Statist Realism And Its Discontents: Another Optics for Shyam Benegal's Ankur (The Seedling, 1973)

Works Cited

• Balagopal, K. “Telangana Movement Revisited.” Economic and Political Weekly 18.18 (1983): 709–12. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Baxi, Upendra. Introduction. Crisis and Change in Contemporary India. Ed. Upendra Baxi and Bhikhu C. Parekh. 8–20. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Baxi, Upendra, and Bikhu Parekh. Crisis and Change in Contemporary India. New Delhi: Sage, 1995. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Benegal, Shyam, dir. Ankur [The Seedling], Perf. Anant Nag and Shabana Azmi. Blaze Film Enterprises, 1974. Film.
   Google Scholar
• Benegal, Shyam “Interview 4: From Ankur (1973) to Manihan (1976)” with William Van der Heide. Bollywood Babylon: Interviews with Shyam Benegal. Oxford: Berg, 2006. 11–23. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Benegal, Shyam “Interview with Shyam Benegal.” Sanjit Narvekar. Cinema Journal (1976): 7–15. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Benegal, Shyam Interview with Sukirat Anand. Gallan Terian… te Kujh Mariyan (“And the we talked about…”). New Delhi: Nayug, 2002. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Benegal, Shyam Interview with Waled Khan, “Shyam Benegal: Progressive Revolutionary.” New Life, June 3, 1988: 9. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Benegal, Shyam Manthan (The Churning). Perf. Smita Patio and Girish Karnad. Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd, 1976. Film.
   Google Scholar
• Benegal, Shyam Nishant [Night's End], Perf. Shabana Azmi and Naseeruddin Shah. Blaze Entertainment, 1975. Film.
   Google Scholar
• Benegal, Shyam Unpublished Interview with Anuradha Dingwaney Needham. 26 March 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, Janet, and Mary Ann Doane. “The Female Spectator: Contexts and Directions.” Camera Obscura 20/21 (1989): 5–27. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Bhalla, Alok, and Peter J. Bumke, eds. Images of Rural India in the Twentieth Century. Delhi: Sterling, 1992. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Bryukhovetska, Olga. “‘Dispositif’ Theory: Returning to the Movie Theater.” ART iT. 29 Nov. 2010. Web. 10 Aug. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Chabria, Suresh. “Images of Rural India in Post-Independence Cinema.” Images of Rural India in the Twentieth Century. Ed. Alok Bhalla and Peter J. Bumke. 233–38. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravarty, Sumita. National Identity in Indian Popular Cinema. Austin: U of Texas P, 1993. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravarty, Sumita. “Can the Subaltern Weep? Maneuvering as Metaphor in Rudaali (The Crier).” Redirecting the Gaze: Gender, Theory and Cinema in the Third World. Ed. Diana Robin and Ira Jaffe. Albany: SUNY, 1999. 283–306. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Chow, Rey. Primitive Passions: Visuality, Sexuality, Ethnography, and Contemporary Chinese Cinema. New York: Columbia UP, 1995. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, Sangeeta. Shyam Benegal. New Delhi: Roli, 2003. Print.
   Google Scholar
• De Lauretis, Teresa. “Rethinking Women's Cinema: Aesthetics and Film Theory.” Multiple Voices in Feminist Film Criticism. Ed. Diane Carson, Linda Dittmar, and Janice R. Welsch. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1994. 140–61. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Doane, Mary Ann. “Film and Masquerade: Theorizing the Female Spectator.” Screen 23.3/4 (1982): 74–87. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Dogra, Bharat. “The Poor Through Middle-Class Eyes.” Filmfare (Bombay) 16–31 (1978): 13–15. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, Geraldine. “The Politics of Respectability: Indian women and the Indian National Congress.” The Indian National Congress. Ed. D. A. Low. New Delhi: OUP, 1988. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard. “Gandhi and Feminized Nationalism in India.” Women Out of Place: the Gender of Agency and the Race of Nationality. Ed. Brackette Williams. New York: Routledge, 1996. 37–49. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, Karen. “The Importance of Being Gandhi: Gendering and the National Subject in Bombay Cinema.” South Asian Masculinities: Context of Change, Sites of Continuity. Ed. Radhika Chopra, Caroline Osella, and Filippo Osella. New Delhi: Kali for Women and Women Unlimited, 2004. 264–304. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Gaines, Jane. “White Privilege and looking Relations: Race and Gender in Feminist Film Theory.” Cultural Critique 4 (1989): 59–79. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Gledhill, Christine. “Pleasurable Negotiations.” Female Spectators. Ed. E. Deidre Pribram. 64–89. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, Claire. “Women's Cinema as Counter Cinema.” Feminism and Film. Ed. E. Ann Kaplan. 22–33. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kannabiran, Vasantha and K. Lalitha. “That Magic Time: Women in the Telangana People's Struggle.” Recasting Women: Essays in Colonial History. Ed. Sangari and Vaid. 180–203. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E. Ann, ed. Feminism and Film. New York: OUP, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kannabiran, Vasantha and K. Lalitha. “Is the Gaze Male?” Feminism and Film. Ed. E. Ann Kaplan. 119–38. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Katrak, Ketu. “Indian Nationalism, Gandhian Satyagraha, and Representations of Female Sexuality.” Nationalism and Sexualities. Ed. Andrew Parker, et al. London: Routledge, 1991: 395–406. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Khilnani, Sunil. The Idea of India. New York: Farrar, 1999. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kishwar, Madhu. “Gandhi on Women” (Parts 1 and 2). Economic and Political Weekly 20.40 (1985): 1691–1702. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kishwar, Madhu. “Gandhi on Women” (Part 3). Economic and Political Weekly 20.41 (1985): 1753–58. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Annette. “Women's Genres.” The Film Cultures Reader. Ed. Graeme Turner. 20–27. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Low, D. A., ed. The Indian National Congress: Centenary Highlights. New Delhi: OUP, 1988. Print
   Google Scholar
• Lukmani, Yasmin. “Committed Films: A Comparative Study of Ankur and Nhhant.” New Quest vol. 1 (1997): 41–49. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Masselos, Jim. Indian Nationalism: A History. 5th ed. U.K.: New Dawn, 2005. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, Judith. “Paradoxes of Spectatorship.” The Film Cultures Reader. Ed. Graeme Turner. 28–45. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, Laura. “Afterthoughts on ‘Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema’ Inspired by Duel in the Sun (King Vidor, 1946).” Framework 15–17 (1981): 12–15. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, Laura. “British Feminist Film Theory's Female Spectators: Presence and Absence.” Camera Obscura 7 (1989): 68–81. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” Screen 16 (1975): 6–18. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, Sujata. “Construction and Reconstruction of Woman in Gandhi.” Economic and Political Weekly (February 1988): 377–87. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Pavier, Barry. “The Telangana Armed Struggle.” Economic and Political Weekly 9.32/34 (1974): 1413, 1417–20. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, Madhava. Ideology of the Indian Film: A Historical Reconstruction. New Delhi: OUP, 1998. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, Madhava. “State in/of Cinema.” The Wages of Freedom: 50 Years of the IndianNation-State. Ed. Partha Chatterjee. New Delhi: OUP, 1998. 123–46. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Pribram, E. Deidre, ed. Female Spectators. London: Verso, 1988. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Pym, John. “Ankur.” Monthly Film Bulletin Vol. XLIII. No. 506 (1976): 47. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rajadhyaksha, Ashish. Indian Cinema in the Time of Celluloid: From Bollywood to the Emergency. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 2009. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rajadhyaksha, Ashish. “India: Filming the Nation.” Oxford History of World Cinema. Ed. Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. Oxford: OUP, 1997. 678–89. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, Arvind. “The Emergency as Pre-history of the Middle Class.” Modern Asian Studies 45.5 (Sept. 2011): 1003–49. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, Leela. “Woman in Indian Films—A Paradigm of Continuity and Change.” Media, Culture, and Society 11 (1989): 443–58. Print.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, Maithili. “A Direction in Search of the Narrative.” Festival Brochure for Shyam Benegal Retrospective. Bombay: Prabhat Chitra Mandai, 1998: 9–12. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, Satyajit. Our Films, Their Films. Delhi: Orient Longman, 1976. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, B. Ruby. “In the Name of Feminist Film Criticism.” Multiple Voices in Feminist Film Criticism. Eds. Diane Carson, Linda Dittmar, and Janice Welsch. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1994. 27–47. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Philip. Change Mummified: Cinema, Historicity, Theory. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2004. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Philip, ed. Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology: A Film Theory Reader. New York: Columbia UP, 1986. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, Philip. “‘Screen’ and the Marxist Project in Film Criticism.” Quarterly Review of Film Studies 2.3 (1977): 273–87. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sangari, Kumkum, and Sudesh Vaid. Recasting Women: Essays in Colonial History. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 1990. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, Carol, and Ann Kibbey, eds. Forming and Reforming Identity. New York: NYU P, 1995. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, Mrinalini. “Nationalism and Respectable Sexuality in India.” Forming and Reforming Identity. Ed. Siegel and Kibbey. 30–57. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Murray. Engaging Characters: Fiction, Emotion, and the Cinema. Oxford: Clarendon, 1995. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Stree Shakti Sanghatan. We Were Making History: Life Stories of Women in the Telangana People's Struggle. New York: St. Martin's, 1989. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sunder Rajan, Rajeswari, ed. Signposts: Gender Issues in Post-Independence India. New Delhi: Kali for Women, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Stree Shakti Sanghatan. Introduction. Signposts: Gender Issues in Post-Independence India. 1–16. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Stree Shakti Sanghatan. “The Story of Draupadi's Disrobing: Meanings for our Times.” Signposts: Gender Issues in Post-Independence India. 332–59. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderayya, P. Telanagana People's Struggle and its Lessons. Calcutta: Communist Party of India (Marxist), 1972. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Surya, J. S. “From Ankur to Sardari Begum: The Evolution of a Filmmaker: An Interview with Shyam Benegal.” Deep Focus: A Film Quarterly (Bangalore) 7.2 (1997): 52–58. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thorval, Yves. The Cinemas of India. New Delhi: MacMillaa, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, Graeme, ed. The Film Cultures Reader. London: Routledge, 2002. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thorval, Yves. Editor's Introduction. The Film Cultures Reader. 1–10. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Uberai, Patricia, ed. Social Reform, Sexuality and the State. New Delhi: Sage, 1996. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thorval, Yves. “Introduction: Problematizing Social Reform, Engaging Sexuality, Interrogating the State.” Social Reform, Sexuality and the State, ix–xxvi. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Vasudevan, Ravi S., ed. Making Meaning in Indian Cinema. New Delhi: OUP, 2000. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thorval, Yves. Introduction. Making Meaning in Indian Cinema. 1–36. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thorval, Yves. “Shifting Codes, Dissolving Identities: The Hindi Social Film of the 1950s as Popular Culture.” Making Meaning in Indian Cinema. 99–121. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thorval, Yves. “Voice, Space, Form: Roja (Maniratnam, 1992), Indian Film and National Identity.” Not on any Map: Essays on Postcoloniality and Cultural Nationalism. Ed. Stuart Murray. Exeter: U of Exeter P, 1997. 153–69. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thorval, Yves. “You Cannot Live in Society—and Ignore it.” Social Reform, Sexuality and the State. Ed. Patricia Uberai. New Delhi: Sage, 1996. 83–108. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Thorval, Yves. “Dislocations: The Cinematic Imagining of a New Society in 1950s India.” Oxford Literary Review: Special issue on India 16 (1994): 93–124. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, Diane. “Individual Responses.” Camera Obscura 7 (May/Sept. 1989): 308–13. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, Diane. “Film Theory and the Gendered Spectator: The Female or the Feminist Reader?” Camera Obscura 18 (1988): 80–94. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Wees, William C. “Rev. of The Cinematic Apparatus.” Ed. Teresa de Lauretis and Stephen Heath. Cinema Journal 21.2 (Spring 1982): 50–54. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Christopher. “After the Classic, the Classical and Ideology: The Difference of Realism.” Screen 35.3 (1994): 275–92. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Linda. “‘Something Else Besides a Mother’: Stella Dallas and the Maternal Melodrama.” Feminism and Film. Ed. E. Ann Kaplan. 479–504. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Linda. “Melodrama Revised.” Refiguring American Film Genres: History and Theory. Ed. Nick Browne. Berkeley: U of California P, 1998. 42–88. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Raymond. “Realism, Naturalism and their Alternatives.” Explorations in Film Theory: Essays from Ciné Tracts. Ed. Ron Burnett. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1991. 121–27. Print.
   Google Scholar