses: A proof-of-concept study. J Refract Surg.. 2017;33(11):773–78. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170807-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A, Elsheikh A, Roberts CR, Zhu HG, Garway-Heath DF. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.. 2006;47(12):5337–47. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-0557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terai N, Raiskup F, Haustein M, Pillunat LE, Spoerl E. Identification of biomechanical properties of the cornea: the ocular response analyzer. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37(7):553–62. doi:10.3109/02713683.2012.669007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiya K, Hagishima M, Fujimura F, Shimizu K. Factors affecting corneal hysteresis in normal eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(10):1491–94. doi:10.1007/s00417-008-0864-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, Mantry S. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006;29(5):257–62. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2006.09.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alhamad TA, Meek KM. Comparison of factors that influence the measurement of corneal hysteresis in vivo and in vitro. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89(5):e443–50. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02150.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu K, Lu X, Zhang R, Wang G, Zhang M. Corneal biomechanics determination in healthy myopic subjects. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:2793516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen M, Fan F, Xue A, Wang J, Zhou X, Lu F. Biomechanical properties of the cornea in high myopia. Vision Res. 2008;48(21):2167–71. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Huang C, Li L, Qiu K, Gong W, Wang Z, Wu X, Du Y, Chen B, Lam DSC, et al. Corneal biomechanics, refractive error, and axial length in Chinese primary school children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(7):4923–28. doi:10.1167/iovs.10-6211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno-Gimeno I, Espana-Gregori E, Gene-Sampedro A, Lanzagorta-Aresti A, Pinero-Llorens DP. Relationship among corneal biomechanics, refractive error, and axial length. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(5):507–13. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim L, Gazzard G, Chan YH, Fong A, Kotecha A, Sim EL, Tan D, Tong L, Saw SM. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(9):3852–57. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan H, Miranda MA, O’Donnell C. Corneal biomechanical properties and their correlates with refractive error. Clin Exp Optom. 2012;95(1):12–18. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00696.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontes BM, Ambrosio R Jr., Alonso RS, Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nose W. Corneal biomechanical metrics in eyes with refraction of −19.00 to +9.00 D in healthy Brazilian patients. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:941–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan C, O’Keefe M, Lanigan B. Corneal hysteresis and intraocular pressure measurement in children using the reichert ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142(6):990–92. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Ohmoto F. Effect of aging on corneal biomechanical parameters using the ocular response analyzer. J Refract Surg. 2009;25(10):888–93. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20090917-10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco S, Lira M. Biomechanical properties of the cornea measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer and their association with intraocular pressure and the central corneal curvature. Clin Exp Optom. 2009;92(6):469–75. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2009.00414.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang HS, Park SK, Kim MS. The biomechanical properties of the cornea and anterior segment parameters. BMC Ophthalmology. 2013;13(1):49. doi:10.1186/1471-2415-13-48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Çevik SG, Kıvanç SA, Akova-Budak B, Tok-Çevik M. Relationship among corneal biomechanics, anterior segment parameters, and geometric corneal parameters. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016.
   Google Scholar
• Viswanathan D, Kumar NL, Males JJ, Graham SL. Relationship of structural characteristics to biomechanical profile in normal, keratoconic, and crosslinked eyes. Cornea. 2015;34(7):791–96. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong YZ, Lam AK. Influence of corneal astigmatism, corneal curvature and meridional differences on corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor. Clin Exp Optom. 2011;94(5):418–24. doi:10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00591.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa N, Lanza M, De Bernardo M, Signoriello G, Chiodini P. Relationship between corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor with other ocular parameters. Semin Ophthalmol. 2015;30(5–6):335–39. doi:10.3109/08820538.2013.874479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno-Gimeno I. Cambios anatómicos en el proceso de emetropización: influencia en las propiedades biomecánicas corneales y los parámetros anatómicos oculares. Spain: Universidad Católica de Valencia; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinstein RN, Jones LA, Hullett S, Kwon S, Lee RJ, Friedman NE, Manny RE, Mutti DO, Yu JA, Zadnik K. Refractive error and ethnicity in children. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2003;121(8):1141–47. doi:10.1001/archopht.121.8.1141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giordano L, Friedman DS, Repka MX, Katz J, Ibironke J, Hawes P, Tielsch JM. Prevalence of refractive error among preschool children in an urban population: the baltimore pediatric eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(4):739–46.e4. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Collins MJ. Diurnal variation of corneal shape and thickness. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86(3):170–80. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181981b7e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau W, Pye DC. Associations between diurnal changes in Goldmann tonometry, corneal geometry, and ocular response analyzer parameters. Cornea. 2012;31(6):639–44. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31822481ac.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(4):330–38. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00851.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mallen EAH, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn JS. A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:458–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankar H, Taranath D, Santhirathelagan CT, Pesudovs K. Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(1):103–13. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.09.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A. What biomechanical properties of the cornea are relevant for the clinician? Surv phthalmol. 2007;52(Suppl 2):S109–14. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 1999;8(2):135–60. doi:10.1177/096228029900800204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) studies and sample-size calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(12):2598–604. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno-Gimeno I, Gene-Sampedro A, Pinero-Llorens DP, Lanzagorta-Aresti A, Espana-Gregori E. Corneal biomechanics, retinal nerve fiber layer, and optic disc in children. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91(12):1474–82. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Jafarzadehpur E, Mehravaran S, Yekta A, Ostadimoghaddam H, Norouzirad R, Khabazkhoob M. Corneal resistance factor and corneal hysteresis in a 6- to 18-year-old population. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(9):1446–53. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hon Y, Cheung SW, Cho P, Lam AK. Repeatability of corneal biomechanical measurements in children wearing spectacles and orthokeratology lenses. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2012;32(4):349–54. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2012.00920.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David VP, Stead RE, Vernon SA. Repeatability of ocular response analyzer metrics: a gender-based study. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(7):691–99. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e318297da45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Montanes J, Maldonado MJ, Garcia N, Mendiluce L, Garcia-Gomez PJ, Segui-Gomez M. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(3):968–74. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbuehi KC, Osuagwu UL. Corneal biomechanical properties: precision and influence on tonometry. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37(3):124–31. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2013.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu G, Lam DS, Leung CK. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements. Journal of Glaucoma. 2011;20(6):344–49. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181efb388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang PY, Chang SW, Wang JY. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure with the ocular response analyzer in childhood myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(7):877–81. doi:10.1136/bjo.2009.158568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Congdon N, Li L, Zhou Z, Choi K, Lam DS, Pang CP, Xie Z, Liu X, Sharma A, et al. Corneal hysteresis and axial length among Chinese secondary school children: the Xichang pediatric refractive error study (X-PRES) report no. 4. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(5):819–26. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Z, Shen M, Mao G, Chen D, Wang J, Qu J, Lu F. Association between corneal biomechanical properties and myopia in Chinese subjects. Eye. 2011;25(8):1083–89. doi:10.1038/eye.2011.104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy A, Chung RS, Wu RY, Park J, Wong WL, Saw SM, Wong TY, Aung T. Determinants of corneal biomechanical properties in an adult Chinese population. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(7):1253–59. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotecha A, Russell RA, Sinapis A, Pourjavan S, Sinapis D, Garway-Heath DF. Biomechanical parameters of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer in normal eyes. BMC Ophthalmology. 2014;14:11. doi:10.1186/1471-2415-14-11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite MT, Alencar LM, Gore C, Weinreb RN, Sample PA, Zangwill LM, Medeiros FA. Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties between healthy blacks and whites using the ocular response analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(2):163–8.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.02.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua J, Nongpiur ME, Zhao W, Tham YC, Gupta P, Sabanayagam C, Aung T, Wong TY, Cheng CY. Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties between indian and chinese adults. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(9):1271–79. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar