Depth and Artificial Reef Type Effects on Size and Distribution of Red Snapper in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

REFERENCES

• Anderson, M. J., and A. J. Underwood. 1994. Effects of substratum on the recruitment and development of an intertidal estuarine fouling assemblage. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 184:217–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, M. H., M. Berggren, D. Wilhelmsson, and M. C. Ohman. 2009. Epibenthic colonization of concrete and steel pilings in a cold-temperate embayment: a field experiment. Helgoland Marine Research 63:249–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askey, P. J., S. A. Richards, J. R. Post, and E. A. Parkinson. 2006. Linking angling catch rates and fish learning under catch-and-release regulations. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26:1020–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, H. K., J. H. Cowan, and R. L. Shipp. 2001. Experimental evaluation of potential effects of habitat size and presence of conspecifics on habitat association by young-of-the-year Red Snapper. Gulf of Mexico Science 19:119–131.
   Google Scholar
• Baine, M. 2001. Artificial reefs: a review of their design, application, management and performance. Ocean and Coastal Management 44:241–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, J. A., D. E. Harper, B. David, and M. Hulsbeck. 1994. Effects of reef size on colonization and assemblage structure of fishes at artificial reefs of southeastern Florida, USA. Bulletin of Marine Science 55:796–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohnsack, J. A., and D. L. Sutherland. 1985. Artificial reef research: a review with recommendations for future priorities. Bulletin of Marine Science 37:11–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Camber, C. I. 1955. A survey of the Red Snapper fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, with special reference to the Campeche banks. State of Florida Board of Conservation Marine Laboratory 12.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. D., K. Rose, K. Boswell, and J. Cowan. 2011. Individual-based modeling of an artificial reef fish community: effects of habitat quantity and degree of refuge. Ecological Modelling 222:3895–3909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, M. R. 1990. A comparison of 3 fish trap designs. Fisheries Research 9:325–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dance, M. A., W. F. Patterson, and D. T. Addis. 2011. Fish community and trophic structure at artificial reef sites in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science 87:301–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufrene, T. A. 2005. Geological variability and Holocene sedimentary record on the northern Gulf of Mexico inner to mid-continental shelf. Master's thesis. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, J. M. 2008. Artificial reefs as restoration tools: a case study on the west Florida shelf. Coastal Management 36:495–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallaway, B. J., J. G. Cole, R. Meyer, and P. Roscigno. 1999. Delineation of essential habitat for juvenile Red Snapper in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128:713–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallaway, B. J., S. T. Szedlmayer, and W. J. Gazey. 2009. A life history review for Red Snapper in the Gulf of Mexico with an evaluation of the importance of offshore petroleum platforms and other artificial reefs. Reviews in Fisheries Science 17:48–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. J., J. R. McKenzie, and N. M. Davies. 2001. Evidence from tag recapture experiments that fish learn to avoid fishing gear. Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics 6:281–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, W. R. 1993. Travel characteristics of marine anglers using oil and gas platforms in the central Gulf of Mexico. Marine Fisheries Review 55:25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Gratwicke, B., and M. R. Speight. 2005. Effects of habitat complexity on Caribbean marine fish assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 292:301–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. 2014. Recreational fishing regulations for Gulf of Mexico federal waters for species managed by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, Tampa, Florida. Available: http://www.gulfcouncil.org/fishing_regulations/. (December 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Hixon, M. A., and J. P. Beets. 1993. Predation, prey refuges, and the structure of coral reef fish assemblages. Ecological Monographs 63:77–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, P. B., A. J. Strelcheck, and P. Steele. 2007. A history of Red Snapper management in the Gulf of Mexico. Pages 241–256 in W. F. Patterson III, J. H. Cowan, G. R. Fitzhugh, and D. L. Nieland, editors. Red Snapper ecology and fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 60, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Jaxion-Harm, J., J. Saunders, and M. R. Speight. 2012. Distribution of fish in seagrass, mangroves and coral reefs: life-stage dependent habitat use in Honduras. Revista De Biologia Tropical 60:683–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanamoto, Z. 1996. Daily changes in the catch of Parapristipoma trilineatum at the hook and line fishing ground of Toshima Fisherman's Union with the special reference to water conditions of Uwa Sea, Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 62:565–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, W. J., T. K. Frazer, K. M. Portier, F. Vose, J. Loftin, D. J. Murie, D. M. Mason, B. Nagy, and M. K. Hart. 2006. Density-dependent habitat selection and performance by a large mobile reef fish. Ecological Applications 16:731–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linehan, J. E., R. S. Gregory, and D. C. Schneider. 2001. Predation risk of age-0 cod (Gadus) relative to depth and substrate in coastal waters. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 263:25–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingo, M. E., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2006. The influence of habitat complexity on reef fish communities in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Environmental Biology of Fishes 76:71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littell, R. C., W. W. Stroup, and R. J. Freund. 2002. SAS for linear models, 4th edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Lukens, R. R. 1981. Ichthyofauna colonization of a new artificial reef in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Gulf Research Reports 7:41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Macpherson, E., and C. M. Duarte. 1991. Bathymetric trends in demersal fish size: is there a general relationship. Marine Ecology Progress Series 71:103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. R., 1985. Species similarity and movement of fishes on natural and artificial reefs in Monterey Bay, California. Bulletin of Marine Science 37:252–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGurrin, J. M., R. B. Stone, and R. J. Sousa. 1989. Profiling United States artificial reef development. Bulletin of Marine Science 44:1004–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minton, R., and S. Heath. 1998. Alabama's artificial reef program: building oases in the desert. Gulf of Mexico Science 16:105–105.
   Google Scholar
• MRD (Marine Resources Division). 2006. Alabama's artificial reefs. Alabama Department of Conservation, MRD, Gulf Shores, Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Mudrak, P. A., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2012. Proximity effects of larger resident fishes on recruitment of age-0 Red Snapper in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141:487–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouzts, A. C., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2003. Diel feeding patterns of Red Snapper on artificial reefs in the north-central Gulf of Mexico. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132:1186–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. O., D. R. Colby, and T. D. Willis. 1983. Estimated amount of reef habitat on a portion of the United States south-Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico continental shelf. Bulletin of Marine Science 33:935–940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piko, A. A., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2007. Effects of habitat complexity and predator exclusion on the abundance of juvenile Red Snapper. Journal of Fish Biology 70:758–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman, R. A., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2009. The effects of epibenthic communities on reef fishes in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fisheries Management and Ecology 16:360–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivas, L. R. 1966. Review of the Lutjanus campechanus complex of Red Snappers. Quarterly Journal of the Florida Academy of Sciences 29:117–136.
   Google Scholar
• Rozas, L. P., and T. J. Minello. 1998. Nekton use of salt marsh, seagrass, and nonvegetated habitats in a south Texas (USA) estuary. Bulletin of Marine Science 63:481–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEDAR (Southeast Data Assessment and Review). 2013. SEDAR 31–Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper stock assessment report. SEDAR, North Charleston, South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Shipp, R. L., and S. A. Bortone. 2009. A Prospective of the importance of artificial habitat on the management of Red Snapper in the Gulf of Mexico. Reviews in Fisheries Science 17:41–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, D. R., and C. A. Wilson. 1991. Factors affecting the abundance of selected fishes near oil and gas platforms in the northern Gulf of Mexico. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 89:149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, D. R., and C. A. Wilson. 2004. Effect of hypoxia on the distribution of fishes associated with a petroleum platform off coastal Louisiana. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24:662–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoner, A. W. 2004. Effects of environmental variables on fish feeding ecology: implications for the performance of baited fishing gear and stock assessment. Journal of Fish Biology 65:1445–1471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelcheck, A. J., J. H. Cowan, and A. Shah. 2005. Influence of reef location on artificial-reef fish assemblages in the northcentral Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science 77:425–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syc, T. S., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2012. A comparison of size and age of Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) with the age of artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 110:458–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szedlmayer, S. T. 2011. The artificial habitat as an accessory for improving estimates of juvenile reef fish abundance in fishery management. Pages 31–43 in S. A. Bortone, F. P. Brandini, G. Fabi, and S. Otake, editors. Artificial reefs in fishery management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Szedlmayer, S. T., and J. Conti. 1999. Nursery habitats, growth rates, and seasonality of age-0 Red Snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, in the northeast Gulf of Mexico. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 97:626–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szedlmayer, S. T., and J. D. Lee. 2004. Diet shifts of juvenile Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) with changes in habitat and fish size. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 102:366–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, D. T., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2011. Site fidelity, residence time and movements of Red Snapper Lutjanus campechanus estimated with long-term acoustic monitoring. Marine Ecology Progress Series 437:183–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Womack, J. 2003. Small commercial fishing vessel stability analysis: where are we now? Where are we going? Marine Technology 40:296–302.
   Google Scholar
• Zar, J. H. 2010. Biostatistical analysis, 5th edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Zeileis, A., C. Kleiber, and S. Jackman. 2008. Regression models for count data in R. Journal of Statistical Software 27:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar