Environmental Factors Associated with the Upstream Migration of Fall-Run Chinook Salmon in a Regulated River

REFERENCES

• Bartoń, K. 2014. MuMIn: multi-model inference. R package version 1.10.0. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn. (October 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, L. J., M. Bettanin, J. McPherson, M. Jones, B. Zampatti, and K. Beyer. 2012. Influence of turbidity and passage rate on the efficiency of an infrared counter to enumerate and measure riverine fish. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 28:531–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beechie, T. J., G. R. Pess, H. Imaki, A. Martin, J. Alvarez, and D. H. Goodman. 2015. Comparison of potential increases in juvenile salmonid rearing habitat capacity among alternative restoration scenarios, Trinity River, California. Restoration Ecology 23:75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, J. M., R. M. Nielson, and A. Low. 2012. Central Valley Chinook Salmon in-river escapement monitoring plan. California Department of Fish and Game, Administrative Report 2012-1, Sacramento.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, T. R., R. L. McLaughlin, and D. G. McDonald. 2010. Relative importance of water temperature, water level, and lunar cycle to migratory activity in spawning-phase Sea Lampreys in Lake Ontario. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:700–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, S. M., and W. H. Satterthwaite. 2011. Weakened portfolio effect in a collapsed salmon population complex. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 68:1579–1589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2014. 2012 Summary report: San Joaquin River Basin fall-run Chinook Salmon telemetry and physiology study. Prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Federal Assistance Grant F-155-D-1, La Grange, California.
   Google Scholar
• CDWR (California Department of Water Resources). 1994. California central valley unimpaired flow data, 3rd edition. CDWR, Sacramento.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, J., J. Dannewitz, L. Karlsson, E. Petersson, A. Löf, and B. Ragnarsson. 2004. The timing of spawning migration: implications of environmental variation, life history, and sex. Canadian Journal of Zoology 82:1864–1870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diffenbaugh, N. S., D. L. Swain, and D. Touma. 2015. Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 112:3931–3936.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, D. M. 2012. Negotiating for endangered and threatened species habitat in the Platte River basin. Pages 58–88 in M. Doyle and C. Drew, editors. Large-scale ecosystem restoration: five case studies from the United States. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Georgakakos, A. P., H. Yao, M. Kistenmacher, K. P. Georgakakos, N. E. Graham, F. Y. Cheng, C. Spencer, and E. Shamir. 2012. Value of adaptive water resources management in northern California under climatic variability and change: reservoir management. Journal of Hydrology 412:34–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guignard, J. 2005. Stanislaus River fall Chinook Salmon escapement survey 2004. California Department Fish and Game, La Grange, California.
   Google Scholar
• Guignard, J. 2006. Stanislaus River fall Chinook Salmon escapement survey 2005. California Department Fish and Game, La Grange, California.
   Google Scholar
• Guignard, J. 2007. Stanislaus River fall Chinook Salmon escapement survey 2006. California Department Fish and Game, La Grange, California.
   Google Scholar
• Guignard, J. 2008. Stanislaus River fall Chinook Salmon escapement survey 2007. California Department of Fish and Game, La Grange, California.
   Google Scholar
• Hallock, R. J., R. F. Elwell, and D. H. Fry. 1970. Migrations of adult King Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha in the San Joaquin Delta as demonstrated by the use of sonic tags. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa, E. I. 2012. Chum Salmon Oncorhynchus keta respond to moonlight during homeward migrations. Journal of Fish Biology 81:632–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasler, C. T., E. Guimond, B. Mossop, S. G. Hinch, and S. J. Cooke. 2014. Effectiveness of pulse flows in a regulated river for inducing upstream movement of an imperiled stock of Chinook Salmon. Aquatic Sciences 76:231–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley, N. Jr. 2001. The great thirst. Californians and water: a history, revised edition. University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. E., and J. C. Petreman. 2014. Environmental influences on fish migration in a hydropeaking river. River Research and Applications 31:1109–1118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juanes, F., S. Gephard, and K. F. Beland. 2004. Long-term changes in migration timing of adult Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) at the southern edge of the species distribution. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:2392–2400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefer, M. L., C. A. Peery, M. A. Jepson, K. R. Tolotti, T. C. Bjornn, and L. C. Stuehrenberg. 2004. Stock-specific migration timing of adult spring–summer Chinook Salmon in the Columbia River basin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24:1145–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, R. L. 1989. Battling the Inland Sea. floods, public policy, and the Sacramento Valley. University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Kondolf, G. M., A. Falzone, and K. A. Schneider. 2001. Reconnaissance-level of channel change and spawning habitat on the Stanislaus River below Goodwin Dam. Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Berkeley, California.
   Google Scholar
• Lesnoff, M., and R. Lancelot. 2012. aod: analysis of overdispersed data. R package version 1.3. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/package=aod. (October 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Lindley, S. T., R. Schick, B. P. May, J. J. Anderson, S. Greene, C. Hanson, A. Low, D. McEwan, R. B. MacFarlane, C. Swanson, and J. G. Williams. 2004. Population structure of threatened and endangered Chinook Salmon ESUs in California’s Central Valley basin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Santa Cruz, California.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M. E., and P. H. Gleick. 2015. Climate change and California drought in the 21st century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 112:3858–3859.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. T., R. M. Nisbet, A. Pike, C. J. Michel, and E. M. Danner. 2015. Sport science for salmon and other species: ecological consequences of metabolic power constraints. Ecology Letters 18:535–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, D., S. Spalding, D. Sturdevant, and M. Hicks. 2001. Summary of technical literature examining effects of temperature on salmonids. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Issue Paper 5, Region 10 Temperature Water Quality Criteria Guidance Development Project, EPA-910-D-01–001, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• McCullough, D. A. 1999. A review and synthesis of effects of alteration to the water temperature regime on freshwater life stages of salmonids, with special reference to Chinook Salmon. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Report 910-R-99–010, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, N. J., D. J. Solomon, and G. W. Smith. 2012. The role of river flow in the migration of adult Atlantic Salmon, Salmo salar, through estuaries and rivers. Fisheries Management and Ecology 19:537–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mount, J. F. 1995. California rivers and streams. The conflict between fluvial processes and land use. University of California Press, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Moyle, P. B., J. A. Israel, and S. E. Purdy. 2008. Salmon, steelhead, and trout in California. Status of an emblematic fauna. Report for California Trout, University of California, Center for Watershed Sciences, Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Mundy, P. R., and D. F. Evenson. 2011. Environmental controls of phenology of high-latitude Chinook Salmon populations of the Yukon River, North America, with application to fishery management. ICES Journal of Marine Science 68:1155–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naimi, B. 2013. usdm: uncertainty analysis for species distribution models. R package version 1.1-12. Available: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=usdm. (October 2016).
   Google Scholar
• NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 1989. Endangered and threatened species; critical habitat; winter-run Chinook Salmon. Federal Register 54:149(4 August 1989):32085–32088.
   Google Scholar
• NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 1994. Endangered and threatened species; status of Sacramento River winter-run Chinook Salmon. Federal Register 59:2(4 January 1994):440–450.
   Google Scholar
• NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 1999. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; determination of threatened status for two Chinook Salmon evolutionarily significant units (ESUs) in California. Federal Register 64:179(16 September 1999):72960–72961.
   Google Scholar
• NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2006. Endangered and threatened species: final listing determinations for 10 distinct population segments of West Coast steelhead. Federal Register 71:3(5 January 2006):834–862.
   Google Scholar
• NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2009. Biological opinion and conference opinion on the long-term operations of the Central Valley project and state water project. NMFS, Southwest Region, Long Beach, California. Available: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=21473. (October 2016).
   Google Scholar
• NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 2011. 2009 reasonable and prudent alternative and 2011 amendments for the biological opinion and conference opinion on the long-term operations of the central valley project and state water project. Available: http://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/central_valley/water_operations/ocap.html. (December 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Patten, D. T., D. A. Harpman, M. I. Voita, and T. J. Randle. 2001. A managed flood on the Colorado River: background, objectives, design, and implementation. Ecological Applications 11:635–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. P., and D. J. Adams. 1996. Environmental changes affecting the migratory timing of American Shad and Sockeye Salmon. Ecology 77:1151–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. P., S. Hodgson, and C. Peven. 1997. Temperature, flow, and the migration of adult Sockeye Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in the Columbia River. Canadian Journal of Fish and Aquatic Sciences 54:1349–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available: https://www.R-project.org/. (October 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Richter, A., and S. A. Kolmes. 2005. Maximum temperature limits for Chinook, Coho, and Chum salmon, and steelhead trout in the Pacific Northwest. Reviews in Fisheries Science 13:23–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RWQCB (Regional Water Quality Control Board) Central Valley Region. 2005. Amendments to the water quality control plan for the Sacramento and San Joaquin River basins. RWQCB Central Valley Region, Final Staff Report, Rancho Cordova, California.
   Google Scholar
• Salinger, D. H., and J. J. Anderson. 2006. Effects of water temperature and flow on adult salmon migration swim speed and delay. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135:188–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. C., R. A. Parnell, P. E. Grams, J. E. Hazel, M. A. Kaplinski, L. E. Stevens, and T. L. Hoffnagle. 2001. The 1996 controlled flood in Grand Canyon: flow, sediment transport, and geomorphic change. Ecological Applications 11:657–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, K. S., G. M. Kondolf, and A. Falzone. 2000. Channel-floodplain disconnection on the Stanislaus River: a hydrologic and geomorphic perspective. University of California–Berkeley, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Shardlow, T. F., and K. D. Hyatt. 2004. Assessment of the counting accuracy of the Vaki infrared counter on Chum Salmon. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24:249–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavík, O., P. Horký, T. Randák, P. Balvín, and M. Bílý. 2012. Brown Trout spawning migration in fragmented central European headwaters: effect of isolation by artificial obstacles and the moon phase. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141:673–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, R. 2002. Resistance board weir panel construction manual. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, Arctic–Yukon–Kuskokwim Region, Regional Information Report 3A02-21, Fairbanks.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, R. 2003. Techniques for installing a resistance board fish weir. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Commercial Fisheries, Arctic–Yukon–Kuskokwim Region, Regional Information Report 3A02-21, Fairbanks.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, J. S. 2007. Adult Chinook migration in the Klamath River basin: 2006 radio telemetry study final report. Yurok Tribal Fisheries Program, Klamath, California and University of Washington, School of Aquatic and Fisheries Resources, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, J. S. 2010. Upper thermal limits to migration in adult Chinook Salmon: evidence from the Klamath River basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:1091–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, J. S. 2012. Migration strategies of adult Chinook Salmon runs in response to diverse environmental conditions in the Klamath River basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 141:1622–1636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorstad, E. B., and T. G. Heggberget. 1998. Migration of adult Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar); the effects of artificial freshets. Hydrobiologia 371:339–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorstad, E. B., F. Økland, K. Aarestrup, and T. G. Heggberget. 2008. Factors affecting the within-river spawning migration of Atlantic Salmon, with emphasis on human impacts. Reviews in Fish Biology 18:345–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorstad, E. B., F. Økland, F. Kroglund, and N. Jepsen. 2003. Upstream migration of Atlantic Salmon at a power station on the River Nidelva, southern Norway. Fisheries Management and Ecology 10:139–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trépanier, S., M. A. Rodríguez, and P. Magnan. 1996. Spawning migrations in landlocked Atlantic Salmon: time series modeling of river discharge and water temperature effects. Journal of Fish Biology 48:925–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USBR (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation). 2014. Reclamation releases additional water to address fish health in lower Klamath River [press release]. Available: http://www.usbr.gov/newsroom/newsrelease/detail.cfm?RecordID=47908. (September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. S., B. M. Sleeter, and D. R. Cameron. 2016. Future land-use related water demand in California. Environmental Research Letters 11:54018–54029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. 2006. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshiyama, R. M., F. W. Fisher, and P. B. Moyle. 1998. Historical abundance and decline of Chinook Salmon in the Central Valley region of California. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 18:487–521.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshiyama, R. M., E. R. Gerstung, F. W. Fisher, and P. B. Moyle. 2001. Historical and present distribution of Chinook Salmon in the Central Valley drainage of California. California Department of Fish and Game Fish Bulletin 179:71–176.
   Google Scholar
• Young, P. S., J. J. Cech Jr., and L. C. Thompson. 2011. Hydropower-related pulsed-flow impacts on stream fishes: a brief review, conceptual model, knowledge gaps, and research needs. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 21:713–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuur, A., E. N. Ieno, N. Walker, A. A. Saveliev, and G. M. Smith. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer-Verlag, New York.
   Google Scholar