191
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cornea

Visual and Refractive Outcomes with a New Topography-integrated Wavefront-guided Lasik Procedure

, &
Pages 615-621 | Received 24 Mar 2020, Accepted 06 Sep 2020, Published online: 16 Sep 2020

References

  • Ryan DS, Sia RK, Rabin J, Rivers BA, Stutzman RD, Pasternak JF, Eaddy JB, Logan LA, Bower KS. Contrast sensitivity after wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized PRK and LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:590–96. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20180716-01.
  • Durán JA, Gutiérrez E, Atienza R, Piñero DP. Vector analysis of astigmatic changes and optical quality outcomes after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using a high-resolution aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:1515–22. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.020.
  • Moussa S, Dexl A, Krall EM, Dietrich M, Arlt EM, Grabner G, Ruckhofer J. Comparison of short-term refractive surgery outcomes after wavefront-guided versus non-wavefront-guided LASIK. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2016;26:529–35. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000882.
  • Chen SP, Manche EE. Patient-reported vision-related quality of life after bilateral wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45:752–59. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.013.
  • Manche E, Roe J. Recent advances in wavefront-guided LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29:286–91. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000488.
  • Piñero DP, Soto-Negro R, Ruiz-Fortes P, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Fukumitsu H. Analysis of intrasession repeatability of ocular aberrometric measurements and validation of keratometry provided by a new integrated system in mild to moderate keratoconus. Cornea. 2019;38:1097–104. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002034.
  • Piñero DP, Soto-Negro R, Ruiz-Fortes P, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Fukumitsu H. Interchangeability of corneal curvature and asphericity measurements provided by three different devices. Int J Ophthalmol. 2019;12:412–16.
  • Roe JR, Manche EE. Prospective, randomized, contralateral eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;207:175–83. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2019.05.026.
  • Thibos LN, Horner D. Power vector analysis of the optical outcomes of refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:80–85. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00797-5.
  • Alpins NA. New method of targeting vectors to treat astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:65–75. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(97)80153-8.
  • Alpins N. Astigmatism analysis by the Alpins method. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(1):31–49. doi:10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00798-7.
  • Stonecipher K, Parrish J, Stonecipher M. Comparing wavefront-optimized, wavefront-guided and topography-guided laser vision correction: clinical outcomes using an objective decision tree. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29:277–85. doi:10.1097/ICU.0000000000000495.
  • Moshirfar M, Somani AN, Motlagh MN, Vaidyanathan U, Sumsion JS, Barnes JR, Ronquillo YC. Comparison of FDA-reported visual and refractive outcomes of the toric ICL lens, SMILE, and topography-guided LASIK for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2019;35:699–706. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20190930-01.
  • Imamoglu S, Kaya V, Oral D, Perente I, Basarir B, Yilmaz OF. Corneal wavefront-guided customized laser in situ keratomileusis after penetrating keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:785–92. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.10.042.
  • Shetty R, Matalia H, Nandini C, Shetty A, Khamar P, Grover T, Sinha Roy A. wavefront-guided LASIK has comparable ocular and corneal aberrometric outcomes but better visual acuity outcomes than SMILE in myopic eyes. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:527–32. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20180607-02.
  • Kobashi H, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Takahashi M, Shimizu K. Two-years results of small-incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96:e119–e126. doi:10.1111/aos.13470.
  • Khalifa MA, Ghoneim A, Shafik Shaheen M, Aly MG, Piñero DP. Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes of SMILE and wavefront-guided LASIK in low and moderate myopia. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:298–304. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170222-01.
  • Moshirfar M, Shah TJ, Skanchy DF, Linn SH, Kang P, Durrie DS. Comparison and analysis of FDA reported visual outcomes of the three latest platforms for LASIK: wavefront guided Visx iDesign, topography guided WaveLight Allegro Contoura, and topography guided Nidek EC-5000 CATz. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:135–47. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S115270.
  • Khalifa MA, Alsahn MF, Shaheen MS, Pinero DP. Comparative analysis of the efficacy of astigmatic correction after wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK in low and moderate myopic eyes. Int J Ophthalmol. 2017;10:285–92.
  • Schallhorn SC, Venter JA, Hannan SJ, Hettinger KA. Clinical outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis to treat moderate-to-high astigmatism. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:1291–98. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S87887.
  • Lee MD, Toy BC, Manche EE. Astigmatic outcomes in myopic wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy using vector analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:1350–54. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.07.022.
  • Piñero DP, López-Navarro A, Cabezos I, de Fez D, Caballero MT, Camps VJ. Intrasession repeatability of refractive and ocular aberrometric measurements obtained using a multidiagnostic device in healthy eyes. Clin Optom. 2017;9:91–96. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S132572.
  • Xu CC, Xue T, Wang QM, Zhou YN, Huang JH, Yu AY. Repeatability and reproducibility of a double-pass optical quality analysis device. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117587. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117587.
  • Garcia-Gonzalez M, Bouza-Miguens C, Parafita-Fernandez A, Gros-Otero J, Cañones-Zafra R, Villa-Collar C, Teus MA. Comparison of visual outcomes and flap morphology using 2 femtosecond-laser platforms. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:78–84. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.10.041.
  • Hood CT, Krueger RR, Wilson SE. The association between femtosecond laser flap parameters and ocular aberrations after uncomplicated custom myopic LASIK. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:2155–62. doi:10.1007/s00417-013-2328-1.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.