598
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special section

Rationalizing tax increment financing in Chicago

Pages 199-220 | Received 19 Dec 2013, Accepted 23 Dec 2015, Published online: 18 Jul 2016

References

  • Albrechts, Louis. (1991). Changing roles and positions of planners. Urban Studies, 28(1), 123–137.
  • Alexander, E. R. (2000). Rationality revisited: Planning paradigms in a post-postmodernist perspective. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(3), 242–256.
  • Arnstein, Serry R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Assocation, 35, 216–224.
  • Beauregard, Robert A. (1989). Between modernity and postmodernity: The ambiguous position of US planning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 7(4), 381–395.
  • Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10(2), 182–222.
  • Brenner, Neil, & Theodore, Nik. (2002). Cities and the geographies of actually existing neoliberalism. Antipode, 34(3), 349–379.
  • Brenner, Neil, & Theodore, Nik. (2005). Neoliberalism and the urban condition. City, 9(1), 101–107.
  • Callon, Michel (Ed.). (1998). The laws of the markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Canal/Congress Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Project and Plan. (1998). City of Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.cityofchicago.org/content/dam/city/depts/dcd/tif/plans/T_063_CanalCongressRDP.pdf
  • Chamberlain, Lisa. (2004). In Chicago’s west loop, real estate profits do grow on trees. New York Times, 154(52991), 12–12.
  • Chicago Central Area Plan. (2003). City of Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.org/city/en/depts/dcd/supp_info/central_area_plandraft.html
  • Clarke, S., & Gaile, G. (1998). The work of cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Clavel, Pierre. (2012, November). Progressive planning: The magazine and the movements. Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, Ohio.
  • Davidoff, Paul. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31, 331–338.
  • Day, Diane. (1997). Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested concept? Journal of Planning Literature, 11, 421–434.
  • Dewey, John. (1920/2004). Reconstruction in philosophy. Mineola, NY: Courier Dover Publications.
  • Fainstein, Susan S. (1991). Promoting economic development urban planning in the United States and Great Britain. Journal of the American Planning Association, 57(1), 22–33.
  • Fainstein, Susan S. (2000). New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review, 34, 451–476.
  • Fainstein, Susan S. (2010). The just city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Findings and Recommendations for Reforming the Use of Tax Increment Financing in Chicago: Creating Greater Efficiency, Transparency and Accountability. (2011). City of Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.cityofchicago.org/content/dam/city/depts/mayor/Press%20Room/Press%20Releases/2011/August/8.29.11TIFReport.pdf
  • Fisher, Melissa S., & Downey, Greg (Eds.). (2006). Frontiers of capital: Ethnographic reflections on the new economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Flyvbjerg, Bent. (1998). Rationality and power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Flyvbjerg, Bent. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Forester, John. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Forester, John. (2001). An instructive case-study hampered by theoretical puzzles: Critical comments on Flyvbjerg’s rationality and power. International Planning Studies, 6(3), 263–270.
  • Friedmann, John. (1989). Planning in the public domain: Discourse and praxis. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 8(2), 128–130.
  • Geertz, Clifford. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
  • Glater, Jonathan. (2004, June 4). Asbestos bankruptcies face setbacks on two fronts. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/04/business/asbestos-bankruptcies-face-setbacks-on-two-fronts.html
  • Hall, Tim, & Hubbard, Phil. (1996). The entrepreneurial city: New urban politics, new urban geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 20(2), 153–174.
  • Harvey, David. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B. Human Geography, 71(1), 3–17.
  • Healey, Patsy. (1992). A planner’s day: Knowledge and action in communicative practice. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(1), 9–20.
  • Healey, Patsy. (1993). Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Healey, Patsy. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.
  • Healey, Patsy. (2009). The pragmatic tradition in planning thought. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), 277–292.
  • Ho, Karen. (2009). Disciplining investment bankers, disciplining the economy: Wall street’s institutional culture of crisis and the downsizing of corporate America. American Anthropologist, 111(2), 177–189.
  • Hoch, Charles. (1984). Doing good and being right. Journal of the American Planning Association, 50(3), 335–345.
  • Hoch, Charles. (1994). What planners do: Power, politics, and persuasion. Chicago: Planners Press.
  • Huxley, Margo. (2000). The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research., 19, 369–377.
  • Innes, Judith. E. (1995). Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3), 183–189.
  • Innes, Judith E., & Booher, David E. (1999). Consensus building as role playing and bricolage. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(1), 9–26.
  • Jessop, Bob. (1990). State theory: Putting capitalist states in their place. University Park: Penn State University Press.
  • Jessop, Bob. (1998). The enterprise of narrative and the narrative of enterprise: Place marketing and the entrepreneurial city. In T. Hall & P. Hubbard (Eds.), The entrepreneurial city (pp. 77–99). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Jessop, Bob. (2007). State power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Jones, Martin R. (1997). Spatial selectivity of the state? The regulationist enigma and local struggles over economic governance. Environment and Planning A, 29(5), 831–864.
  • Kalberg, Stephen. (1980). Max Weber’s types of rationality: Cornerstones for the analysis of rationalization processes in history. American Journal of Sociology, 85(5), 1145–1179.
  • Knorr-Cetina, Karen, & Bruegger, Urs. (2002). Traders’ engagement with markets: A postsocial relationship. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5–6), 161–185.
  • Krumholz, Norman. (1982). A retrospective view of equity planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 48, 163–174.
  • Lake, Robert W. (1993). Planning and applied geography: Positivism, ethics, and geographic information systems. Progress in Human Geography, 17(3), 404–413.
  • Lake, Robert W. (2012, November). Justice as object and subject of planning. Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Annual Meeting, Cincinnati, OH.
  • Lake, Robert W. (2014). Methods and moral inquiry. Urban Geography, 35, 657–668. Advance online publication.
  • LaSalle Central Redevelopment Project Area Tax Increment Finance District Plan and Project. (2006). City of Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.cityofchicago.org/content/dam/city/depts/dcd/tif/plans/T_147_LaSalleCentralRDP.pdf
  • Lester, T. William. (2014). Does Chicago’s Tax Increment Financing (TIF) programme pass the ‘But-for’Test? Job creation and economic development impacts using time-series data. Urban Studies, 51(4), 655–674.
  • Leyshon, Andrew, & Thrift, Nigel. (1997). Money/space: Geographies of monetary transformation. New York: Routledge.
  • Lindblom, Charles. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.
  • MacKenzie, Donald. (2008). Material markets: How economic agents are constructed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McGreal, S., Berry, J., Lloyd, G., & McCarthy, J. (2002). Tax-based mechanisms in urban regeneration: Dublin and Chicago Models. Urban Studies, 39(10), 1819–1831.
  • Meyerson, Martin, & Banfield, Edward C. (1955). Politics, planning, and the public interest: The case of public housing in Chicago. New York: Free Press.
  • Near West Tax Increment Financing and Redevelopment Project and Plan. (1996). City of Chicago. Retrieved from http://www.cityofchicago.org/content/dam/city/depts/dcd/tif/plans/T_032_NearWestRDP.pdf
  • Pacewicz, Josh. (2012). Tax increment financing, economic development professionals and the financialization of urban politics. Socio-Economic Review, 11(3), 413–440.
  • Peck, Jamie. (2010). Constructions of neoliberal reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Peck, Jamie., & Tickell, Adam. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.
  • Peck, Jamie., & Tickell, Adam. (2007). Conceptualising neoliberalism: Thinking Thatcherism. In H. Leitner, J. Peck, & E. S. Sheppard (Eds.), Contesting neo-liberalism: Urban frontiers (pp. 26–50). New York: Guilford.
  • Perry, David C. (1995). Making space: Planning as a mode of thought. In Helen Liggett & David C. Perry (Eds.), Spatial practices: Critical explorations in social/spatial theory (pp. 209–242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Riles, Annelise. (2011). Collateral knowledge: Legal reasoning in the global financial markets. Chciago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Sagalyn, Lynne B. (1990). Explaining the improbable local redevelopment in the wake of federal cutbacks. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56(4), 429–441.
  • Sagalyn, Lynne B. (1997). Negotiating for public benefits: The bargaining calculus of public-private development. Urban Studies, 34(12), 1955–1970.
  • Sandercock, Leonie. (2003). Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(1), 11–28.
  • Sandercock, Leonie. (2004). Towards a planning imagination for the 21st century. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(2), 133–141.
  • Sandercock, Leonie, & Forsyth, Ann. (1992). A gender agenda: New directions for planning theory. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(1), 49–60.
  • Smith, Neil. (2008). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
  • Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, (65 ILCS 5/) Illinois Municipal Code (1999).
  • Timeline of United Airlines’ Bankruptcy. (2006, February 1). Chicago Tribune. Chicago, IL: The Associated Press. Retrieved from http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-021205ual-timeline-story.html
  • Verma, Niraj. (1996). Pragmatic rationality and planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(1), 5–14.
  • Weber, Rachel. (2002). Extracting value from the city: Neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. Antipode, 34(3), 519–540.
  • Weber, Rachel. (2010). Selling city futures: The financialization of urban redevelopment policy. Economic Geography, 86, 251–274.
  • Weber, Rachel, & O’Neill-Kohl, Sara. (2013). The historical roots of tax increment financing, or how real estate consultants kept urban renewal alive. Economic Development Quarterly, 27(3), 193–207.
  • Yiftachel, Oren. (1998). Planning and social control: Exploring the dark side. Journal of Planning Literature, 12, 396–406.
  • Young, Iris. (2002). Inclusion and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Zaloom, Caitlin. (2006). Out of the pits: Traders and technology from Chicago to London. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.