Corneal Crosslinking Biomechanics Evaluated by a Novel and Easily Implemented Differential Tonometry Method

References

• Hersh P, Greenstein S, Fry K. Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:149–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.030.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roberts C, Dupps W. Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:991–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deol M, Taylor D, Radcliffe N. Corneal hysteresis and its relevance to glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26:96–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amano S, Nejima R, Inoue K. Effect of topical prostaglandins on the biomechanics and shape of the cornea. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;10:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Gkika M, Labiris G, Giarmoukakis A, Koutsogianni A, Kozobolis V. Evaluation of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after corneal cross-linking for keratoconus. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250:565–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-011-1897-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman R, Behndig A, Hallberg P, Lindén C. Increased corneal hysteresis after corneal collagen crosslinking: a study based on applanation resonance technology. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:1426–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoerl E, Terai N, Scholz F, Raiskup F, Pillunat L. Detection of biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking using ocular response analyzer software. J Refractive Surg. 2011;27:452–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20110106-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bak-Nielsen S, Pedersen IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Dynamic Scheimpflug-based assessment of keratoconus and the effects of corneal cross-linking. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:408–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20140513-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Romano V, Arbabi E, Brunner M, Willoughby C, Batterbury M, Kaye S. In vivo early corneal biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking in patients with progressive keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:840–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20170922-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling S, Remon L, Pérez-Escudero A, Merayo-Lloves J, Marcos S. Corneal biomechanical changes after collagen cross-linking from porcine eye inflation experiments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(8):3961–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-4536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palko J, Tang J, Cruz Perez B, Pan X, Liu J. Spatially heterogeneous corneal mechanical responses before and after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Jun;40(6):1021–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.09.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmund C. Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 1988;66:134–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1988.tb04000.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra R, Romano V, Arbabi E, Brunner M, Willoughby CE, Batterbury M, Kaye SB. In vivo early corneal biomechanical changes after corneal cross-linking in patients with progressive keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:840–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20170922-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty S, Lim G, Duncan W, Enikov E, Schwiegerling J. Goldmann tonometer prism with an optimized error correcting applanation surface. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016;5:1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.5.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Roberts C. Influence of cornea biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cat and Ref Surg. 2005;31:146–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detorakis E, Tsaglioti E, Kymionis G. Non-invasive ocular rigidity measurement: a differential tonometry approach. Acta Medica. 2015;58:92–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.14712/18059694.2015.99.
   Google Scholar
• Moiseeva I, Stein A, Lyubimov G. Estimating the elastic properties of the eye from differential tonometry by the Schiøtz tonometer: analysis of the measurement procedure on the basis of a two-component mathematical model. BIOPHYSICS. 2016;61:1011–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1134/S000635091606018X.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider E, Grehn F. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:2–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ijg.0000196655.85460.d6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe N, Berdahl J, Ibach M, Schweitzer J, Levine J, McCafferty S. Improved efficacy of topical latanoprost 0.005% demonstrated by corneal biomechanical correcting modified goldmann prism. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:2245–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S264055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam A, Hon Y, Leung L, Lam D. Repeatability of a novel corneal indentation device for corneal biomechanical measurement. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35:455–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hon Y, Chen G, Lu S, Lam D, Lam A. In vivo measurement of regional corneal tangent modulus eye. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14974. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14750-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu SH, Chong IT, Leung SYY, Lam DCC. Characterization of corneal biomechanical properties and determination of natural intraocular pressure using CID-GAT. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019;8:10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.5.10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty S, Tetrault K, McColgin A, Chue W, Levine J, Muller M. Modified Goldmann prism intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and correlation to corneal biomechanical metrics: multicentre randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthal. 2019;0:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• McCafferty S, Tetrault K, McColgin A, Chue W, Levine J, Muller M. Intraocular pressure measurement accuracy and repeatability of a modified Goldmann prism: multi-center randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthal. 2018;196:145–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty S, Lim G, Duncan W, Enikov E, Schwiegerling J. Goldmann tonometer error correcting prism: clinical evaluation. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:835–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S135272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty S, Levine J, Schwiegerling J, Enikov ET. Goldmann and error correcting tonometry prisms compared to intracameral pressure. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;1:8.
   Google Scholar
• McCafferty S, Enikov E, Schwiegerling J, Ashley S. Goldmann tonometry tear-film error and partial correction with a shaped applanation surface. Clin Ophthal. 2018;1:5.
   Google Scholar
• Read S, Collins M. Intraocular pressure in keratoconus. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89:358–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01690.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romppainen T, Bachmann L, Kaufmann C, Kniestedt C, Mrochen M, Thiel M. Effect of riboflavin-UVA–induced collagen cross-linking on intraocular pressure measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:5494–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty S, Schwiegerling J, Enikov E. Thermal load from a CO2 laser radiant energy source induces changes in corneal surface asphericity, roughness, and transverse contraction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:4279–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-9579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty S, Schwiegerling J, Enikov E. Corneal surface asphericity, roughness, and transverse contraction after uniform scanning excimer laser ablation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:1296–305. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-9267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar