Publication Cover
Sociological Spectrum
Mid-South Sociological Association
Volume 37, 2017 - Issue 2
156
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Differential Effects of Time Constraints on Athletic Behavior and Survey Reports of Athletic Behavior

References

  • Adams, Swann Arp, Charles E. Matthews, Cara B. Ebbeling, Charity G. Moore, Joan E. Cunningham, Jeanette Fulton, and James R. Hebert. 2005. “The Effect of Social Desirability and Social Approval on Self-Reports of Physical Activity.” American Journal of Epidemiology 161:389–398.
  • Ainsworth, Barbara E., David R. Jacobs, and Arthur S. Leon. 1992. “Validity and Reliability of Self-Reported Physical Activity Status: The Lipid Research Clinics Questionnaire.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 25:92–98.
  • Albanes, Demetrius, Joan M. Conway, Philip R. Taylor, Paul W. Moe, and Joseph Judd. 1990. “Validation and Comparison of Eight Physical Activity Questionnaires.” Epidemiology 1:65–71.
  • Allison, Paul D. 1999. “Comparing Logit and Probit Coefficients across Groups.” Sociological Methods and Research 28:186–208.
  • Bassett, David R. 2000. “Validity and Reliability Issues in Objective Monitoring of Physical Activity.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 71:30–36.
  • Bianchi, Suzanne M., John P. Robinson, and Melissa Milkie. 2006. Changing Rhythms of American Family Life. New York: Russell Sage.
  • Biskup, Claudia and Gertrud Pfister. 1999. “I Would Like to Be Like Her/Him: Are Athletes Role-Models for Boys and Girls?” European Physical Education Review 5:199–218.
  • Blair, Edward and Scot Burton. 1987. “Cognitive Processes Used by Survey Respondents to Answer Behavioral Frequency Questions.” Journal of Consumer Research 14:280–88.
  • Bolger, Niall, Angelina Davis, and Eshkol Rafaeli. 2003. “Diary Methods: Capturing Life as it is Lived.” Annual Review of Psychology 54:579–616.
  • Brenner, Philip S. 2011a. “Exceptional Behavior or Exceptional Identity? Overreporting of Church Attendance in the US.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75(1):19–41.
  • Brenner, Philip S. 2011b. “Identity Importance and the Overreporting of Religious Service Attendance: Multiple Imputation of Religious Attendance using American Time Use Study and the General Social Survey.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50(1):103–115.
  • Brenner, Philip S. 2012. “Identity as a Determinant of the Overreporting of Church Attendance in Canada.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 51(2):377–85.
  • Brenner, Philip S. 2014. “Testing the Veracity of Self-reported Religious Behavior in the Muslim World.” Social Forces 92(3):1009–1037.
  • Brenner, Philip S. Forthcoming. “Narratives of Response Error From Cognitive Interviews of Survey Questions About Normative Behavior.” Sociological Methods & Research.
  • Brenner, Philip S. and John D. DeLamater. 2013. “Predictive Validity of Paradata on Reports of Physical Exercise: Evidence from a Time Use Study Using Text Messaging.” Electronic International Journal of Time Use Research 10(1):38–54.
  • Brenner, Philip S. and John D. DeLamater. 2014. “Social Desirability Bias in Self-Reports of Physical Activity: Is an Exercise Identity the Culprit?” Social Indicators Research 117:489–504.
  • Brenner, Philip S. and John DeLamater. 2016. “Lies, Damned Lies, and Survey Self-Reports? Identity as a Cause of Measurement Bias.” Social Psychology Quarterly 79:333–354.
  • Brenner, Philip S., Richard T. Serpe, and Sheldon Stryker. 2014. “The Causal Ordering of Prominence and Salience in Identity Theory: An Empirical Examination.” Social Psychology Quarterly 77:231–252.
  • Burke, Peter J. 1980. “The Self: Measurement Implications from a Symbolic Interactionist Perspective.” Social Psychology Quarterly 43:18–29.
  • Burke, Peter J. and Jan E. Stets. 2009. Identity Theory. New York: Oxford.
  • Burton, Scot and Edward Blair. 1991. “Task Conditions, Response Formulation Processes, and Response Accuracy for Behavioral Frequency Questions in Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 55:50–79.
  • Cast, Alicia D. 2003. “Identities and Behavior.” Pp. 41–55 in Advances in Identity Theory and Research, edited by P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, and P. A. Thoits. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
  • Chase, David R. and Geoffrey C. Godbey. 1983. “The Accuracy of Self-Reported Participation Rates.” Leisure Studies 2:231–235.
  • Chase, David R. and Munehiko Harada. 1984. “Response Error in Self-Reported Recreation Participation.” Journal of Leisure Research 16:322–329.
  • Cooky, Cheryl. 2009. “‘Girls Just Aren’t Interested’: The Social Construction of Interest in Girls’ Sport.” Sociological Perspectives 52:259–283.
  • Eccles, Jacquelynne S. and Rena D. Harold. 1991. “Gender Differences in Sport Involvement: Applying the Eccles’ Expectancy-Value Model.” Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 3:7–35.
  • Fowler, Floyd J. 1995. Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  • Frick, Robert W. 1995. “Accepting the Null Hypothesis.” Memory and Cognition 23:132–138.
  • Hadaway, C. Kirk, Penny Long Marler, and Mark Chaves. 1988. “Overreporting Church Attendance in America: Evidence That Demands the Same Verdict.” American Sociological Review 63:122–30.
  • Harrison, Lisa A. and Amanda B. Lynch. 2005. “Social Role Theory and the Perceived Gender Role Orientation of Athletes.” Sex Roles 52:227–236.
  • Higgins, E. Tory. 1987. “Self-Discrepancy: A Theory Relating to Self and Affect.” Psychological Review 94:319–340.
  • Higgins, E. Tory. 1989. “Self-Discrepancy Theory: What Patterns of Self-Beliefs Cause People to Suffer?” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 22:93–136.
  • Hochschild, Arlie R. 2003. The Second Shift. New York: Penguin.
  • Hoetker, Glenn. 2007a. “COMPLOGIT: Stata Module to Compare Logit Coefficients across Groups.” Statistical Software Components S456828, Boston College Department of Economics.
  • Hoetker, Glenn. 2007b. “The Use of Logit and Probit Models in Strategic Management Research: Critical Issues.” Strategic Management Journal 28:331–343.
  • Jacobs, David R., Barbara E. Ainsworth, Terryl J. Hartman, and Arthur S. Leon. 1992. “A Simultaneous Evaluation of 10 Commonly Used Physical Activity Questionnaires.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 25:81–91.
  • Klesges, Robert C., Linda H. Eck, Michael W. Mellon, William Fulliton, Grant W. Somes, and Cindy L. Hanson. 1990. “The Accuracy of Self-Reports of Physical Activity.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 22:690–697.
  • Klomsten, Anne Torhild, Einar M. Skaalvik, and Geir Arild Espnes. 2004. “Physical Self-Concept and Sports: Do Gender Differences Still Exist?” Sex Roles 50:119–127.
  • Lantz, Christopher D. and Peter J. Schroeder. 1999. “Endorsement of Masculine and Feminine Gender Roles: Differences Between Participation in and Identification With the Athletic Role.” Journal of Sport Behavior 22:545–557.
  • Large, Michael D. and Kristen Marcussen. 2000. “Extending Identity Theory to Predict Differential Forms and Degrees of Psychological Distress.” Social Psychology Quarterly 63:49–59.
  • Leenders, Nicole Y. J. M., W. Michael Sherman, H. N. Nagaraja, and C. Lawrence Kien. 2001. “Evaluation of Methods to Access Physical Activity in Free-Living Conditions.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 33:1233–1240.
  • Matthews, Charles E. and Patty S. Freedson. 1995. “Field Trial of a Three-Dimensional Activity Monitor: Comparison With Self-Report.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 27:1071–78.
  • Marcussen, Kristen and Michael D. Large. 2006. “Identities, Self-Esteem, and Psychological Distress: An Application of Identity-Discrepancy Theory.” Sociological Perspectives 49:1–24.
  • Marcussen, Kristen and Michael D. Large. 2003. “Using Identity Discrepancy Theory to Predict Psychological Distress.” Pp. 151–166 in Advances in Identity Theory and Research, edited by P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, and P. A. Thoits. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
  • McCall, George. 2016. “Some Effects of a Stroke on Identity Change: An Autobiographical Account.” Pp. 59–74 in New Directions in Identity Theory and Research, edited by J. E. Stets and R. T. Serpe. New York: Oxford.
  • McCall, George J. and J. L. Simmons. 1978. Identities and Interactions: An Examination of Human Associations in Everyday Life. New York: Free Press.
  • Motl, Robert W., Edward McAuley, and Christine DiStefano. 2005. “Is Social Desirability Associated With Self-Reported Physical Activity?” Preventative Medicine 40:735–739.
  • Niemi, Ilris. 1993. “Systematic Error in Behavioral Measurement: Comparing Results from Interview and Time Budget Studies.” Social Indicators Research 30:229–244.
  • Nomaguchi, Kei M. and Suzanne M. Bianchi. 2004. “Exercise Time: Gender Differences in the Effect of Marriage, Parenthood, and Employment.” Journal of Marriage and Family 66:413–430.
  • Pager, Devah and Lincoln Quillian. 2005. “Walking the Talk? What Employers Say Versus What They Do.” American Sociological Review 70:355–380.
  • Patterson, Patricia. 2000. “Reliability, Validity, and Methodological Response to the Assessment of Physical Activity Via Self-Report.” Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 71:15–20.
  • Robinson, John P. 1985. “The Validity and Reliability of Diaries versus Alternative Time Use Measures.” Pp. 33–62 in Time, Goods, and Well-Being, edited by F. T. Juster and F. P. Stafford. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
  • Robinson, John P. 1999. “The Time-Diary Method: Structure and Uses.” Pp. 47–90 in Time Use Research in the Social Sciences, edited by W. E. Pentland, A. S. Harvey, M. P. Lawton, and M. A. McColl. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
  • Robinson, John P. and Geoffrey Godbey. 1997. Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Roxburgh, Susan. 2002. “Racing Through Life: The Distribution of Time Pressures by Roles and Role Resources Among Full-Time Workers.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues 23:121–145.
  • Rzewnicki, Randy, Yves Vanden Auweele, and Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij. 2003. “Addressing Overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) Telephone Survey with a Population Sample.” Public Health Nutrition 6:299–305.
  • Smith-Lovin, Lynn. 2003. “Self, Identity, and Interaction in an Ecology of Identities.” Pp. 167–178 in Advances in Identity Theory and Research, edited by P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, and P. A. Thoits. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
  • Statistics Canada. 2011. General Social Survey, Cycle 24: Time-Stress and Well-Being [MRDF]. Toronto: Statistics Canada [producer]. Toronto: Statistics Canada [distributor].
  • Stets, Jan E. and Richard T. Serpe. 2013. “Identity Theory.” Pp. 31–60 in Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by J. DeLamater and A. Ward. New York: Springer.
  • Stinson, Linda L. 1999. “Measuring How People Spend Their Time: A Time Use Survey Design.” Monthly Labor Review 122:12–19.
  • Stryker, Sheldon. 1968. “Identity Salience and Role Performance: The Relevance of Symbolic Interaction Theory for Family Research.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 30:558–564.
  • Stryker, Sheldon. [1980] 2003. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Caldwell, NJ: The Blackburn Press.
  • Stryker, Sheldon and Richard T. Serpe. 1982. “Commitment, Identity Salience, and Role Behavior: Theory and Research Example.” Pp. 199–218 in Personality, Roles, and Social Behavior, edited by W. Ickes and E. S. Knowles. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Stryker, Sheldon and Richard T. Serpe. 1994. “Identity Salience and Psychological Centrality: Equivalent, Overlapping, or Complimentary Concepts?” Social Psychology Quarterly 57:1.
  • Thoits, Peggy A. 2003. “Personal Agency in the Accumulation of Multiple Role-Identities.” Pp. 179–194 in Advances in Identity Theory and Research, edited by P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, and P. A. Thoits. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.
  • Twenge, Jean M. 1997. “Changes in Masculine and Feminine Traits Over Time: A Meta-Analysis.” Sex Roles 36:305–325.
  • Williams, Ellen, Robert C. Klesges, Cindy L. Hanson, and Linda Eck. 1989. “A Propective Study of the Reliability and Convergent Validity of Three Physical Activity Measures in a Field Research Trial.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 42:1161–1170.
  • Williams, Richard. 2009. “Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups.” Sociological Methods and Research 37:531–559.
  • Wood, Wendy and Alice H. Eagly. 2002. “A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Behavior of Women and Men: Implications for the Origins of Sex Differences.” Psychological Bulletin 128:699–727.
  • Zuzanek, Jiri and Bryan J. A. Smale. 1999. “Life-Cycle and Across-the-Week Allocation of Time to Daily Activities.” Pp. 127–154 in Time Use Research in the Social Sciences, edited by W. E. Pentland, A. S. Harvey, M. P. Lawton, and M. A. McColl. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.