Contrasting Impacts of Dams on the Metacommunity Structure of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Assemblages

References

• American Public Health Association and American Water Works Association. 1981. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater: selected analytical methods approved and cited by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• American Rivers. 2002. The ecology of dam removal: a summary of benefits and impacts. American Rivers, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarek, A. 2001. Undamming rivers: a review of the ecological impacts of dam removal. Environmental Management 27:803–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilton, D. T., J. R. Freeland, and B. Okamura. 2001. Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 32:159–181.
   Google Scholar
• Brenkman, S. J., G. R. Pess, C. E. Torgersen, K. K. Kloehn, J. J. Duda, and S. C. Corbett. 2008. Predicting recolonization patterns and interactions between potamodromous and anadromous salmonids in response to dam removal in the Elwha River, Washington State, USA. Northwest Science 82:91–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burroughs, B. A., D. B. Hayes, K. D. Klomp, J. F. Hansen, and J. Mistak. 2010. The effects of the Stronach Dam removal on fish in the Pine River, Manistee County, Michigan. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:1595–1613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushaw-Newton, K. L., D. D. Hart, J. E. Pizzuto, J. R. Thomson, J. Egan, J. T. Ashley, T. E. Johnson, R. J. Horwitz, M. Keeley, J. Lawrence, D. Charles, C. Gatenby, D. A. Kreeger, T. Nightengale, R. L. Thomas, and D. J. Velinsky. 2002. An integrative approach towards understanding ecological responses to dam removal: the Manatawny Creek study. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38:1581–1598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, S. E., and D. H. Wahl. 2010. Common Carp distribution, movements, and habitat use in a river impounded by multiple low-head dams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:1121–1135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano, M. J., M. A. Bozak, and T. D. Pellett. 2007. Effects of dam removal on fish assemblage structure and spatial distributions in the Baraboo River, Wisconsin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 27:519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, P. J., and S. J. Brenkman. 2008. Fish assemblage, density, and growth in lateral habitats within natural and regulated sections of Washington’s Elwha River prior to dam removal. Northwest Science 82:107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, C., S. M. J. R. Coghlan, J. Zydlewski, and R. Saunders. 2013. Distribution and abundance of stream fishes in relation to barriers: implications for monitoring stream recovery after barrier removal. River Research and Applications 29:65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillette, D. P., J. S. Tiemann, D. R. Edds, and M. L. Wildhaber. 2005. Spatiotemporal patterns of fish assemblage structure in a river impounded by low-head dams. Copeia 2005:539–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, L. J., and J. V. Ward. 1982. Effects of sediment releases from a reservoir on stream macroinvertebrates. Hydrobiologia 96:177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, C. B., and A. Spacie. 2006. Changes in fish assemblage structure upstream of impoundments within the upper Wabash River basin, Indiana. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135:570–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, J., and R. Linke. 2003. Assessments of the impacts of dams on the DuPage River. Conservation Foundation, Naperville, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, D. D., T. E. Johnson, K. L. Bushaw-Newton, R. J. Horwitz, A. T. Bednarek, D. F. Charles, D. A. Kreeger, and D. J. Velinsky. 2002. Dam removal: challenges and opportunities for ecological research and river restoration. BioScience 52:669–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, R. P., S. J. Meiners, R. E. Colombo, and T. Thomas. 2016. When to sample: flow variation mediates low-head dam effects on fish assemblages. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 31:191–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino, J. 2012. The importance of metacommunity ecology for environmental assessment research in the fresh water realm. Biological Reviews 8:166–178.
   Google Scholar
• Helms, B. S., D. C. Werneke, M. M. Gangloff, E. E. Hartfield, and J. W. Feminella. 2011. The influences on low-head dams on fish assemblages in streams across Alabama. Journal of North American Benthological Society 304:1095–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Hershey, A. E., and G. A. Lamberti. 2001. Aquatic insect ecology. Pages 733–775 in J. H. Thorp and A. P. Covich, editors. Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. J., E. A. Long, and S. Hardin. 1994. Effects of dam removal on dead lake, Chipola River, Florida. Proceedings of the Annual Conference Southeastern Association Fish and Wildlife Agencies 48:512–523.
   Google Scholar
• Hilsenhoff, W. L. 1987. An improved biotic index of organic stream pollution. Great Lakes Entomologist 10:31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2013. Danville and Ellsworth Park Dam modifications, Vermilion and North Fork Vermilion River: strategic planning study, 2013 draft. Illinois Department of Natural Resources, Springfield.
   Google Scholar
• Illinois Department of Natural Resources. 2016. IBI calculator. Available: http://dnr.illinois.gov/IBICalculation/NewSampleForm.aspx. ( February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. A., P. R. Peres-Neto, and J. D. Olden. 2001. What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities: roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58:157–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanehl, P. D., J. Lyons, and J. E. Nelson. 1997. Changes in the habitat and fish community of the Milwaukee River, Wisconsin, following removal of the Woolen Mills Dam. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 17:387–400.
   Google Scholar
• Karna, O. M., M. Gronroos, H. Antikainen, J. Hjor, J. Ilmonen, L. Paasivirta, and J. Heino. 2015. Inferring the effects of potential dispersal routes on the metacommunity structure of stream insects: as the crow flies, as the fish swims, or as the fox runs? Journal of Animal Ecology 10:1365–2656.
   Google Scholar
• Karr, J. R., K. D. Fausch, P. L. Angermeir, P. R. Yant, and I. J. Schlosser. 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey, Special Publication 5, Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Leibold, M. A. 2009. Spatial and metacommunity dynamics in biodiversity. Pages 312–319 in S. A. Levin, S. R. Carpenter, H. C. J. Godfray, A. P. Kinzig, M. Loreau, J. B. Losos, B. Walker, and D. S. Wilcove, editors. The Princeton guide to ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Leibold, M. A., M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M. F. Hoopes, R. D. Holt, J. B. Shurin, R. Law, D. Tilman, M. Loreau, and A. Gonzalez. 2004. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecology Letters 7:601–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liermann, C. R., C. Nilsson, J. Robertson, and R. Y. Ng. 2012. Implications of dam obstruction for global freshwater diversity. BioScience 62:539–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, M. C., E. Baras, T. J. Thom, A. Duncan, and O. Slavík, editors. 2001. Migration of freshwater fishes. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, P. J., T. E. Chart, M. A. Trammell, M. G. Wullschleger, and E. P. Bergersen. 1994. Fish species composition before and after construction of a main stem reservoir on the Whiter River, Colorado. Environmental Biology of Fishes 40:227–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune, B., and B. Grace 2002. Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Glenden Beach, Oregon.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, R. W., and K. W. Cummins 1996. An introduction to the aquatic Insects of North America. Kendall Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L. A., and D. L. Johnson 1983. Fisheries techniques. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Nislow, K. H., M. Hudy, B. H. Letcher, and E. P. Smith. 2011. Variation in local abundance and species richness of stream fishes in relation to dispersal barriers: implications for management and conservation. Freshwater Biology 56:2135–2144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohio EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2006. Methods for assessing habitat in flowing waters: using the qualitative habitat evaluation index (QHEI). Ohio EPA, Division of Surface Water, Columbus.
   Google Scholar
• Poff, L. N., and D. D. Hart. 2002. How dams vary and why it matters for emerging science of dam removal. BioScience 52:659–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyron, M., and C. M. Taylor. 1993. Fish community structure of Oklahoma Gulf Coastal Plains. Hydrobiologia 257:29–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santucci, V., J. Gephard Jr., and S. M. Pescitelli. 2005. Effects of multiple low-head dams on fish, macroinvertebrates, habitat, and water quality in the Fox River, Illinois. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25:975–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. 2006. Base SAS 9.3 procedures guide. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Slawski, T. M., F. M. Veraldi, S. M. Pescitelli, and M. J. Pauers. 2008. Effects of tributary spatial position, urbanization, and multiple low-head dams on warmwater fish community structure in a Midwestern stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28:1020–1035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. W. 2002. The fishes of Illinois. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, E. H., M. A. Luebke, M. W. Doyle, and D. W. Marshall. 2002. Short-term changes in channel form and macroinvertebrate communities following low-head dam removal. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21:172–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. M., T. L. Holder, R. A. Fiorillo, L. R. Williams, R. B. Thomas, and M. L. Warren Jr. 2006. Distribution, abundance, and diversity of stream fishes under variable environmental conditions. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. M., D. S. Millican, M. E. Roberts, and W. T. Slack. 2008. Long-term change to fish assemblages and the flow regime in a southeastern U.S. river system after extensive aquatic ecosystem fragmentation. Ecography 31:787–797.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. R., D. D. Hart, D. F. Charles, T. L. Nightengale, and D. M. Winter. 2005. Effects of the removal of a small dam on downstream macroinvertebrate and algal assemblages in a Pennsylvania stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24:192–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiemann, J. S., D. P. Gillette, M. L. Wildhaber, and D. R. Edds. 2004. Effects of lowhead dams on riffle-dwelling fishes and macroinvertebrates in a Midwestern stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133:705–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehanen, T., J. Jurvelius, and M. Lahti 2005. Habitat utilization by fish community in a short-term regulated river reservoir. Hydrobiologia 545:257–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, J. B., and N. H. Anderson. 1996. Habitat, life history, and behavioral adaptations of aquatic insects. Pages 41–73 in R. W. Merritt and K. W. Cummins, editors. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., D. Infante, J. Lyons, J. Stewart, and A. Cooper. 2011. Effects of dams in river networks on fish assemblages in non-impoundment sections of rivers in Michigan and Wisconsin, USA. River Research and Applications 27:473–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, P. J., and P. D. Armitage. 1997. Biological effects of fine sediment in the lotic environment. Environmental Management 21:203–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar