Intraspecific morphological variation and its implications in the taxonomic status of ‘Bufo pisanoi,’ a Pliocene anuran from eastern Argentina

LITERATURE CITED

• Báez, A.M., and L. Nicoli. 2004. Bufonid toads from the late Oligocene beds of Salla, Bolivia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24:73–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, C.J., J.A. Gauthier, and G.S. Bever. 2010. Covert biases, circularity, and apomorphies: a critical look at the North American Quaternary Herpetofaunal Stability Hypothesis. Quaternary International 217:30–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bever, G.S. 2005. Variation in the ilium of North American Bufo (Lissamphibia, Anura) and its implications for species-level identification of fragmentary anuran fossils. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 25:548–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bookstein, F.L. 1991. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 455 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J.A., and D.R. Frost. 1993. Anguid lizards of the genus Abronia: revisionary notes, descriptions of four new species, a phylogenetic analysis, and key. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 216:1–121.
   Google Scholar
• Casamiquela, R.M. 1967. Sobre un nuevo Bufo fósil de la provincia de Buenos Aires (Argentina). Ameghiniana 5:161–169.
   Google Scholar
• Cei, J.M. (ed.). 1980. Amphibians of Argentina. Monitore Zoologico Italiano, N. S., Monografia 2, Florence, 609 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Chaparro, J.C., J.B. Pramuk, and A.G. Gluesenkamp. 2007. A new species of arboreal Rhinella (Anura: Bufonidae) from cloud forest of southeastern Peru. Herpetologica 63:203–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Queiroz, K. 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology 56:879–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschamps, C.M., M.G. Vucetich, D.H. Verzi, and A.I. Olivares. 2012. Biostratigraphy and correlation of the Monte Hermoso Formation (early Pliocene, Argentina): the evidence from caviomorph rodents. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 35:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estes, R., and R. Wassersug. 1963. A Miocene toad from Colombia, South America. Breviora 193:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer von Waldheim, G. 1813. Zoognosia Tabulis Synopticis Illustrata, in Usum Praelectionum Academiae Imperialis Medico-Chirurgicae Mosquensis edita, third edition. Nicolai Sergeidis Vsevolozsky, Moscow, 464 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzinger, L.J. F. J. 1826. Neue Classification der Reptilien nach ihren natürlichen Verwandtschaften nebst einer Verwandtschafts-Tafel und einem Verzeichnisse der Reptilien-Sammlung des K. K. Zoologisch Museums zu Wien. J. G. Heubner, Vienna, 66 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, D.R. 2013. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. American Museum of Natural History, New York. Available at http://research.amnh.org/vz/herpetology/amphibia. Accessed January 17, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, D.R., T. Grant, J. Faivovich, R. Bain, A. Haas, F.B. Haddad, R.O. De Sá, A. Channing, M. Wilkinson, N. Donnellan, C.J. Raxworthy, J. Campbell, B.L. Blotto, P. Moler, R. Drewes, R. Nussbaum, J.D. Lynch, D.M. Green, and W.C. Wheeler. 2006. The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297:1–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goin, F.J., U.F. J. Pardiñas, and M. Lezcano. 1994. Un nuevo resto del cenoléstido Pliolestes Reig, 1955 (Mammalia, Marsupialia) del Plioceno de la provincia de Buenos Aires. Ameghiniana 31:15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J.E. 1825. A synopsis of the genera of reptiles and Amphibia, with a description of some new species. Annals of Philosophy 10:193–217.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, Ø., D.A. T. Harper, and P.D. Ryan. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: PE4.1.4A. Available at http://palaeoelectronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm. Accessed January 17, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hensel, R. 1867. Beitrage zur kenntniss der Wirbeltiere Südbrasiliens Batrachier. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 33:141–149.
   Google Scholar
• Kwet, A., M. Di-Bernardo, and R. Maneyro. 2006. First record of Chaunus achavali (Anura, Bufonidae) from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, with a key for the identification of the species in the Chaunus marinus group. Iheringia. Série Zoologia 96:479–485.
   Google Scholar
• Maciel, N.M., R. Garcia Collevatti, G. Rinaldi Colli, and E. Ferroni Schwartz. 2010. Late Miocene diversification and phylogenetic relationships of the huge toads in the Rhinella marina (Linnaeus, 1758) species group (Anura: Bufonidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 57:787–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R.F. 1972. Evidence from osteology; pp. 37–70 in W.F. Blair (ed.), Evolution in the Genus Bufo. University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Mayden, R.L. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem; pp. 381–424 in M.F. Claridge, H.A. Dawah, and M.R. Wilson (eds.), Species: The Units of Biodiversity. Chapman and Hall, London.
   Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. (ed.). 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 974 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Pramuk, J.B. 2006. Phylogeny of South American Bufo (Anura: Bufonidae) inferred from combined evidence. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 146:407–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pramuk, J.B., T. Robertson, J. Sites, and B. Noonan. 2008. Around the world in 10 million years: biogeography of the nearly cosmopolitan true toads (Anura: Bufonidae). Global Ecology and Biogeography 17:72–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyron, R.A., and J.J. Wiens. 2011. A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2,800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61:543–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reig, O.A. 1955. Un nuevo género y especie de cenolestinos del Plioceno de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (República Argentina). Revista Asociación Geológica Argentina 10:60–71.
   Google Scholar
• Reig, O.A. 1958. Proposiciones para una nueva macrosistemática de los anuros. Physis 21:109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F.J. 2006. TpsDig 2.1. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F.J. 2007. TpsRelw 1.45. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F.J. 2008. TpsUtil 1.40. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, F.J., and D.E. Slice. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Zoology 39:40–59.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchíz, B. 1998. Salientia. Handbuch der Paläoherpetologie, Part 4. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich, 275 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A.B. 1994. Systematics and the Fossil Record, Documenting Evolutionary Patterns. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 232 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Tambussi, C.P. 1998. Nuevo Anatidae (Aves: Anseriformes) del Plioceno de la región pampeana, Argentina. Bulletin Societat D’Historia Natural de les Balears 41:19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tattersall, I. 1986. Species recognition in human paleontology. Journal of Human Evolution 15:165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauber, A.A. 1989. Presencia del género Bufo Laurenti, 1768 (Anura, Bufonidae) en sedimentitas del Grupo San Alberto, Cenozoico superior, provincia de Córdoba. Ameghiniana 26:251A.
   Google Scholar
• Templeton, A.R. 1989. The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective; pp. 3–27 in D. Otte and J.A. Endler (eds.), Speciation and its Consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Tihen, J.A. 1962a. Osteological observations on New World Bufo. American Midland Naturalist 67:157–183.
   Google Scholar
• Tihen, J.A. 1962b. A review of New World fossil bufonids. American Midland Naturalist 68:1–50.
   Google Scholar
• Trueb, L. 1973. Bones, frogs, and evolution; pp. 65–132 in J.L. Vial (ed.), Evolutionary Biology of the Anurans. Contemporary Research on Major Problems. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Trueb, L. 1977. Osteology and anuran systematics: intrapopulational variation in Hyla lanciformis. Systematic Zoology 26:165–184.
   Google Scholar
• Vallinoto, M., F. Sequeira, D. Sodré, J.A. R. Bernardi, I. Sampaio, and H. Schneider. 2010. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Rhinella marina species complex (Amphibia, Bufonidae) revisited: implications for Neotropical diversification hypotheses. Zoologica Scripta 39:128–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Bocxlaer, I., S. Loader, K. Roelants, and S. Biju. 2010. Gradual adaptation toward a range-expansion phenotype initiated the global radiation of toads. Science 327:679–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, F. 1894. Herpetologische Nova. Zoologischer Anzeiger 17:410–415.
   Google Scholar
• Wiens, J.J. 1995. Polymorphic characters in phylogenetic systematics. Systematic Biology 44:482–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiens, J.J., and M.R. Servedio. 1997. Accuracy of phylogenetic analysis including and excluding polymorphic characters. Systematic Biology 46:332–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiens, J.J., and M.R. Servedio. 2000. Species delimitation in systematics: inferring diagnostic differences between species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 267:631–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar