DEM simulation of impact charge on polymer particles by single and repeated impact on different metal plates

References

• Anderson, J. H. 1996. The effect of additives on the tribocharging of electrophotographic toners. Journal of Electrostatics 37 (3):197–209. doi:10.1016/0304-3886(96)00017-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunchatheeravate, P., J. Curtis, Y. Fujii, and S. Matsusaka. 2013. Prediction of particle charging in a dilute pneumatic conveying system. AIChE Journal 59 (7):2308–16. doi:10.1002/aic.14025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustamante, D., A. X. Jerves, and S. A. Pazmiño. 2020. A generalized three-dimensional discrete element method with electrostatic induced cohesion. Granular Matter 22 (4):90. doi:10.1007/s10035-020-01048-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceresiat, L., H. Grosshans, and M. V. Papalexandris. 2019. Powder electrification during pneumatic transport: The role of the particle properties and flow rates. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 58:60–9. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2019.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, F., M. Ray, A. Sowinski, P. Mehrani, and A. Passalacqua. 2021. A review on modeling approaches for the electrostatic charging of particles. Powder Technology 389:104–18. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2021.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, F., A. Sowinski, M. Ray, A. Passalacqua, and P. Mehrani. 2018. Charge generation and saturation on polymer particles due to single and repeated particle-metal contacts. Journal of Electrostatics 91:9–15. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2017.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosshans, H., and M. V. Papalexandris. 2017. A model for the non-uniform contact charging of particles. Powder Technology 305:518–27. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2016.10.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadisarabi, M., R. S. Gharebagh, R. Zarghami, and N. Mostoufi. 2019. Computational modeling of the electrostatic charge build-up in fluidized beds. Journal of Electrostatics 97:108–20. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2019.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassani, M. A., R. Zarghami, H. R. Norouzi, and N. Mostoufi. 2013. Numerical investigation of effect of electrostatic forces on the hydrodynamics of gas–solid fluidized beds. Powder Technology 246:16–25. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2013.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogue, M., C. Calle, P. Weitzman, and D. Curry. 2008. Calculating the trajectories of triboelectrically charged particles using discrete element modeling (DEM). Journal of Electrostatics 66 (1-2):32–8. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2007.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, J., X. Zeng, C. Han, C. Liang, Q. Zhou, J. Ma, D. Liu, and X. Chen. 2019. Measurement of single particle impact charging under an external electric field. The Review of Scientific Instruments 90 (4):045125. doi:10.1063/1.5085080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland, P., and K. Nicholson. 2011. Analysis and comparison of particle tribochargers. Minerals Engineering 24 (8):914–22. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2011.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, H. 2008. Some techniques on electrostatic separation of particle size utilizing electrostatic traveling-wave field. Journal of Electrostatics 66 (3–4):220–8. doi:10.1016/j.elstat.2008.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazemi, S., R. Zarghami, N. Mostoufi, and R. Sotudeh-Gharebagh. 2021. CFD-DEM simulation of wall sheeting and particles charge in fluidized beds. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 99 (7):1582–94. doi:10.1002/cjce.24007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. J. H., M. A. Hussain, Z. Mansourpour, N. Mostoufi, N. M. Ghasem, and E. C. Abdullah. 2014. CFD simulation of fluidized bed reactors for polyolefin production – a review. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 20 (6):3919–46. doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2014.01.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko Higashitani, H. M., and S. Matsusaka. 2019. Powder technology handbook. CRC Press. doi:10.1201/b22268.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., G. Wu, and Z. Xu. 2015. Tribo-charging properties of waste plastic granules in process of tribo-electrostatic separation. Waste Management 35:36–41. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsusaka, S., M. Ghadiri, and H. Masuda. 2000. Electrification of an elastic sphere by repeated impacts on a metal plate. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 33 (18):2311–9. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/33/18/316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsusaka, S., H. Maruyama, T. Matsuyama, and M. Ghadiri. 2010. Triboelectric charging of powders: A review. Chemical Engineering Science 65 (22):5781–807. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2010.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsusaka, S., and H. Masuda. 2003. Electrostatics of particles. Advanced Powder Technology 14 (2):143–66. doi:10.1163/156855203763593958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuyama, T., M. Ogu, H. Yamamoto, J. C. M. Marijnissen, and B. Scarlett. 2003. Impact charging experiments with single particles of hundred micrometre size. Powder Technology 135–136:14–22. doi:10.1016/S0032-5910(03)00154-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuyama, T., and H. Yamamoto. 1995a. Charge relaxation process dominates contact charging of a particle in atmospheric conditions. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 28 (12):2418–23. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/28/12/005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuyama, T., and H. Yamamoto. 1995b. Electrification of single polymer particles by successive impacts with metal targets. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 31 (6):1441–5. doi:10.1109/28.475738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuyama, T., and H. Yamamoto. 2010. Maximum electrostatic charge of powder in pipe flow. Advanced Powder Technology 21 (3):350–5. doi:10.1016/j.apt.2010.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujumdar, A. S. 2021. Powder technology handbook. Drying Technology 39 (5):710. doi:10.1080/07373937.2020.1757994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nifuku, M., and H. Katoh. 2003. A study on the static electrification of powders during pneumatic transportation and the ignition of dust cloud. Powder Technology 135–136:234–42. doi:10.1016/S0032-5910(03)00163-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, S., S. Jung, C. Roh, and C. Kang. 2019. Case studies for dangerous dust explosions in South Korea during recent years. Sustainability 11 (18):4888. doi:10.3390/su11184888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei, C., C. Y. Wu, D. England, S. Byard, H. Berchtold, and M. Adams. 2013. Numerical analysis of contact electrification using DEM–CFD. Powder Technology 248:34–43. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2013.04.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Vaquero, J., J. Landauer, H. Briesen, and P. Foerst. 2021. A particle tracking velocimetry method to measure size and charge distributions in tribocharged powder particles. Chemical Engineering Science 229:116036. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2020.116036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pingali, K. C., T. Shinbrot, S. V. Hammond, and F. J. Muzzio. 2009. An observed correlation between flow and electrical properties of pharmaceutical blends. Powder Technology 192 (2):157–65. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2008.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantard, G., and M. Papini. 2005. Mechanical and electrical behaviors of polymer particles. Experimental study of the contact area between two particles. Experimental validation of a numerical model. Granular Matter.7 (1):1–12. doi:10.1007/s10035-004-0194-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Aragón, C., J. Ordieres-Meré, F. Alba-Elías, and A. González-Marcos. 2018. Comparison of cohesive models in EDEM and LIGGGHTS for simulating powder compaction. Materials 11 (11):2341. doi:10.3390/ma11112341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescaglio, A., F. De Smet, L. Aerts, and G. Lumay. 2019. Tribo-electrification of pharmaceutical powder blends. Particulate Science and Technology 37 (8):1024–31. doi:10.1080/02726351.2018.1533606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, K., A. Ndama, and P. Guigon. 2011. Relevant parameters involved in tribocharging of powders during dilute phase pneumatic transport. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 89 (12):2582–97. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2011.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Schella, A., S. Herminghaus, and M. Schröter. 2017. Influence of humidity on tribo-electric charging and segregation in shaken granular media. Soft Matter 13 (2):394–401. doi:10.1039/C6SM02041K.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwindt, N., U. von Pidoll, D. Markus, U. Klausmeyer, M. V. Papalexandris, and H. Grosshans. 2017. Measurement of electrostatic charging during pneumatic conveying of powders. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 49:461–71. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2017.05.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, D., and P. Mehrani. 2017. Comparison of electrostatic charge generation in gas-solid fluidized beds in turbulent versus pre-turbulent flow regime. Powder Technology 319:426–33. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2017.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghavivand, M., B. Elchamaa, A. Sowinski, and P. Mehrani. 2019. Study of electrostatic charging of single particles during pneumatic conveying. Powder Technology 355:242–50. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2019.07.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi, K., G. S. P. Castle, and M. Takeuchi. 2003. Tribocharging mechanism of mono-component irregular and spherical toners in an electrophotographic development system. Powder Technology 135–136:35–42. doi:10.1016/S0032-5910(03)00156-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, H., M. Ghadiri, T. Matsuyama, Y. L. Ding, K. G. Pitt, H. Maruyama, S. Matsusaka, and H. Masuda. 2007. Triboelectrification of pharmaceutical powders by particle impact. International Journal of Pharmaceutics 334 (1-2):149–55. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe, H., A. Samimi, Y. L. Ding, M. Ghadiri, T. Matsuyama, and K. G. Pitt. 2006. Measurement of charge transfer due to single particle impact. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization 23 (2):133–7. doi:10.1002/ppsc.200601021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanar, D. K., and B. A. Kwetkus. 1995. Electrostatic separation of polymer powders. Journal of Electrostatics 35 (2–3):257–66. doi:10.1016/0304-3886(94)00044-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, J., Y. Zhang, C.-H. Wang, and Y. C. Liang. 2006. On the electrostatic equilibrium of granular flow in pneumatic conveying systems. AIChE J. 52:3775-93. doi:10.1002/aic.10991.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, J., Y. Zhang, C.-H. Wang, S. Matsusaka, and H. Masuda. 2004. Electrostatics of the granular flow in a pneumatic conveying system. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 43 (22):7181–99. doi:10.1021/ie049661l.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, M., N. Ii, A. Shimosaka, Y. Shirakawa, and J. Hidaka. 2006. Experimental and theoretical approaches to charging behavior of polymer particles. Chemical Engineering Science 61 (7):2239–48. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2004.06.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zellnitz, S., J. T. Pinto, M. Brunsteiner, H. Schroettner, J. Khinast, and A. Paudel. 2019. Tribo-Charging behaviour of inhalable mannitol blends with salbutamol sulphate. Pharmaceutical Research 36 (6):80. doi:10.1007/s11095-019-2612-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeybek, M., and H. Grosshans. 2021. Eulerian formulation for the triboelectric charging of polydisperse powder flows. Physics of Fluids 33 (6):063304. doi:10.1063/5.0054374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar