Gender, succession and dynastic rule

References

• Aberle, David F. 1974. “Matrilineal Descent in Cross-Cultural Perspective.” In Matrilineal Kinship, edited by David Murray Schneider and Kathleen Gough, 655–727. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amirell, Stefan. 2011. “The Blessings and Perils of Female Rule: New Perspectives on the Reigning Queens of Patani, c. 1584–1718.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 42 (2): 303–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirell, Stefan. 2016. “Female Rule in the Indian Ocean World (1300–1900).” Journal of World History 26 (3): 443–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayache, Simon. 1975. “Esquisse pour le portrait d’une reine: Ranavalona Iere.” Omaly sy Anio 1 (11): 251–270.
   Google Scholar
• Bachofen, Johann Jakob. 1861. Das Mutterrecht: eine Untersuchung über die Gynaikokratie der alten Welt nach ihrer religiösen und rechtlichen Natur. Stuttgart: Krais & Hoffman.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, John. 1960. Bunyoro: An African Kingdom. New York: Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, John. 1967. “Checks on the Abuse of Political Power in Some African States: A Preliminary Framework for Analysis.” In Comparative Political Systems: Studies in the Politics of Pre-industrial Societies, edited by Ronald Cohen and John Middleton, 355–373. Garden City: Natural History Press.
   Google Scholar
• BenYishay, Ariel, et al. 2017. “The Fish Is the Friend of Matriliny: Reef Density and Matrilineal Inheritance.” Journal of Development Economics cxxvii, 234-249.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Gwyn. 1987. “The Adoption of Autarky in Imperial Madagascar, 1820–1835.” The Journal of African History 28 (3): 395–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, Mary. 1969. “Is Matriliny Doomed in Africa?” In Man in Africa, edited by Mary Douglas and Phyllis M. Kaberry, 121–135. London: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker-Brown, Susan. 1975. Ritual Aspects of the Mamprusi Kingship. Leiden: Afrika-Studiecentrum.
   Google Scholar
• Duindam, Jeroen. 2016. Dynasty: A Global History of Power 1300–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duindam, Jeroen. 2019a. Dynasty: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duindam, Jeroen. 2019b. “A Plea for Global Comparison: Redefining Dynasty.” Past & Present 242 (Suppl 14): 318–347.
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, Juliette. 2013. “Les Perles de Nacre du Sultanat: Les Princesses Ottomanes (Mi-XVe – Mi-XVIIIe Siècle).” Dissertation, EHESS Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Feeley-Harnik, Gillian. 2019. “Descent in Retrospect and Prospect.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Kinship, edited by Sarah C. Bamford, 51–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frazer, James G. 1894. The Golden Bough. New York: MacMillan and co.
   Google Scholar
• Goody, Jack. 1966. Succession to High Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helfferich, Tryntje. 2013. The Iron Princess Amalia Elisabeth and the Thirty Years War. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henley, David, and Ian Caldwell. 2008. Indonesia and the Malay World 36 (105), 163-175; 269-291.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, Jennifer W. 1996. “Imagining Matriarchy: ‘Kingdoms of Women’ in Tang China.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 116: 220–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Jessica. 2016. “Matriliny.” Cambridge Encyclopedia of Anthropology. Accessed 18 August 2019. http://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/matriliny.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Doug. 2011. “The Matrilocal Tribe.” Human Nature 22 (1): 177–200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, Dan’el, et al. 2012. “The Queen Mother in the Kingdom of Kush: Status, Power and Cultic Role.” In Teshura Le-Zafrira: Studies in the Bible, the History of Israel, and the Ancient Near East Presented to Zafrira Ben-Barak of the University of Haifa, edited by M. I. Gruber, 61–68. Beer Sheva: Ben-Gurion University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, Sher Banu A.L. 2017. Sovereign Women in a Muslim Kingdom: The Sultanahs of Aceh, 1641–1699. Singapore: NUS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, Chris. 2011. “Early Kinship was Matrilineal.” In Early Human Kinship: From Sex to Social Reproduction, edited by N. J. Allen et al., 61–82. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Krehl, L., and T. W. Juynboll. 1862–1908. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhârî: The Early Years of Islam: Being the Historical Chapters of the Kitāb al-jâmiʿ al-Ṣaḥīḥ, IV, 376–377. 4 vols. Leiden: Brill. Accessed 20 August 2019. See a translation at https://sunnah.com/bukhari/92/50.
   Google Scholar
• Krige, Jensen E., and J. D. Krige. 1943. The Realm of a Rain-Queen: A Study of the Pattern of Lovedu Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lutter, Christina, Daniel Frey, Herbert Krammer and Judit Majorossy. 2021. “Kinship, Gender and the Spiritual Economy in Medieval Central European Towns”. History & Anthropology 32 (2): 249–270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, Keith. 2013. “Women Rulers in Imperial China.” NAN NÜ 15 (2): 179–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, Lewis Henry. 1877. Ancient Society. Or, Researches in the Line of Human Progress from Savagery Through Barbarism to Civilization. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Murdock, George Peter. 1957. “World Ethnographic Sample.” American Anthropologist 59 (4): 664–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, George Peter. 1967. Ethnographic Atlas. Pittsburgh. Online at eHRAF World Cultures. Accessed 18 August 2019. https://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/ehrafe/.
   Google Scholar
• Murphey, Rhoads. 2008. Exploring Ottoman Sovereignty: Tradition, Image and Practice in the Ottoman Imperial Household, 1400–1800. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Sarah M. 2003. “The Queens of Silla: Power and Connections to the Spirit World.” In Ancient Queens: Archaeological Explorations, edited by Sarah Nelson, 77–92. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, Peter. 1993. “The Meaning of Matrilocality: Kinship, Property, and Politics in Mid-Heian.” Monumenta Nipponica 48 (4): 429–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottino, Paul. 1983. “Ancient Malagasy Dynastic Succession: The Merina Example.” History in Africa 10: 247–292.
   Google Scholar
• Paige, Karen Ericksen, and Jeffery M. Paige. 1981. The Politics of Reproductive Ritual. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, Robert. 2021. “Arranged Marriages: Whose Choice and Why? Reflections on the Principles Underlying Spouse Selection Worldwide”. History and Anthropology 32 (2): 271–287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce Leslie, P. 1993. The Imperial Harem: Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Pauline E. 1997. “Introduction. Revisiting the Puzzle of Matriliny in South-Central Africa.” Critique of Anthropology 17: 125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattray, Robert Sutherland. 1929. Ashanti Law and Constitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Audrey I. 1950. “Some Types of Family Structure Amongst the Central Bantu.” In African Systems of Kinship and Marriage, edited by A. R. Radcliffe-Brown and D. Forde, 207–251. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Audrey I. 1968. “Keeping the King Divine.” Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland (1968), 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Marc Howard. 1986. “Female Political Participation: A Cross-Cultural Explanation.” American Anthropologist 88 (4): 843–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabean, David Warren, Teuscher Simon, et al., eds. 2007. Kinship in Europe: Approaches to Long-Term Development (1300–1900). New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sabean, David Warren, Teuscher Simon, et al. 2011. Transregional and Transnational Families in Europe and Beyond: Experiences Since the Middle Ages. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sabean, David Warren, Teuscher Simon, et al. 2013. Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, Marshall. 2013. What Kinship Is – And Is Not. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, David Murray. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, David Murray, and Kathleen Gough. 1974. Matrilineal Kinship. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoorl, J. W. 1994. “Power, Ideology and Change in the Early State of Buton.” In State and Trade in the Indonesian Archipelago, edited by G. J. Schutte, 17–59. Leiden: KITLV Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shillony, Ben-Ami. 2005. Enigma of the Emperors: Sacred Subservience in Japanese History. Folkestone: Folkestone Global Oriental.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiec, Alexandra, Kate T. Snyder, and Nicole Creanza. 2019. “A Worldwide View of Matriliny: Using Cross-Cultural Analyses to Shed Light on Human Kinship Systems.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 374 (1780) 1-12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szonyi, Michael. 2002. Practicing Kinship: Lineage and Descent in Late Imperial China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tardits, Claude. 1987. Princes & serviteurs du royaume: cinq études de monarchies africaines. Paris: Société d’ethnologie.
   Google Scholar
• Thoden van Velzen, H. U. E. 1982. “De Aukaanse (Djoeka) beschaving.” Sociologische Gids 29 (3–4): 243–278.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, John. 1991. “Legitimacy and Political Power: Queen Njinga, 1624–1663.” The Journal of African History 32 (1): 25–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twitchett, Denis. 2003. “Chen Gui and Other Works Attributed to Empress Wu Zetian.” Asia Major 16 (1): 33–109.
   Google Scholar
• Tylor, Edward Burnett. 1896. “The Matriarchal System.” The Nineteenth Century 40: 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Veth, P. 1870. “Vrouwenregeeringen in den Indischen Archipel.” Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch Indië 4 (11): 354–369.
   Google Scholar
• Watson Andaya, Barbara. 1994. “The Changing Religious Role of Women in Pre-modern South East Asia.” South East Asia Research 2: 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Watson Andaya, Barbara. 2006. The Flaming Womb: Repositioning Women in Early Modern Southeast Asia. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson Andaya, Barbara, and Yoneo Ishii. 1992. “Religious Developments in Southeast Asia, c. 1500–1800.” In The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, Volume One: From Early Times to c. 1800, edited by Nicholas Tarling, 508-571. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilks, Ivor. 1989. Asante in the Nineteenth Century: The Structure and Evolution of a Political Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winterling, Aloys. 2004. “‘Hof’: Versuch einer idealtypischen Bestimmung anhand der mittelalterlichen und frühneuzeitlichen Geschichte.” In Hof und Theorie: Annäherungen an ein Historisches Phänomen, edited by R. Butz, J. Hirschbiegel, and D. Willoweit, 77–90. Cologne: Böhlau.
   Google Scholar
• Wunder, Heide. 1992. Er ist die Sonn’, sie ist der Mond: Frauen in der Frühen Neuzeit. Munich: Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Yaya, Isabel. 2013. The Two Faces of Inca History: Dualism in the Narratives and Cosmology of Ancient Cuzco. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar