2,728
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Importing export zones: processes and impacts of replicating a Chinese model of urbanization in rural south India

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1496-1518 | Received 27 Nov 2020, Accepted 28 Nov 2021, Published online: 17 Dec 2021

References

  • Aggarwal, A. (2010). Economic impacts of SEZs: Theoretical approaches and analysis of newly notified SEZs in India 20902 (Munich Personal RePEc Archive). https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20902/ .
  • Andors, P. (1988). Women and work in Shenzhen. Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 20(3), 22–41.
  • Bach, J. (2010). “They come in peasants and leave citizens”: Urban villages and the making of Shenzhen, China. Cultural Anthropology, 25(3), 421–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01066.x
  • Bach, J. (2017). Shenzhen: From Exception to Rule. In M. O’Donnell, W. Wang & J. Bach (eds), Learning from Shenzhen (pp. 23-38). University of Chicago Press.
  • Baker, T, McCann, E, & Temenos, C. (2020). Into the ordinary: Non-elite actors and the mobility of harm reduction policies. Policy and Society, 39(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2019.1626079
  • Balakrishnan, S. (2013). Highway urbanization and land conflicts: The challenges to decentralization in India. Pacific Affairs, 86(4), 785–811. https://doi.org/10.5509/2013864785
  • Balakrishnan, S. (2019). Shareholder cities: Land transformations along urban corridors in India. University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Bedi, H. P. (2013). Special Economic Zones: National land challenges, localized protest. Contemporary South Asia, 21(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2012.757582
  • Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2011). What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political Studies Review, 9(3), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00240.x
  • Bok, R., & Coe, N.M. (2017). Geographies of policy knowledge: The state and corporate dimensions of contemporary policy mobilities. Cities, 63, 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.01.001
  • Bunnell, T, & Das, D. (2010). Urban pulse-A geography of serial seduction: Urban policy transfer from Kuala Lumpur to Hyderabad. Urban Geography, 31(3), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.31.3.277
  • Cartier, C. (2018). Zone analog: The state–market problematic and territorial economies in China. Critical Sociology, 44(3), 455–470.
  • Census of India. (2001). https://censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/
  • Chua, B H. (2011). Singapore as model: Planning innovations, knowledge experts. In A. Roy & A. Ong (Eds.), Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp. 29–54). Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Cohen, D. (2015). Grounding mobile policies: Ad-hoc networks and the creative city in Bandung, Indonesia. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 36(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12090
  • Cowan, T. (2018). The urban village, agrarian transformation, and rentier capitalism in Gurgaon, India. Antipode, 50(5), 1244–1266. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12404
  • Cross, J. (2010). Neoliberalism as unexceptional: Economic zones and the everyday precariousness of working life in South India. Critique of Anthropology, 30(4), 355–373.
  • Cross, J. (2014). Dream zones: Anticipating capitalism and development in India. Pluto Press.
  • Fan, C.C. (2007). China on the move: Migration, the state, and the household. Routledge.
  • Fang, I. (2012). Keen to get married: Why marriage is so important to ‘independent’ female migrant workers in Shenzhen, China (FREIA Working Paper No. 78). https://vbn.aau.dk/ws/files/65219033/freia_wp_78.pdf
  • Farole, T., & Akinci, G. (2011). Special economic zones: Progress, emerging challenges, and future directions. The World Bank. https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/978-0-8213-8763-4
  • Ghani, E., Goswami, A, & Kerr, W. (2012). Is India’s manufacturing sector moving away from cities? National Bureau of Economic Research (Working Paper 17992). https://www.nber.org/papers/w17992
  • Goodburn, C. (2015). Migrant girls in Shenzhen: Gender, education and the urbanization of aspiration. The China Quarterly, 222, 320–338. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741015000429
  • Goodburn, C. (2020). Changing patterns of household decision-making and the education of rural migrant children: Comparing Shenzhen and Mumbai. Migration Studies, 8(4), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz013
  • Goodburn, C, & Mishra, S. (n.d.). Beyond the Dormitory Labour Regime: Comparing Chinese and Indian workplace-residence systems as strategies of migrant labour control (under submission).
  • Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry. (2005). Special Economic Zones Act. https://commerce.gov.in/writereaddata/aboutus/actspdfs/SEZ%20Act,%202005.pdf
  • Gururani, S, Kennedy, L, & Sood, A. (2021). Engaging the Urban from the Periphery. South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal, 28. https://journals.openedition.org/samaj/7131
  • He, S., & Chang, Y. (2020). A zone of exception? Interrogating the hybrid housing regime and nested enclaves in China-Singapore Suzhou-Industrial-Park. Housing Studies, 1–25.
  • Hoffman, L. (2011). Urban modelling and contemporary technologies of city building in China: The production of regimes of green urbanisms. In A. Roy & A. Ong (Eds.), Worlding cities: Asian experiments and the art of being global (pp. 55–76). John Wiley and Sons.
  • Jenkins, R., Kennedy, L., Mukhopadhyay, P., & Pradhan, K.C. (2015). Special economic zones in India: Interrogating the nexus of land, development and urbanization. Environment and Urbanization ASIA, 6(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0975425315585426
  • Jenkins, R., Kennedy, L., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2014). Power, policy, and protest: The politics of India’s special economic zones. Oxford University Press.
  • Jiang, Y. (2018). Chinese wisdom: New norms for development and global governance. In K. Brown (Ed.), China’s 19th party congress: Start of a new era (pp. 177–203). World Scientific.
  • Kennedy, L. (2014). The politics of economic restructuring in India: Economic governance and state spatial rescaling. Routledge.
  • Klasen, S., & Pieters, J. (2015). What explains the stagnation of female labor force participation in urban India? (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2015). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-7222
  • Knoerich, J, & Urdinez, F. (2019). Contesting contested multilateralism: Why the west joined the rest in founding the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 12(3), 333–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poz007
  • Kothari, B, Kishore, DV, Raghavaswamy, V, & Galab, S. (2010). Special economic zones and the emergent rural-urban dynamics. Conference proceedings of dynamics of rural transformation in emerging economies. Planning commission, Government of India. https://www.cet.ac.in/prof-bejene-s-kothari/ppt_benjene_kothari-7
  • Kundra, A. (2000). The performance of India’s export zones: A comparison with the Chinese approach. Sage Publications.
  • Lee, CK. (1998). Gender and the South China miracle: Two worlds of factory women. Univ of California Press.
  • Levien, M. (2013). Regimes of dispossession: From steel towns to special economic zones. Development and Change, 44(2), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12012
  • Liu, Y., He, S., Wu, F., & Webster, C. (2010). Urban villages under China’s rapid urbanization: Unregulated assets and transitional neighbourhoods. Habitat International, 34(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.08.003
  • Ma, E. X., and Blackwell, A. (2017). The Political Architecture of the First and Second Lines. In M. O’Donnell, W. Wang & J. Bach, Learning from Shenzhen (pp. 124–137). University of Chicago Press.
  • Majumdar, R, & Menezes, B. (2014). Maharashtra. In R. Jenkins, L. Kennedy, and P. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Power, policy, and protest: The politics of India’s special economic zones (pp. 239–271). Oxford University Press.
  • Majumder, S. (2003). SEZs: Go the Chinese way. Business Line. The Hindu Group. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2003/05/07/stories/2003050700120900.htm
  • McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00276.x
  • McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and critical urbanism. City, 15(2), 204–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.568715
  • Menon, S, & Mitra, S. (2009). Special economic zones: The rationale. In P Mukhopadhyay, K Pradhan, and K. Sivaramakrishnan (Eds.), Special economic zones: Promise, performance and pending issues (pp. 3–44). Centre for Policy Research.
  • Mitra, S. (2018). Roads to new urban futures. Economic & Political Weekly, 53(49), 57. https://www.epw.in/journal/2018/49/review-urban-affairs/roads-new-urban-futures.html .
  • Neveling, P. (2015). Free trade zones, export processing zones, special economic zones and global imperial formations 200BCE to 2015CE. In I. Ness & Z. Cope (Eds.), Palgrave encyclopedia of imperialism and anti-imperialism (pp. 1007–1016). Palgrave.
  • Ngo, T, Yin, C, & Tang, Zhilin. (2017). Scalar restructuring of the Chinese state: The subnational politics of development zones. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16661721 .
  • O’Donnell, M, Wong, W, & Bach, J (eds). (2017). Learning from Shenzhen: China’s post-Mao experiment from special zone to model city. University of Chicago Press.
  • Ong, A. (2004). The Chinese axis: Zoning technologies and variegated sovereignty. Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(1), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800004392
  • Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as Exception. Duke University Press.
  • Ong, A. (2011). “Introduction: Worlding Cities, or the Art of Being Global.” In: Roy, A. and Ong, A. (eds.) Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global (pp. 1–28). London: Blackwell.
  • Palit, A., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2008). Special economic zones in India: Myths and realities. Anthem Press.
  • Park, B. G. (2017). State territoriality and spaces of exception in East Asia: Universalities and particularities of East Asian special zones. Journal of the Korean association of regional geographers, 23(2), 288–310.
  • Parliament of India. (2007). Standing committee on commerce’s 83rd report on the functioning of SEZs. http://164.100.47.5/newcommittee/reports/EnglishCommittees/Committee%20on%20Commerce/Report%20SEZ1.htm
  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002
  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1068/a44179
  • Percival, T., & Waley, P. (2012). Articulating intra-Asian urbanism: The production of satellite cities in Phenom Penh. Urban Studies, 49(13), 2873–2888. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012452461
  • Pun, N. (2005). Made in China: Women factory workers in a global workplace. Duke University Press.
  • Robinson, J. (2002). Global and world cities: A view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00397
  • Roy, A. (2016). When is Asia? The Professional Geographer, 68(2), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2015.1099183
  • Sampat, P. (2010). Special economic zones in India: Reconfiguring displacement in a neoliberal order? City & Society, 22(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-744X.2010.01037.x
  • Shenzhen Statistics Bureau. (2008). Shenzhen statistical yearbook. China Statistics Press.
  • Shin, H.B., Zhao, Y., & Koh, S.Y. (2020). Whither progressive urban futures? Critical reflections on the politics of temporality in Asia. City 24(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2020.1739925 .
  • Shin, H.B. (2019). Asian urbanism, Orum, Anthony (ed.). In The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of urban and regional studies (pp. 1–10).
  • Singh, J. (2009). Labour law and special economic zones in India. Centre for the Study of Law and Governance, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
  • Sit, V. (1988). China’s export-oriented open areas: The export processing zone concept. Asian Survey, 28(6), 661–675. https://doi.org/10.2307/2644659
  • Sivaramakrishnan, K.C. (2009). Special economic zones: Issues of urban growth and management (Occasional Paper No 19). Centre for Policy Research. file:///C:/Users/k1211160/Downloads/1243240858-SEZ%20pdf%20(1).pdf
  • Sklair, L. (1991). Problems of socialist development: the significance of Shenzhen special economic zone for China’s open door development strategy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 15(2), 197–215.
  • Smith, C., & Pun, N. (2006). The dormitory labour regime in China as a site for control and resistance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(8), 1456–1470. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190600804762
  • Sood, A. (2015). Industrial townships and the policy facilitation of corporate urbanisation in India. Urban Studies, 52(8), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014562318
  • Sood, A, & Kennedy, L. (2020). Neoliberal exception to liberal democracy? Entrepreneurial territorial governance in India. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1687323
  • Srinivasulu, K. (2014). Andhra Pradesh. In R. Jenkins, L. Kennedy, and P. Mukhopadhyay (Eds.), Power, policy, and protest: The politics of India’s special economic zones (pp. 72–107). Oxford University Press.
  • Tantri, M.L. (2016). Special economic zones in India: Policy, performance and prospects. Cambridge University Press.
  • Temenos, C, & McCann, E. (2013). Geographies of policy mobilities. Geography Compass, 7.5(5), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12063
  • Tian, Li. (2008). The chengzhongcun land market in China: Boon or bane?—A perspective on property rights. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(2), 282–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00787.x
  • Tsai, Y. (2015). Behind the economic success of Taiwan’s Hsinchu Science Industrial Park: Zoning technologies under neo-liberal governmentality. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 14(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15339114.2014.1000352
  • Vaidya, C, & Dar, V. (2008). SEZs and their implications for urban management and regional planning in India. Urban Finance Newsletter. http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/Download.aspx?fname=Document1265201140.8212244.pdf&fcategory=Articles&aid=4097
  • Ward, K. (2006). “Policies in motion”, urban management and state restructuring: The trans-local expansion of business improvement districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00643.x
  • Wong, K. Y. (1987). China’s special economic zone experiment: An appraisal. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 69(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/04353684.1987.11879532
  • World Bank. (2015). china’s special economic zones: experience gained. World Bank Investing in Africa Forum. https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/Event/Africa/Investing%20in%20Africa%20Forum/2015/investing-in-africa-forum-chinas-special-economic-zone.pdf
  • Zhang, J. (2012). From Hong Kong’s capitalist fundamentals to Singapore’s authoritarian governance: The policy mobility of neo-liberalising Shenzhen, China. Urban Studies, 49(13), 2853–2871. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012452455
  • Zhang, L. (2011). The political economy of informal settlements in post-socialist China: The case of chengzhongcun(s). Geoforum, 42(4), 473–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.03.003