Testing the Utility of an Adaptive Cluster Sampling Method for Monitoring a Rare and Imperiled Darter

REFERENCES

• Blanton , R. E. and Jenkins , R. E. 2008 . Three new darter species of the Etheostoma percnurum species complex (Percidae, subgenus Catonotus) from the Tennessee and Cumberland river drainages . Zootaxa , 1963 : 1 – 24 .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , J. A. 1994 . “ The application of adaptive cluster sampling to ecological studies ” . In Statistics in ecology and environmental monitoring , Edited by: Fletcher , D. J. and Manly , B. F. J. 86 – 97 . Dunedin , , New Zealand : University of Otago Press .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , J. A. 1996 . The efficiency of adaptive cluster sampling. Doctoral dissertation , Dunedin , , New Zealand : Otago University .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , J. A. and Manly , B. J. F. 1998 . Restricted adaptive cluster sampling . Environmental and Ecological Statistics , 5 : 49 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman , M. C. 2003 . Adaptive two-stage one-per-stratum sampling . Environmental and Ecological Statistics , 10 : 43 – 60 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman , M. C. and Lan , F. 2001 . Inverse adaptive cluster sampling . Biometrics , 57 : 1096 – 1105 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comiskey , C. E. and Etnier , D. A. 1972 . Fishes of the Big South Fork of the Cumberland River . Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science , 47 : 140 – 146 .
   Google Scholar
• Conners , M. E. and Schwager , S. J. 2002 . The use of adaptive cluster sampling for hydroacoustic surveys . Journal of Marine Science , 59 : 1314 – 1325 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis , J. G. and Cook , S. B. 2010 . Habitat use of the tuxedo darter at the macrohabitat and microhabitat spatial scales . Journal of Freshwater Ecology , 25 : 321 – 330 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis , J. G. , Miller , J. E. , Billings , M. S. , Gibbs , W. K. and Cook , S. B. 2011 . Capture efficiency of underwater observation protocols for three imperiled fishes . Southeastern Naturalist , 10 : 155 – 166 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolloff , C. A. , Kersher , J. and Thurow , R. 1996 . “ Underwater observation ” . In Fisheries techniques, 2nd edition , Edited by: Murphy , B. R. and Willis , D. W. 553 – 564 . Bethesda , Maryland : American Fisheries Society .
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhour , D. J. and Burr , B. M. 2000 . Conservation status and nesting biology of the endangered duskytail darter, Etheostoma percnuram, in the Big South Fork of the Cumberland River, Kentucky . Journal of the Kentucky Academy of Science , 61 : 67 – 76 .
   Google Scholar
• Etnier , D. A. and Starnes , W. C. 1993 . The fishes of Tennessee , Knoxville : University of Tennessee Press .
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg , N. A. , Heine , J. N. and Brown , J. A. 2007 . The application of adaptive cluster sampling for rare subtidal macroalgae . Journal of Marine Biology , 151 : 1343 – 1348 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry , B. E. and Grossman , G. D. 2008 . Microhabitat use by blackbanded (Percina nigrofasciata), turquoise (Etheostoma inscriptum), and tessellated (E. olmstedi) darters during drought in a Georgia piedmont stream . Environmental Biology of Fishes , 83 : 171 – 182 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo , N. C. H. , Griffith , D. and Hunter , J. R. 1997 . Using restricted adaptive cluster sampling to estimate Pacific hake larval abundance . California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations Reports , 38 : 103 – 113 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly , H. T. and Galat , D. L. 2002 . Distributional patterns of the threatened Niangua darter Etheostoma nianguae at three spatial scales, with implications for species conservation . Copeia , 2002 : 573 – 585 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May , R. M. , Lawton , J. H. and Stark , N. E. 1995 . “ Assessing extinction rates ” . In Extinction rates , Edited by: Lawton , J. H. and May , R. M. 1 – 24 . Oxford , , UK : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• O’Bara , C. J. , Pennington , W. L. and Bonner , W. P. 1982 . A survey of water quality, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish for sixteen streams within the Big South Fork National River and Recreational Area , Nashville : Tennessee Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, Final Report to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tennessee Technological University .
   Google Scholar
• Patil , G. P. and Rao , C. R. 1994 . Environmental statistics , North-Holland , New York : Elsevier .
   Google Scholar
• Pink , M. , Pratt , T. C. and Fox , M. G. 2007 . Use of underwater visual distance sampling for estimating habitat-specific population density . North American Journal of Fisheries Management , 27 : 246 – 255 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price , A. L. and Peterson , J. T. 2010 . Estimation and modeling of electrofishing capture efficiency for fishes in wadeable warmwater streams . North American Journal of Fisheries Management , 30 : 481 – 498 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team . 2009 . R: a language and environment for statistical computing , Vienna : R Foundation for Statistical Computing .
   Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz , D. , Cairns , S. and Dillon , T. 1986 . “ Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles ” . In Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity Edited by: Soulé , M. E. and Sunderland , M. A. 182 – 204 . Sinauer, Sunderland , Massachusetts
   Google Scholar
• Ricciardi , A. and Rasmussen , J. B. 1999 . Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna . Conservation Biology , 13 : 1220 – 1222 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter , B. D. , Braun , D. P. , Mendelson , M. A. and Master , L. L. 1997 . Threats to imperiled freshwater fauna . Conservation Biology , 11 : 1081 – 1093 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salehi , M. M. and Seber , G. A. F. 1995 . Two-stage adaptive cluster sampling , Auckland , , New Zealand : Department of Statistics, Technical Report 95-04, University of Auckland .
   Google Scholar
• Salehi , M. M. and Seber , G. A. F. 2004 . A general inverse sampling scheme and its application to adaptive cluster sampling . Australia and New Zealand Journal of Statistics , 46 : 483 – 494 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute . 2009 . SAS version 9.1 , Cary , North Carolina : SAS Institute .
   Google Scholar
• Smith , D. R. , Brown , J. A. and Lo , N. C. H. 2004 . “ Application of adaptive sampling to biological populations ” . In Sampling rare or elusive species: concepts, designs, and techniques for estimating population parameters , Edited by: Thompson , W. L. Washington , D.C. : Island Press . Pages 77–122
   Google Scholar
• Smith , D. R. , Villella , R. F. and Lemarie , D. P. 2003 . Application of adaptive cluster sampling to low-density populations of freshwater mussels . Environmental and Ecological Statistics , 10 : 7 – 15 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson , S. K. 1990 . Adaptive cluster sampling . Journal of the American Statistical Association , 85 : 1050 – 1059 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson , S. K. and Seber , G. A. F. 1994 . Detectability in conventional and adaptive sampling . Biometrics , 50 : 712 – 724 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson , W. L. 2004 . Sampling rare or elusive species: concepts, designs, and techniques for estimating population parameters , Washington , D.C. : Island Press .
   Google Scholar
• Thurow , R. F. 1985 . Middle Salmon Fork River fisheries investigations , Boise : Idaho Department of Game and Fish, Job Completion Report F-73-R-6 .
   Google Scholar
• Thurow , R. F. 1994 . Underwater methods for study of salmonids in the Intermountain West. U.S . Forest Service General Technical Report INT-GTR-307 ,
   Google Scholar
• Thurow , R. F. and Schill , D. J. 1996 . Comparison of day underwater observation, night underwater observation, and electrofishing to estimate bull trout abundance and size structure in a second-order Idaho stream . North American Journal of Fisheries Management , 16 : 314 – 323 .
   Google Scholar
• Turk , P. and Borkowski , J. J. 2005 . A review of adaptive cluster sampling: 1990–2003 . Environmental and Ecological Statistics , 12 : 55 – 94 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar