Preparation, Characterization, and Evaluation of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Suspension as an Antimicrobial Media for Daily Use Soft Contact Lenses

References

• Corrigan K, Harmis N, Willcox M. Association of acinetobacter species with contact lens–induced adverse responses. Cornea. 2001;20(5):463–66. doi:10.1097/00003226-200107000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaridurg PR, Sharma S, Willcox M, Naduvilath TJ, Sweeney DF, Holden BA, Rao GN. Bacterial colonization of disposable soft contact lenses is greater during corneal infiltrative events than during asymptomatic extended lens wear. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4420–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope JR, Collier SA, Rao MM, Chalmers R, Mitchell GL, Richdale K, Wagner H, Kinoshita BT, Lam DY, Sorbara L, et al. Contact lens wearer demographics and risk behaviors for contact lens-related eye infections-United States, 2014. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(32):865. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6432a2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaridurg P, Willcox M, Sharma S, Gopinathan U, Janakiraman D, Hickson S, Vuppala N, Sweeney DF, Rao GN, Holden BA. Haemophilus influenzae adherent to contact lenses associated with production of acute ocular inflammation. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:2426–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalbert I, Willcox MD, Sweeney DF. Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from a contact lens at the time of a contact lens–induced peripheral ulcer: case report. Cornea. 2000;19(1):116–20. doi:10.1097/00003226-200001000-00023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kioomars S, Heidari S, Malaekeh-Nikouei B, Rad MS, Khameneh B, Mohajeri SA. Ciprofloxacin-imprinted hydrogels for drug sustained release in aqueous media. Pharm Dev Technol. 2017;22(1):122–29. doi:10.1080/10837450.2016.1230131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omranipour HM, Tabassi SAS, Kowsari R, Rad MS, Mohajeri SA. Brimonidine imprinted hydrogels and evaluation of their binding and releasing properties as new ocular drug delivery systems. Curr Drug Deliv. 2015;12(6):717–25. doi:10.2174/1567201812666150316110838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rad MS, Mohajeri SA, Simultaneously load and extended release of betamethasone and ciprofloxacin from vitamin E-loaded silicone-based soft contact lenses. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(9):1185–91. doi:10.3109/02713683.2015.1107591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rad MS, Mohajeri SA. Extended ciprofloxacin release using vitamin E diffusion barrier from commercial silicone-based soft contact lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2017;43(2):103–09. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rad MS, Tabassi SAS, Moghadam MH, Mohajeri SA. Controlled release of betamethasone from vitamin E-loaded silicone-based soft contact lenses. Pharm Dev Technol. 2016;21(7):894–99. doi:10.3109/10837450.2015.1078355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höfling-Lima AL, Roizenblatt R. Therapeutic contact lens-related bilateral fungal keratitis. Eye Contact Lens. 2002;28:149–50.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Keay L, Jalbert I, Cole N. The epidemiology of contact lens related infiltrates. Optometry Vision Sci. 2007;84(4):257–72. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3180485d5f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein OD, McNally JJ, Katz J, Chalmers RL, Tielsch JM, Alfonso E, MCOptom MB, O’Day D, Shovlin J. The incidence of microbial keratitis among wearers of a 30-day silicone hydrogel extended-wear contact lens. Ophthalmol. 2005;112(12):2172–79. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.09.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton F, Keay L, Edwards K, Naduvilath T, Dart JKG, Brian G, Holden BA. The incidence of contact lens-related microbial keratitis in Australia. Ophthalmol. 2008;115(10):1655–62. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein OD, Ormerod LD, Barraquer E, Alfonso E, Egan KM, Paton BG, Kenyon KR. Microbiology of contact lens-related keratitis. Cornea. 1989;8(4):281–85. doi:10.1097/00003226-198912000-00011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng KH, Leung SL, Hoekman HW, Beekhuis WH, Mulder PG, Geerards AJM, Kijlstra A. Incidence of contact-lens-associated microbial keratitis and its related morbidity. Lancet. 1999;354(9174):181–85. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09385-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhelst D, Koppen C, Looveren JV, Meheus A, Tassignon M. Clinical, epidemiological and cost aspects of contact lens related infectious keratitis in Belgium: results of a seven-year retrospective study. Bull Soc Belge Ophthalmol. 2005;297:7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Poggio EC, Glynn RJ, Schein OD, Seddon JM, Shannon MJ, Scardino VA, Kenyon KR. The incidence of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended-wear soft contact lenses. N Engl J Med. 1989;321(12):779–83. doi:10.1056/NEJM198909213211202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Hood DL, Grant T, Newton-Howes J, Baleriola-Lucas C, Willcox MD, Sweeney DF. Gram-negative bacteria can induce contact lens related acute red eye (CLARE) responses. Eye Contact Lens. 1996;22:47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Willcox M, Harmis N, Cowell B, Williams T, Holden B. Bacterial interactions with contact lenses; effects of lens material, lens wear and microbial physiology. Biomater. 2001;22(24):3235–47. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00161-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keay L, Harmis N, Corrigan K, Sweeney D, Willcox M. Infiltrative keratitis associated with extended wear of hydrogel lenses and Abiotrophia defectiva. Cornea. 2000;19(6):864–69. doi:10.1097/00003226-200011000-00024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden BA, Sankaridurg PR, Jalbert I. Adverse events and infections: which ones and how many? In Sweeney DF (Ed). Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses. Oxford (UK): Butterworth-Heinemann (pp. 150–213), 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Shi G-S, Boost MV, Cho P. Does the presence of QAC genes in staphylococci affect the efficacy of disinfecting solutions used by orthokeratology lens wearers? Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(5):708–12. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzman T, Barišić Kutija M, Kordić R, Popović Suić S, Jandroković S, Škegro I, Pokupec R. Comparative study of antibacterial and antifungal effects of rigid gas permeable contact lens disinfecting solutions. Coll Antropol. 2013;37:127–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Ganiny AM, Shaker GH, Aboelazm AA, El-Dash HA. Prevention of bacterial biofilm formation on soft contact lenses using natural compounds. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2017;7(1):11. doi:10.1186/s12348-017-0129-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gabriel MM, McAnally C, Bartell J, Walters R, Clark L, Crary M, Shannon S. Biocidal efficacy of a hydrogen peroxide lens care solution incorporating a novel wetting agent. Eye Contact Lens. 2019;45(3):164–70. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones N, Ray B, Ranjit KT, Manna AC. Antibacterial activity of ZnO nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;279(1):71–76. doi:10.1111/fml.2008.279.issue-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rad MS, Kompany A, Zak AK, Javidi M, Mortazavi SM. Microleakage and antibacterial properties of ZnO and ZnO: Ag nanopowders prepared via a sol–gel method for endodontic sealer application. J Nanopart Res. 2013;15(9):1925. doi:10.1007/s11051-013-1925-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahapatra O, Bhagat M, Gopalakrishnan C, Arunachalam KD. Ultrafine dispersed CuO nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity. J Exp Nanosci. 2008;3(3):185–93. doi:10.1080/17458080802395460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khameneh B, Diab R, Ghazvini K, Bazzaz BSF. Breakthroughs in bacterial resistance mechanisms and the potential ways to combat them. Microb Pathogenesis. 2016;95:32–42. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2016.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosi NL, Mirkin CA. Nanostructures in biodiagnostics. Chem Rev. 2005;105(4):1547–62. doi:10.1021/cr030067f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hien L, Trang P, Phuong P, Tam P, Xuan N. Effects of nano-copper on maize yield and inflammatory response in mice. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019;22:781–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran N, Mir A, Mallik D, Sinha A, Nayar S, Webster TJ. Bactericidal effect of iron oxide nanoparticles on Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Nanomed. 2010;5:277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazzaz BSF, Khameneh B, Jalili-Behabadi -M-M, Malaekeh-Nikouei B, Mohajeri SA. Preparation, characterization and antimicrobial study of a hydrogel (soft contact lens) material impregnated with silver nanoparticles. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2014;37(3):149–52. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2013.09.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakerimoghaddam A, Ghaemi EA, Jamalli A. Zinc oxide nanoparticle reduced biofilm formation and antigen 43 expressions in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2017;20:451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rad MS, Kompany A, Zak AK, Abrishami M. The effect of silver concentration and calcination temperature on structural and optical properties of ZnO: Ag nanoparticles. Mod Phys Lett B. 2015;29(01):1450254. doi:10.1142/S0217984914502546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azam A, Ahmed AS, Oves M, Khan M, Memic A. Size-dependent antimicrobial properties of CuO nanoparticles against Gram-positive and-negative bacterial strains. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:3527. doi:10.2147/IJN.S29020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon K-Y, Byeon JH, Park J-H HJ. Susceptibility constants of Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis to silver and copper nanoparticles. Sci Total Environ. 2007;373:572–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruparelia JP, Chatterjee AK, Duttagupta SP, Mukherji S. Strain specificity in antimicrobial activity of silver and copper nanoparticles. Acta Biomater. 2008;4(3):707–16. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2007.11.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azam A, Ahmed AS, Oves M, Khan MS, Habib SS, Memic A. Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:6003. doi:10.2147/IJN.S35347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghupathi KR, Koodali RT, Manna AC. Size-dependent bacterial growth inhibition and mechanism of antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2011;27(7):4020–28. doi:10.1021/la104825u.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy KM, Feris K, Bell J, Wingett DG, Hanley C, Punnoose A. Selective toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles to prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems. App Phys Lett. 2007;90(21):213902. doi:10.1063/1.2742324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman MD, Stotland M, Ellis JI. The safety of nanosized particles in titanium dioxide– and zinc oxide–based sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61(4):685–92. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.02.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen JW, Martinez E, Louka P, Wingett DG. Zinc oxide nanoparticles for selective destruction of tumor cells and potential for drug delivery applications. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010;7(9):1063–77. doi:10.1517/17425247.2010.502560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smijs TG, Pavel S. Titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles in sunscreens: focus on their safety and effectiveness. Nanotechnol Sci App. 2011;4:95. doi:10.2147/NSA.S19419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schilling K, Bradford B, Castelli D, Dufour E, Nash JF, Pape W, Schulte S, Tooley I, Bosch J, Schellauf F. Human safety review of “nano” titanium dioxide and zinc oxide. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2010;9(4):495–509. doi:10.1039/b9pp00180h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley C, Layne J, Punnoose A, Reddy K, Coombs I, Coombs A, Feris K, Wingett D. Preferential killing of cancer cells and activated human T cells using ZnO nanoparticles. Nanotechnol. 2008;19(29):295103. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/19/29/295103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman MD, Stotland M, Ellis JI. The safety of nanosized particles in titanium dioxide–and zinc oxide–based sunscreens. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;61(4):685–92. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.02.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinardell M, Mitjans M. Antitumor activities of metal oxide nanoparticles. Nanomater. 2015;5(2):1004–21. doi:10.3390/nano5021004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahab R, Kaushik NK, Kaushik N, Choi EH, Umar A, Dwivedi S, Musarrat J, Al-Khedhairy AA. ZnO nanoparticles induces cell death in malignant human T98G gliomas, KB and non-malignant HEK cells. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2013;9(7):1181–89. doi:10.1166/jbn.2013.1652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahab R, Dwivedi S, Umar A, Singh S, Hwang I, Shin H-S, Musarrat J, Al-Khedhairy AA, Kim YS. ZnO nanoparticles induce oxidative stress in Cloudman S91 melanoma cancer cells. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2013;9(3):441–49. doi:10.1166/jbn.2013.1593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos P, Pilawa B. The EPR examination of free radicals formation in thermally sterilized β-lactam antibiotics. Curr Top Biophys. 2010;33:183–87.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal RA, Sutton SV, Schlech BA. Review of standard for evaluating the effectiveness of contact lens disinfectants. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2002;56:37–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hildebrandt C, Wagner D, Kohlmann T, Kramer A. In-vitro analysis of the microbicidal activity of 6 contact lens care solutions. BMC Infec Dis. 2012;12(1):241. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-12-241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbilek M, Evren E. Efficacy of multipurpose contact lens solutions against ESBL-positive Escherichia coli, MRSA, and Candida albicans clinical isolates. Eye Contact Lens. 2014;40(3):157–60. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaselgrave W, Andrew PW, Kilvington S. Acidified nitrite enhances hydrogen peroxide disinfection of Acanthamoeba, bacteria and fungi. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(6):1207–14. doi:10.1093/jac/dkq075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montani G. Clinical evaluation of multipurpose lens care solutions on a silicone hydrogel contact lens. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2012;35:e24–e5. doi:10.1016/j.clae.2012.08.077.
   Google Scholar
• Belfort R, Toledo M, Burnier M, Smith RL, Silva V, Trabulsi LR. Experimental guinea pig ocular infection by Salmonella typhimurium. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26:591–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata A, Ramirez-Arcos S. A comparative study of McFarland turbidity standards and the Densimat photometer to determine bacterial cell density. Curr Microbiol. 2015;70(6):907–09. doi:10.1007/s00284-015-0801-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly C, Gilchrist J, Peeler J, Campbell J. Spiral plate count method for the examination of raw and pasteurized milk. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1976;32:21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rad MS, Khameneh B, Sabeti Z, Mohajeri SA, Bazzaz BSF. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticle-loaded soft contact lens materials: the effect of monomer composition. Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(10):1286–93. doi:10.3109/02713683.2015.1123726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer L, Stratton CW, Reller L. Minimum inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of 44 antimicrobial agents against three standard control strains in broth with and without human serum. Antimicrob Agents Chem. 1981;19(6):1050–55. doi:10.1128/AAC.19.6.1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh U, Akhtar S, Mishra A, Sarkar D. A novel screening method based on menadione mediated rapid reduction of tetrazolium salt for testing of anti-mycobacterial agents. J Microbiol Methods. 2011;84(2):202–07. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2010.11.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inamdar S, Ganbavle V, Shaikh S, Rajpure K. Effect of the buffer layer on the metal–semiconductor–metal UV photodetector based on Al‐doped and undoped ZnO thin films with different device structures. Physica Stat Solidi (A). 2015;212(8):1704–12. doi:10.1002/pssa.201431850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pudukudy M, Yaakob Z. Simple chemical synthesis of novel ZnO nanostructures: role of counter ions. Solid State Sci. 2014;30:78–88. doi:10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2014.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair S, Sasidharan A, Rani VD, Menon D, Nair S, Manzoor K, Raina S. Role of size scale of ZnO nanoparticles and microparticles on toxicity toward bacteria and osteoblast cancer cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009;20(1):235. doi:10.1007/s10856-008-3548-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon-Deckers A, Loo S, Mayne-L’hermite M, Herlin-Boime N, Menguy N, Reynaud C, Gouget B, Carrière M. Size-, composition-and shape-dependent toxicological impact of metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes toward bacteria. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43(21):8423–29. doi:10.1021/es9016975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Jiang Y, Ding Y, Povey M, York D. Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids). J Nanopart Res. 2007;9(3):479–89. doi:10.1007/s11051-006-9150-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha R, Karan R, Sinha A, Khare S. Interaction and nanotoxic effect of ZnO and Ag nanoparticles on mesophilic and halophilic bacterial cells. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102(2):1516–20. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunalan S, Sivaraj R, Rajendran V. Green synthesized ZnO nanoparticles against bacterial and fungal pathogens. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int. 2012;22(6):693–700. doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2012.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar