Spatial Heterogeneity, Variable Rewards, Tag Loss, and Tagging Mortality Affect the Performance of Mark–Recapture Designs to Estimate Exploitation: an Example using Red Snapper in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

REFERENCES

• ALDCNR (Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources). 2014. Preliminary results of Alabama’s Red Snapper reporting program. ALDCNR, Marine Resources Division, Dauphin Island. Available: http://outdooralabama.com/sites/default/files/Preliminary%20Results%20of%20Alabama%202014%20Red%20Snapper%20Reporting.pdf. (March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• ALDCNR (Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources). 2015. Summary of Alabama’s 2015 mandatory Red Snapper reporting program. ALDCNR, Marine Resources Division, Dauphin Island. Available: http://outdooralabama.com/sites/default/files/Preliminary%20Results%20of%20Alabama%27s%202015%20Red%20Snapper%20Reporting.pdf. (March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Bacheler, N. M., J. E. Hightower, S. M. Burdick, L. M. Paramore, J. A. Buckel, and K. H. Pollock. 2010. Using generalized linear models to estimate selectivity from short-term recoveries of tagged Red Drum Sciaenops ocellatus: effects of gear, fate, and regulation period. Fisheries Research 102:266–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., and B. T. Wilkins. 1978. Clues to reasons for nonresponse, and its effect upon variable estimates. Journal of Leisure Research 10:226–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2015. Databases, tables and calculators by subject, CPI inflation calculator. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Available: http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm. ( November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. D., W. B. Driggers, B. Sauls, and J. F. Walter).. 2014. Release mortality in the Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) fishery: a meta-analysis of three decades of research. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 112:283–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, M. J., and W. W. Blandin. 1984. Geographic and temporal differences in band reporting rates for American black ducks. Journal of Wildlife Management 48:23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, J. H. Jr., C. B. Grimes, W. F. Patterson III, C. J. Walters, A. C. Jones, W. J. Lindberg, D. J. Sheehy, W. E. Pine III, J. E. Powers, M. D. Campbell, K. C. Lindeman, S. L. Diamond, R. Hilborn, H. T. Gibson, and K. A. Rose. 2011. Red Snapper management in the Gulf of Mexico: science- or faith-based? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 21:187–204.
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, L., S. J. Walsh, C. J. Schwarz, N. Cadigan, and J. Morgan. 2009. Estimating exploitation rates of migrating Yellowtail Flounder (Limanda ferruginea) using multistate mark–recapture methods incorporating tag loss and variable reporting rates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 66:1245–1255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denson, M. R., W. E. Jenkins, A. G. Woodward, and T. I. J. Smith. 2002. Tag-reporting levels for Red Drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) caught by anglers in South Carolina and Georgia estuaries. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service Fishery Bulletin 100:35–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drumhiller, K. L., M. W. Johnson, S. L. Diamond, M. M. Reese Robillard, and G. W. Stunz. 2014. Venting or rapid recompression increase survival and improve recovery of Red Snapper with barotrauma. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science [online serial] 6:190–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitschlag, G. R., and M. L. Renaud. 1994. Field experiments on survival rates of caged and released Red Snapper. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 14:131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. 2015. Increasing survival rates of discarded Red Snapper: best release strategies. Fisheries 40:3–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henny, C. J., and K. P. Burnham. 1976. A reward band study of mallards to estimate reporting rates. Journal of Wildlife Management 40:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig, J. M., N. J. Barrowman, K. H. Pollock, E. N. Brooks, W. S. Hearn, and T. Polacheck. 1998. Models for tagging data that allow for incomplete mixing of newly tagged animals. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:1477–1483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, P. B., A. J. Strelcheck, and P. Steele. 2007. A history of Red Snapper management in the Gulf of Mexico. Pages 267–284 in W. F. Patterson III, J. H. Cowan Jr., G. R. Fitzhugh, and D. L. Nieland, editors. Red Snapper ecology and fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. American Fisheries Society, Symposium 60, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• McGarvey, R., and J. E. Feenstra. 2002. Estimating rates of fish movement from tag recoveries: conditioning by recapture. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59:1054–1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, K. A., and D. J. Schill. 2014. Use of a statewide angler tag reporting system to estimate rates of exploitation and total mortality for Idaho sport fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 34:1145–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minta, S., and M. Mangel. 1989. A simple population estimate based on simulation for capture-recapture and capture-resight data. Ecology 70:1738–1751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, L. E., R. E., Brock, and B. S. Dorr. 2002. Uncertainty of exploitation estimates made from tag returns. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:1358–1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, K. M., T. Henwood, G. R. Fitzhugh, and R. J. Allman. 2004. Distribution, abundance, and age structure of Red Snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) caught on research longlines in U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Gulf of Mexico Science 22:164–172.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. D., and R. G. Taylor. 1991. Preliminary study of the effect of reward amount on tag-return rate for Red Drums in Tampa Bay, Florida. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 11:471–474.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, J. D., R. J. Blohm, R. E. Reynolds, R. E. Trost, J. E. Hines, and J. P. Bladen. 1991. Reporting rates for mallards with reward bands of different dollar values. Journal of Wildlife Management 55:119–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pine, W. E., K. H. Pollock, J. E. Hightower, T. J. Kwak, and J. A. Rice. 2003. A review of tagging methods for estimating fish population size and components of mortality. Fisheries 28(10):10–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, K. H., J. M. Hoenig, W. S. Hearn, and B. Calingaert. 2001. Tag reporting rate estimation I: an evaluation of the high-reward tagging method. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:521–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available: https://www.R-project.org/. (March 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Ricker, W. E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Fisheries Research Board of Canada Bulletin 191.
   Google Scholar
• Rummer, J. L., and W. A. Bennett. 2005. Physiological effects of swim bladder overexpansion and catastrophic decompression on Red Snapper. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:1457–1470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroepfer, R. L., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2006. Estimates of residence and site fidelity for Red Snapper Lutjanus campechanus on artificial reefs in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science 78:93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEDAR (Southeast Data, Assessment, and Review). 2013. SEDAR 31: Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper stock assessment report, June 2013. SEDAR, North Charleston, South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. G., J. A. Whittington, W. E. Pine III, and K. H. Pollock. 2006. Effect of different reward levels on tag reporting rates and behavior of Common Snook anglers in southeast Florida. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 26:645–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, D. T., and S. T. Szedlmayer. 2013. Use of ultrasonic telemetry to estimate natural and fishing mortality of Red Snapper. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142:1090–1100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. House of Representatives. 2016. Commerce, Justice, Science, and related agencies appropriations bill, 2016. House Report 114-130 (114th Congress, 1st session).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Senate. 2016. Departments of Commerce and Justice, and Science and related agencies appropriations bill, 2016. Senate Report 114-66 (114th Congress, 1st session).
   Google Scholar
• Walters, C. J., and S. J. D. Martell. 2004. Fisheries ecology and management Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Wilde, G. R. 2009. Does venting promote survival of released fish? Fisheries 34:20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar