114
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Extra Ocular Structures

Primary Probing with and without Monoka Silastic Stent Intubation for Epiphora in Older Children and Adults

Pages 87-90 | Received 25 Dec 2018, Accepted 09 Jul 2019, Published online: 15 Aug 2019

References

  • Evereklioglu C, Oner A, Somdaş MA, Ketenci I, Doğan H, Mirza E, İlhan Ö. Figure-of-eight vertical mattress suture technique for anterior flap suspension to overlying tissues in external dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(2):328–33. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.09.057.
  • Cokkeser Y, Evereklioglu C, Er H. Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123(4):488–91. doi:10.1067/mhn.2000.105470.
  • Cokkeser Y, Evereklioglu C, Tercan M, Hepsen IF. Hammer-chiesel technique in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003;112(5):444–49. doi:10.1177/000348940311200511.
  • Schlachter DM, Richani K, Black EH. Diode laser-assisted endocanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy: A prospective study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;32(3):183–86. doi:10.1097/IOP.0000000000000453.
  • Evereklioglu C, Gunduz A, Er H. Comparative results of external dacryocystorhinostomy with or without silicone tube intubation. MN Ophthalmol. 2000;7:167–69.
  • Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Zadok D, Avni I, Pras E, Mezer E, Morad Y. Balloon catheter dilatation versus probing as primary treatment for congenital dacryostenosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:634–36. doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.183301.
  • Honavar SG, Prakash VE, Rao GN. Outcome of probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in older children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:42–48.
  • El-Essawy R. Effect of timing of silicone tube removal on the result of duct intubation in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;29:48–50. doi:10.1097/IOP.0b013e318275b634.
  • Athanasiov PA, Prabhakaran VC, Mannor G, Woog JJ, Selva D. Transcanalicular approach to adult lacrimal duct obstruction: a review of instruments and methods. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009;40(2):149–59. doi:10.3928/15428877-20090301-04.
  • Emmerich KH, Ungerechts R, Meyer-Rüsenberg HW. [Transcanalicular microendoscopic laser DCR: technique and results]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2012;229:39–41.
  • Emmerich KH, Amin S, Meyer-Rüsenberg HW, Ungerechts R. [Microendoscopic minimally invasive techniques in lacrimal surgery]. Ophthamologe. 2017 May;114(5):409–15. doi:10.1007/s00347-017-0481-3.
  • Lee H, Ahn J, Shin HH, Park M, Baek S. Effectiveness of primary monocanalicular nasal intubation with Monoka tubes and nasal endoscopic findings for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with enlarged lacrimal sac and chronic dacryocystitis. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(6):1638–41. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31825dad6c.
  • Komínek P, Cervenka S, Pniak T, Zelenik K, Tomaskova H, Matousek P. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249(11):1729–33. doi:10.1007/s00417-011-1641-9.
  • Huang YH, Liao SL, Lin LL. Balloon dacryocystoplasty and monocanalicular intubation with Monoka tubes in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(6):795–99. doi:10.1007/s00417-009-1071-0.
  • Han JY, Lee H, Chang M, Park M, Lee JS, Baek S. Clinical effectiveness of monocanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction under nasal endoscopic visualization of the terminal end of the obstructed nasolacrimal duct. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(4):1328–31. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000001732.
  • Andalib D, Nabie R, Abbasi L. Silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct stenosis in adults: monocanalicular or bicanalicular intubation. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(3):1009–11. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000000708.
  • Kashkouli MB, Kempster RC, Galloway GD, Beigi B. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct stenosis in adults. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;21(2):142–47. doi:10.1097/01.IOP.0000155524.04390.7B.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.