181
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cornea

ICare Pro: Age Dependent Effect of Central Corneal Thickness on Intraocular Pressure in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Patients

, , &
Pages 668-674 | Received 21 Jun 2018, Accepted 14 Nov 2019, Published online: 06 Jan 2020

References

  • Quigley HA. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90(3):262–67. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081224.
  • Kass MA. Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the eye care technology forum. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:183–85.
  • Moreno-Montanes J, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Sabater AL, Morales-Fernandez L, Saenz C, Garcia-Feijoo J. Clinical evaluation of the new rebound tonometers Icare PRO and Icare ONE compared with the Goldmann tonometer. J Glaucoma. 2015;24:527–32.
  • Jablonski KS, Rosentreter A, Gaki S, Lappas A, Dietlein TS. Clinical use of a new position-independent rebound tonometer. Journal of Glaucoma. 2013;22:763–67.
  • Hladikova E, Pluhacek F, Maresova K. [Comparison of measurement of intraocular pressure by ICARE PRO(R) tonometer and Goldman applanation tonometer]. Cesk Slov Oftalmol. 2014;70:90–93.
  • Schweier C, Hanson JV, Funk J, Toteberg-Harms M. Repeatability of intraocular pressure measurements with Icare PRO rebound, Tono-Pen AVIA, and Goldmann tonometers in sitting and reclining positions. BMC Ophthalmol. 2013;13:44.
  • Kohlhaas M, Boehm AG, Spoerl E, Pursten A, Grein HJ, Pillunat LE. Effect of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length on applanation tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:471–76.
  • Matsuura M, Murata H, Fujino Y, Yanagisawa M, Nakao Y, Tokumo K, Nakakura S, Kiuchi Y, Asaoka R. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314370.
  • McCafferty SJ, Tetrault K, McColgin A, Chue W, Levine J, Muller M. Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103(12):1840–44.
  • Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L. Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Journal of Glaucoma. 2006;15(3):213–17. doi:10.1097/01.ijg.0000212208.87523.66.
  • Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S. Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 2009;53(1):34–43. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1975.tb01135.x.
  • Elsheikh A, Alhasso D, Gunvant P, Garway-Heath D. Multiparameter correction equation for Goldmann applanation tonometry. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88(1):E102–12. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181fc3453.
  • Elsheikh A, Alhasso D, Pye D. Goldmann tonometry correction factors based on numerical analysis. J Biomech Eng. 2009;131:111013.
  • Spoerl E, Terai N, Pillunat LE. Age-dependent correction factors for goldmann tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2012;21:276–77.
  • Jung Y, Park HL, Yang HJ, Park CK. Characteristics of corneal biomechanical responses detected by a non-contact scheimpflug-based tonometer in eyes with glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95:e556–e563.
  • Tian L, Wang D, Wu Y, Meng X, Chen B, Ge M, Huang Y. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94:e317–24.
  • Kotecha A, Crabb DP, Spratt A, Garway-Heath DF. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2009;50:4229–36.
  • Hohberger B, Monczak E, Mardin CY. 26 Years of the erlangen glaucoma registry: demographic and perimetric characteristics of patients through the ages. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2017;236(5):691–98.
  • Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Komaroff E. Early manifest Glaucoma Trial G. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment: the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:48–56.
  • Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO. Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1779–88.
  • Rask G, Behndig A. Effects of corneal thickness, curvature, astigmatism and direction of gaze on Goldmann applanation tonometry readings. Ophthalmic Res. 2006;38:49–55.
  • Wolfs RC, Klaver CC, Vingerling JR, Grobbee DE, Hofman A, de Jong PT. Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: the rotterdam study. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:767–72.
  • Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher C, Goudeau-Boutillon S, d’Athis P Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237(3):220–24.
  • Gunvant P, Baskaran M, Vijaya L, Joseph IS, Watkins RJ, Nallapothula M, Broadway DC, O’Leary DJ. Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:518–22.
  • Foster PJ, Baasanhu J, Alsbirk PH, Munkhbayar D, Uranchimeg D, Johnson GJ. Central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in a Mongolian population. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:969–73.
  • Iliev ME, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K, Amstutz C, Frueh B. Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:833–35.
  • Baneros-Rojas P, Martinez de la Casa JM, Arribas-Pardo P, Berrozpe-Villabona C, Toro-Utrera P, Garcia-Feijoo J. Comparison between goldmann, icare pro and Corvis ST tonometry. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2014;89:260–64.
  • Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R. The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:80–84.
  • Sahin A, Basmak H, Yildirim N. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on intraocular pressure measured by tono-pen and rebound tonometer in children. J Glaucoma. 2008;17:57–61.
  • Smedowski A, Weglarz B, Tarnawska D, Kaarniranta K, Wylegala E. Comparison of three intraocular pressure measurement methods including biomechanical properties of the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:666–73.
  • Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, Garcia-Sanchez J. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:4578–80.
  • Jorge JMM, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Queiros A, Fernandes P, Parafita MA. Correlations between corneal biomechanical properties measured with the ocular response analyzer and ICare rebound tonometry. Journal of Glaucoma. 2008;17:442–48.
  • Gao F, Liu X, Zhao Q, Pan Y. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13:1912–16.
  • Sharifipour F, Panahi-Bazaz M, Bidar R, Idani A, Cheraghian B. Age-related variations in corneal biomechanical properties. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016;28:117–22.
  • Celebi ARC, Kilavuzoglu AE, Altiparmak UE, Cosar Yurteri CB. Age-related change in corneal biomechanical parameters in a healthy Caucasian population. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2018;25:55–62.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.