Simultaneous copper bioaccumulation, growth and lipase production of Rhizopus delemar in molasses medium: optimisation of environmental conditions using RSM

References

• Wang J, Chen C. Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:195–226. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik A. Metal bioremediation through growing cells. Environ Int. 2004;30:261–278. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammarota MC, Freire DMG. A review on hydrolytic enzymes in the treatment of wastewater with high oil and grease content. Bioresource Technol. 2006;97:2195–2210. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.02.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masse L, Kennedy KJ, Chou SP. The effect of an enzymatic pretreatment on the hydrolysis and size reduction of fat particles in slaughterhouse wastewater. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2001;76:629–635. doi: 10.1002/jctb.428
   Google Scholar
• D'Annibale A, Sermanni GG, Federici F, Petruccioli M. Olive-mill wastewaters: a promising substrate for microbial lipase production. Bioresource Technol. 2006;97:1828–1833. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeganathan J, Bassi A, Nakhla G. Pre-treatment of high oil and grease pet food industrial wastewaters using immobilized lipase hydrolyzation. J Hazard Mater. 2006;B137:121–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad MP, Manjunath K. Comparative study on biodegredation of lipid-rich wastewater using lipase producing bacterial species. Indian J Biotechnol. 2011;10:121–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufekci N, Sivri N, Toroz I. Pollutants of textile industry wastewater and assessment of its discharge limits by water quality standards. Turk J Fish Aquat Sc. 2007;7:97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Leal MCMR, Freire DMG, Cammarota MC, Sant'Anna GL Jr. Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on anaerobic treatment of dairy wastewater. Process Biochem. 2006;41:1173–1178. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes AA, Pereira EB, de Castro HF. Effect of the enzymatic hydrolysis pretreatment of lipids-rich wastewater on the anaerobic biodigestion. Biochem Eng J. 2006;32:185–190. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2006.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dharmsthiti S, Kuhasuntisuk B. Lipase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa LP602; biochemical properties and application for wastewater treatment. J Ind Microbial Biot. 1998;21:75–80. doi: 10.1038/sj.jim.2900563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongkolthanaruk W, Dharmsthiti S. Biodegradation of lipid-rich wastewater by a mixed bacterial consortium. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2002;50:101–105. doi: 10.1016/S0964-8305(02)00057-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acikel U, Ersan M, Sag Acikel Y. The effects of the composition of growth medium and fermentation conditions on the production of lipase by R. delemar. Turk J Biol. 2011;35:35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acikel U, Alp T. A study on the inhibition kinetics of bioaccumulation of Cu(II) and Ni(II) ions using Rhizopus delemar. J Hazard Mater. 2009;168:1449–1458. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayaraghavan K, Yun Y-S. Bacterial biosorbents and biosorption. Biotechnol Adv. 2008;26:266–291. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sag Y. Biosorption of heavy metals by fungal biomass and modeling of fungal biosorption: a review. Separ Purif Methods. 2001;30:1–48. doi: 10.1081/SPM-100102984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chojnacka K. Biosorption and bioaccumulation – the prospects for practical applications. Environ Int. 2010;36: 299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labuschagne RB, Tonder AV, Litthauer D. Flavobacterium odoratum lipase: isolation and characterization. Enzyme Microb Tech. 1997;21:52–58. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0229(96)00226-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iizumi T, Nakamura K, Fukase T. Purification and characterization of a thermostable lipase from newly isolated Pseudomonas sp. KWI-56. Agric Biol Chem. 1990;54:1253–1258. doi: 10.1271/bbb1961.54.1253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiol A, Jonzo MD, Rugani N, Druet D, Sarda L, Comeau LC. Purification and characterization of an extracellular lipase from a thermophilic Rhizopus oryzae strain isolated from palm fruit. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2000;26:421–430. doi: 10.1016/S0141-0229(99)00173-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrán-Prietoa JC, Veloz-Rodrígueza R, Pérez-Péreza MC, Navarrete-Bolañosa JL, Vázquez-Navaa E, Jiménez-Islasa H, Botello-Álvareza JE. Chromium recovery from solid leather waste by chemical treatment and optimisation by response surface methodology. Chem Ecol. 2012;28:89–102. doi: 10.1080/02757540.2011.628016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik R, Saran S, Isar J, Saxena RK. Statistical optimization of medium components and growth conditions by response surface methodology to enhance lipase production by Aspergillus carneus. J Mol Catal B – Enzym. 2006;40:121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acikel U, Ersan M, Sag Acikel Y. Optimization of critical medium components using response surface methodology for lipase production by R. delemar. Food Bioprod Process. 2010;88:31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.fbp.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das D, Charumathi D, Das N. Bioaccumulation of the synthetic dye Basic Violet 3 and heavy metals in single and binary systems by Candida tropicalis grown in a sugarcane bagasse extract medium: modelling optimal conditions using response surface methodology (RSM) and inhibition kinetics. J Hazard Mater. 2011;186:1541–1552. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicek E, Cojocaru C, Zakrzewska-Trznadel, G, Harasimowicz M, Miskiewicz A. Response surface methodology for the modelling of 85Sr adsorption on zeolite 3A and pumice. Environ Technol. 2012;33:51–59. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2010.549514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan Y, Zhu L, Xu X. Optimization of factors with C/N ratio and flocs biomass concentration in simulated aquaculture bio-flocs systems by response surface methodology. Environ Technol. 2012;33:907–914. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2011.602433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Malik A, Satya S. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of nutrient supplementation for Cr(VI) removal by Aspergillus lentulus AML05. J Hazard Mater. 2009;164:1198–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.09.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonderwülbecke T, Kieslich K, Erdman H. Comparison of lipases by different assays. Enzyme Microb Tech. 1992;14:631–639. doi: 10.1016/0141-0229(92)90038-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statease.com (n.d.) Design-Expert 8 Manual [Internet; cited 2013 Feb 4]. Available from: http://www.statease.com/dx8_man.html
   Google Scholar
• Rajendran A, Thangavelu V. Statistical experimental design for evaluation of medium components for lipase production by Rhizopus arrhizus MTCC 2233. LWT – Food Sci Technol. 2009;42:985–992. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elibol M, Özer D. Response surface analysis of lipase production by freely suspended Rhizopus arrhizus. Process Biochem. 2002;38:367–372. doi: 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00076-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar