Starting a Research Data Management Program Based in a University Library

REFERENCES

• Gold, Anna. “Cyberinfrastructure, Data, and Libraries, Part 1.” D-Lib Magazine 13, no. 9 (September/October 2007). doi:10.1045/september20september-gold-pt1.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Research Libraries. To Stand the Test of Time: Long-Term Stewardship of Digital Data Sets in Science and Engineering. A Report to the National Science Foundation from the ARL Workshop on “New Collaborative Relationships: The Role of Academic Libraries in the Digital Data Universe.” Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Borgman, Christine L. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Fearon, David, Betsy Gunia, Sherry Lake, Barbara E. Pralle, and Andrew L. Sallans. SPEC Kit 334: Research Data Management Services. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, Office of Management Services, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Yi, and Virgil E. Varvel, Jr. “Developing Data Management Services at the Johns Hopkins University.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 39, no. 6 (November 2013): 552–557. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2013.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabridge, Tracy. “The Last Mile: Liaison Roles in Curating Science and Engineering Research Data.” Research Library Issues no. 265 (August 2009): 15–21. http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/rli/archive/rli265.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, Anna. “Cyberinfrastructure, Data, and Libraries, Part 2. Libraries and the Data Challenge: Roles and Activities for Libraries” D-Lib Magazine 13, no. 9/10 (September/October 2007). doi:10.1045/july20september-gold-pt2.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbins, Michael. “Expanding Public Access to the Results of Federally Funded Research.” Office of Science and Technology Policy (blog). February 23, 2013. http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2013/02/22/expanding-public-access-results-federally-funded-research.
   Google Scholar
• Sinai, Nick, and Corinna Zarek. “OSTP's Own Open Government Plan.” Open Government Initiative (blog). 2014. http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/06/02/ostp-s-own-open-government-plan.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, Heidrun C. “Second-Mover Advantages in the Strategic Adoption of New Technology Under Uncertainty.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 18, no. 2 (2000): 315–338. doi:10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00020-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westra, Brian. “Data Services for the Sciences: A Needs Assessment.” Ariadne: A Web & Print Magazine of Internet Issues for Librarians & Information Specialists 30, no. 64 (July 2010). http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue64/westra.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Layne M., John T. Butler, and Lisa R. Johnston. “Developing E-Science and Research Services and Support at the University of Minnesota Health Sciences Libraries.” Journal of Library Administration 52, no. 8 (September 2012): 754–769. doi:10.1080/01930826.2012.751291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parsons, Thomas. “Creating a Research Data Management Service.” International Journal of Digital Curation 8, no. 2 (2013): 146–156. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v8i2.279.
   Google Scholar
• Akers, Katherine G., and Jennifer Doty. “Disciplinary Differences in Faculty Research Data Management Practices and Perspectives.” International Journal of Digital Curation 8, no. 2 (2013): 5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Purdue University Libraries and Graduate School of Library and Information Science at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. “Data Curation Profiles Toolkit.” Purdue University Libraries. Accessed October 17, 2014. http://datacurationprofiles.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Brianna, Katherine O'Bryan, Na Qin, and Rebecca Vernon. “Organizing, Contextualizing, and Storing Legacy Research Data: A Case Study of Data Management for Librarians.” Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship no. 74 ( Fall 2013). doi:10.5062/F4K07270.
   Google Scholar
• Case, Donald O. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Raboin, Regina, Rebecca C. Reznik-Zellen, and Dorothea Salo. “Forging New Service Paths: Institutional Approaches to Providing Research Data Management Services.” Journal of eScience Librarianship 1, no. 3 (2012). http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/jeslib/vol1/iss3/2/.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen-Dalsgaard, Birte. Ten Recommendations for Libraries to Get Started with Research Data Management: Final Report of the LIBER Working Group on E-Science / Research Data Management. Ligue des Bibliothèques Européennes de Recherche (LIBER), 2012. http://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/The%20research%20data%20group%202012%20v7%20final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bresnahan, Megan M., and Andrew M. Johnson. “Assessing Scholarly Communication and Research Data Training Needs.” Reference Services Review 41, no. 3 (August 2013): 413–433. doi:10.1108/RSR-01-2013-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, Jake R. “The Use of Life Cycle Models in Developing and Supporting Data Services.” In Research Data Management: Practical Strategies for Information Professionals, edited by Joyce M. Ray 63–86. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Graduate School of Library and Information Science: The iSchool at Illinois. “Specialization in Data Curation.” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Accessed October 17, 2014. http://www.lis.illinois.edu/academics/degrees/specializations/data_curation.
   Google Scholar
• Goben, Abigail, Dorothea Salo, and Claire Stewart. “Federal Research.” College & Research Libraries News 74, no. 8 (September 2013): 421–425.
   Google Scholar
• LIBER Working Group on E-science. Ten Recommendations for Libraries to Get Started with Research Data Management. 2012. http://libereurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/The%20research%20data%20group%202012%20v7%20final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McLure, Merinda, Allison V. Level, Catherine L. Cranston, Beth Oehlerts, and Mike Culbertson. “Data Curation: A Study of Researcher Practices and Needs.” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 14, no. 2 (2014): 139–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar