Use of Optical Monitoring to Assess the Breakage of Activated Sludge Flocs

References

• Cheng, Wen Po, Ping Hung Chen, Ruey Fang Yu, Ying Ju Hsieh, and Yu Wei Huang. 2011. Comparing floc strength using a turbidimeter. International Journal of Mineral Processing 100(3–4):142–148. doi:10.1016/j.minpro.2011.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Weipeng, Jun Nan, Haoyu Li, and Shengnan Li. 2012. Characteristic analysis on temporal evolution of floc size and structure in low-shear flow. Water Research 46(2):509–520. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, P., B. Jefferson, J. Gregory, and S. A. Parsons. 2005. A review of floc strength and breakage. Water Research 39(14):3121–3137. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klausen, Morten M., Trine R. Thomsen, Jeppe L. Nielsen, Lene H. Mikkelsen, and Per H. Nielsen. 2004. Variations in microcolony strength of probe-defined bacteria in activated sludge flocs. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 50(2):123–132. doi:10.1016/j.femsec.2004.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivuranta, E., J. Keskitalo, A. Haapala, T. Stoor, M. Sarén, and J. Niinimäki. 2013. Optical monitoring of activated sludge flocs in bulking and non-bulking conditions. Environmental Technology 34(5):679–686. doi:10.1080/09593330.2012.710410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. H., and J. C. Liu. 2000. Sludge dewaterability and floc structure in dual polymer conditioning. Advances in Environmental Research 5(2):129–136. doi:10.1016/S1093-0191(00)00049-6.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Qi-Shan, Yu Liu, Joo-Hwa Tay, and Kuan Yoew Show. 2005. Responses of sludge flocs to shear strength. Process Biochemistry 40(10):3213–3217. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2005.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maximova, Natalia, and Olli Dahl. 2006. Environmental implications of aggregation phenomena: Current understanding. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 11(4):246–266. doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2006.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesquita, D. P., A. L. Amaral, and E. C. Ferreira. 2011. Characterization of activated sludge abnormalities by image analysis and chemometric techniques. Analytica Chimica Acta 705(1–2):235–242. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2011.05.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen, Lene Haugaard, and Kristian Keiding. 2002. The shear sensitivity of activated sludge: An evaluation of the possibility for a standardised floc strength test. Water Research 36(12):2931–2940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, Patrick, Sotiris Pratsininis, Judy Raper, Rose Amal, Graeme Bushell, and Gabrie Meesters. 1998. Effect of shear schedule on particle size, density, and structure during flocculation in stirred tanks. Powder Technology 97:26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang, Y. F., H. Chua, S. N. Sin, and C. Y. Tam. 2006. A novel technology for bulking control in biological wastewater treatment plant for pulp and paper making industry. Biochemical Engineering Journal 32(3):127–134. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2006.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassileva, Nikolina D., Dirk van den Ende, Frieder Mugele, and Jorrit Mellema. 2007. Fragmentation and erosion of two-dimensional aggregates in shear flow. Langmuir 23(5):2352–2361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Dongsheng, Ruobing Wu, Yunzhong Jiang, and Christopher W. K. Chow. 2011. Characterization of floc structure and strength: Role of changing shear rates under various coagulation mechanisms. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 379(1–3):36–42. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.11.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Yan, Bao-Yu Gao, Xiu-Ming Xu, Wei-Ying Xu, and Gui-Ying Xu. 2009. Characterization of floc size, strength and structure in various aluminum coagulants treatment. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 332(2):354–359. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2009.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilén, Britt-Marie, Bo Jin, and Paul Lant. 2003. Impacts of structural characteristics on activated sludge floc stability. Water Research 37(15):3632–3645. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00291-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Wenzheng, John Gregory, and Luiza C. Campos. 2011a. Breakage and re-growth of flocs: Effect of additional doses of coagulant species. Water Research 45(20):6718–6724. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Wen-zheng, John Gregory, Luiza Campos, and Guibai Li. 2011b. The role of mixing conditions on floc growth, breakage and re-growth. Chemical Engineering Journal 171(2):425–430. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Yuan, and Ramin R. Farnood. 2010. Strength and breakage of activated sludge flocs. Powder Technology 199(2):111–119. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2009.11.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukselen, Mehmet Ali, and John Gregory. 2004. The reversibility of floc breakage. International Journal of Mineral Processing 73(2–4):251–259. doi:10.1016/S0301-7516(03)00077-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zartarian, F., C. Mustin, G. Villemin, T. Ait-Ettager, A. Thill, J. Y. Bottero, J. L. Mallet, and D. Snidaro. 1997. Three-dimensional modeling of an activated sludge floc. Langmuir 13(1):35–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar