Intrasession Repeatability of Biometric Measurements Obtained with a Low-Coherence Interferometry System in Pseudophakic Eyes

References

• Lam AK, Chan R, Pang PC. The repeatability and accuracy of axial length and anterior chamber depth measurements form the IOL Master. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2001;21:477–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors R 3rd, Boseman P 3rd, Olson RJ. Accuracy and reproducibility of biometry using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:235–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mallen EA, Gilmartin B, Wolffsohn JS. A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:458–62. doi:10.1136/bjo.86.4.458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eleftheriadis H. IOLMaster biometry: refractive results of 100 consecutive cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:960–63. doi:10.1136/bjo.87.8.960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YA, Hirnschall N, Findl O. Evaluation of 2 new optical biometry devices and comparison with the current gold standard biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:513–17. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini G, Negishi K, Hoffer KJ, Lomoriello DS. Refractive outcomes of intraocular lens power calculation using different corneal power measurements with a new optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:701–08. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.03.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G. Comparison of 2 instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:644–48. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ, Hoffmann PC, Savini G. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1165–72. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura BV, Ventura MC, Wang L, Koch DD, Weikert MP. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:74–79. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.11.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal P, Berrow EJ, Naroo SA, Wolffsohn JS, Uthoff D, Holland D, Shah S. Validity and repeatability of the Aladdin ocular biometer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:256–58. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Savini G, Wu F, Yu X, Yang J, Yu A, Yu Y, Wang Q. Repeatability and reproducibility of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence interferometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2233–41. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlinden C, Gao R, Yu A, Wang X, Yang J, Yu Y, Chen H, Wang Q, Huang J. Repeatibility and agreement of ocular biometry measurements: Aladdin versus Lenstar. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:1223–29. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G, Huang J. Multicenter study of optical low coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:62–67. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.07.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatino F, Findl O, Maurino V. Comparative analysis of optical biometers. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:685–93. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.01.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorkin N, Rosenblatt A, Barequet IS. Predictability of biometry in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Optom Vis Sci. 2016;93:1545–51. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000000990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Belda C, Rodrigo F, Piñero DP. Validation of keratometric measurements obtained with an intraoperative image-guided system: intra-session repeatability and interchangeability with an optical biometer. Clin Exp Optom. 2018;101:200–05. doi:10.1111/cxo.12623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft N, Hirnschall N, Farrokhi S, Findl O. Comparability of anterior chamber depth measurements with partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry in pseudophakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1678–84. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.08.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth G, Vajas A, Kolozsvari B, Bertha A, Modis L Jr. Anterior chamber depth measurements in phakic and pseudophakic eyes: Pentacam versus ultrasound device. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1331–35. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.02.057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Jin W, Wang Q. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of central anterior chamber depth measurements in pseudophakic and phakic eyes: optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:941–46. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su PF, Lo AY, Hu CY, Chang SW. Anterior chamber depth measurement in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. Optom Vis Sci. 2008;85:1193–200. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e31818e8ceb.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan AH, Sayed KM, ElAgooz M, Elhawary AM. Refractive results: safety and efficacy of secondary piggyback Sensar™ AR40 intraocular lens implantation to correct pseudophakic refractive error. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:4505812.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin H, Rabsilber T, Ehmer A, Borkenstein AF, Limberger IJ, Guo H, Auffarth GU. Comparison of ray-tracing method and thin-lens formula in intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:650–62. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Albert N, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Montés-Micó R, Fernández-Vega-Cueto L, Ferrer-Blasco T. Repeatability assessment of biometric measurements with different refractive states and age using a swept-source biometer. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16:63–69. doi:10.1080/17434440.2019.1557517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua Y, Qiu W, Xiao Q, Wu Q. Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) of ocular parameters obtained by the Tomey OA-2000 biometer compared to the IOLMaster in healthy eyes. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0193023. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0193023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Mesa R, Abengózar-Vela A, Ruiz-Santos M. Comparison of a new Scheimpflug imaging combined with partial coherence interferometry biometer and a low-coherence reflectometry biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:1406–12. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Na J, Kim MJ, Lee BH. Simultaneous measurement of refractive index and thickness by combining low-coherence interferometry and confocal optics. Opt Express. 2008;16:5516–26. doi:10.1364/oe.16.005516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohmi M, Ohnishi Y, Yoden K, Haruna M. In vitro simultaneous measurement of refractive index and thickness of biological tissue by the low coherence interferometry. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2000;47:1266–70. doi:10.1109/10.867961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria-Ribeiro M, Lopes-Ferreira D, López-Gil N, Jorge J, González-Méijome JM. Errors associated with IOLMaster biometry as a function of internal ocular dimensions. J Optom. 2014;7:75–78. doi:10.1016/j.optom.2013.12.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Schiano-Lomoriello D. Agreement between lens thickness measurements by ultrasound immersion biometry and optical biometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:1463–68. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.07.057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar