Impact of Re-bubbling after Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty on Long-term Results

References

• Price MO, Price FW Jr. Endothelial keratoplasty - a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;38(2):128–40. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02213.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price DA, Kelley M, Price FW Jr., Price MO. Five-year graft survival of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (EK) versus descemet stripping EK and the effect of donor sex matching. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1508–14. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.03.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Zarei-Ghanavati M, Avadhanam V, Liu C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty/descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2017;36:1437–43. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cursiefen C. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: the taming of the shrew. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131:88–89. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourtas T, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(6):1082–90. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.12.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng SX, Lee WB, Hammersmith KM, Kuo AN, Li JY, Shen JF, Weikert MP, Shtein RM. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: safety and outcomes: a report by the american academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2018 Feb;125(2):295–310. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.08.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price FW, Price MO. To intervene or not to intervene: that is the question. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:6–7. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber-Hollbach N, Baydoun L, López EF, Frank LE, Dapena I, Liarakos VS, Schaal SC, Ham L, Oellerich S, Melles GRJ. Clinical outcome of rebubbling for graft detachment after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2017 Jul;36(7):771–76. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang M, Wilkins MR, Mehta JS, Tan D. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(1):15–21. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher F, Hos D, Müller-Schwefe S, Steven P, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM. Spontaneous long-term course of persistent peripheral graft detachments after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99(6):768–72. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid RA, Craig EA, Suleman H. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): first UK prospective study of 1-year visual outcomes, graft survival and endothelial cell count. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:166–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorovoy MS. DMEK Complications. Cornea. 2014;33(1):101–04. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Horn FK, Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation: advanced triple procedure. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154(1):47–55. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2012.01.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balachandran C, Ham L, Verschoor CA, Ong TS, van der Wees J, Melles GRJ. Spontaneous corneal clearance despite graft detachment in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(2):227–34. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.02.033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaridis A, Fydanaki O, Giallouros E, Georgalas I, Kymionis G, Sekundo W, Droutsas K. Recovery of corneal clarity after DMEK followed by rebubbling versus uneventful DMEK. Cornea. 2018 Jul;37(7):840–47. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng MT, Price MO, Miller JM, Price FW Jr. Air reinjection and endothelial cell density in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: five-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Jul;40(7):1116–21. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea. 2006;25(8):987–9905. doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000248385.16896.34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Preliminary clinical results of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(2):222–27. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.09.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier AK, Gundlach E, Schroeter J, Klamann MK, Gonnermann J, Riechardt AI, Bertelmann E, Joussen AM, Torun N. Influence of the difficulty of graft unfolding and attachment on the outcome in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;253(6):895–900. doi:10.1007/s00417-015-2939-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier AK, Gundlach E, Pilger D, Rübsam A, Klamann MK, Gonnermann J, Bertelmann E, Joussen AM, Torun N. Rate and Localization of Graft Detachment in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. Cornea. 2016 Mar;35(3):308–12. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorovoy IR, Cui QN, Gorovoy MS. Donor tissue characteristics in preparation of DMEK grafts. Cornea. 2014 Jul;33(7):683–85. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinzelmann S, Hüther S, Böhringer D, Eberwein P, Reinhard T, Maier P. Influence of donor characteristics on descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2014 Jun;33(6):644–48. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-calvo de Mora M, Groeneveld-van Beek EA, Frank LE, van der Wees J, Oellerich S, Bruinsma M, Melles GR. Association between graft storage time and donor age with endothelial cell density and graft adherence after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jan;134(1):91–94. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaurasia S, Price FW Jr, Gunderson L, Price MO. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: clinical results of single versus triple procedures (combined with cataract surgery). Ophthalmology. 2014;121:454‐458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahnazaryan D, Sese AH, Hollick EJ. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: DMEK compared to triple-DMEK [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 10]. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;S0002-9394(20)30232–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Marchtaler PV, Weller JM, Kruse FE, Tourtas T. Air versus sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2018;37(1):15–19. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaub F, Simons HG, Roters S, Heindl LM, Kugler W, Bachmann BO, Cursiefen C. Influence of 20 % sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) on human corneal endothelial cells. Ophthalmologe. 2016;113:52–57. doi:10.1007/s00347-015-0051-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse M, Kuerten D, Walter P, Plange N, Johnen S, Fuest M. The effect of air, SF6 and C3F8 on immortalized human corneal endothelial cells. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;95:e284–e290. doi:10.1111/aos.13256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques RE, Guerra PS, Sousa DC, Ferreira NP, Gonçalves AI, Quintas AM, Rodrigues W. Sulfur hexafluoride 20% versus air 100% for anterior chamber tamponade in DMEK: a meta-analysis. Cornea. 2018;37(6):691‐697. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora M, Quilendrino R, Ham L, Liarakos VS, van Dijk K, Baydoun L, Dapena I, Oellerich S, Melles GR. Clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2015 Mar;122(3):464–70. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.09.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlögl A, Tourtas T, Kruse FE, Weller JM. Long-term clinical outcome after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;169:218‐226. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baydoun L, Ham L, Borderie V, Dapena I, Hou J, Frank LE, Oellerich S, Melles GR. Endothelial Survival After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: effect of Surgical Indication and Graft Adherence Status. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov;133(11):1277–85. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.3064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peraza-Nieves J, Baydoun L, Dapena I, Ilyas A, Frank LE, Luceri S, Ham L, Oellerich S, Melles GRJ. Two-year clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2017 Jun;36(6):655–60. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham L, Frank LE, Gorges S, Bourgonje VJA, Baydoun L, van Dijk K, Melles GRJ. Parameters associated with endothelial cell density variability after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar;211:22–30. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2019.10.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar