Are mixed neighborhoods more socially cohesive? Evidence from Nanjing, China

References

• Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, Sergio, & Wacziarg, Romain. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024471506938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alesina, Alberto, & Ferrara, Eliana La. (2000). The determinants of trust.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, Gordon W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Roger, Musterd, Sako, Galster, George, & Kauppinen, Timo M. (2007). What mix matters? Exploring the relationships between Individuals’ incomes and different measures of their neighbourhood context. Housing Studies, 22(5), 637–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030701474602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthurson, Kathy. (2012). Social mix and the city: Challenging the mixed communities consensus in housing and urban planning policies. Csiro Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bolt, Gideon, Phillips, Deborah, & Van Ronald, Kempen. (2010). Housing policy, (de)segregation and social mixing: An international perspective. Housing Studies, 25(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030903564838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, Lyndal, Sautkina, Elena, & Kearns, Ade. (2011). Mixed messages about mixed tenure: Do reviews tell the real story? Housing Studies, 26(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2010.512752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boterman, Willem R., Musterd, Sako, & Manting, Dorien. (2020). Multiple dimensions of residential segregation. The case of the metropolitan area of Amsterdam. Urban Geography, 00(00), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breschi, Stefano, & Lissoni, Francesco. (2001). Localised knowledge spillovers vs. innovative milieux: Knowledge “tacitness” reconsidered. Papers in Regional Science, 80(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00013627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrera, Joseph F., & Najarian, Jonathan C. (2013). Can new urbanism create diverse communities? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(4), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X13500309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, He, & He, Xiaxu. (2014). Chengshi shequ yizhixing yu shequ ningjuli: Yi shequ linli guanxi wei yanjiu duixiang [Urban community heterogeneity and community cohesion: A study on neighbourly ties]. Zhongshan Daxue Xuebao, 2(54), 133–151.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, He, & Zhang, Yunjie. (2017). Chengshi yizhixing yu shequ zhenghe [Urban heterogeneity and community intergration]. Zhongshan Daxue Xuebao, 3, 182–193.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Kam Wing, & Li, Zhang. (1999). The Hukou system and rural-urban migration in China: Processes and changes. The China Quarterly, 160(12), 818–855. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741000001351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaskin, Robert J., & Joseph, Mark L. (2010). Building “Community” in mixed-income developments: Assumptions, approaches, and early experiences. Urban Affairs Review, 45(3), 299–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087409341544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaskin, Robert J., & Joseph, Mark L. (2011). Social interaction in mixed-income developments: Relational expectations and emerging reality. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(2), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00537.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, Chau Kiu, & Leung, Kwan Kwok. (2011). Neighborhood homogeneity and cohesion in sustainable community development. Habitat International, 35(4), 564–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffé, Hilde, & Geys, Benny. (2006). Community heterogeneity: A burden for the creation of social capital? Social Science Quarterly, 87(s1), 1053–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, Ian, & Goodchild, Barry. (2000). Social mix and the ‘balanced community’ in British housing policy – a tale of two epochs. GeoJournal, 51(4), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012049526513
   Google Scholar
• Costa, Dora L., & Kahn, Matthew E. (2003). Civic engagement and community heterogeneity: An economist’s perspective. Perspective on Politics, 1(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592703000082
   Google Scholar
• Curley, Alexandra M. (2009). Draining or gaining? the social networks of public housing movers in Boston. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(2–3), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509106716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, Jeremy. (2011). Measurement of work group diversity. Aston University.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Communities and Local Government. (2007). Homes for the future: More affordable, more sustainable. Communities and Local Government Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, B. H. (1996). Culture, class and connections. The American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 217–251. https://doi.org/10.1086/230912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, C. Cindy. (2002). The elite, the natives, and the outsiders: Migration and labor market segmentation in urban China. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, Ray, & Kearns, Ade. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaeser, Edward L. (2001). The formation of social capital. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, Elspeth, Manley, David, Hiscock, Rosemary, Boyle, Paul, & Doherty, Joe. (2009). Mixing housing tenures: Is it good for social well-being? Urban Studies, 46(1), 139–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098008098640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Yuliang, & Zhou, Pan. (2015). Chengshi hunhe shequ de shuailuo yu bianyuanhua fengxian [the danger of decline and marginalisation of mixed urban neighbourhoods]. Renwen Zazhi, 4, 102–108.
   Google Scholar
• He, Shenjing, & Qian, Junxi. (2017). From an emerging market to a multifaceted urban society: Urban China studies. Urban Studies, 54(4), 827–846. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016675826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Xiaxu, & Liu, Pengfei. (2016). Zhongguo chengshi shequ de yizhixing shehui jiegou yu jiefang/linli guanxi yanjiu [Research on heterogeneous social structure and neighbourhood relationship in urban communities]. Renwen Dili, 31(6), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, Cecilia, & Lieberg, Mats. (1996). Strong ties or weak ties? neighbourhood networks in a new perspective. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 13(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02815739608730394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, Lawrence F., Kling, Jeffrey R., & Liebman, Jeffrey B. (2001). Moving to opportunity in Boston: Early results of a randomized mobility experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 607–654. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530151144113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, Ade, & Mason, Phil. (2007). Mixed tenure communities and neighbourhood quality. Housing Studies, 22(5), 661–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030701474628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefer, Philip, & Knack, Stephen. (2005). Social capital, social norms, and the new institutional economics . In C. Ménard & M. M. Shirley (Eds.), Handbook of new institutional economics (pp. 701–726). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kipnis, Andrew B. (2006). Suzhi: A keyword approach. The China Quarterly, 186(6), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741006000166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinhans, Reinout. (2004). Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: A review of recent literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(4), 367–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-004-3041-5
   Google Scholar
• Knies, Gundi, Melo, Patricia C., & Zhang, Min. (2021). Neighbourhood deprivation, life satisfaction and earnings: Comparative analyses of neighbourhood effects at bespoke scales. Urban Studies, 58(13), 2640–2659. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020956930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence, James. (2011). The effect of ethnic diversity and community disadvantage on social cohesion: A multi-level analysis of social capital and interethnic relations in UK communities. European Sociological Review, 27(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, Tama, & Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne. (2003). Moving to opportunity: An experimental study of neighborhood effects on mental health. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1576–1582. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Si-Ming, Zhu, Yushu, & Li, Limei. (2012). Neighborhood type, gatedness, and residential experiences in Chinese cities: A study of Guangzhou. Urban Geography, 33(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.33.2.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Ye, Li, Zhigang, & Breitung, Werner. (2012). The social networks of new-generation migrants in China’s urbanized villages: A case study of Guangzhou. Habitat International, 36(1), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Yuqi, Wu, Fulong, Liu, Ye, & Zhigang, Li. (2017). Changing neighbourhood cohesion under the impact of urban redevelopment: A case study of Guangzhou, China. Urban Geography, 38(2), 266–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1152842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Yuqi, Zhang, Fangzhu, Liu, Ye, Zhigang, Li, & Fulong, Wu. (2017). The effect of neighbourhood social ties on migrants’ subjective wellbeing in Chinese cities. Habitat International, 66, 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzen, Mark. (2007). Social capital and localised learning: Proximity and place in technological and institutional dynamics. Urban Studies, 44(4), 799–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980601184752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manca, Anna Rita. (2014). Social cohesion. In Alex C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6026–6028). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Manley, David, van Ham, Maarten, & Doherty, Joe. (2011). Social mixing as a cure for negative neighbourhood effects : Evidence based policy or urban myth? IZA Discussion Papers, No. 5634, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:101:1-201104134380
   Google Scholar
• Mcpherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, & Cook, James M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mennis, Jeremy, Dayanim, Suzanne Lashner, & Grunwald, Heidi. (2013). Neighborhood collective efficacy and dimensions of diversity: A multilevel analysis. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(9), 2176–2193. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, James, & White, Douglas R. (2003). Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. American Sociological Review, 68(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musterd, Sako, & Andersson, Roger. (2005). Housing mix, social mix, and social opportunities. Urban Affairs Review, 40(6), 761–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087405276006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanjing Municipal Government. (2017). Nanjingshi zhuchenqu shisanwu baozhangxing zhufang jianshe zhidao yijian [Guidance on affordable housing construction in the Central Urban Area of Nanjing during the 13th five-year plan period]. General Office of the People's Government of Nanjing Municipality.
   Google Scholar
• Nanjing Statistical Bureau. (2020). Statistical yearbook of Nanjing 2019. China Statistics Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, Robert J., Raudenbush, Stephen W., & Earls, Felton. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sautkina, Elena, Bond, Lyndal, & Kearns, Ade. (2012). Mixed evidence on mixed tenure effects: Findings from a systematic review of UK studies, 1995-2009. Housing Studies, 27(6), 748–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2012.714461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurber, Amie, Bohmann, Claire Riehle, & Heflinger, Craig Anne. (2018). Spatially integrated and socially segregated: The effects of mixed-income neighbourhoods on social well-being. Urban Studies, 55(9), 1859–1874. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017702840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, Donald J. (1977). . Occupational prestige in comparative perspective . New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tunstall, Rebecca, & Lupton, Ruth. (2010). Mixed communities: Evidence review. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Twigg, Liz, Taylor, Joanna, & Mohan, John. (2010). Diversity or disadvantage? Putnam, Goodhart, ethnic heterogeneity, and collective efficacy. Environment & Planning A, 42(6), 1421–1438. https://doi.org/10.1068/a42287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Meer, Tom, & Tolsma, Jochem. (2014). Ethnic diversity and its effects on social cohesion. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gent, Wouter, Das, Marjolijn, & Musterd, Sako. (2019). Sociocultural, economic and ethnic homogeneity in residential mobility and spatial sorting among couples. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(4), 891–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X18823754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kempen, Ronald, & Bolt, Gideon. (2009). Social cohesion, social mix, and urban policies in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-009-9161-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Völker, Beate, Flap, Henk, & Lindenberg, Siegwart. (2006). When are neighbourhoods communities? Community in Dutch neighbourhoods. European Sociological Review, 23(1), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcl022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Zheng, Zhang, Fangzhu, & Wu, Fulong. (2016). Intergroup neighbouring in urban China: Implications for the social integration of migrants. Urban Studies, 53(4), 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014568068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Zheng, Zhang, Fangzhu, & Wu, Fulong. (2017). Neighbourhood cohesion under the influx of migrants in Shanghai. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(2), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16673839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, Susanne. (2013). Commonplace diversity and the “ethos of mixing”: Perceptions of difference in a London neighbourhood. Identities, 20(4), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2013.822374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixe, S. (2018). Neighbourhood related diversity, human capital and firm innovation. Papers in Regional Science, 97(2), 217–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Fulong. (2005). Rediscovering the ‘gate’ under market transition: From work-unit compounds to commodity housing enclaves. Housing Studies, 20(2), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/026730303042000331754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Qiyan, Edensor, Tim, & Cheng, Jianquan. (2018). Beyond space: Spatial (re)production and middle-class remaking driven by Jiaoyufication in Nanjing City, China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip, Ngai-Ming. (2012). Walled without gates: Gated communities in Shanghai. Urban Geography, 33(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.33.2.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Ang, & Tang, Chengzuo. (2018). Mobilized to take a vanguard role: Communist party members’ participation in the community building campaign. SocArxiv, 10, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Wenhong, & Liu, Lin. (2015). Chengshi yimin yu bendi jumin de juzhu geli jiqi dui shehui ronghedu de yingxiang [Residential segregation between local residents and migrants and its influences on social integration]. Jianghai Xuekan, 6, 114–122.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Pengyu. (2016). Residential segregation and employment outcomes of rural migrant workers in China. Urban Studies, 53(8), 1635–1656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015578614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar