Histologic and Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Radiosurgery in Strabismus Surgery in a Rabbit Model

References

• Metz HS. Restrictive factors in strabismus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1983;28(2):71–83. doi:10.1016/0039-6257(83)90075-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassem RR, El-Mofty RMA. Amniotic membrane transplantation in strabismus surgery. Curr Eye Res. 2019;44(5):451–464. doi:10.1080/02713683.2018.1562555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güçlü ES, Sari AA, Dinç E, Özcan Metin T, Çoşkun Yilmaz B, Taşdelen B. Efficacy of mitomycin-C and infliximab in reducing adhesion and fibrosis following strabismus surgery. Turk J Med Sci. 2016;46(5):1401–1406. doi:10.3906/sag-1506-45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun BY, Rhiu S. Cryopreserved rabbit amniotic membrane alleviated inflammatory response and fibrosis following experimental strabismus surgery in rabbits. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0187058. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu WY, Jung HM, Roh MS, Kwon YH, Jeung WJ, Park WC, Rho SH, Ahn HB. The effect of a temperature-sensitive poloxamer-alginate-CaCl2 mixture after strabismus surgery in a rabbit model. J Aapos. 2013;17(5):484–489. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy JB, Larochelle MB, Pedler MG, Petrash JM, Enzenauer RW. The effect of amniotic membrane grafting on healing and wound strength after strabismus surgery in a rabbit model. J Aapos. 2018;22(1):22–26 e1. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.08.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oktem C, Oto S, Toru S, Bakar C, Ozdemir H, Akova YA. Suramin, genistein and collagen matrix (DuraGen) for delayed adjustment after strabismus surgery: which one is best? Curr Eye Res. 2016;41(3):417–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SB, Kim JH, Yang HK, Hwang JM. Efficacy of polytetrafluoroethylene/polylactide-co-glycolide (PTFE/PLGA) laminate and PTFE/PLGA laminate containing slow-releasing thalidomide in delayed adjustable strabismus surgery in a rabbit model. Curr Eye Res. 2019;44(7):806–812. doi:10.1080/02713683.2019.1591461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo YJ, Hwang JM, Choe G, Yang HK. Efficacy of collagen matrix implant on adhesions in restrictive strabismus: an experimental study in a rabbit model. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(2):e156–e61. doi:10.1111/aos.13876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung KI, Choi JS, Kim HK, Shin SY. Effects of an anti-transforming growth factor-beta agent (pirfenidone) on strabismus surgery in rabbits. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37(9):770–776. doi:10.3109/02713683.2012.681748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi K, Nakazawa M, Metoki T, Yamazaki H, Miyagawa Y, Ito T. Effects of solid hyaluronic acid film on postoperative fibrous scar formation after strabismus surgery in animals. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2011;48(5):301–304. doi:10.3928/01913913-20100920-02.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassem RR, Khodeir MM, Salem M, Abdel-Hamid MA, El-Mofty RM, Kamal AM, Elhilali HM. Effect of cryopreserved amniotic membrane on the development of adhesions and fibrosis after extraocular muscle surgery in rabbits. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(2):e140-8–e148. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02563.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SU, Kim KW, Moon NJ. Effective treatment for prevention of post-operative adhesion after strabismus surgery in experimental rabbit model: 0.5% tranilast ophthalmic solution. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16(1):166. doi:10.1186/s12886-016-0344-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eşme A, Yildirim C, Tatlipinar S, Düzcan E, Yaylali V, Ozden S. Effects of intraoperative sponge mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil on scar formation following strabismus surgery in rabbits. Strabismus. 2004;12(3):141–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta P, Dadeya S, Bhambhawani V. Comparison of minimally invasive strabismus surgery (MISS) and conventional strabismus surgery using the limbal approach. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2017;54(4):208–215. doi:10.3928/01913913-20170321-01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner BJ. Comparison of a new, minimally invasive strabismus surgery technique with the usual limbal approach for rectus muscle recession and plication. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91(1):5. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.108381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charoenkwan K, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z, Rerkasem K, Matovinovic E. Scalpel versus electrosurgery for major abdominal incisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:CD005987.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monteiro L, Delgado ML, Garces F, Machado M, Ferreira F, Martins M, Salazar F, Pacheco JJ. A histological evaluation of the surgical margins from human oral fibrous-epithelial lesions excised with CO2 laser, diode laser, Er:YAG laser, Nd:YAG laser, electrosurgical scalpel and cold scalpel. Med Oral. 2019;24(2):e271–e80. doi:10.4317/medoral.22819.
   Google Scholar
• Manivannan N, Ahathya RS, Rajaram PC. Scalpel versus electrosurgery: comparison of gingival perfusion status using ultrasound Doppler flowmetry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013;5(Suppl 2):S154–S9. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.114317.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinha UK, Gallagher LA. Effects of steel scalpel, ultrasonic scalpel, CO2 laser, and monopolar and bipolar electrosurgery on wound healing in guinea pig oral mucosa. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(2):228–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn JM, Choi CY, Seo KY. Surgical approach with high-frequency radiowave electrosurgery for superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis. Cornea. 2014;33(2):210–214. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji MJ, Lee SJ, Han SB, Hyon JY. Efficacy and safety of conjunctival cystectomy using high-frequency radiowave electrosurgery: a preliminary report. Eye Contact Lens. 2019;45(6):410–413. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji YW, Seong H, Lee S, Alotaibi MH, Kim TI, Lee HK, Seo KY. The correction of conjunctivochalasis using high-frequency radiowave electrosurgery improves dry eye disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2551. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-82088-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo KI, Choi CY. High-frequency radiowave electrosurgery for persistent conjunctival chemosis following cosmetic blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):1336–1342. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang W, Zhong X, Chen H, Chen W, Chen W. Pupilloplasty by radiofrequency diathermy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(3):e479–e81. doi:10.1111/aos.13827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Tiwary PK, Jha AK, Zeeshan M, Ranjan A. Successful treatment of xanthelasma palpebrarum with a combination of radiofrequency ablation and wound suturing. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(12):3286–3290. doi:10.1111/jocd.13678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou B, Wang F, Ye Z, Jin X, Fu Y, Li Z. Study of minimally invasive radiofrequency ablation of the ciliary body for the treatment of glaucoma in rabbits. Mol Med Rep. 2020;21(3):1071–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zgaljardic Z, Zgaljardic I, Juric F. Treatment of malar mound and festoon with fractional microneedle bipolar radiofrequency combined with 15% TCA peel. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021;20(6):1810–1812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salama MM, Abdel-Hamid RM, El-Basty MK, El-Zawahry OM. One-year results of stab incision glaucoma surgery and radiofrequency-assisted stab incision in management of open-angle glaucoma. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2019;26(3):141–147. doi:10.4103/meajo.MEAJO_153_18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasar ZB, Ozmeric N, Ozdemir B, Gökmenoğlu C, Baris E, Altan G, Kahraman S. Comparison of radiofrequency and electrocautery with conventional scalpel incisions. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(11):2136–2141. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2016.06.172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liboon J, Funkhouser W, Terris DJ. A comparison of mucosal incisions made by scalpel, CO2 laser, electrocautery, and constant-voltage electrocautery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;116(3):379–385. doi:10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70277-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman EB, Read RW, Boyle CR, Cooper R, Miller WW, McLaughlin RM. Histologic comparison of canine skin biopsies collected using monopolar electrosurgery, CO2 laser, radiowave radiosurgery, skin biopsy punch, and scalpel. Vet Surgery. 2007;36(1):50–56. doi:10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00234.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courey MS, Fomin D, Smith T, Huang S, Sanders D, Reinisch L. Histologic and physiologic effects of electrocautery, CO2 laser, and radiofrequency injury in the porcine soft palate. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(8):1316–1319. doi:10.1097/00005537-199908000-00025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Divers S, Stahl SJ, Cooper T, Blas-Machado U. Comparison between CO2 laser and 4.0 MHz radiosurgery for incising skin in white Carneau pigeons (Columba livia). J Avian Med Surg. 2008;22(2):103–107. doi:10.1647/2007-009R1.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoinohoriti OK, Chrysomali E, Tzerbos F, Iatrou I. Comparison of lateral thermal injury and healing of porcine skin incisions performed by CO2-laser, monopolar electrosurgery and radiosurgery: a preliminary study based on histological and immunohistochemical results. Int J Dermatol. 2012;51(8):979–986. doi:10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05384.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar